Satire is the form of humor that holds people, or society in general, up for examination, and ridicules the follies revealed. Good satire should offer improving examples or at least make us consider choices we often take for granted. In this sense, satire is of huge value to society. While satire can be cruel to the victims it mocks, it should always be funny. These ten individuals are the best satirists that have ever lived. As with so many lists, that last sentence requires the caveat ‘In my opinion.’ If you think I missed anyone, pop them in the comments.

“You have all the characteristics of a popular politician: a horrible voice, bad breeding and a vulgar manner.”
Classical Athens was a deeply political city, as you would expect from a democracy. In a democracy the voters like to be informed, and they like to laugh at the people in charge. Aristophanes was a master of comedic plays in Athens. Special festivals were held each year for comedy, and attendance was considered a religious necessity. A deeply conservative thinker, Aristophanes took aim at all the innovations he saw as dangerous. His targets included politicians (like the demagogue Cleon), the new thinkers (sophists, with whom he lumped Socrates) and fellow dramatists (such as Euripides, with his low born characters). His plays range from absurd situations (the search for the city of the birds) to the familiar (jury service), but all are packed with wit. Translation can be hard as his works are hugely topical and contain references we might miss. A good translation, when performed well, can still have people roaring with laughter and make a point. In the run up to the second Iraq War Aristophanes’ Lysistrata was performed world-wide as a call for peace. Aristophanes may have had the last laugh as at least some people, myself included, see the Lysistrata as an argument to see a war through to the end.

“I entirely agree,” said Aristophanes, “that we should, by all means, avoid hard drinking, for I was myself one of those who were yesterday drowned in drink.”
Until I actually read the dialogues of Plato, instead of simply learning about them, I had no idea that Plato was hilarious. Anecdotes have a young Plato writing dramas before taking to philosophy. It would seem he never lost the knack for drama, or for mimicry. Plato satirizes all the way through the dialogues. Aristophanes is mocked in the Symposium as a boorish individual, who can tell an entertaining story but is incapable of deep thought. Plato catches Aristophanes’ backwards looking voice perfectly. In most of the dialogues, whenever Socrates, always a paragon of virtue, talks with someone, the other person is satirized. The interlocutor almost always misses the fact that they are being mocked, but we can hear the smirk Socrates was hiding. Plato uses satire to underline his philosophy of virtue so that those who may not be able to follow the philosophical thread of the dialogues may still profit from them.

“Of all the Griefs that harass the Distrest,
Sure the most bitter is a scornful Jest.”
Like Athens, Rome was a political hotbed, and so satire flourished. Two styles of satire developed. The first is based on the works of Horace, who used poetry to gently point out peoples’ follies. The second, far harsher, was based on the poems of Juvenal. It is hard not to like Juvenal, even when he is at his most vulgar. His book of satirical poems begins with a lament; “It is hard not to write satire…” Like Aristophanes, Juvenal is conservative and attacks what he sees as moral decay. He mocks the people who fawn to the emperor, how hard it is to flatter effectively, female morals and people who lack common human feeling. Like many satirists, Juvenal suffered for his sharp tongue, being exiled for his wit. While his words were sharp they have become proverbial. We still say people long for ‘bread and circuses’ and ask ‘who will watch the watchers?’

“Ful del she sange the service devine,
Entuned in hire nose ful swetely;
And Frenche she spake flu fayre and fetidly,
After the scale of Stratford atte bowe,
For Frenche of Paris was to hire unknown.”
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales is one of the greatest poems in English. It offers us an insight into the medieval mind and the social situation of a wide slice of society. By holding his dramatic mirror up to such an assorted group of pilgrims, Chaucer is bound to notice certain follies. We all recognize the social climber who tries to do as their betters do (in this case, speak French) and fails miserably (The prioress speaks French well, but with a heavy English accent). What makes Chaucer such a skillful satirist is that he spares no one their foibles, but he tempers his mockery. The knight is a good man and so the mockery is gentle, almost affectionate. The Pardoner, a man who preys on people’s fears of hell to make money by fraud, is scourged with all of Chaucer’s force. Knowing which targets are worthy of abuse is the satirist’s art.

