These films, for the most part, arenât at all obscureâsome of them are downright classics, and many of you may have seen some of them. But they arenât the films that leap immediately to mind when the average person walks into the video store and heads for the âSuspenseâ section.
Still, thereâs some true gems here that deserve to be seen and remembered. So next time you stroll into Blockbuster or send away to Netflix and have an urge to see a mystery or thriller, skip the contemporary stuff just once, and try one of these.
This crossword puzzle of a movie is one of the most remarkable murder mysteries ever made. The entire movie plays like a game; indeed, itâs all about a game being played by a group of bite-you-in-the-back friends who have subjected themselves to a weekâs vacation aboard the yacht of a sadistic egotist (James Coburn) who derives enjoyment from humiliating his guests. While they play their amateur detective game, trying to uncover each otherâs assigned âsecrets,â one of the group, it seems, is playing for realâbecause it looks as though their host is trying to blame one of them for the hit-and-run killing of his wife a year before.
If you enjoy board games, puzzles, and thinking fast on your feet, this movie will keep you interestedâand guessingâright up to the final minutes. Sole liability: 70s fashion styles throughout. Offset by a fantastic cast: James Mason, Raquel Welch, Dyan Cannon, Coburn, Richard Benjamin, Joan Hackett
Second in the series of films in which Michael Caine plays Harry Palmer, Len Deightonâs ordinary-guy-as-unwilling-spy (the previous film, âThe Ipcress File,â is a must-see as well). Palmer, former army sergeant, is caught in some unnamed crime, and given a choiceâwork for British intelligence, or go to the stockade. This film sends Palmer to Berlin to oversee the defection of a cynical Russian general (âAmericans? Bah!â The general says to Palmerâs suspicions about why he doesnât offer himself to the Americans instead, since they have more money to offer him. âTheyâre revolutionaries gone decadent. Theyâre Russians in blue jeans.â) In the process Palmer meets up with an untrustworthy old German friend and a beautiful Israeli operative, and gets framed for murder. Is the Russian up to something, or is he on the level? And what do the Israelis have to do with it?
One of the best and most realistic spy movies of the 60s (this isnât some flashy, gadget-laden James Bond flick), with humor, tension, and a riveting dark side.
In the 1950s and 60s, Britainâs Hammer Films was known for their lush, Technicolor horror moviesâlatter day (and gorier) takes on the classic old Universal Studios monster movies. Beginning with remakes of Dracula and Frankenstein, Hammer went on to revive mummies and wolfmen, zombies and phantoms, and stretched out Christopher Leeâs indestructible Dracula and Peter Cushingâs morally-challenged Frankenstein into multi-film series.
For a time Hammer also delved into psychological thrillers, and âScream of Fearâ is perhaps the best of these. The film begins with a pretty girl being fished out of a Swiss lake, victim of a drowning. We learn she was the friend and care companion to beautiful (and morose) Susan Strasberg, who has been confined to a wheelchair after a riding accident. Mourning the loss, Strasberg makes the journey to see her estranged father for the first time in ten years at his hilltop Riviera estate. Met at the airport by a handsome and sympathetic chauffeur, she learns that her father has unexpectedly gone away on business, due to return in a few daysâ time. The chauffeur hints at something mysterious going on, and Strasberg begins to suspect her new stepmother of plotting her fatherâs murder along with the local doctor (played by Christopher Lee). Her suspicions turn to paranoiaâand perhaps madnessâwhen she begins seeing her fatherâs corpse in the houseâonly to discover it gone when she comes back with help. Is her father really dead? And if he isâwho killed him? Or is she simply losing her mind?
This film made a lasting impression on me when I was a kidâI saw it onceâand only onceâon a Saturday afternoon on local television, and it gave me nightmares. 30+ years later I had forgotten most of the plot, but still remembered a scene where the chauffeur dives to the bottom of a weed-choked pool and finds the old manâs corpse hidden there, staring out emptily with wild, open eyes. Years later I sought help on the internet from a fellow classic horror-movie buff, who quickly identified what film this memory came fromâand within a week I had my own copy from eBay. The thrill of seeing this riveting picture again after all those years made me damn grateful for the ânet and how it makes the re-discovery of old gems possible.
