This is actually our third list of science facts, but here we have focussed especially on lesser-known trivia. Hopefully you will find at least a handful of items here that are completely new to you. Be sure to add your own fascinating facts to the comments. If you wish to read the previous lists of facts, they are: Top 20 Amazing Science Facts, and Another 15 Amazing Science Facts.
1. An iceberg contains significantly more total heat energy than a burning match. The reason is the sheer size of the iceberg. [Source]
2. Caves breathe. They inhale and exhale great quantities of air when the barometric pressure on the surface changes, and air rushes in or out seeking equilibrium. [Source]
3. While the chances of being struck by a meteor are extremely slim, there have been a number of documented cases: On June 21, 1994, Jose Martin of Spain was driving with his wife near Madrid when a 3-pound (1.4-kilogram) meteor crashed through his windshield, bent the steering wheel and ended up in the back seat. Martin suffered a broken finger while his wife was uninjured. [Source]
4. When a new queen bee emerges in a hive, she “pipes” (repeatedly sings a G# or A note) to incite her worker bees to fight for her if another queen in the hive needs killing. You can listen to the piping in the youtube clip above. All bees pipe the same note – but Africanized bees pipe more frequently and louder. You can hear another clearer example here. The difference in pitch between the video clip and the sound file is cause by compression and quality of recording devices.
5. There is a current scientific hypothesis that the sun has a companion which is currently about 1-1.5 light years away. It is believed that it has an elliptical orbit which, every 26 million years, sends matter towards the earth causing mass Extinction events. It was the discovery of these seemingly regular events that gave rise to the hypothesis in the first place. The star is predicted to be most likely a red or brown dwarf and has been named Nemesis or “Death Star”. [More]
6. Fulgurite is the name for fossilized lightning. They are natural hollow glass tubes formed in quartzose sand, or silica, or soil by lightning strikes and are formed when lightning with a temperature of at least 1,800 degrees Celsius instantaneously melts silica on a conductive surface and fuses grains together. The image above is a fulgurite.
7. When Anders Celsius (1701–1744) created the celsius scale, he invented it upside-down with 0 ℃ being the boiling point of water and 100 ℃ being the freezing point. It was reversed in the year of Celsius’ death by Carolus Linnaeus.
8. When dropped on a very hard, rigid surface, glass balls and steel balls will bounce higher than rubber ones. The reason is that rubber balls deform significantly on impact, flattening onto the surface, and then springing back. In the process of this squashing, some energy is lost. [Source - physics.illinois.edu]
9. 65 Million years ago, a meteor impact in Chicxulub, Mexico caused megatsunamis thousands of feet high. It is believed by some scientists that this impact was the single cause of the extinction of the dinosaurs. [More]
10. Sound travels much faster through a steel than it does air: Sound travels at 5100 m/s through steel, 1480 m/s through water and 330 m/s through air.
11. Most icebergs are salt-free water caused by mainland glaciers. Some sea-water icebergs do exist – they are green. When an icebergs pics up sea-water, it can create green stripes. Additionally, normal water that freezes more rapidly in the ‘berg can cause blue stripes. These are quite stunning to see and the picture above is a good example of this effect. Click the image above for a larger view; and no, it isn’t photoshopped. Here’s proof.
12. The cracking sound of a whip is actually a sonic boom – this is because the tip of the whip travels faster than the speed of sound. The whip is the first man made device capable of exceeding the sound barrier.
13. At this moment, the earth is in the middle of an ice age which began around 2.58 million years ago. We are in an interglacial period which started between 10,000 and 15,000 years ago and may last for a further 50,000 years before global glaciation begins again. [Source - NASA]
14. The Nintendo gaming software company first opened its doors to business in 1889 as “Nintendo Koppai”. Its first product? Playing cards. [Why is this item on the list? Computer science.]
15. The world’s first nuclear reactor was built in a squash court beneath a Chicago football stadium on December 2, 1942. While it only generated enough power to light a flashlight, it proved that nuclear power was feasible.


















1 dbrownl
August 4th, 2009 at 1:35 am
thats crazy about nintendo, sure some of the graphics looked like it was from that era but interesting
2 stunty
August 4th, 2009 at 1:36 am
Is there any evidence whatsoever for the Death Star?
3 Patrask
August 4th, 2009 at 1:37 am
Funny, I’ve read about most of these in the last few days. Some are new, all interesting of course.