“Wherefore farewell, clap your hands, live and drink lustily, my most excellent disciples of Folly.”
Erasmus was one of the greatest minds of the European renaissance, and a founder of the reformation, famed for his learned collection and comparison of biblical texts. While Luther, the most dour man of the age, was inspired by that work, we take our inspiration from Erasmus’ ‘In Praise of Folly.’ In this short essay, written in the form of a speech by the goddess Folly, every folly of the age is held up for mocking praise. What makes this work so notable is that no one escapes the prodding satire. In the work the following people are mocked – the young, the old, women, those who have children, scholars, monks, kings, theologians… The list goes on. Since everyone takes their share of satire, no one feels hard done by and we all must consider; why do we do what we do?

“It is computed that eleven thousand persons have at several times suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the smaller end.”
We leave the gentle satire of Erasmus now, for a far sharper satirical mind. Jonathan Swift is best known today for Gulliver’s Travels, but his writings are extensive. Gulliver’s Travels takes the form of a travelogue, where each of the places Gulliver reaches reflects, in grotesque form, some wrong of contemporary society. Gulliver feels morally superior to the tiny men of Lilliput, but is revealed inferior to the giants of Brobdingnag. The humor in Gulliver’s Travels is sharp, but nothing compared to the pamphlet A Modest Proposal. The proposal involved is one to solve the Irish famines, that occurred regularly, by the cooking and eating of babies. Even today, people are shocked if they do not understand the subtle satire.

“Optimism,” said Cacambo, “what is that?”
“Alas!” replied Candide, “it is the obstinacy of maintaining that everything is well when it is hell.”
Voltaire was one of the wittiest men in an age of wits. His Candide is one of the best books you can read in a few hours. It is the story of a young man, Candide, under the influence of a teacher of Optimism, Pangloss. Before the first page is over dreadful things begin to happen to all the characters. When asked why such things occur, Pangloss will explain “All is for the best in the best of all worlds.” The book may be seen as a narrow attack on the work of Leibniz, but in reality it is much more. It mocks the native optimism of youth, justice, Christian prejudice, war and class distinctions, as the deluge of disaster is dumped on the protagonists. What final advice does Candide offer us, who do not live in the best of all possible worlds? We must tend our gardens.

“Satire; Noun. An obsolete kind of literary composition in which the vices and follies of the author’s enemies were expounded with imperfect tenderness.”
Bierce has divided opinion on his merits. Is he a vulgar and obscene cynic? Is he a keen and witty observer of human nature? His inclusion here tells you which way I come down on the matter. His ‘Devil’s Dictionary’ gives satirical definitions of words that, as well as making you laugh, make you wonder how much truth there is in his satire. The Devil’s Dictionary remains popular after a century, and is the perfect companion if you wish to puncture an enemy’s arguments.
“Conservative; Noun. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others.”

“All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.”
The theory of communism is alluring. Who does not want to think that everyone is equal, and that utopia is just around the corner, if only we could learn to share? George Orwell, the product of an upper-middle class background and Eton, was deeply concerned for his fellow man, and toyed with communism as a weapon against fascism. His experiences in the Spanish civil war taught him that communism can descend into totalitarianism, purges and beastliness. So Orwell wrote a fable of communism, Animal Farm, to explain what evils it can lead to. In a few short chapters we see the rise of an idealistic idea to dominance, and the descent into a regime just as bad as anything that preceded it. The humor here is dark, but so were the times he was writing it in.

I do not know what quote to start this entry off with. A bit of a cheat, but these two have worked together to create a great satiric force. South Park has set its satiric sights on just about everyone in its fourteen years. The humor is absurdist and shotgun, no one escapes without having their ludicrous aspects exposed. Even though many view it as offensive, they seem to miss that everyone is getting their fair share of abuse. To watch South Park and feel you are being unfairly targeted is to reveal your own insecurities. Whatever your religious or political standpoints, by mocking all sides, South Park asks everyone to question their beliefs and accept nothing on the basis of an outside authority.



















