There are many sources of energy that are renewable and considered to be environmentally friendly and harness natural processes. These sources of energy provide an alternate ‘cleaner’ source of energy, helping to negate the effects of certain forms of pollution. All of these power generation techniques can be described as renewable since they are not depleting any resource to create the energy. While there are many large-scale renewable energy projects and production, renewable technologies are also suited to small off-grid applications, sometimes in rural and remote areas, where energy is often crucial in human development.
Tidal energy can be generated in two ways, tidal stream generators or by barrage generation. The power created though tidal generators is generally more environmentally friendly and causes less impact on established ecosystems. Similar to a wind turbine, many tidal stream generators rotate underwater and is driven by the swiftly moving dense water. Although not yet widely used, tidal power has potential for future electricity generation. Tides are more predictable than wind energy and solar power. Historically, tide mills have been used, both in Europe and on the Atlantic coast of the USA. The earliest occurrences date from the Middle Ages, or even from Roman times. Tidal power is the only form of energy which derives directly from the relative motions of the Earth–Moon system, and to a lesser extent from the Earth–Sun system. The tidal forces produced by the Moon and Sun, in combination with Earth’s rotation, are responsible for the generation of the tides. British company Lunar Energy announced that they would be building the world’s first tidal energy farm off the coast of Pembrokshire in Wales. It will be the world’s first deep-sea tidal-energy farm and will provide electricity for 5,000 homes. Eight underwater turbines, each 25 metres long and 15 metres high, are to be installed on the sea bottom off St David’s peninsula. Construction is due to start in the summer of 2008 and the proposed tidal energy turbines, described as “a wind farm under the sea”, should be operational by 2010.
Wave power is the transport of energy by ocean surface waves, and the capture of that energy to do useful work — for example for electricity generation, water desalination, or the pumping of water (into reservoirs). Wave energy can be difficult to harness due to the unpredictability of the ocean and wave direction. Wave farms have been created and are in use in Europe, using floating Pelamis Wave Energy converters. Most wave power systems include the use of a floating buoyed device and generate energy through a snaking motion, or by mechanical movement from the waves peaks and troughs. Though often co-mingled, wave power is distinct from the diurnal flux of tidal power and the steady gyre of ocean currents. Wave power generation is not currently a widely employed commercial technology although there have been attempts at using it since at least 1890. The world’s first commercial wave farm is based in Portugal, at the Aguçadora Wave Park, which consists of three 750 kilowatt Pelamis devices. In the United States, the Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative is funding the building of a commercial wave-power park at Reedsport, Oregon. The project will utilize the PowerBuoy technology Ocean Power Technologies which consists of modular, ocean-going buoys. The rising and falling of the waves moves the buoy-like structure creating mechanical energy which is converted into electricity and transmitted to shore over a submerged transmission line. A 40 kW buoy has a diameter of 12 feet (4 m) and is 52 feet (16 m) long, with approximately 13 feet of the unit rising above the ocean surface. Using the three-point mooring system, they are designed to be installed one to five miles (8 km) offshore in water 100 to 200 feet (60 m) deep.
Photovoltaic (PV) Solar power is harnessing the suns energy to produce electricity. One of the fastest growing energy sources, new technologies are developing at a rapid pace. Solar cells are becoming more efficient, transportable and even flexible, allowing for easy installation. PV has mainly been used to power small and medium-sized applications, from the calculator powered by a single solar cell to off-grid homes powered by a photovoltaic array. The 1973 oil crisis stimulated a rapid rise in the production of PV during the 1970s and early 1980s. Steadily falling oil prices during the early 1980s, however, led to a reduction in funding for photovoltaic R&D and a discontinuation of the tax credits associated with the Energy Tax Act of 1978. These factors moderated growth to approximately 15% per year from 1984 through 1996. Since the mid-1990s, leadership in the PV sector has shifted from the US to Japan and Germany. Between 1992 and 1994 Japan increased R&D funding, established net metering guidelines, and introduced a subsidy program to encourage the installation of residential PV systems. Solar installations in recent years have also largely begun to expand into residential areas, with governments offering incentive programs to make “green” energy a more economically viable option. In Canada the government offers the RESOP (Renewable Energy Standard Offer Program).
