I believe that we can safely say that the period of man’s history from 476 AD to 1000 AD is the most maligned of all. This period, known to historians as the Early Middle Ages, is still referred to by most laymen as the Dark Ages. In fact the term “dark ages” is almost as ancient as the period itself – it was coined in the 1330s by Petrarch, the Italian scholar, to refer to the decline of Latin literature. It was later taken by the protestant reformers (16th century) and then the members of the Englightenment (18th century) as a derogatory term with much broader implications, because they saw their own “enlightenment” as absent from the earlier period. Hardly a fair judgement on the past. Fortunately for modern students of history, the term is now officially known as the Early Middle Ages – a name which has no connotations at all. So, having given you the background on the terms, here are ten reasons that the dark ages were, in fact, a period of great progress and light.
The Classical Education (still used today in some schools) was the system used by the Universities which were created in the Early Middle Ages (the first in history). The universities taught the arts, law, medicine, and theology (the study of religion). The University of Bologna (founded in 1088) was the first ever to grant degrees. In addition to the classical structure (based on Ancient Greek education), these medieval universities were heavily influenced by Islamic education which was thriving at the time. While women were not admitted to Universities in the early days, the education of women did exist. The convents of the day educated the young women who would often enter at a very young age. One such women (Hildegard Von Bingen) is one of the most celebrated women of the Medieval era who had great influence over the men in power at the time.
While progress in Science was slow during this period in the West, the progress was steady and of a very high quality. The foundation was laid here for the wonderful blossoming of science that was to occur in the High Middle Ages to come. It can be safely said, that without the study of Science in the Early Middle Ages, we would be considerably behind in our scientific knowledge today. Ronald Numbers (professor at Cambridge University) has said: ‘Notions such as: “the rise of Christianity killed off ancient science”, “the medieval Christian Church suppressed the growth of the natural sciences”, “the medieval Christians thought that the world was flat”, and “the Church prohibited autopsies and dissections during the Middle Ages” [are] examples of widely popular myths that still pass as historical truth, even though they are not supported by historical research.’ [Source: Video or audio Lecture]
The Carolingian Renaissance was a period of advancements in literature, writing, the arts, architecture, jurisprudence, liturgical and scriptural studies which occurred in the late eighth and ninth centuries. The Carolingians were Franks and the most well known is Charlemagne. The Carolingian empire was considered a rebirth of the culture of the Roman Empire. At the time, Vulgar Latin was beginning to be replaced by various dialects as the main spoken languages in Europe, so the creation of schools was vital to spread knowledge further amongst the common people. It was also this period which gave us the foundation of Western Classical Music.
Under Justinian this period gave us the Corpus Juris Civilis (Body of Civil law) – an enormous compendium of Roman Law. Literacy was high,elementary education was widespread (even in the countryside), middle education was available to many people, and higher education (as discussed above) was also widely accessible. In the Byzantine empire during this period we saw a massive outpouring of books – encyclopedias, lexicons, and anthologies. While they did not create a lot of new thinking, they solidified and protected for the future much of what was already known.
This is a sticky topic, but the fact is, during the Early Middle Ages, Europe had a united Church, an agreed upon canon of the Bible, and a well developed philosophical tradition. This led (as one would expect) to a great period of peace within the Western nations. While Islam was not in agreement with the doctrines of the West, much mutual sharing of information happened and the Islamic contribution to the West is still felt today. This union of beliefs allowed for intellectual progress unseen since the Roman Empire at its heyday. In a sense you might consider this period as the calm before the storm, as it was merely a hundred years later that the first Crusade would be called to take Jerusalem back from the Muslims – an event which ended the flow of knowledge between groups.
Thanks to the learning of the Islamic people in the East, the world received its first book on algebra. The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing was written by Al-Khwārizmī (790-840) and the Arabic title of the book gave us the word “algebra”. The word algorithm comes from al-Khwārizmī’s name. This book gave us the first systematic solution of linear and quadratic equations. Later translations of his books also gave us the decimal positional number system we use today. Al-Khwārizmī, along with Diophantas, is considered the Father of algebra.
During the Early Middle Ages, architecture was diverse and innovative. It introduced the idea of realistic images in art and it laid the groundwork for the Romanesque period which was to come in the High Middle Ages. The period also included the introduction and absorption of classical forms and concepts in architecture. It can safely be said that this period was the first period of high art – with previous styles (Migration period) being much more functional and less “artistic”. In the Early Middle Ages we witness the birth of an astonishing and beautiful history of art and building.