I thought satirists were like comic strip writers.
Finally, someone else understands how I feel about South Park.
#1 spot….. I love you.
FAIL
Wasn’t a “First” post.
haha. thats not what she meant. duh
I love South Park, but placing the creators at number 1 is pulling it a bit
I saw this interview with them, where they say they prefer bashing liberals than conservatives, because liberals can’t take it: “How dare you?! The joke’s not on us!”. Twas pretty funny.
Good list anyway
South Park is at #1 because the list is presented in chronological order
#1 seems a bit controversial
Just some south park fanboy.
The list is in chronological order
they also won a few tony’s you know
A different list and although personally I would have put Swift at #1 and Bierce at #2, that’s what makes it interesting. I think the best description of satire is that at its heart, it’s subversive and that’s why the two authors I mentioned are at the top of my list.
Neat list. I would place Chaucer higher up, but of course, it’s opinion. South Park certainly has shaped the form of satire in the recent years. It’s very funny, but it can be a bit blunt sometimes. I like having a bit of subtlety in my satire, but then you run into the issue of people thinking they’re so great because they “get it.” I don’t think they understand that you’re supposed to get it. Otherwise it wouldn’t be funny.
Missed so many off the list. Everyone MUST watch anything by Chris Morris, The Day Today & Brasseye. Two of the greatest pieces of satire ever made!
I could see two lists here; one details the historical satirists (10 through 2, then add Oscar Wilde), and another that lists modern satirists (like #1), adding in people like the Monty Python team, George Carlin, and various other comedians/commentators who’ve made a career of satire. Just my 2¢.
Carlin is my favorite!
Yah, it needs more of the modern ones. Also does Bo Burnham count?
great idea
Top 20
No Terry Pratchett?!? I am disapoint!
You could also add Kurt Vonnegut to that list. But Orwell is my favorite.
agreed on Vonnegut, when I saw that name of the list I immediately thought of him
Me too!! In my opinion he is the best satirist to ever live. Slaughterhouse-five is a masterpiece.
Love #1. I love when you see something on a list you weren’t expecting and it makes you say, ‘Oh, yeah! I never thought of it that way.’ Great thinking outside the box.
Alas! I dont like this list
#vote for delete
Great list. I love South Park but I seriously think they have lost a lot of their cleverness. Nod silently at your computer if you agree.
” everyone to question their beliefs and accept nothing on the basis of an outside authority.”
In Penn and Teller’s words this is bullsh#t. Belief according to Merriam Webster:”a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing.” a synonim would be faith.
If you start questioning belief, well you are no longer believing. Believing is guesswork: “I guess this must be right.” but when you start knowing things, it is no longer guessing. You know. And unless you have *all* the information you need to know, you will need to do some guesswork and believe in making a correct choice.
And we all do it. We all believe some things to be true or not. We all accept things according to an outside authority. We believe physics theories to be true, we all believe in something(our kids, values, families, statistocs, our loved ones, this guy believed SP is better than Voltaire or Swift etc etc etc) and trust some mighty authority. And people that are “hollier than thou” and say they question everything are bullsh#tters. Or Kurt Godel. But he’s dead.
PS: i love SP as any other guy, but really?
That’s ridiculous.. You can’t say there’s no grey area with beliefs
No. Im saying that people who think (read: believe) that they are 100% critical, 100% rational, 100% informed, 100% sober etc. beings are hypocrites. (“accept *nothing* on the basis of an outside authority.” and i stress the importance of *nothing* in their speech).
It’s obvious we cannot question everything in our lives. No one can do that. So now “open-minded” people might say: we question the maximum amount of things in our lives. Well if open mindedness depends on the quantity or quality of things you question, then open mindedness is a relative thing (which it is) so we are now all open minded and close minded at the same time (which we are). So people that claim to be, or urge people to be 100% open minded are hypocrites. Just like religion tells us to be saints (and we cannot be), these people want us to be 100% rational (the new type of saints) and we cannot be. Let’s stop advising people how to be or behave, according to our view. (my rule: there are no rules)