Wind power is the conversion of wind energy by wind turbines into a useful form, such as electricity or mechanical energy. Large-scale wind farms are typically connected to the local power transmission network with small turbines used to provide electricity to isolated areas. Residential units are entering production and are are capable of powering large appliances to entire houses depending on the size. Wind farms installed on agricultural land or grazing areas, have one of the lowest environmental impacts of all energy sources. Although wind produces only about 1.5% of worldwide electricity use, it is growing rapidly, having doubled in the three years between 2005 and 2008. In several countries it has achieved relatively high levels of penetration, accounting for approximately 19% of electricity production in Denmark, 11% in Spain and Portugal, and 7% in Germany and the Republic of Ireland in 2008. Wind energy has historically been used directly to propel sailing ships or converted into mechanical energy for pumping water or grinding grain, but the principal application of wind power today is the generation of electricity. As of 2008, Europe leads the world in development of offshore wind power, due to strong wind resources and shallow water in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, and limitations on suitable locations on land due to dense populations and existing developments. Denmark installed the first offshore wind farms, and for years was the world leader in offshore wind power until the United Kingdom gained the lead in October, 2008. Other large markets for wind power, including the United States and China focused first on developing their on-land wind resources where construction costs are lower (such as in the Great Plains of the U.S., and the similarly wind-swept steppes of Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia in China), but population centers along coastlines in many parts of the world are close to offshore wind resources, which would reduce transmission costs.
Hydroelectricity is electricity generated by hydropower, i.e., the production of power through use of the gravitational force of falling or flowing water. It is the most widely used form of renewable energy. Once a hydroelectric complex is constructed, the project produces no direct waste. Small scale hydro or micro-hydro power has been an increasingly popular alternative energy source, especially in remote areas where other power sources are not viable. Small scale hydro power systems can be installed in small rivers or streams with little or no discernible environmental effect or disruption to fish migration. Most small scale hydro power systems make no use of a dam or major water diversion, but rather use water wheels to generate energy. This was approximately 19% of the world’s electricity (up from 16% in 2003), and accounted for over 63% of electricity from renewable sources. While many hydroelectric projects supply public electricity networks, some are created to serve specific industrial enterprises. Dedicated hydroelectric projects are often built to provide the substantial amounts of electricity needed for aluminium electrolytic plants, for example. In the Scottish Highlands there are examples at Kinlochleven and Lochaber, constructed during the early years of the 20th century. The Grand Coulee Dam, long the world’s largest, switched to support Alcoa aluminum in Bellingham, Washington for America’s World War II airplanes before it was allowed to provide irrigation and power to citizens (in addition to aluminum power) after the war. In Suriname, the Brokopondo Reservoir was constructed to provide electricity for the Alcoa aluminium industry. New Zealand’s Manapouri Power Station was constructed to supply electricity to the aluminium smelter at Tiwai Point.
This natural energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity at less than 1% of the cost. It does not behave exactly like electricity, however, which has contributed to the scientific community’s misunderstanding of it. The Methernitha Community in Switzerland currently has 5 or 6 working models of fuelless, self-running devices that tap this energy. Nikola Tesla’s magnifying transmitter, T. Henry Moray’s radiant energy device, Edwin Gray’s EMA motor, and Paul Baumann’s Testatika machine all run on radiant energy. This natural energy form can be gathered directly from the environment or extracted from ordinary electricity by the method called fractionation. One of the earliest wireless telephones to be based on radiant energy was invented by Nikola Tesla. The device used transmitters and receivers whose resonances were tuned to the same frequency, allowing communication between them. In 1916, he recounted an experiment he had done in 1896. He recalled that “Whenever I received the effects of a transmitter, one of the simplest ways [to detect the wireless transmissions] was to apply a magnetic field to currents generated in a conductor, and when I did so, the low frequency gave audible notes.”