Trivial as it may seem, the weather played a much greater part in the lives of the average people during the Middle Ages and beyond. When we think of the “Dark Ages” we tend to see images of snow storms, rain, thunder, and darkness – such as we see in films like “The Name of the Rose”. The fact is, in the Early Middle Ages, the North Atlantic region was warming up – so much so that at the opening of the High Middle Ages (1100 AD), the region was 100 years into an event now known as the Medieval Warm Period. This warm period thawed much ice and enabled the Vikings to begin their colonization of Greenland and other northern nations. Ironically, the Protestant reformation (16th century) up until the 19th century suffered the Little Ice Age – the period of “enlightenment” was literally darker and colder than the “dark” ages. During this period, reforms and better knowledge of agriculture provided a boost to food supplies.
The Early Middle Ages had a complex system of laws which were often not connected, but they were effective and fair for the most part. For merchants traveling around the world, there was the Lex Mercatoria (Law Merchant) which had evolved over time, rather than being created. This law included arbitration and promoted good practice amongst traders. At the same time, Anglo Saxon Law was formed with a focus on keeping peace in the land. While this eventually lead to some very tough laws, living under the legal system in the Early Middle Ages was probably the best time to live – as it was still flexible and fair for the majority. The third important legal system was the the Early Germanic Law which allowed each person to be tried by his own people – so as to not be disadvantaged by ignorance or major cultural differences.
If you were wanting to die a martyr by starvation, the Early Middle Ages were not the time to do it! As a consequence of the excellent weather and greater agricultural knowledge, the West did extremely well. Iron tools were in wide use in the Byzantine empire, feudalism in other parts of the world introduced efficient management of land, and massive surpluses were created so that animals were fed on grains and not grass. Public safety was also guaranteed under the feudal system and so peace and prosperity was the lot for most people.






























how ironic really. such a boom in man’s life and they call it that way…
great list! something to add during convos.
damn…so close
Great list J! Though I thought you said this was going to be Tuesdays one?
It’s a really interesting read, it’s good to get a clear view of a time, rather than clouded by myths and assumptions.
someone: For future info…any “first” posts automatically go into moderation and will be deleted by an admin. You’re better off not even trying to play that game.
As for the list, very interesting. This actually dispells some misconceptions I had about the Middle Ages. I always had the impression that it was a fearful, strenuous, oppresive period in history, not one of fairness and growth. Didn’t the Spanish Inquisition take place in the Middle Ages? The auto-de-fe? Didn’t the Middle Ages spawn an rebirth in torture technology?
The Spanish Inquisition took place in the Modern Ages and was established by the united Crown in Aragon and Crown in Castile as a means of enforcing political uniformity. In the Early Modern Age, when the State was seizing control of everything, including religion, uniformity of religion was important. This was especially so in Spain, where they had recently expelled their Islamic conquerors and fears a counter-counter-attack from Morocco.
Great list! It’s always good when someone strives to correct the historical record.
Wonderful list. I’m curious, though, why it would be a bad thing to prevent people from cutting up human bodies. What must it take for one person to treat another as non-human? Our own age has the answer.
very nice.
SlickWilly: The Spanish Inquisition was set up in 1478, which is quite a while after the time period this list is referring to, from 476 AD to 1000 AD.
Great list. The Middle Ages were a beautiful time.
Interesting, to say the least. while this list describes the period of the EARLY middle ages, which is indeed known as the “Dark Ages” (476-1000 AD), the sad truth is that by the following century it became far worse, with the emergence of the Black Death (which seems to have killed over half of Europe’s population), and the terrible Inquisition which set Europe aflame with terror, torture, and many other inhumane practices overtaken by the Roman Catholic Church.
Plus, compared to today, even during the Early Middle Ages people lived in very inhumane conditions due to the poverty, and all these ‘reasons’ applied mostly to the higher classes who were the vast minority (except perhaps the weather
).
So ‘beautiful times’ they were not. For that, go to a Medieval Faire or something.
The Black Death was mid-14th century. (In some regions a third of Europeans died. And so did Chinese, Indians, and Arabs, since the plague spread to all regions.) One reason why the Modern Ages were so dark, imho, is that Europe thereafter had a death fixation that ran from the Danse Macabre of the post-plague years to the death camps of the 1940s.