This is a perfect of someone using a Straw Man argument. As in, he’s arguing against a position that nobody has laimed to have. Nobody has claimed to be 100% critical, 100% rational, 100% informed, and 100% sober. Nobody told you you had to do this, so why are you saying nobody should? Is it a preemptive countermeasure? And accepting physics theories is not done on authority. Scientific theories are not “guesses” or ideas somebody just came up with, in science a theory is something that has evidence for it and has been tested, and peer reviewed purely so you DON’T have to take it on authority.
Clearly you do not know the difference between a theory and a theorem. Physicist hope that their theory is correct and work on it hoping it is correct, if it is not, they make corrections. The equivalent would be mathematicians assuming that every conjecture is correct cuz they kinda seem correct and nobody has proven then to be false. Wouldnt that be a funny world?
And my argument that these people (that take nothing on authority) is simply based on the fact that one cannot live or produce work based on that assumption. There will always be things that you assume to be correct or as is (like working on a 7 days/week system, or living a moral life (morality being defined by an authority: the authority of the majority) ) and many more examples.
“peer reviewed purely so you DON’T have to take it on authority.”
Haven’t the peers become the authority.
Just ask Boltzmann, he was ostracized (spelling) by the scientific community when he came up with his theories. How many scientist do not go into research because their work might be considered “dangerous” by the majority(im thinking about racial research and things like that). And grants are given by an authority so clearly an authority has influence on the scientific community.
Ill repeat my main argument:It is obvious that one cannot pretend to not have taken *anything* on authority. There is only one thing that humanity came up with that isn’t based on authority and that is mathematics. But people do mathematics and live in an imperfect world. Im done with this.
Damn man chill the ***** out. No ones said anything against you so badly, so you don’t have to be all “I’m done with this.” just chill out man -_-;
Interesting list but I think you could have considered dividing this into three list. My choices would have been (starting with recorded history beginning 5,000 years ago or so) Ancient, Middle Ages, and Modern. Even this would have been difficult to narrow down the 10 greatest satirist, in particular the Middle and Modern ages, given the proliferation of education & printing.
To make the leap from the top 9 to Southpark as #1 is quite clearly a personal preference and, if out of the box, is so far out of the box as to lose credibility. You leaped over H.L. Mencken, Mark Twain, Swift, Will Rogers, the creators of Punch Magazine, I could go on… I enjoyed what you wrote about each entry however and urge you to approach this topic again, perhaps with a little more alacrity for thorougness.
Sorry, I mentioned Swift without thinking carefully of what I had just read. I suppose it was the shock of seeing South Park at #1.
Definitely agree on Twain & Mencken, but as stated elsewhere here, Vonnegut also must be included, IMHO. I don’t know if I’d put South Park @ #1, but they don’t take any prisoners, and they are probably the best known and most appreciated “currently operating” satirists in the business. Though I might not agree with their position on the list, I think the inclusion of SP [on the list] is completely appropriate.
Perhaps another list for the top ten satirical comics, so that the likes of George Carlin, Lewis Black, Lenny Bruce, Jon Stewart, etc could be honored, is in order.
So, you essentially concocted a rather shoddy for the ***SOLE*** purpose of showcasing your personal love for a silly TV show that will be forgotten in a decade or two?
What, are you twelve?
Twelve seems to be a better descriptor of your IQ than his age. (Or at least your IQ, as hinted at by your appallingly poor ability to justify an opinion.)
There is absolutely no reason to think that South Park will be forgotten, let alone in a decade or two. Just because Matt Stone and Trey Parker don’t wear white wigs and weren’t born in Europe doesn’t mean that they cannot be considered to be brilliant.
Everyone’s entitled to an opinion. Fortunately, in his case; unfortunately, in your case.
Honorable Mention: Berke Brethed (Bloom County)
Ah, yes. But then we have to include Doonsbury, and its creator Trudeau (not sure of spelling).