Geothermal energy is a very powerful and efficient way to extract a renewable energy from the earth through natural processes. This can be performed on a small scale to provide heat for a residential unit (a geothermal heat pump), or on a very large scale for energy production through a geothermal power plant. It has been used for space heating and bathing since ancient roman times, but is now better known for generating electricity. Geothermal power is cost effective, reliable, and environmentally friendly, but has previously been geographically limited to areas near tectonic plate boundaries. Recent technological advances have dramatically expanded the range and size of viable resources, especially for direct applications such as home heating. The largest group of geothermal power plants in the world is located at The Geysers, a geothermal field in California, United States. As of 2004, five countries (El Salvador, Kenya, the Philippines, Iceland, and Costa Rica) generate more than 15% of their electricity from geothermal sources. Geothermal power requires no fuel, and is therefore immune to fluctuations in fuel cost, but capital costs tend to be high. Drilling accounts for most of the costs of electrical plants, and exploration of deep resources entails very high financial risks. Geothermal power offers a degree of scalability: a large geothermal plant can power entire cities while smaller power plants can supply rural villages or heat individual homes. Geothermal electricity is generated in 24 countries around the world and a number of potential sites are being developed or evaluated.
Biomass, as a renewable energy source, refers to living and recently dead biological material that can be used as fuel or for industrial production. In this context, biomass refers to plant matter grown to generate electricity or produce for example trash such as dead trees and branches, yard clippings and wood chips biofuel, and it also includes plant or animal matter used for production of fibers, chemicals or heat. Biomass may also include biodegradable wastes that can be burnt as fuel. Industrial biomass can be grown from numerous types of plants, including miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, poplar, willow, sorghum, sugarcane, and a variety of tree species, ranging from eucalyptus to oil palm (palm oil). The particular plant used is usually not important to the end products, but it does affect the processing of the raw material. Production of biomass is a growing industry as interest in sustainable fuel sources is growing. The existing commercial biomass power generating industry in the United States produces about 0.5 percent of the U.S. electricity supply. Currently, the New Hope Power Partnership is the largest biomass power plant in North America. The facility reduces dependence on oil by more than one million barrels per year, and by recycling sugar cane and wood waste, preserves landfill space in urban communities in Florida.
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is a fossil fuel substitute for gasoline, diesel, or propane fuel. Although its combustion does produce greenhouse gases, it is a more environmentally clean alternative to those fuels, and it is much safer than other fuels in the event of a spill (natural gas is lighter than air, and disperses quickly when released). CNG is used in traditional gasoline internal combustion engine cars that have been converted into bi-fuel vehicles (gasoline/CNG). Natural gas vehicles are increasingly used in Europe and South America due to rising gasoline prices. In response to high fuel prices and environmental concerns, CNG is starting to be used also in light-duty passenger vehicles and pickup trucks, medium-duty delivery trucks, transit and school buses, and trains. Italy currently has the largest number of CNG vehicles in Europe and is the 4th country in the world for number of CNG-powered vehicles in circulation. Canada is a large producer of natural gas, so it follows that CNG is used in Canada as an economical motor fuel. Canadian industry has developed CNG-fueled truck and bus engines, CNG-fueled transit buses, and light trucks and taxis. Both CNG and propane refueling stations are not difficult to find in major centers. During the 1970s and 1980s, CNG was commonly used in New Zealand in the wake of the oil crises, but fell into decline after petrol prices receded.
