This is the third installment of our “books that changed the world” series. Be sure to read the previous two so that you don’t think we have missed important books off the list. If you can think of books that are not on any of the three lists that deserve a mention in future, be sure to tell us about it in the comments. Here are the original two lists: Top 10 Books That Changed The World, and 10 More Books That Changed The World. These are in no particular order.
Why it changed the world: This book (though not the first dictionary) was the first to use literary quotations to illustrate the meanings of words. It set the stage for the scholarly study of language.
Published on 15 April 1755 and written by Samuel Johnson, A Dictionary of the English Language, sometimes published as Johnson’s Dictionary, is among the most influential dictionaries in the history of the English language. There was dissatisfaction with the dictionaries of the period, so in June 1746 a group of London booksellers contracted Johnson to write a dictionary for the sum of 1,500 guineas, equivalent to about £220,000 as of 2009.
Johnson took nearly nine years to complete the work, although he had claimed he could finish it in three. Remarkably, he did so single-handedly, with only clerical assistance to copy out the illustrative quotations that he had marked in books. Johnson wrote several revised editions during his life. Until the completion of the Oxford English Dictionary, 150 years later, Johnson’s was viewed as the pre-eminent English dictionary.
Why it changed the world: It virtually created modern economics – the free market and competition. In it, Smith proposes the invisible hand of the market: the pursuit of self-interest can be beneficial to society at large: for example, the Butcher, the Baker, and the Brewer provide goods and services to each other out of self-interest; the unplanned result of this division of labor is a better standard of living for all three.
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations is the magnum opus of the Scottish economist Adam Smith. It is a clearly written account of economics at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, as well as a rhetorical piece written for the generally educated individual of the 18th century – advocating a free market economy as more productive and more beneficial to society.
The work is credited as a watershed in history and economics due to its comprehensive, largely accurate characterization of economic mechanisms that survive in modern economics; and also for its effective use of rhetorical technique, including structuring the work to contrast real world examples of free and fettered markets.
Why it changed the world: This book on Levi’s time in Auschwitz changed man’s understanding for suffering and gave us an awareness of our unlimited ability to work for good or evil.
If This Is a Man (United States title: Survival in Auschwitz) is a work of witness by the Italian author Primo Levi. It was influenced by his experiences in the concentration camp at Auschwitz during the Second World War. It can be described as a memoir or a personal narrative, but it goes beyond mere recollection by seeking to consider the human condition in all its extremes through the narrative form.
The first manuscript for If This Is a Man was completed by Levi in December 1946. However, in January 1947, the manuscript was refused by Einaudi. Despite this, Levi managed to find another, smaller publisher who printed 2,500 copies of the book. 1,500 of these were sold, mostly in his home town, Turin. It was not until 1956 that Einaudi published the work in a revised form. On this occasion, the book had major worldwide success, being translated into English by Stuart Woolf in 1958, and into German by Heinz Reidt in 1959.
Why it changed the world: Achebe was the first African to writer to show the world that Africa had suffered brutally under colonialism. He finally gave a voice to the millions of oppressed and misunderstood Africans and for the first time, the world listened.
Things Fall Apart is a milestone in African literature. It has achieved the status of the archetypal modern African novel in English, and is read in Nigeria and throughout Africa. It is studied widely in Europe and North America, where it has spawned numerous tertiary analytical works. It has achieved similar repute in India and Australia. Considered Achebe’s magnum opus, it has sold more than 8 million copies worldwide. Time Magazine included the novel in its TIME 100 Best English-language Novels from 1923 to 2005.
Achebe’s writing about African society is intended to extinguish the misconception that African culture had been savage and primitive by telling the story of the colonization of the Igbo from an African point of view. In Things Fall Apart, western culture is portrayed as being “arrogant and ethnocentric,” insisting that the African culture needed a leader. As it had no kings or chiefs, Umofian culture was vulnerable to invasion by western civilization. It is felt that the repression of the Igbo language at the end of the novel contributes greatly to the destruction of the culture.
Why it changed the world: The historical hatred of the Jews in Europe was re-ignited by this anonymous book (believed to have been produced by the Russian Secret Police) and in time it formed the core of Hitler’s plan for their extermination.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a tract alleging a Jewish and Masonic plot to achieve world domination. Purportedly written by a secret group of Jews known as the Elders of Zion, the document underlies 24 protocols that are supposedly followed by the Jewish people. The Protocols has been proven to be a literary forgery and hoax as well as a clear case of plagiarism.