Placing “South Park” at Number One is stretching it a bit, but despite being crude, the show does have its comic satirical moments. One positive accomplishment of “SP” is that it took some of the heat off of “Beavis and Butthead”, which can also be considered a satirical…if raunchy…piece of cartoon art. Another honorable mention would have to go out to Norman Lear. After all, “All In The Family” can be classified as an adult form of social satire as well as a pioneering trend in TV history. Without Archie Bunker could we have arrived at Al Bundy?
And as to the field of music let’s not forget Frank Zappa, who lampooned everything from the 50s beat generation to “Sgt Pepper “.
South Park! Perfect modern day pick.
If we were to include contemporary contenders, I would put Steve Colbert on the list. Although he does have a staff of writers helping him.
Stephen Colbert is the best example of today’s satire. Hands down. Not even arguable. Sometimes Jon Stewart is satirical, but not nearly to the lengths or depths Colbert takes it all 22 minutes of every show 4 nights a week. Period. BEARS!
South Park definitely mocks liberals/leftists more than say, oh I don’t know,…. libertarians.
C’mon. And the you’re insecure if you see bias is bull*****. Because I like laugh my ass off at their funny cartoon show.
I love Orson Welles. And Animal Farm is one of my favourite books of all time. It may have been set in a different time and been about different issues but it’s as relevant today as it was then.
*Wells not Welles. A thousand apologies.
Sorry just doesn’t cut it anymore
LOL :d
You were right the first time. His name is Orson Welles.
I strongly disagree with putting Stone and Parker on the top place, but do respect (and support!) them being on the list!
Great list. Parker and Stone deserve #1. They are brutal, fair, accurate, even-handed, universal, well-informed, fearless and most of all, funny.
What of Washington Irving and Mark Twain?
To all of the “intelligent” and “shocked” people, I’m pretty sure this is a CHRONOLOGICAL list, so it makes absolute sense that South Park is at the top spot. Just saying.
I love South Park however the past couple of seasons have been poor. They seem to have moved into a realm of extremely absurd and sometimes stupid comedy which doesn’t remotely stack up to at least the first 11 seasons. It’s a shame because when they choose to use their talents Stone and Parker are two of the wittiest men in the world.
You forgot to add “I think”. Your opinion is not fact.
From the intro: These ten individuals are the best satirists that have ever lived. As with so many lists, that last sentence requires the caveat ‘In my opinion.’
On second thought keep Mark Twain off and put Ambrose Bierce at No. 1
Animal Farm is awesome.
So is SouthPark.
I love Satires
I swear, Obama and all the stuff he says, and does it`s like Animal Farm..
a) South Park creators at #1 but Matt Groening not even in the list?!!!??
b) Orwell’s work in both Animal Farm and 1984 goes FAR beyond satire and criticism against communism. They both alert on anything totalitarian, whether communism, fascism, apartheid or mass media brainwashing. Looking at them as anti-communism books is restricting.
Groening doesn’t really do satire.
I wholeheartedly agree with you about the exclusion of Matt Groening. The Simpsons is one of my favorites and has been on the air a lot longer than South Park has and probably ever will be. Always great satire.
I kinda feel like you missed nearly every great satirist who ever lived to be honest. Then to put Stone and Parker at #1 on such a list is just dumbfounding. You may as well have put the writers of Aqua Teen Hunger Force at #1, it would make about as much sense to me. I think with #1 you have confused comedy with satire, they are far from the same thing. I’ve never completely disliked a list in pretty much every way but alas this is the first.
The fact that you don’t see South Park as satire tells me you barely ever watched it at all. Almost every single episode of South Park has that underlying satire that they’ve always had, South Park is most deffinitely satire. No question about it.
South park just isn’t SMART satire. If satire doesn’t hold an underlying philosophy to hold true, then it’s just target-shooting by a blind man. In other words, it’s not SAYING anything- it’s just shooting fish in a barrel for sport.
I’d have to agree that, while South Park is undeniably entertaining, it is hardly intelligent enough in its satire to be considered for such a list. South Park’s satire is simply taking something in the current Zeitgeist and poking fun at it in ridiculous fashions. It has no underlying philosophies or beliefs, just pandering to the views and opinions of the majority.