I canât recommend this film enough. Not a great work of art, just a tense, chilling, and edgy psycho-thrill with a hint of ghost story and an unexpected twist at the end.
Really a classic that any old movie buff will have heard of and seen—but since weâre in a post-literate age, it seems like almost all old films are candidates for re-discoveryâespecially when thereâs no longer much incentive for young people to check out old movies on TV anymore, with hundreds of cable channels making it easy to avoid the challenge of giving old cinema a chance. Things were different thirty-five years ago when all we had were a mere handful of local TV stationsânetwork affiliates of the Big ThreeâNBC, CBS, and ABC⌠as well as PBSâŚand nothing else. If you wanted to watch TV, sometimes you HAD to sit down and try to get into an old movieâespecially since that was all that was on during many afternoons.
Anyway, this great film, told partly in flashback, presents Peter Lorre as a crime novelist who by chance meets a Turkish police detective who for years has been chasing a murderer, spy and terrorist named Dimitrios, whose dead body recently washed ashore in Turkey. Lorre is taken to see Dimitriosâ body, and is told some of the story of how this petty criminal became one of the most wanted men in the Near East. Lorre becomes fascinated with this character, and decides to start writing a book about Dimitrios. This takes him on a trip around Europe, from Greece to Switzerland to Paris, interviewing various people who had encountersâand even had their lives ruinedâby the unscrupulous and dangerous Dimitrios. Along the way he finds himself partnered with a mysterious man (Sydney Greenstreet) who turns out to be one of Dimitriosâ former criminal colleagues, betrayed to the police by Dimitrios years before. After speaking with Lorre, Greenstreet finds reason to believe that the slippery Dimitrios is actually still alive, and involves Lorre in a scheme to blackmail the slippery master criminal and spy.
Another tense Hammer psycho-thriller, Nightmare is the story of a school girl who, years before, had witnessed her insane mother stab her father to death. Emotionally fragile and obsessed by this horribly traumatic incident, the girl begins having terrible nightmares which eventually cause her to be sent home from boarding school accompanied by a sympathetic teacher. Once there she enters into the care of her guardian, the old family servants and a hired nurseâbut despite the presence of these familiar and caring faces, the girlâs nightmares worsen, and she begins seeing a spectral woman wandering the house at night. Believing sheâs going mad like her mother, her hold on reality plummets⌠until a tragedy occurs. But even then we learn thereâs more to the story than mere madness.
Twisting, creepy, and reeking with betrayal, this is a neatly disturbing little thriller worthy of the Hammer name.
There was something about the 1970s and realistic, gritty crime dramas. They just went together. âThe French Connectionâ films, âthe Godfatherâ films, âSerpico,â âDog Day Afternoonâ⌠even âThe Yakuzaâ⌠and then thereâs âThe Taking of Pelham One Two Three.â While in the same league as these other great films, what makes âPelhamâ different is that it takes itself just a *shade* less seriouslyâat least at times. It even stars Walter Matthau as a Transit Police officer, and of all people, Jerry Stiller as a cop. It shouldnât be a surprise, then, that thereâs the occasional light moment to relieve the tension.
But this is no comedy–not by a long shot. Itâs an extremely tense and even violent thriller with moments of shock and terror. A group of ruthless and highly organized men (led by the quintessential Quint of âJaws,â tough guy Robert Shaw) hijack a New York City subway car, and threaten to kill the passengers one by one unless a ransom is paid. Working frantically against the hijackersâ deadline, Matthau and his detectives are stymied at every turn by Shaw, who seems to anticipate every move they make.