The Protocols became a part of the Nazi propaganda effort to justify persecution of the Jews. It was made required reading for German students. In The Holocaust: The Destruction of European Jewry 1933–1945, Nora Levin states that “Hitler used the Protocols as a manual in his war to exterminate the Jews”:
Despite conclusive proof that the Protocols were a gross forgery, they had sensational popularity and large sales in the 1920s and 1930s. They were translated into every language of Europe and sold widely in Arab lands, the United States, and England. But it was in Germany after World War I that they had their greatest success. There they were used to explain all of the disasters that had befallen the country: the defeat in the war, the hunger, the destructive inflation.
Why it changed the world: Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning The Two Chief World Systems was the book that sparked off the centuries-long debate of science versus religion. It was the cause of Galileo’s imprisonment and the end of his writing career (with the exception of his Discourses). It was not the science of this book which was problematic – it was Galileo’s mocking of the Pope which caused him to come before the Inquisition.
The Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems was a 1632 book by Galileo, comparing the Copernican system with the traditional Ptolemaic system. In the Copernican system the Earth and other planets orbit the Sun, while in the Ptolemaic system everything in the Universe circles around the Earth. The Dialogue was published in Florence under a formal license from the Inquisition.
In 1633, Galileo was convicted of “grave suspicion of heresy” based on the book, which was then placed on the Index of Forbidden Books, from which it was not removed until 1835 (after the theories it discussed had been permitted in print in 1822.) In an action that was not announced at the time, the publication of anything else he had written or ever might write was also banned.
Why it changed the world: There is no doubt that the invention of the telephone is one of the most significant and world changing inventions in the history of man. But without the telephone directory, it would never have succeeded. The popularity of the phone relied on the ability of subscribers to know who else was subscribed so they could telephone them.
The first telephone directory, consisting of a single page, was issued on February 21, 1878. It covered 50 subscribers in New Haven, Connecticut. The Reuben H. Donnelly company asserts that it published the first classified directory, or yellow pages, for Chicago, Illinois, in 1886. The first British telephone directory was published in 1880.
In the US, under current rules and practices, mobile phone and Voice over IP listings are not included in telephone directories. Efforts to create cellular directories have met stiff opposition from several fronts, including a significant percentage of subscribers who seek to avoid telemarketers.
Why it changed the world: The frequent calls for this book to be banned due to teenaged sexuality and vulgar language have kept the concept of censorship clearly in the public eye. This novel is the archetype of the teenage novel – now a very popular genre in literature.
The Catcher in the Rye is a 1951 novel by J. D. Salinger. Originally published for adults, the novel has become a common part of high school and college curricula throughout the English-speaking world; it has also been translated into almost all of the world’s major languages. Around 250,000 copies are sold each year, with total sales of more than sixty-five million. The novel’s antihero, Holden Caulfield, has become an icon for teenage rebellion and defiance.
The novel was chosen by Time among the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to 2005, and by Modern Library and its readers as one of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century. It has been frequently challenged in the United States for its liberal use of profanity and portrayal of sexuality and teenage angst.
Why it changed the world: This landmark epic novel proved to the world that America had a unique voice in the world of literature – a voice worth hearing. There is no doubt that America now dominates the world of modern literature.
Moby-Dick is an 1851 novel by Herman Melville. The story tells the adventures of the wandering sailor Ishmael and his voyage on the whaleship Pequod, commanded by Captain Ahab. Ishmael soon learns that Ahab seeks one specific whale, Moby Dick, a white whale of tremendous size and ferocity. Comparatively few whaleships know of Moby Dick, and fewer yet have encountered him. In a previous encounter, the whale destroyed Ahab’s boat and bit off his leg. Ahab intends to take revenge.
In Moby-Dick, Melville employs stylized language, symbolism, and metaphor to explore numerous complex themes. Through the main character’s journey, the concepts of class and social status, good and evil, and the existence of gods are all examined as Ishmael speculates upon his personal beliefs and his place in the universe.
Why it changed the world: The first “Sherlock Holmes novel” created the detective genre which has enthralled readers and filmgoers for well over a century. It can be said that Holmes changed the face of entertainment.