4 dbrownl
August 4th, 2009 at 1:37 am
stunt all you have to do is watch star wars new hope, what else happened to alderaan???
5 blitz17
August 4th, 2009 at 1:40 am
btw… interesting fact. the force your body exerts when you sneeze propels the boogers and what-not to over 100 mph.
6 Maximuz04
August 4th, 2009 at 1:41 am
#5 will be my new line to girls
7 ag
August 4th, 2009 at 2:02 am
#4 will be my new line to girls
8 Zack
August 4th, 2009 at 2:13 am
Thank god that Carolus Linnaeus fixed Celsius’ dumb idea of having 100 ℃ being the freezing point and 0 ℃ being the boiling point. We don’t need any more needlessly confusing things like electrons and protons with currents.
9 Ninja_Wallaby
August 4th, 2009 at 2:27 am
Great list, I love these types of lsts.
Ihe only drawback on this one was #5. Is the interesting fact the fact that they are speculating? I ask as there seems to be no evidence for a brown dwarf orbiting the sun apart from extintion events.
10 dinesh
August 4th, 2009 at 2:31 am
why did you feel the need to delete my comment
never been first before! x
11 BooRadley
August 4th, 2009 at 2:36 am
That iceberg is stunning! I wonder why I’ve never seen a picture of one like that before… Are they very rare?
12 darkside
August 4th, 2009 at 2:46 am
Next you’ll join the rabble that think the world is round.
13 Derek
August 4th, 2009 at 2:58 am
good stuff, but is 14 really anything related to science?
14 cocolautreq
August 4th, 2009 at 2:59 am
#14 seems a little out of place in this list.
15 Arsenal
August 4th, 2009 at 3:01 am
I dont mean to be picky but in thermodynamics heat is considered as an energy transfer. So to say that it contains heat doesnt make much sense:-p.
16 Sam
August 4th, 2009 at 3:06 am
‘That iceberg is stunning! I wonder why I’ve never seen a picture of one like that before… Are they very rare?’
Does nobody else think it looks photoshopped?
17 Stizzy
August 4th, 2009 at 3:07 am
If number 5 is a speculation, what’s it doing on a list about “facts”?
Tis also interesting when you compare with recent studies:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090730141552.htm
Which indicate that no more than 2 or 3 comets could have struck the Earth in the last 500 million years as opposed to strikes every 25 million years.
18 apepper
August 4th, 2009 at 3:07 am
The Celcius scale one reminds me that in the UK it’s commonplace to use the Celcius scale in the winter and Farenheight in the summer – in the winter people will say “It’s going to be freezing tonight – below zero”, in the summer we say “What a scorcher – nearly ninety!”. I’ve had to make a conscious effort to use Celcius in the summer because it felt so silly using a mix of scales.
19 joanne
August 4th, 2009 at 3:22 am
#5 is BS. it’s hypothesis, speculation, and not scientific fact as the title of the list implies.
#8 is very counterintuitive but i suppose it can happen if the collision is perfectly elastic(absolutely no denting or shattering of either the ball or the surface).
as for #13 i predict there will be a global warming… debate which shall ensue soon.
and jfrater could you please direct us to your sources for #’s 8 + 13? i would like to know more, thank you. i love your lists but i have some tiny problems with this one
20 notas
August 4th, 2009 at 3:54 am
#5. Using “there is speculation….” in a scientific “facts” list seems a bit odd, doesnt it?. Otherwise a pretty good list although many are not very surprising
21 jj
August 4th, 2009 at 4:27 am
This is supposed to be a list of lesser known science facts, and then there is number 14. what is scientific about “14. The Nintendo gaming software company first opened its doors to business in 1889 as “Nintendo Koppai”. Its first product? Playing cards.” Nintendo is neither a scientific fact, nor is it a company devoted to scientific research.
#5-thats just dumb. even if it is fact, the entry starts with “there is speculation”. obviously, if there is only speculation, then it is not a scientific fact…
22 max
August 4th, 2009 at 4:28 am
i really love getting in interstellar travels…just hoping it will become the science fact soon
23 nuriko
August 4th, 2009 at 5:10 am
nice list!
24 PirateXxEsque
August 4th, 2009 at 5:12 am
‘he invented it upside-down with 0 ℃ being the boiling point of water and 100 ℃ being the freezing point.’
Um. You mean he invented it with 0 ℃ being the boiling point of water and 100 ℃ being the freezing point, and it was later inverted in the year of Celsius’ death by Carolus Linnaeus.