Creepy and ambiguous, âKluteâ is the film that made Jane Fonda a serious actress (prior to this sheâd starred mostly in light comedies and, of course, had played the title space-vixen in the sci-fi/soft-core cult flick, âBarbarellaâ) and even managed to redeem her reputation (slightly) from the harm done it by her pro-Vietcong antics a couple years earlier.
Hired by a company CEO to investigate the disappearance of a fellow executive, private detective John Klute (Donald Sutherland) soon discovers that the missing man may have had something to do with the brutal torture-murder of a hooker. Klute traces the manâs movements (and prior patronage) to a group of prostitutes working for pimp Roy Scheider. One of the hookers in particular seems to have information about the killerâBree Daniels (Fonda)–and seems, also, to be next on his list.
In between moments of truly chilling tension, the film delves into the personal life of Fondaâs character, whoâs trying to get out of the call-girl life (her therapy sessions serve as a centerpoint) and her ambiguity towards strait-laced and protective Klute, whom she is both attracted to and disdainful of. All the while the killer is getting closer, clearly stalking Fonda.
In the 1940s, RKO Pictures, one of the major Hollywood studios, had fallen on hard times due to their bankrolling of Orson Wellesâ extravagant (if artistically brilliant) âCitizen Kaneâ and âThe Magnificent Ambersons.â Neither film had recouped its cost at the box office, putting RKO in jeopardy. The studio needed to get back to making cheap, but profitable movies. Noting the huge success rival Universal Studios was having with the horror genre, RKO decided they wanted a piece of the fright action. But what producer could outdo Universal at its own game, for a fraction of the cost?
Enter Selznick Studios chief script editor Val Lewton. Lewton, who had worked on âGone With the Windâ as well as a number of other Selznick properties, had grown tired of playing second banana to David O. Selznickâs Hollywood mogul. Lewton wanted a chance to play the mogul himself; and RKO gave him the ideal opportunity.
Or so he thought. Lewton *was* given full power to produce some low-budget âBâ horror pictures, but also found himself saddled with the cheesy titles that RKO had dumped on him. (It was common practice in those days for a studio to hand a producer a title, or at most a title and concept, and he then had to go away and come up with a story to go with it). Lewton proved his genius, however, by taking low-grade concepts and titles âCat Peopleâ and âI Walked with a Zombie,â and turning them into minor moody masterpieces of suspense and horror.
âThe Seventh Victimâ was another of Lewtonâs highly successful and brilliant âBâ films. The story of devil worshipers in New York City who have marked an errant member for death, the film moves from noir-ish mystery to darkly sad exploration of futility. What makes the film such a delight to watch are the memorable bits of tense imagery (a threatening hand touching the heroineâs hand from around a dark alleyway corner; an empty apartment with a single chair positioned directly under a noose; a murder occurring off-camera, down a dark hallway) and the moody, tragically-tinged performance of Jean Brooks as the beautiful, depressed victim of the Satanists, being driven hard to take her own life to pay the price for betraying the group.
Seemy film noir with the great Robert Ryan as a racist bank robber, enlisted by criminal old-timer Ed Begley for one last big heistâthough it involves Ryan having to partner with inside man Harry Belafonte to make the job happen. Of course part of the tension comes from the electric hostility going on between Ryan and Belafonte, but underscoring this is the need for Begley to pull off a final, successful robbery. The team works carefully to make sure every aspect of the job comes off rightâtiming it to the minuteâbut of course something goes wrong.
Ryanâs performance takes this film to a higher level (Belafonte is also excellent) and it becomes impossible not to identify, a little, with this unsavory character—or to not get caught up in the tension and danger of the crime the group is trying to pull off.
One of the best scenes: Ryan beats the crap out of a young and cocky Wayne Rogers in a bar.
Okay, bear with me on this one. This is the lightweight entry, and one for the kidsâbut enjoyable for adults too, if they put a little effort into it. Plus, I only had nine titles and needed a tenth. Still, this is an enjoyable little romance/mystery worth seeing at least once. It IS a little suspenseful (sometimes)⌠and IS a thriller (of sorts)⌠if a fluffy one. And yes, itâs a Disney film.