A Study in Scarlet is a detective mystery novel written by British author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, which was first published in 1887. It is the first story to feature the character of Sherlock Holmes, who would later become one of the most famous and iconic literary detective characters, with long-lasting interest and appeal. The book’s title derives from a speech given by Holmes to his companion Doctor Watson on the nature of his work, in which he describes the story’s murder investigation as his “study in scarlet”: “There’s the scarlet thread of murder running through the colourless skein of life, and our duty is to unravel it, and isolate it, and expose every inch of it.”
The story, and its main character, attracted little public interest when it first appeared. Although Doyle wrote fifty-six short stories featuring Holmes, A Study in Scarlet is one of only four full-length novels in the original canon. The novel was followed by The Sign of Four, published in 1890.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.






























Nice list – only read one of those
Strike that – I read the Holmes novel as part of a compendium of all the books as well as CITR. First piqued my interest in spy/detective genre
Great list, hitler’s ovens would go great along with number 8.
very nice list, I’ve heard of 3 of these, but only read The Catcher in the Rye, which I didn’t really care for. I’m going to have to find the rest of these though.
illbegood – I found catcher in the rye a little boring. I only perservered because of its reputation
I think TCITR is a little overrated tbh. It was recommended me by some friends in an english class, but the dialogue is weak, storyline convoluted…even the foreword in my copy is rather critical of the novel!
I was told to perserve, but that is a day of my life I am not getting back.
jfrater, same here, I had heard of it as one of the greatest novels ever written and found (in my opinion) it to be grossly overrated.
nice list
1 cymraegbachgen87 : Subtle… Methinks you should read the list before you post… After all, you don’t want any landmark posts do you?
Very thoughtful list
Mark, I ALWAYS read the list first. Don’t tarnish my first ‘first’ in nearly a year of visiting this site. I know lists are published around 9.30GMT so am always interested to see what new additions are gracing this site before I start my day proper! It was going to happen sooner or later!
Technically I HAD only read one of the books, as the holmes novel was in a collection, ingeniously titled “The complete Sherlock Holmes”
Just because you have to trace the words with your finger doesnt mean the rest of us do
(jk)
Heh, looks like somebody used my idea from the last list:
“26 w00tz
March 2nd, 2009 at 6:55 am
I think you’re forgetting Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, by Galileo, it was a book supporting the heliocentrism concept completely, and it was extremely controversial.”
Thanks for including that, jfrater.
Ooo… A Study in Scarlet, excellent story. A very interesting crossover of ‘A Study in Scarlet’ and the Cthulu Mythos called ‘A Study in Emerald’ written by Neil Gaiman can be found at his website – http://www.neilgaiman.com/p/Cool_Stuff/Short_Stories
You won’t be disappointed, the allusions are brilliant.
Great list by the way. I was thinking of reading Catcher, but as couple of commenters have mentioned, I wouldn’t want to waste a day, considering all the other Listverse-recommended books I need to read already.
11 cymraegbachgen87 : Actually *cough* Welshy *cough* what? Anyway, as I was saying, I read the list in about 2 minutes, so
Stupid LV, should be doing Chem assignment due tomorrow, or studying for exams… Stupid LV
Good list.
I just dont understand in which aspects ” America now dominates the world of modern literature”…
Number of books published? Number of books sold? quality of the books? prizes won?
These books are over rated! One book that changed my life was “Members Edition of Penthouse Forum Collection”, now thats good reading!
And in another note… “The Bible” and “Coran” should be there, if there ever was a book (or two) that changed the world that would be it!
16 Travis : Read the intro, both the Bible and the Quran are in the other list/s.
@ Mark :
Thanx for the heads up!
But I still believe “Members Edition of Penhouse Forum” should be up there… it did change the world in various factors. ***** is what sells the most in Modern Days and is the fuel for all human actions. Having a book that speaks clearly about *true* events happening in the office place and so on, promotes a state of mind that will and has changed the human presence in this virgin world.
mark (17) thank you
I might get dissed for this, but I still say that The Vampyre by John Polidori should be on the list. Alright, you may say the story was not life-changing, but it did influence Bram Stoker’s Dracula and changed the way the world would see vampires forever; *****y, romantic, mysterious and alluring, rather than demonic and not at all attractive as in folklore.
mrs polidori: I must be honest and say that I have never found vampires to be *****y and alluring – in fact, I find them to be something of a pain in the neck.