There was no established Inquisition during the Middle Ages. There were inquisitorial tribunals established ad hoc for special circumstances; but vast regions of Europe (N. France, England, n. Empire, Scandinavia, Poland, etc.) never saw a tribunal called. Further, the legal process known as inquisitio was from the Late Roman Republic as an alternative to accusatio. Without inquisitio, victims of crimes would have to proceed as for a tort: bring charges, compel witnesses, etc. The inquisitio established the office of "the police who gather evidence and the prosecutors who try the accused." It underlies Continental law and in the Anglo-American tradition underlies the coroner's inquest, the grand jury, and the US special prosecutor.
pretty cool
Jamie:
Great list, but I think what’s kind of missed here is that the term “Dark Ages” has never been all that precise (in regards to what time frame, exactly, is encompassed within the term) and many–perhaps most–scholars have whittled it down to basically mean the period from roughly the late 5th century AD to only about the late 7th century or so. In essence, from the fall of Rome until the rise of Charlemagne. That two to three hundred year period is the actual “Dark Ages,” and then most of the items you cite occur after that.
Indeed, yes, Romanesque architecture, then Gothic, rise after this period, as does slowly-spreading learning (and literacy).
But the Dark Ages–the REAL Dark Ages, until Charlemagne—*were* truly dark. Barbarism, illiteracy, few if any examples of central authority, no permanent buildings being constructed, etc. So let’s not say there was never a Dark Age. It just wasn’t as LONG as people think.
Great list! Too bad the Inquisition ruined things for the next few hundred years!
“The Middle Ages is an unfortunate term. It was not invented until the age was long past. The dwellers in the Middle Ages would not have recognized it. They did not know that they were living in the middle; they thought, quite rightly, that they were time’s latest achievement.”—Morris Bishop
Dark ages = Heinous torture
So it’s them we have to thank for algebra…..
Nope…I think that belongs in the “dark” category. Algebra is not a happy thing at all.
It is not only Algebra, but most of your sciences, and modern day medicine too but the author to ignore these facts.
Jamie, every bit of this material will be added to my lecture notes on Medieval Music, since I spend a great deal of time on Medieval history to set the stage for Medieval Music. Thanks, again!
I remember this joke from grade school and thought I would share it. Probably much to the chagrin of 99.9% of the Listversers:
Why were the early middle ages of history called the dark ages?
Because there were so many knights!
Seriously though, this is a really great list. I found #6 particularly fascinating given what’s going on today.
Wow, you learn something new everyday.
Thanks j for surfacing something many of us bible-oriented protestants know, but get tired of repeating – that Enlightenment historians, and modern historians who perpetuate the myth that xianity hindered science and led to the ‘dark’ ages is really just spin, and not real history.
For more on this, or perhaps a little of the opposite spin, I recommend Rodney Stark‘s books, such as
For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery
The Victory of Reason: How Ch
One True God: Historical Consequences of Monotheism
BTW, that second book above is: The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success
Blogball You beat me to the punchline. I was going to tell that joke. It come to mind as soon as I saw the list.
I LOVE algebra. Could do it all day. Math.Game On!
Great list Jamie… very informative and easy to read!
Must say though I don’t agree with Algebra. Not to toot my own horn but I am pretty smart. I passed Grade 11 Algebra with a 54% and I literally kissed Mrs. Markham for that grade!
looks like the late 20th and early 21st centuries are shaping up to be the “Second” Dark Ages.
Poor leadership (around much of the world, see US, China, Middle East), war, poverty, rise of uncurable disease, bad economy.
algebra= dark ages were not dark???
i beg to differ!!! evil, evil sin and cos and tan and slope and ax+by=c… die algebra………… die.
yes, some things were good.
But com’on! they’re still the dark ages. Compare the pros and cons with other times.
People didn’t die of starving, they died of fatigue, illness and pillage. All the power was in warriors -knights is just an euphemism- and religion. The rest were just servants to them.
The bourgeois class had a better treatment but they were really few and had to deffend themeselves against the injustice that sorrounded them. Their laws were mostly “forced” to mantain their business up.
So I don’t think the law became fair to everyone. It was similar to Roman or Greek one, and so far to the Egyptian.
And most of this items come from the islamic culture, and the dark ages must not be refered to them.
Is like to say: “Vietman war wasn’t so bad. We got to the moon on that period”. Of course, but weren’t the vietnamese who did it.
While Europe was rotted, Islam, Aztecs, Chinese, etc. were in a golden age. And Islam was close to us, so we got profit on it. And in that terms Byzantine was closer to the roman period than the dark ages.