Now, ordinarily I detest Disney, but this oneâs from back in the day (1960s) when Disney produced some decent (if ultimately forgettable and yesâtotally lightweight) live action films. Nothing to make anyoneâs top ten list mind you (this isnât a top ten list after all)⌠just entertaining time wasters. Best by far in this category was Disneyâs excellent version of âTreasure Island,â while the worst was⌠well, take your pick. âThat Darn Cat,â maybe? âThe Apple Dumpling Gang?â
But âThe Moon Spinnersâ is closer to the âTreasure Islandâ end of the scale, if not quite in the same (relatively) rarified air. Disney contract player Hayley Mills (I had a boyish crush on Hayley back then) on vacation in Greece, meets up with a mysterious young man who turns out to be the former employee of a London banking house, who is chasing a group of international jewel thieves in hopes of clearing his name (they framed him). Okay, sounds hokey right? And it is. But itâs also fun, and richly photographed, and you canât beat the Greek location for timeless beauty. It even stars Eli Wallach as the villain.
Contributor: Randall
























good list! i havent seen a lot of these though…..
this is a good list! not big into mystery movies tho…should do a list about action movies randall!
Interesting list, Randall, you could have gone a completely different route like Hitchcock. But these are worthy titles as well.
I like this list because it’s not a subjective “best of” that gets people up in arms about whatever dumb movies they like, but merely a list of good and relatively unknown films in a particular genre. Good move. Personally, I’d like to see more like this.
bucslim:
That’s just the point–EVERYONE has seen some Hitch*****films or at least heard of them… this is a list of lesser-known flicks that are still worthy.
I never heard of any of these but now I want to watch a mystery. Do you remember that one low budget flick starring a pre Sara Connor Linda Hamilton called Tag the Assasination Game?
jfrater:
Whoa whoa whoa… wait a second…. can you please fix the title of this list? It shouldn’t be “Top Ten..” anything. If it was that, I would have populated this list with Hitch*****and “Wages of Fear” and “Witness for the Prosecution.”
Please, just “Ten Mystery or Suspense Movies You Must See”
Thanks.
Done.
jfrater:
Thanks Jamie. Sorry to be a pain.
Cool list. But I wasn’t even born when these movies came out! >.
Normally these days movies are lacking in the suspense department, but “No Country For Old Men” did an excellent job conveying suspense, especially the scene between Chigurh and the gas station clerk. Not saying it should be on the list, just merely pointing out a modern movie that actually managed to pull it off well.
Wonderful list; I didn’t recognize many of the titles, but its as you said, you watched what was on, it didn’t matter the title. I was babysitter extraordinaire, what else to do late friday and saturday nights? I recognized quite a few of the scenes you described though, great job. The creepy guy in the pond, the vampires in the city, Klute, and of course a family fave, The taking of Pelham 123.
Geez, what with the books I need to read, and the movies I need to see…
randall: good list
jfrater: you’re not on irc . . .
Great list, I’m with mom though, I need to catch up on my reading and movie watching.
SubliminalDeath666; I’m pretty sure that was the point. At least part of it.
I haven’t heard of any of these movies. Like SubliminalDeath666, I wasn’t even born yet. Great list for enlightenment on suspense movies Randall. Thanks.
puddingpuppet: No Country For Old Men was a very good movie, although the end made no sense to me?
If you needed a tenth, you should’ve gone with “Laura”.
Not DISNEY.
hey Jfrater. i had an idea for a “your view” topic. Its up to you, but you could do “what makes art good” or something because in art history class the professor was babbling about how amazing this was as art!!!!!!!!! it SUCKS!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/71/Suprematism_with_Blue_Triangle_and_Black_Square.jpg/492px-Suprematism_with_Blue_Triangle_and_Black_Square.jpg
its by supremacist Kasimir Malevich. its called Blue triangle black rectangle.