Nuclear power is any nuclear technology designed to extract usable energy from atomic nuclei via controlled nuclear reactions. The only method in use today is through nuclear fission, though other methods might one day include nuclear fusion and radioactive decay. All utility-scale reactors heat water to produce steam, which is then converted into mechanical work for the purpose of generating electricity or propulsion. In 2007, 14% of the world’s electricity came from nuclear power, with the U.S., France, and Japan together accounting for 56.5% of nuclear generated electricity. There are 439 nuclear power reactors in operation in the world, operating in 31 countries. According to the World Nuclear Association, globally during the 1980s one new nuclear reactor started up every 17 days on average, and by the year 2015 this rate could increase to one every 5 days. According to a 2007 story broadcast on 60 Minutes, nuclear power gives France the cleanest air of any industrialized country, and the cheapest electricity in all of Europe. France reprocesses its nuclear waste to reduce its mass and make more energy. Reprocessing can potentially recover up to 95% of the remaining uranium and plutonium in spent nuclear fuel, putting it into new mixed oxide fuel. This produces a reduction in long term radioactivity within the remaining waste, since this is largely short-lived fission products, and reduces its volume by over 90%. France is generally cited as the most successful reprocessor, but it presently only recycles 28% (by mass) of the yearly fuel use, 7% within France and another 21% in Russia.
Proponents of nuclear energy contend that nuclear power is a sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions and increases energy security by decreasing dependence on foreign oil. Proponents also emphasize that the risks of storing waste are small and can be further reduced by using the latest technology in newer reactors, and the operational safety record in the Western World is excellent when compared to the other major kinds of power plants. Critics believe that nuclear power is a potentially dangerous energy source, with decreasing proportion of nuclear energy in power production, and dispute whether the risks can be reduced through new technology. Proponents advance the notion that nuclear power produces virtually no air pollution, in contrast to the chief viable alternative of fossil fuel. Proponents also point out that nuclear power is the only viable course to achieve energy independence for most Western countries. Critics point to the issue of storing radioactive waste, the history of and continuing potential for radioactive contamination by accident or sabotage, the history of and continuing possibility of nuclear proliferation and the disadvantages of centralized electricity production.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.






























until this moment nobody has presented an alternative energy model different as those that has been showed, now I have a new complet innovation that markt the difference. for instance when all the arrays the limit of their capacities at any ways is mine sure, reliable, sustainable and attainable without interruption meanwhile the whole global grid system fall out, would you like to heard more about?
Conservatory guns on the list, g. I like to store up my farts all summer, keeps me warm in the winter.
yo
Nerds… Nice use of “Yo” My class did crack up reading these comments…
Amazing list
dun think CNG is renewable
This list was so enlighting that sucks that this country isn’t looking to replace our current energy sources with one this ways to help out the future if this planet
on #1: nuclear power can be either nuclear fission or nuclear fusion.
also the law of conservation of energy states that energy can be converted from one form to another, but does not state how they can be converted (that is, it does not say whether energy in a particular form can only be turned into certain other forms of energy e.g. in einstein’s day who would have thought light can be turned directly into electricity by photovoltaics, and nowadays there’s talk of thermoacoustics), so personally i believe it’s all about transformation of energy; all it takes is the need to put our most valuable source of power – human ingenuity – to work
Einstein received the Nobel prize mostly for work explaining the photoelectric effect, which is closely related to how photovoltaic panels operate.
Some of them aren’t really “Green”:
1- Biomass
2- CNG (I’m not sure)
3- Nuclear Power
These are of course renewable (or very long lasting) but they will ruin the global environment, so they’re not “Green”
Sweet list, number 5 got me thinking…
again on #1 i think nuclear fission does not need to be very dangerous or harmful since it has been around for decades and so should be very well understood – most if not all of the accidents involving nuclear fission were caused by human error. we need to develop safeguards against human error, tighter security measures around nuclear plants and nuclear waste storage facilities and safer ways to dispose of or better yet recycle the waste products
jfrater, Maybe this isnt the best place to put this, but I couldnt think of a better one off the top of my head or in the spur of the moment. I’ve been reading your fascinating site for several weeks now since discovering it, and it has provided me with hours upon hours of joyful diversion from my real work (thanks a lot!) But I do have one minor qualm! Okay, not so minor.. WHATS WITH THE DAMN POPUPS!!! I know you’re trying to pay the bills, and have no fuss with advertising whatsoever, but pop ups? Do you really need every penny so much that you are willing to make use of the internets single most annoying invention on your site!? I have a somewhat slow computer, thus whenever one of those godawful little things appears it actually freezes everything for a few moments so it can make its presence known! Its like an irritating, unlikeable, uninvited “friend” at an otherwise good party, entering loudly just to make sure everyone knows he’s there.. I never click on them, they are only disruptive, and I think the morons who advertise through them should all be lined up against a wall and shot with large blunt, flush pulping, bone shattering bullets, maybe even cannon rounds.. Please man, for the love of mercy!!! Cram a dozen more adwords in here, offer ***** links, sell trinkets, write an ebook, anything! Just cut the popups and tell those popup providers to shove their crappy little windows up where the sun don’t shine and plants dont grow! I am really curious if anyone, ever, anywhere in this world, at any time, actually clicks through on one of these stupid little things! Other then that, thank you for the wonderful site, and keep up the good work. I especially love the paranormal and mystery disappearance lists!