21 jfrater : *facepalm* Why Jamie? Why?
lol
Where’s the Holy Bible form the list? :-/ just thinking…
14 Mark–Sorry dude, but take responsibility for your own actions and quit blaming an inanimate website for your decisions on how to spend your study time.
And BTW, I probably would not have called you out, if you had not taken so much activity to point out other’s posts in a negative manner.
And yes I DID notice Jamie’s kudos to your post 17.
@ Travis:
I still believe that you should have read the intro first you *****!
@15: definitely agree.
Even more: I don’t even find from which good perspective could “America now dominates the world of modern literature”! So what is that and from where is that coming??
If that is based on the sell numbers for The Da Vinci Code, I think I might die laughing…
Actually, if memory serves me correctly, A Study in Scarlet took for its inspiration E.A. Poe’s “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” and the detective Pierrot (sp?). While Conan-Doyle may have refined the genre, he by no means created it.
To the subject at hand–The telephone directory-
What a fabulous and necessary publication. If you doubt it, think about how it has spanned the gap and become such a diverse tool on the internet.
Awww, Jamie, did you have to go there?
I can say, with some relief, that I never had to read Catcher in the Rye. It was on the recommended lists in school, but since it was never mandatory, I never read it.
I have read all of these except the dictionary completely (I am in the T’s) and the telephone book. (Its after the dictionary)
25 deeeziner : Way to over-react…
Okay Mark– You say over-react, I say that I was reading a pleasant list of comments until I came across post #9, the first negative post on a personal basis. Boy that didn’t take long did it–under 10 responses.
So I look to see who had to take a jab and what do I read? Mark. Am I surprised? Not really.
No 2: “There is no doubt that America now dominates the world of modern literature.” O.o
I’m glad I’m not the only one who didn’t like The Catcher in the Rye. I really just wanted that kid to be real so I could smack him in the face. There’s only so much teenage whining I can take from a book. I’m glad it was a short one.
I wish jews today were worthy of the repution they got at the “protocols”…
33 deeeziner : What the crap are you on mate? There’s no animosity between cym and I. As a matter of fact, short of oouchan, he’s probably the regular I get along the best with. Chillax brotha, deep breaths…
@ twit :
Yes, the word *****. Love it! Reminds me of the person that gave birth to you. What a horrible mistake!
Oh, the phone book. It’s just so amazing, isn’t it? Millions of people look at this book everyday. This is the kind of spontaneous publicity – your name in print – that makes people. I’m in print! Things are going to start happening to me now…
I assume Newton’s Principia was on a previous list.
37 Mark–Pardon me for not keeping up on the intricacies of comment friendships here. I spend most of my site time at forums. I Apologize.
Now go do your homework!!:)
I think Moby Dick is way more overrated thancatcher inthe Rye, although I didn’t really care for that one either. For teen angst, my money was on A Seperate Peace or, more recently The Perks of Being a Wallflower. But Moby Dick…bleh. Actually my entire Early American Lit class…bleh.
jayfray: i thought this was another great list. and the moment i came across your sentence “There is no doubt that America now dominates the world of modern literature.” i knew this would cause controversy.
but hey, what is a LV list without a little argument.
gina:(39) brilliant!!! what a fantastic movie reference!
avi:(36) i can’t even begin to imagine what you mean by that statement.
11 cym: Mark’s got post envy! At least you got a landmark post…….once…hehe
BTW…great list, jfrater. I like all of your choices.
hated things fall apart. I think it makes africa precolonization society look worse. they beat women, behead a child that okonkwo is caring for and listen to a prophet living in a cave, what a life
DiscHuker(44): You to be really good in something to get to be the protagonist of such a book (say, being good in making money). Nowadays, we’re not even remotely as good.
Didn’t read the intro – GUILTY!!!
sorry
In all fairness, Poe created the detective story with “Murders in the Rue Morgue.” Doyle just copied him.
Things fall apart and catcher in the rye are two of the worst books i have ever read. haha
36. avi June 3rd, 2009 at 5:35 am
wtf do you mean by that??
avi (36)
wtf do you mean by that??
omg omg omg why isnt twilight on the list? that book is like the best bk evaaaaaa!!! rob pattinson is the hottest edward in the world, that bk like changed my life omg cant believe you guys are so rude…im neva gna cme bk to this site, twilight foreva!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! woooo!!! we LOVE you robert, ur sooooo phit!!!!