It’s hilarious, incredibly well written and will be viewed as such for years to come, but good satire it is not
This is without question the worst list ever posted on listverse. I’m shocked they even had the nerve to put it on here. An abomination.
Brian O’Nolan/ Flann O’Brien/ Myles na gCopaleen deserves a spot on the lists, as does Wilde.
nice job celebrating halloween no satire intended
I agree, matt stone and trey are the best modern satirist, but they dont feel like they fit on this list
I think Matt Groenig and the writers of The Simpsons deserve the #1 spot over South Park creators. Yes, The Simpsons has been in decline over the years, but at its peak, I think it did a better job at attacking society’s sacred cows than South Park ever has.
No mark twain?
Nor Oscar Wilde?
No Stephen Colbert?
“….South Park asks everyone to …. accept nothing on the basis of an outside authority.” For example, someone considering Southpark the greatest satirists in world history.
What? Me Worry?
Exactly…
The “usual gang of idiots” didn’t make the list? So they’re behind right now; they’re making Gaines!
Richard Curtis and Rowan Atkinson (Blackadder)?
The Python Troupe (Monty Python)?
Plenty of good ones missed out…
Mary Roach.
Well, since the list is in age order, I have no problem with who is placed where on the list. I would add The Onion to the list.
Mostly older writers followed by very recent one in 1st place. I like the order of how you wrote the list. Satire truly has the widest targets to choose from…and no one does it better than the South Park writers. No one is exempt and nothing is sacred. I like that. Even thought I’ve found them offensive in many cases, for the most part, they need to be taken with a grain of salt. Too many people get their panties in a bunch….it’s time to pick the wedgie and move on.
Good list.
Glad to see Swift on the list, although I had a very well thought out snarky comment to post if the list DID NOT have Swift on it. I guess now all I can say is…good job!
No Petronius?
Hahahahahahahahahaha
South Park deserves #1 but I think Chris Morris deserves a place aswell
I would have included as a bonus Machiavelli, who was a satirist of the Colbert stripe of his era.
Love the list and LOOOOOOVE south park
xx
Good list. Nice choice to put South Park as No 1. SP has mocked almost everybody and deservably so, teetering on the brink of good humour and bad taste. Parker and Stone have open up countless minds to the silliness of modern world just when we need it the most.
That quote from Chaucer could’ve been chosen better. It is simply too complex for non-english and i bet that maybe a promille of people here understand at all what was the meaning. I know that it is explained but the witty of the original gets lost.. Maybe the lister tried to state the fact that he/she has got years of education in this field and we don’t? It’s not a crime to modernize the language, if we don’t, these kinds of brilliant text will be lost to the scholars private snickering club. A sort of academic contempt of the “simpler folks”..
Also what is Folly? I don’t think that it is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folly It is one of those words that are so rarely used and as such, i’ve never encountered it. I might know what it means, something useless but that’s about it… I love to learn new things but i get very frustrated when that path leads to a dead end. Please enlighten me more.
There is nothing new under the sun but there are lots of old things we don’t know.
Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary
But we will know everything if we keep coming back to this site. I’m certain. Almost.
where is mark twain????
Woodlawn Cemetery, Elmira, New York State, USA.
While South Park is rife with satire, a mention for Team America: World Police is deserving. It was also created by Parker and Stone and is, in my opinion, the greatest satirical film since Dr. Strangelove.
stupid list
stupid comment
If you’re going to include only one contemporary satirists (in my opinion there should be more) then Matt Groening has to get the nod over the SP guys. While I respect and enjoy what they do on SP, they don’t even come close to the satirical genious of The Simpsons. Groening has been doing it much longer and better then these guys and has to be mentioned.
This was a decent list, but I expected something a little spookier on Halloween.
Especially since Listverse often features lists with a macabre theme.
A little disappointed, I am.
It’s too soon to include South Park on a list like this. Their brand of satire lacks subtlety; the best satire skewers its victims without them even realizing it. Check this list in 50 or 100 years to see if SP really belongs with the other nine.
Charlie Chaplin?