There're no popups for me. Try using Chrome and see if the problem persists.
@ Reaper himself: I think this article is quite good. It doesn’t say anywhere that they are “green”. I think it’s more looking in comparative perspective with current use of fossil fuels without explicitly mentioning this.
as i was writing my previous comments a thought came to my mind: what if we sent some satellites that would unfurl into long thin metal rods once in orbit and because the earth is one giant magnet its magnetic field would induce an electric current on the satellite (essentially one very big dynamo) which it would then beam to earth via microwaves
9. Ryan:
right i agree maybe not all of these are “green” but compared with what we’re doing now they’re cleaner
@ Joanne: You’re right, i think i should have my eyes check-up because i did read the title “10 Green Energy Sources”
a contradiction in the first sentence of #2:
“Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is a fossil fuel substitute for gasoline, diesel, or propane fuel.”
“fossil” means that this is, in fact, NOT in any way ‘renewable’.
same goes for Nuclear Power – fission is dependent of Uranium and Plutonium, both aren’t renewable either. (it will be at least decades to centuries to use fusion technology – if it can be done at all).
Apart from #1 and #2, which don’t belong to the list at all, it’s a good one… maybe another comment: instead of photovoltaic you should have mentioned solar thermal energy, which currently is MUCH more effective
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy
wtf.
This is officially the crappest list ever.
None of these energy sources are interesting and theyre nothing new.
putting Nuclear Power at n°1 is totally ridicolous. Not only nuclear power is NOT RENEWABLE AT ALL (we’ll run out of uranium well before oil) but it is also NOT environmental frieldy. Nucelar wastes can’t be eliminated in any way. They last THOUSANDS of years and they are potentially deadly to the highest levels.
Honestly, the only reason to use nuclear power plants it to make atomic bombs. Period.
All nuclear plants should be shut down for mankind’s sake.
hmm… bit of a boring list >.
great effort dude, but wont agree with CNG and Nuclear..
what a boring list!!! can’t believe i stayed up for 3 hours wating for a new list, only to read this dribble – YAWNSVILLE!!!
your a weird fag.com
LOL jajdude farts are not energy, just odious gases!!!
what you talkin’ bout will? farts, if properly collected, can be used to cook eggs.
rushfan:
as i was reading down this list (i do not peek ahead), i was thinking (1) what an excellent job you have done – well written and well ordered and (2) people might comment on the order but no real controversy today.
imagine my shock when i reached number 2!
CNG! on a renewable list!
i was so glad you used an excellent definition: “not depleting any resource to create the energy” in the opening statement – and then the list is fouled by the pollution of CNG.
The surprise of CNG was nothing compaired to seeing NP as number 1. not only is NP an environmentally crappy process, but the use of uranium – even with reprocessing – is, definitially, non-renewable.
i suppose that the comments will be interesting, after all…
if these two items were witten as comments, i would label them as troll bait. as they were written by the author, i don’t know what to say…
jajdude:
you are spot-on, of course:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2274995/Cow-farts-collected-in-plastic-tank-for-global-warming-study.html
I saw a face in the top of pic for #3.