(seriously if i ever behaved like this, twonk me over the head with a large saucepan, blooming twilighters ruining every site i visit!!)
sorry for the double post
I thought Things Fall Apart was a great work and I don’t think it made precolonial Africa look any worse than any European society at that time. Europeans burned witches, killed religious minorities, and the took the supposed word of God to extreme and deadly extents. Plus what the Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch and British did to destroy precolonial African societies was horrific. The legacy of European as well as Arab involvement in Africa is still seen today. Things Fall Apart shows the beginning of the destruction of civilizations in Africa in a microcosm and shows how Europeans attempted to dehumanized Africans to justify their treatment.
53 Tropical: *snort*
That was perfect. I have to show my kid that.
I agree with setalaus. In what way, if any, does American literature even have an impact on let alone dominate modern literature? It’s primary effect seems to be in the recycling of ideas, the reinforcement of stereotypes and imposing of certainty where doubt is more appropriate. Kingsly Amis once said that ‘literature was the war on cliches’. If that be true then American literature has been of no use at all. However, I think your choices are interesting and well-justified. I might of selected James Fenimore Cooper over Melville. Though an inferior writer I think he has a better claim to being the father of American literature. If his work seems out of place now it is because America had changed some much in the year since it was written.
As a bonus, at #11, we could have added The Ultimate Book of Top 10 Lists….
Good list, but I have one reservation. Well… two actually. But the one is purely a matter of taste.
So to begin with THAT, I have to say that I never thought “Things Fall Apart” was really all that great a book. I didn’t find it to be terribly well written. But to each his own—and at any rate, that nevertheless does NOT call into question your reasons for including it on this list—there’s no denying that it DID have an impact.
Where I have a larger reservation is with the choice of “Catcher in the Rye.” Now, it isn’t that I think “Catcher” is a bad book—it isn’t. Though I’ll agree to some extent with others here that it doesn’t seem to ring as true and great to us, today, as it did when it first came out, and into the Sixties.
But… correct me if I’m wrong—it seemed you chose “Catcher” for inclusing for two reasons—one, it was one of the first “teenage angst” novels (probably true, though the genre of youth fiction had existed for a long while before that–but of course it was of an entirely different nature)… and two, because of the effects it had in sparking debates about censorship.
But this is where it seems to me that there were a couple better choices to be made—books that have a much greater importance artistically and historically (if nowhere near as popular) and books that preceded “Catcher” by several years, even decades.
First of all, “Ulysses” by James Joyce. Now, I can’t recall, but this was probably on the earlier “10 Books” list… I should go and check. But if it wasn’t, then it (or my other suggestion) should have been on THIS one.
The other book is “Tropic of Cancer” by Henry Miller.
BOTH of these are far better, deeper, and artistically important books than “Catcher in the Rye,” which good as it is, is almost fluff by comparison. In fact, it’s of course recognized that “Ulysses” is pretty much the greatest novel ever written, and “Tropic” scored a very high place as well on all the “lists of great books” that I’ve seen. It certainly scores high on mine.
Both books were the subject of intense censorship in this country and Britain (and other countries as well) and both books were the subject of groundbreaking, important court cases that ended in judicial rulings which broke the back of heavy censorship in the US—the court case surrounding “Ulysses” being the more important of the two, it could be argued—but nevertheless, the ruling on “Tropic” was just as vital, building on the precedent of the earlier case but also making it clear that Joyce’s work was not just some random exception.
Remember, Joyce and Miller’s books were BANNED in this country for YEARS after they were published overseas. If I recall, the case for Ulysses was decided in the 1930s, though the book had been out since 1914 in Europe. I don’t know when the ban was lifted on it in Britain. “Tropic of Cancer” was banned in the US until the 1950s, though the book had been published in the 30s in France. Some others of Miller’s books remained banned until the SIXTIES. I believe Miller’s books (including “Tropic”) remained banned in Britain until at least that time.
To my knowledge, there was no such court case (I can’t recall anyway) surrounding “Catcher,” perhaps because it is not as explicit in its language as either “Ulysses” or “Tropic,” and I certainly don’t recall any stories about “Catcher” being confiscated by the US Postal Service, which Joyce and Miller both were. But also “Catcher” was always thought of as simply a “youth novel,” which perhaps isn’t fair—it’s a greater piece of work than that—but it doesn’t rank with the other two books.
If the point here was to indicate the impact that a book had on ending official censorship in America and Britain—I’d honestly say that Joyce or Miller would have been the better choice here.
great list!