Ok, I’m feeling a little weird because I haven’t seen any of these movies. Guess it’s time to hit the classics section at the video store. I love this genre so a huntin’ I will go. Love the list, as always.
Joss:
I DID almost use Laura. It’s one of my favorite movies. But I then thought Laura was DEFINITELY a movie than any self-respecting film buff will have seen. I was shooting for rarer pictures.
jesse:
I find this interesting. Tell me why you think it sucks. And also please tell me exactly what your art history prof said about it.
Thanks.
StormyGirl – you’re not alone on the ending of NCFOM. But that’s part of why it was such a brilliant movie. It wasn’t wrapped up in a tight little package for everyone to digest easily. There weren’t any easy conclusions – the ‘good’ guy didn’t keep the money or the girl, the cops don’t pursue and catch their man and the ‘bad’ guy walks away. That’s different from just about any popular movie – apart from Jason or Mike Meyers setting up the next sequel by popping up again from the grave.
bucslim/stormygirl:
Ambiguity is also par for the course with the Coen brothers. Either of you ever see their first film, “Blood Simple”?
Randall – yes, but it’s been a while. I’m gonna have to see it again because a lot of critics I respect brought that movie up when they were talking about NCFOM
nice list Randall, I’m very intrigued to try these.
I’ve seen every film on this list and not one of them do I find suspenseful or tense. I must be immune.
romerozombie:
Honestly, ***** off.
A piece of adult advice, romero: Instead of wasting your time on the internet, why don’t you go out and find a girlfriend? Me, I was into girls when I was 18. You—you’d rather spend your time alone in front of a computer, pretending to be cleverer than someone twice your age and at least twice your IQ.
I hadn’t heard of many of these but they sounds interesting. Thanks for movie night ideas.
There is a really good mystery movie called “Unknown” that came out in 2006.
“Five men wake up in a locked-down warehouse with no memory of who they are. They are forced to figure out who is good and who is bad to stay alive.”
(IMDB – http://imdb.com/title/tt0450340/)
Extremely interesting and kept me confused until the end.
Anyway Good list!
puddingpuppet: Funny you mention No country for old men. A friend is letting me borrow that and I am going to be watching it tonight.
As far as the list… I have never seen any of these. Wow. More to add to my netflix. WOOT!
you guys should check out…. boring:the tail of a bad list
Hey “badlist,” it’s TALE, not “tail.”
dumb*****.
You should also check out… badlist, a tale of a dork who can’t spell and makes stupid comments.
bucslim:
You wanna see stupid comments–I suspect this *****lehead has been over in my “Brunettes” list adding insulting comments… funny how most of them were only minutes apart, all using “new” monikers….
I would have put in Disturbia but thats only because i like shia lebouf
i always liked the movie CLUE. not really suspenseful, though the constant mix of characters makes it tough to know who’s doing what.
1 + 2 + 1 + 1
If you were going to go Disney you should have went with Candleshoe. The Last of Sheila looks pretty good.
Randall:
not that im attempting to start something, but do you seriously have to start things with every person. some people may not like these movies, maybe not even feel scared, or get tensed or get into them like you can. Pretty much everything is a matter of opinion. Because of your IQ and age does not make you able to tell people what they should and shouldn’t like.
You disagree and dislike many things on other lists, and your entitled to your opinions as others are entitled to theirs. No Reason to get huffed about it.
If i made a list of anything, and you hated everything on it and everything in it, I honestly wouldn’t think more than second of it, because you may not appreciate it as much I did.
you need to relax a bit there fella.
Wanderer:
I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re just out of the loop on some matters. And I assume that your comment here references my reaction to the posting made by “romerozombie” up above (#26). Now, the reason I reacted thusly to romerozombie is because in another thread he basically called me a whole *****load of names and was, in general, pretty *****ing rude. I saw his statement above as a deliberate attempt to once again stick a shiv in my back, so I responded. (romerozombie is all of 18 years old–there’s no way he’s seen “all” these movies, as he claimed. He can’t even have heard of most of them).