Yeah, I thought CNG wasn’t renewable. Hmm, doth I sense a debate?
Any wind turbine put in the ocean will disturb the ocean environment and fish population. The land windmill farms need to be far away from any population as they cause noise pollution and are very dangerous during the winter or during high winds. Check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u14tBwO5QVQ
Suskis. Learn something about nuclear fission before ranting about it. There are nuclear plants in operation that cannot provide weapon grade waste. Why build those if the only reason to build them by your reasoning is to make bombs? Guess they must build them for a lark eh? Maybe they like the look of them.
The waste is also safer than people think. Plus there isn’t a huge amount of it either. The UK nuclear plants have produced enough waste to “fill the Albert Hall” – once – since production began. If we’re going to be arsey about it. Wind turbines aren’t environmentally friendly either. I’ve been behind lorries carrying a single blade in sections for one of those things. Those lorries don’t burn pixie dust for fuel!
However, fission isn’t renewable. Granted. But what is when you *really* think about it?
Number 5 is pretty meaningless. You note there’s no explanation of how it actually works. That’s because it’s just cut and past from various religious cult and conspiracy theory websites. Tesla was a genius but for various resons he has been picked up by fringe groups as a visionary (in some cases angel. The Testatika is just one of many claimed perpetual motion machines.
Radiant energy, in it’s usual meaning, is electromagnetic radiation. That’s what solar energy is utilizing. There are other parts of the spectrum that could potentially be used, but the energy aroung the visible/near infrared is the most plentiful so that is what is used.
The problem with implementing some of these alternative energy sources is that (and heres the ironic part) the enviromentalists come out of the woodwork and start raving against it. There was a plan to put wind turbines in a large plot in Staten Island, NY. Well, apparently a certain species of mosquito is drawn to the spinning fans for whatever crazy reason. Here comes PETA wailing…”You’re going to wipe out the mosquito population!” So the plan was scrapped.
This list was pretty generic. Sorry for saying that but I’ve been getting this crap all forced onto my head ever since I started school at the age of six. It’s getting so annoying that all I want to do is drive a hummer.
I got it. There are loads of renewable energy sources that we’re not taking advantage of. Stop TALKING about it and start DOING something. It’s beggining to look like our government is trying to make up for not using renewable energy sources by brainwashing every single future citizen for the advantages they bring. The fact that the energy sources we are currently using will end and the constant neglect of renewable energy R&D leads me to believe we’ll have a hell of a future.
But hell, at least we know the sun is an eternal source of power. Now if only that nuclear winter provoked by the war for the last galons of oil would end…
…I think i just sounded like a senile old man. Sorry about that.
15 Suskis: Thats the funniest rant I’ve seen in a while. You’re AGAINST nuclear power because it’s not eco-fiendly, yet you advocate a healthy dose of atomic bombs
for breakfast. Good times!
31. damien_karras – May 2nd, 2009 at 6:58 am
I think you need to read it again, I am sure you dont understand it properly
klaas- sorry.. what am I missing from Suskis pro-con argument for using nuclear power?
damien_karras – May 2nd, 2009 at 7:14 am . Suskis didn’t say that nuclear weapons were a good thing.
Really? Here’s the quote from that post: “Honestly, the only reason to use nuclear power plants it to make atomic bombs. Period.”
Saying that something has a purpose doesn’t mean that you agree with that purpose. I could say ‘the only reason to make thumbscrews is to torture people’ that doesn’t mean I’m in favour of them!
Holy crap… out come the semantics on a Saturday morning.
Can’t deal witout my coffee
8. Stephan – you need to download Ad Block Plus. Blocks almost all advertising on websites. Best thing since canned beer. I’ve never seen any ad, pop-up or otherwise on this website.