Good list, though the playing cards one is extremely out of place :/
25 sciencegeek
August 4th, 2009 at 5:23 am
that is so cool!Now i have more science facts to confuse my classmates with!
26 astraya
August 4th, 2009 at 5:25 am
When I saw the photo of the iceberg I thought it was an “artwork” by Christo.
27 stefan
August 4th, 2009 at 5:25 am
a kid in germany this year got hit in the forearm by a meteor
UNLUCKY
28 Haas
August 4th, 2009 at 5:38 am
#5 is a fact, but the fact is that there is a speculation of another star. The fact isn’t that there is another star. Only that there is a speculation makes it interesting enough to put it here on the list.
29 Gilboa
August 4th, 2009 at 5:38 am
#8 is simply not true, I’d like to see your evidence/sources.
30 Rolo Tomasi
August 4th, 2009 at 5:52 am
Another great list. BTW Is #9 really little known? I thought most people knew that one
31 Ryan
August 4th, 2009 at 5:57 am
Some of you people are just ridiculous. Why do you all feel the need to pick everything apart. I thought the list was a lot of fun. Thanks JFrater
32 archangel
August 4th, 2009 at 6:04 am
5. Well, its a fact that there is speculation?
Anyway, cool list! I love these ones cause they expand my trivia knowledge.
33 oouchan
August 4th, 2009 at 6:09 am
Something new to mull over for today.
I had heard of number 5 before, but sounds more like a crack theory than anything else. I enjoyed the iceberg picture which looks extremely awesome. I would like to see that one in person.
Nice list, JFrater!
34 frushka
August 4th, 2009 at 6:17 am
@blitz17 (5): I heard that it’s impossible to sneeze with your eyes open because your eyeballs would pop out.
Daddy, I want an iceberg just like that one. DADDY!!!!
Sweet list, Nintendo and all.
xoxox
F.
35 L
August 4th, 2009 at 6:18 am
@stefan (27):
Lucky bastard. What wouldn’t I give to be hit in the forearm by the meteor.
36 Pameloola
August 4th, 2009 at 6:21 am
@Sam, have to agree it is very beautiful, but it does look like it has been photoshopped. :S
37 pergola
August 4th, 2009 at 6:31 am
Love the new look, keep up the great work the number of visitors must have increased?.
38 callie19
August 4th, 2009 at 6:35 am
@Sam (16): The first time I saw one of these pictures was on one of cracked’s “images you won’t believe aren’t photoshopped” lists. Made me giggle. It does look really cool.
39 Ducky23
August 4th, 2009 at 6:35 am
#14 isn’t a science fact…but interesting none the less
40 Truth Watch
August 4th, 2009 at 6:36 am
Numbers 9 and 13 are not facts. It is absolutely ludicrous to state that “x number of million years ago . . .” That is pure speculation.
41 Shagrat
August 4th, 2009 at 6:56 am
Rolo – No#9 IS little-known as it is patently UNTRUE!
At best the Chicxulub Meteorite performed the role of “coup-de-gras” – It weas the bullet that helped finish the job.
JFrater got this one HORRIBLY wrong!
Without writing a thesis it boils down thus: There have been MANY meteor strikes which seem to lie IN CONJUNCTION with Dinosaur extinction events – there was more than one!
There was one at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary, one (possibly two) during the Jurassic, one at the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary and another about mid-Cretaceous: NONE of them killed off the dinosaurs – they re-built, re-radiated and re-established each time – with a subsequent arising of new species and genera.
FACTORS ONE & TWO: Fast-forward to the end of the Cretaceous: 75 million years ago (75MYA) there were about 8-12 Hadrosaur species with Corythosaurus, Prosaurolophus, Lambeosaurus and Maiasaura making up 55% of the large herbivore niche; there were about 5 or 6 species of Ceratopsians with Torosaurus, Centrosaurus, Stryracosaurus and Chasmosaurus making up the remainder of large herbivores: there were 3 or 4 large (7-metres-plus) predatory therapods and about 7 more in the 3 – 7-metre range. By the time of Chicxulub those numbers had dropped to 1 Hadrosaur (Saurolophus) making up 70% of all Hadrosaurs and 15% of large herbivores with Triceratops making up 95% of all Ceratopsians and 85% of large herbivores – this is called SPECIES PAUCITY and EQUABILITY.