So I don't think the law became fair to everyone.
Unlike today? Yet we have records of manorial courts of peasants bringing suit against the lord – and winning. There is even a case of the serfs going on strike.
Except for the steward – who was appointed by the lord from among the more important peasants (called virgaters in England) – the other offices on the manor were elected by the manse-holders. (One household = one vote.) This included the beadle, the reeve, the wardens of autumn, the alewives, the jurymen, and so on. The laws of the manor were recorded in the Weistümer (the "by-laws" in England), which were written on rolls of pages pasted together. During a trial, the jurymen would consult these laws, which recorded who owed what duties for which manses.
The situation in the House of Submission was different. A madrassa was not a university; and no number of ijaza would ever add up to a master's degree. The ideas of degrees of achievement, standard curricula, quodlibet, etc. did not exist. And "foreign studies" (or "Greek studies") as the Arabs always called it were never taught officially in madrassa. Those faylasuf who embraced Greek learning were frequently persecuted, except where a sympathetic caliph or emir intervened. (Al-Kindi was publicly flogged, for example. And the works of ibn Rushd and ibn Sinna circulated in more copies and to greater acclaim in Christendom than in the House of Submission itself.
The golden age of the Aztecs lay in the future. Their ancestors did not even arrive in the Valley of Mexico until the 12th cent. And it took a while after that to terrorize the surrounding region and rip the living hearts our of their POWs.
All those Englightenment bastards taking the shine off
whats up with that?
Of coarse, we now know that the the external facades of the Cathedrals were originally painted in gawdy colors, very much akin to what we today might refer to as “neon” or “day-glo”
As the internal light of God shone through the stained glass, The outsides were meant to glare that light into the devils, so that they wouldn’t dare set hoof across the threshold.
I would like to give a “shout out” to my man, Beauvais!
Beauvais, you rock! Ho!
Some say your Gothic, I know, its allrite.
I still think your awesome.
I think number 5 is a PERFECT example of why the Dark Ages were dark. Algebra is evil.
it was called the dark ages because electricity had not been harnessed yet…right?
yet an another intersesting. you are on a roll my friend
Vera Lynn: I hate Algebra. in fact i just took my algebra final…nailed it
A very good and informativ list. : D
How is algebra a good thing?! D:
How is algebra a good thing?! D:
Scar – well, for one thing, it allows us to prove that 0.999(recurring) equals 1
Here we go :
Let x = 0.999(recurring)
Thus :
=> 10x = 9.999(recurring)
So :
=> 10x – x = 9x
=> 9.999(recurring) – 0.999(recurring) = 9
So :
If 9x = 9
Then
x = 1
Or rather, Crimanons GF:
First very spiffy list! This is what I got my BA in.
Minor point: In #6 “an agreed upon canon of the Bible” considering that in the 700′s Abbess Hild hosted a synod (a church wide meeting to determine religious doctrine) at Whitby Abby, England. They were trying to agree on the date of Easter, they failed which split the Irish monks from the main church.
Comment 25 JB: In the early Middle Ages women could get a divorce if their husband beat them, and keep their children. They could own property. Nuns held the same offices and had the same power as monks. Abbess Hild ran a convent with both men and women and the only people she had to look to were the King and the bishops.
Yes, the ruling classes had all the power and wealth, but they also had to protect everyone else. The peasants could leave their land if they were unhappy. Later in the Middle Ages they were serfs tied to the land, if they left they were hunted down and possibly killed.
Most knowledge is not gained in brilliant flashes of light and long leaps of intuition. Understanding is built on the backs and brains of those before you. Without the beginning of the early middle ages the rest (i.e. the computer age) could not have happened. You have to invent the wheel before you can invent the waterwheel to mill your grain and pound iron. Cultures grow by taking the knowledge of their neighbors and applying it in new and interesting ways. So of course the Europeans swiped ideas from Islam and the Chinese. In some cases they then took off and ran with it in ways that effect the entire world (easy examples gunpowder and printing).
And last in a culture that has enough excess food to support cities and the creation of entire classes of people that sat around thinking all day, could the masses really have been that fatigued? If they produced so much and ate pretty well why would they have a problem sleeping?
____ Her words Not mine. I’ll keep her informed.
algebra is better than having a Scar
i always thought religious unity was an oxymoron.
if pro is the opposite of con and pro means good and con means bad then what about progress and congress
kiwiboi: Listverse is one of my favorite sites on the web. Please don’t destroy that be bringing math into the picture D :
as much as i hate algebra i can say in no way thta it is useless…Duh!!
that not thta.. my apologies
MPW – nope. They are not opposites here.