Great article rushfan; However I agree with some of the other comments that CNG should not be on this list. Your opening paragraph sates “…can be described as renewable since they are not depleting any resource to create the energy.” and CNG does not fit this description. As for the other criticisms and problems mentioned so far, all of those things can be worked out through proper R&D. For instance, nuclear fission reactors have received a bad rap since the 60′s. Yes, the 60′s, even before 3Mile and Chernobyl. Keep in mind this is coming from a “lefty”, but and educated and informed one. Issues with nuclear waste can be resolved just as issues of harm to the marine environment can be mitigated in the case of tidal power. C,mon people, let’s be a bit more optimistic about our children’s future. We CAN solve the problems associated with new technologies and this should be seen as a moral imperative for us to do so. If anyone is old enough to remember how impossible it seemed to be able to walk on the moon or land a man made object on another planet then you may also begin to see that these problems present even less of a technical challenge. Let’s hear more arguments about which renewable energy plan goes where based on community needs and resources.
On this issue, it’s not just remote communities that can benefit. Such as the case of solar servers in Africa (http://www.solarserver.de/solarmagazin/anlage_0207_e.html)
For instance, I live in the city but that doesn’t mean we have to get our energy from the grid. We can have solar in the form of PV’s and CSP’s. Many large cities are built around major rivers since this was a major form of transportation when they first developed. There are many technical problems associated with tidal power as well as issues of harm to the environment but those problems can and must be solved. (http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18567/)
(http://www.riverkeeper.org/campaign.php/hudson_fisheries/the_facts/178-hudson-river-power-plant-fish-)
I’m reading “some” intelligent responses to this article, but I’d love to hear more from those engineers, business people and scientists that have more “hands-on” knowledge of the issues.
jajdude: best post ever!
Well done rushfan! I was aware of a few of these but got a shock when I reached the last 2. hmmmph. Not sure we want to rely on such as those for renewable energy but consider what we do now…not as bad.
We also need to look into some type of renewable fuel as well. Gas needs to go. (except for jajdude’s …. )
CNG is not renewable.
I saw the face in the pic for #3, too. Creepy.
Awesome list! Its a wonder why this technology is not being employed yet to mass scale. I would much prefer them to fossil fuels.
Though, I am wondering, CNG isn’t renewable, and isn’t nuclear non-renewable as well? Plus they’re not green, but that’s a side point since this list is about renewable sources strictly.
the last three, except nuclear fusion, aren’t really Renewable sources because they need an exhaustable raw material. In any case I agree all of them are plausible alternatives to fossil fuels.
In anycase we must find a way to degradate the nuclear waste. And some countries -like mine- shouldn’t be allowed to produce nuclear power, at least till they trust them to responsable people able to see beyond money.
energy is control, i honestly in my heart of hearts believe we already have the tech available, but the power that be is witholding and who can blame them really, natural resources account for many if not most of the wars in history, have a think about why countries declare war its scary,
Great list – although not too certain about the waste created by Nuclear – which im my book knocks it off the top spot by miles.
Ok, I wish there were more scientists who could debate with Joanne’s claim of a space generator. I’ve seen one of these in operation – at the beginning of Highlander 2!
Seriously though. Biomass is a great opportunity that seems to have been swept under the carpet of global ecconomics. A lot of people understand that a fire must be intentionally lit under a rubbish dump (tip) to degrade the materials piled on top of it. The gases from this process are then simply vented into the air, and very few places actually harness that constant energy. It’s a waste
. With a world sinking under the weight of it’s own garbage (some of which is simply pumped into the oceans), I predict that Man will not stay ignorant and apathetic for much longer.
The space generator idea using the earths magnetic field has been seriously proposed. But at the moment the costs and technical problems would be enormous. Maybe later this century?
Another idea that’s been suggested is solar collectors in space. Both would be great in theory. What would really be needed to achieve such large scale high tech options would be a combined effort from all the worlds industrial nations. I’m not holding my breath for that!
Actually, the title suggests ‘renewable energy’, which means energy sources that will not deplete with the correct usage.