FACTOR THREE: Land bridges opened up world-wide allowing Dino’s to reach other continents – - – taking their parasites and diseases with them and encountering the indigenous ones – these ‘pandemics’: several leading palaeontologists have theorised and provided data to affirm – created massive die-offs across the globe; or POPULATION DESTRUCTION – which combined with Factor One – could have proved catastrophic (but these had also happened previously (if you want proof of Population Destruction – check what Rinderpest did to Africa’s antelope populations after it was introduced there by the Asian cattle Kitchener used to haul his cannon up the Nile to Khartoum)
FACTOR FOUR: The COSMIC BULLET: Chicxulub! The dinosaur genera were reeling under the two factors above, plus several other minor factors such as some habitat destruction due to shifting ocean levels and so on.
However, Chicxulub set off massive firestorms, tsunami and earthquakes world-wide which, in turn set off – - – -
FACTOR FIVE: Megavolcanism. Just as a bullet fired into a body will leave a small entry wound on impact and a big one on exit – so did Chicxulub. Of course the meteorite didn’t ‘punch through’ the earth – it’s too big! However it DID set off massive earthquakes – especially along the west coast of India (which was, then almost DIRECTLY OPPOSITE the Chicxulub impact point – and India itself was, as Australia is now – an island continent). These set off massive volcanism – especially in western India creating what is now known as the Deccan Traps – a lava field 500,00 square kilometres and in places up to 2,000 metres thick.
These four factors – along with several minor ones led to the extinction of dinosaurs – as we traditionally view them:
Species Paucity + Equability + Migratory Pandemic + Chicxulub + Volcanism = ALMOST total wipeout.
NOT Total – Not ALL of the dinosaurs went extinct: the Avian branch of SuperOrder Dinosauria is still with us – - – BIRDS are dinosaurs and if not in the first half of this century – then almost certainly by the end of it Order Aves (Birds) will be relegated to Family Aves under Suborder Theropoda which will be under SuperOrder Dinosauria.
Even THIS convincing concatenation of factors is still a theory – though, to date the best one so far; and the one generally accepted as most likely by the palaeontological community – No I’m not a palaeontologist as well; but I AM a ‘gifted amateur’ with many links to that community, a teacher in dinosaurian studies at schools as workshops (Primary and Secondary) and have written two dinosaur books and with a third on the drawing board.
Bottom line: NO ONE THING KILLED OFF THE DINOSAURS!
42 ionic air cleaners
August 4th, 2009 at 7:05 am
Some very interesting points have been made here, it is refreshing to see that your site gets quality visitors.
43 Ethnic_Tension
August 4th, 2009 at 7:11 am
#1 is WRONG
Heat is the process of energy transfer from one body or system to another due to a difference in temperature. Therefore an object cannot contain heat. It may contain energy which can transfer out of the object in the form of heat. The source article uses incorrect terminology. You cannot compare a match with an iceberg.
If the statement refers to the rate of energy being given off in the form of heat then it is possible. If this is what you were was being claimed then the statement should read “The rate that an iceberg releases energy, in the form of heat, is greater than a burning match. The reason is the sheer size of the iceberg.”
44 Bob
August 4th, 2009 at 7:16 am
Yeah, the MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO stuff is nonsense. Welcome to the new mythology, people.
45 Pameloola
August 4th, 2009 at 7:25 am
Oh dear! It looks like this list has been well and truly flayed in a rather gruesme manner!
I did find @Shagrat’s(41) ‘rant’ to be extremely interesting, if a little on the angry side. Thanks for that! :\
46 Vishesh Handa
August 4th, 2009 at 7:37 am
@Shagrat : You should go meet Ross from Friends. You two would get along just fine!
Btw the reason the Celsius scale wasn’t changed when Anders Celsius was still alive was because he was a wacko, and all his colleagues were scared of point out the flaw. So they just waited until he died. Or so I’ve heard!
47 air conditioners hire
August 4th, 2009 at 7:40 am
Some very interesting points raised here, which has got me thinking!
48 shaymm
August 4th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Ive heard the Ice Age one before. Im sure it pisses people off to think that we are actually in an Ice Age rather than in global warming. Or, if we are in global warming its probably good, because now were getting closer to the norm.
49 mom424
August 4th, 2009 at 8:33 am
@Shagrat (41): Not horribly wrong – just a tad too simplistic, I agree. It wasn’t only the birds that made it either, was it? Pretty sure crocs, coelocanths, a myriad of insects, and sharks lived through that particular decimation. Probably some I’ve missed too.