If that’s not what you were referring to, then you should enlighten me. But I trust this explains my attitude.
But more to the point–I frankly can’t stand these little lectures about “opinions.” It’s mealy-mouthed. What is it to you if I have disagreements with people? You aren’t required to participate in it. I welcome your comments about the material itself—but commenting on how I conduct myself with others—I could care less.
Of course you’re still free to make such comments, as I’m free not to listen.
so there, we’ve both done what we feel is right. On to other things.
And thanks for the advice. It’s honestly appreciated, and if I’ve been wrong, I’ll see it in time. It so happens that in this instance I don’t think I was.
Except—I’ll give you this—I shouldn’t care what anybody says, least of all some 18 year old. I have a natural reaction to defend myself when insulted in public. I admit that.
“These films, for the most part, arenât at all obscure”
please change that to:
“These films, for the most part, are all obscure”
Thanks.
Wanderer:
Actually… I’ll take some of what I said back. I AM a bit touchy these days.
Jono:
Klute is by no means obscure. It won Academy Awards. Made a real star out of Jane Fonda.
Mask of Dimitrios is a classic of old Hollywood–very well known by film buffs.
You think these films obscure because they’re not contemporary… that’s all. But it’s not the same thing. This is the problem. People refuse to look beyond the last 10 years.
Then that would mean that the rest are obscure. And if you knew the definition of obscure rather than using some rudimentary definition inside your head, you would see that they are obscure (for the most part).
Though back on topic, as a person who does enjoy suspense/myster films I may check some of these out. I actually usually enjoy older films as opposed to new ones, because they try to put in current slang/lingo and things in stories that were ment for an older time. (i am legend is a perfect example, i loved the book and a lot of backing in the theory, but the movie’s modernization was aweful, however i did like the movie as a movie aspect, just not as a life version of that story).
One Mystery movie I did enjoy that came out i believe in 2006, but was very under-rated was Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.
has robert downy jr and val kilmer in it, and was set up to be like a murder mystery book that they describe in the movie which usually has double mysterys to solve.
its kind of a comedy mystery, and some of the jokes were pretty good.
Randall; a rectangle and a triangle and a white background. You don’t really think that to be good art? I’m not all that familiar with contemporary art, but still? Unless there is something awe-inspiring about the textures that I can’t see on my monitor, I’m with the kid on this one.
Bucslim: *****! It’s called a **SPOILER ALERT**. Guess that’s $3.95 I don’t have to spend On Demand for NCFOM…
It’s funny, though, I was wondering if “Blood Simple” would be on here. One of my all-time faves.
Dan Hedaya: “I gotta job for ya.”
M. Emmett Walsh: “Well, if it’s legal, and the money’s right…”
DH: “It ain’t exactly legal.”
MEW: “Well, if the money’s right…”
“Mask of Dimitrios” is really a great film.
My other guess was “Double Indemnity” (Has there been a film noir list, Jamie?), or maybe “Carnival of Souls”.
When I was 8, I convinced my parents to take me to a Hammer Films festival. Umm, mistake! I still can’t watch them.
Note: Just because something is “Classic” or Old does not make it unique or good, just old, somethings are good somethings are bad, age has nothing to do with it. The nostalgia on some of these lists is ridiculous.
I’ve never heard of any of these.
oooh Disturbia would have been sweet
love it
Randall
she talked all about supremacist art and how its about balance and how its about all these crazy ideas. i dont know i have notes on it but its bothers me man, i dont really like it. at all. its gives GOOD impressive TALENTED art a bad name.
Anyone see Bad Arnold? Or the movie about a scientist who breeds and mutates bugs until they can think and spell? Both TOO creepy!
Haha, art that is just a stripe or a square drives me crazy. Sure, sometimes they have an interesting texture, but generally I prefer art that I couldn’t pull off with a canvas, a ruler, and some paint. Drives me nuts.