Nuclear power, when talking about nuclear fission reaction, however is not renewable (though it is green and does not produce any greenhouse gases) because it requires uranium, which is the nuclear fuel, and can run out… However, this source of energy is considered sustainable because there is an abundance of uranium and it takes very little uranium to produce a lot of energy.
When talking about nuclear fusion as a source of energy (though it is yet impossible, considering the extreme conditions needed for it to happen in and how uneconomically viable it is), however, it is renewable because the fuel needed for nuclear fusion reaction to take place is hydrogen, which can never deplete (hydrogen can be harvested from water). This source of nuclear power is both renewable AND environmentally friendly!
kutte
Pretty good list Rushfan – I wouldn’t have included Nuclear Energy, not because it isn’t safe, or because of the waste storage problems, just because as yet this is not renewable. Maybe if we figure out fusion it will be.
In Ontario we actually call electricity Hydro. Most of our power (Niagra Falls/Gorge) is generated this way. Our newest hydro facility to date, in Quebec – The James Bay Project – produces 8 times the hydro that the Hoover Dam does and twice that of all our nuclear reactors combined. We’re selling it cut-rate to the USA (Damn that free trade.
) This form of energy is not environmentally benign, it’s just better than most.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Bay_Project
Bio-fuel concerns me and it should most people. Not if it is confined to garbage, that is a win-win situation, but when applied to corn, rice, and other staples the consequences are far-reaching. The price of rice has increased by more than double in the last two years – makes it a little tougher for me, my food budget is stretched, but for those living in marginal areas the result is catastrophic. People starve to death. Western folks seeing the possibilities, bid on rice/corn/wheat futures – artificially driving up the price. They lose only money, others lose far more.
All these are good and well… but they each have some pretty significant drawbacks. It’d have been nice to have those included so that the number 1 alternative energy wasn’t one that isn’t going to be viable without some major unforeseen advancements.
HEMP FOR FUEL!
HEMP WILL SAVE US ALL!
http://www.jackherer.com/
CNG is a fossil fuel- nice try AND don’t forget nuke power is nonrenewable- since uranium and plutonium are finite resources, AND it is the power source that keeps on giving (headaches) since the waste is radioactive for hall a million YEARS!
Good list! I learned a lot. I am not so sure about #s 1 and 2, but they were still fairly educational. I don’t really get #5, though.
Natural Gas is easily derived from just about any landfill out there. I can’t tell you if we really get enough to support an economy, but we can get significant quantities.
Nuclear’s really quite safe and efficient. Sure, the output’s radioactive, but when the top nuclear scientists are willing to demonstrate how dangerous it is by EATING IT, and we have the most secure nuclear dump imaginable being constructed, it’s barely a problem. Just be careful when transporting it.
Martin#13 is correct–Fossils and /or uranium/plutonium are in no way “renewable”
Nice list Rushfan. I especially like the different methods of harnessing the oceans awesome power. As far as NP, I remember in the 60′s, they were bringing up the same problems as today. Safety, finite resources, and inability to insure safe storage for the next million years. I do not see where they have solved any of these problems.
to anyone who complained about the list being ‘boring’: not every single list on here will be of interest to every single person! for me, personally, I haven’t had this information shoved down my throat during school or ever, I knew nothing about renewable energy sources!
but now I do…;)
Nuclear Power is safe and as green as any method on this list. Using breeder reactors we can power the earth for the rest of human civilization. The only reason this power method is not used more is because of uneducated and fearful people like the many who have posted on this list. A coal power plant puts out more radioactivity than a nuclear power plant. Nuclear fuel can be reprocessed into new fuel. What nuclear waste is left can be stored safely for thousands of years using current technology. Nuclear power is over-regulated and politically unpopular, otherwise we’d have cheap, safe and clean power for the entire western world.
Also, as one poster requested, if we shutdown all nuclear power plants there would be brownouts and blackouts, the only viable alternative would be immediate construction of coal plants. You’d also lose all your aircraft carriers and submarines (USA). Enjoy.
If anyone thinks nuclear waste can be stored safely,he or she is living in a dream world where reality doesn’t exist.