The pro- prefix here means “forward” (Latin).
The con- prefix here means “with/together” (Latin again)
WarningDontReadThis – actually, I don’t disagree with you
what about when people discuss the good and bad aspects of something
for example my family is taking a trip to the mountains
pro- we will have fun and spend quality time together
con- it might be freezing
good and bad are opposites so why cant pro and con be opposite if they mean the same thing?
some words have multiple meanings
how would the latin version of pro have anything to do with the pro in professional or protagonist?
Al-Khwārizmī just failed me my Junior cert!
But seriously, where did algebra come from, as in, why create maths with X’s and Y’s?
MPW – reasonable question. Remember that there can be more than one definition/usage for a prefix or suffix.
But the examples you gave earlier (congress/progress) are not opposites despite their prefixes.
I cannot answer each case you could raise. Aside from time/effort, I am no expert on this.
If you are really interested (and it is a very interesting topic, IMHO), try this site (I have started you on the derivation of “professional”) :
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=profession
it was supposed to be a joke but since you’re not from the states its understandable
Lewis – wiki has a good article on algebra. But, basically, we need to be able to express general rules and concepts; and to apply them. The use of a standardised symbolic framework allows this.
MPW – what part of it was a joke? The progress/congress thing?
If so, it’s because you are from the states I thought you were not joking
Great list. It’s funny that you refer to it as “Fantastic Weather” for #3. I thought a slight warming meant the end of the world that justified destroying economies to stop it. Obviously they were driving around in gas guzzling carts and not offsetting their environmental impact by buying carbon credits. Truly the dark ages.
you see kiwiboi in the USA Congress is the most powerful branch of government and they never seem to get anything done
and since progress means to be productive and to solve problems and such
do you see where im headed with this?:)
congress and progress- total opposites.
end.
“do you ever notice how men always leave the toilet seat up(silence) that’s the joke”
“you suck Mcbain”
you see kiwiboi in the USA Congress is the most powerful branch of government and they never seem to get anything done
MPW – gee thanks. I’d never heard of this “congress” thingy, not being from the states ‘n all.
okily dokily
“con” is also the slang for “contra-” meaning “against” or “opposite”
IE. contraband, contradict, contrast
“pros and cons” is short for “proponents and contradictions”
“con-” as a prefix on its own means “together”
DIOG WROTE: Of coarse, we now know that the the external facades of the Cathedrals were originally painted in gawdy colors, very much akin to what we today might refer to as “neon” or “day-glo” as the internal light of God shone through the stained glass, The outsides were meant to glare that light into the devils, so that they wouldn’t dare set hoof across the threshold.
Are you kidding? Perhaps you could document such a silly thing.
“pros and cons” is short for “proponents and contradictions”
copperdragon – actually, it’s a shortened, colloquial form of the Latin pro et contra (for and against).
dgsinclair: perhaps he is confusing it with this: http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-color-classical-reproductions/
I nominate Kiwiboi, comment number 49, for most wryly sarcastic comment of the week. MPW gets honorable mention in the category of buffoonery for comment number 48.
6 is strange considering that parts of Europe were held by the muslim Empire (Spain, Sicily).
SlickWilly (#55) haha
Crimanon (#33): Thanks for that comment – it clears up some of the further myths that people have. It is so hard to get people to realize that the dark ages (and a lot of the middle ages) were not a time of millions of peasants dying and a few wealthy guys at the top. So – thanks for dispelling part of that myth!
“In a sense you might consider this period as the calm before the storm, as it was merely a hundred years later that the first Crusade would be called to take Jerusalem back from the Muslims – an event which ended the flow of knowledge between groups.”
Sorry buts thats just wrong. How did it end the flow?
200 years of Christian presence in Israel causes an intensive flow of knowledge and goods (e.g. spices) it even changed the languages of both sides a bit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiral).
To say that Europe has a united church during the middle ages is brave since there have been several wars and several occasions where the Pope(s) had to struggle withe the German Kaiser (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investiture_Controversy)
Kiwiboi:Thanks, I really should look these things up rather than make other people do it…:p
Oh and here’s another ‘proof’ with false logic like Kiwiboi’s:
“Proof” that 1 + 1 = 1
a = 1
b = 1
a = b
a2 = b2
a2 – b2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1