But then I am a fan of meticulously detailed Japanese art with its tini tiny brush strokes.
I actually thought the painting that Jesse put up looks like it might have some potential to be textured in a cool way, but it is hard to tell on a computer screen. Still not my thing though.
I like the list, but honestly I’ve not see a single one of these. I’ve been working my way through Hitch*****recently (or reworking my way through, I saw most of them as a kid). I’ll have to see if I can find any of these titles in the media library I work in. I would have loved to see Laura on here though… I know it might not be as obscure as the others. But if you can include Klute, you can surely include Laura over a Disney movie that looks like it belongs on an entirely different list? Besides, Laura is a movie that should be enthusiastically recommended to younger generations. I just love that film.
I usually do not comment on any list but rather just read the opinions of everyone else. I have come to this realization. Film and modern music are categories that are to broad and I think that to really come up with a cream of the crop mix we need to break films and modern music down by not only genre but also decade. Just once, one series of lists that begins with 1910- Best suspense movie and ends with best suspense movies in the 2000s. After all that we can then have a your view what is the top 10 movies from the suspense movies lists. Then we can have a Top Ten Suspense movies according to Listverse list.
Pelham has been in my top ten for years I love that movie
Veering out of topic here, JF – if you like Angelina Jolie and we all know you love Atlas Shruged, the Gods are smiling upon you their making a movie adaptation.Sorry man they already casted bradd pitt.
Wait thats a good list there Top Book / movie adaptation or better Worst movie adaptation.BTW excellent list randall though i would have placed the mask of dimitrios at 1.
Nice, Offbeat list this. Though Randall generally does come on as a jerk, the guy does have a wealth of experience and knowledge on a lot of topics. I have to give him that. Was pleasantly surprised to see Klute. Was expecting another classic on here (Don’t look now – Donald Sutherland/Julie Christie – 1973). Will definitely check out all the others. Would love to see more follow ups to this list. Thanks Randall.
Have put up this notice in our company board – Whenever you are outta ideas and no good movies to watch on cable refer to listverse you are sure to get loads of good films to last a lifetime. Great list…………
Nice list, I put #10 and 5 in my Netflix queue.
Longtime lurker and fan here. IMHO Wages of Fear should be here somewhere. That is all.
Great list. I’ve only heard of 2 of these (4 and 5) but I think I may have seen #10, based on the description. Will definitely be chasing some of these up to watch. Thanks Randall.
Nelia/Bad News/others:
A little clarification about this list: (this is my fault, I should have written something like this into the introduction) the original title was “Ten Suspense Movies You Probably Haven’t Seen… but SHOULD see” or something like that. Ridiculously long title, it’s no surprise Jamie changed it… but what I was trying to convey (and I say, I should have mentioned this in the intro) was that this was a list of films people probably haven’t seen or heard of. Now… “Laura,” as it happens, is absolutely one of my favorite movies of all time. It’s got Gene Tierny, first of all, who is a freakin’ goddess.. and then it’s got Dana Andrews, who, I think, is one of the most underrated actors of all time—I love the guy and have *never* seen him in a bad film… and it’s got Vincent Price to boot, who does a fantastic job playing this rakish but loveable loser (and Vincent Price also is one of my favorite actors). The plot is fantastic and the film is even funny in several spots.
So naturally Laura came to mind when I was writing this list–as did several other titles. But then I thought–no, come on… Laura is too well known. I’m looking for films people have forgotten about or never heard of. Which is also why I didn’t include “Wages of Fear,” and “Diabolique” and “The Third Man.”
Anyway, that’s the explanation. Maybe I made a mistake, I dunno. But people seem to be seeking out some of these movies based on my recommendation, so at least that’s a good thing.. but then, let me add, EVERYONE:
GO AND GET
“LAURA,” Starring Gene Tierney and Dana Andrews. Murder mystery of the HIGHEST order.
You will NOT be sorry.