I take issue with #5 – hypothesis is not fact, and I haven’t been able to find any supporting evidence at all. Even the cyclical nature of extinction events is up in the air. There are many that do NOT fit into any discernible pattern.
50 SlashBeast
August 4th, 2009 at 8:39 am
#14 is not a science fact.
51 Happypants78
August 4th, 2009 at 8:47 am
#14 doesn’t have anything to do with science. come on
52 diogenes
August 4th, 2009 at 8:50 am
Whatcha thinking air conditioners hire?
53 Maxx the Slash
August 4th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Sorry to be a pest, but how exactly is the Nintendo fact considered “Science”? Sounds more like a choice for a busines-based list.
54 Rufus
August 4th, 2009 at 8:59 am
Thousands of years ago, this list would be
#1: the earth is round
#2: Gravity holds us on the ground
#3: Earth orbits around the sun
55 this_list_is_BS
August 4th, 2009 at 9:01 am
GOD THIS LIST FUCKING SUCKS. none of this is even new shit.
56 D. Sharp
August 4th, 2009 at 9:20 am
I imagine the list creator is likely under age. I am surprised that this list was acceptable to “listverse.com”. The few facts above are well known and the rest is just speculation/hypothesis. I won’t even start with the “Unknown scientific Nintendo fact”XD
I’ve been surfing the web since the nineties, and never comment on anything. This is probably the eighth or ninth time in over ten years. I’m soooooo disappointed in Listverse. You are a daily bookmark stop for me, and this list (hopefully written by a child) was constructed very poorly. Reminds me of someone’s personal blog that was lost in translation.
Who proof reads this stuff? Come on guys. Even your most boring, unexciting lists blow this one out of the water. The bee clip at the beginning….scroll,scroll..read scroll…scroll…OH, that’s what that clip is for….
Had to check my URL to make sure I wasn’t at The Onion.
57 Hafsa
August 4th, 2009 at 9:24 am
Great list! The iceberg looks beautiful!
58 Sasquatch
August 4th, 2009 at 9:31 am
@D. Sharp (56): It was written by JFrater, the maker of the site.
My brother showed me how to do number 12 just while ago while we were cleaning rugs outside, it was pretty cool. I liked this list, keep it up.
59 D. Sharp
August 4th, 2009 at 9:41 am
No way! JFrater, what’s up dude! This list is yours!
I didn’t mean to sound like such a a**hole, but damn…
This list is not even close to being listverse worthy. I love this site, and visit every day like I said earlier this is slopped together poppycock (don’t know what it means, but it sounds cool).
Pleeeease tell me you let your kid or little bro/sis use your name and all will be forgiven. Pleeeeeeeease.
)
60 sa
August 4th, 2009 at 9:43 am
lets get some better list
61 M.J. Linné
August 4th, 2009 at 9:48 am
Carolus Linnaeus, as in Carl von Linné?
62 LateralAntiman
August 4th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Pretty good list, although as others have said some of them do not strictly belong here… Number 5, though hypothetical, is very interesting nonetheless. There’s an Asimov novel titled “Nemesis” about a future colony located on a planet circling the theoretical star and it deals with the idea of its orbit eventually destabilizing our solar system. It’s fiction, but a great read anyways.
63 Norman
August 4th, 2009 at 9:55 am
This list lacks a ‘disgusting’ fact.
64 inconsistentAngelThings
August 4th, 2009 at 9:57 am
this list is a perfect example of why i refuse to frequent this site anymore.
PURE BULLSH*T. Stupid f-ing list that is neither grammatically correct, intelligent, or in any way coherent.
i think its time jfrater sticks to his day job.
65 government auction
August 4th, 2009 at 10:03 am
This was a really great read, I am very glad I came across your site.
66 redcaboose
August 4th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Good list, Jfrater, although several of them should me in a list entitled, “lesser known science speculations. Photoshopped or not, I really liked the pic of the iceberg.
@Shagrat (41): Thanks for the explanation to a complicated and confusing subject. It was well written and easily understood for us non-science types. Time to do some research on it now.
I have been in costal caves when they are breathing. Never knew what caused it.
67 necro_penguin
August 4th, 2009 at 10:25 am
@shaymm (48): aww man, don’t say that! it gets too hot here in PA for me even in the winters. i don’t think i could take whatever the “normal” temps are.
68 pplpal
August 4th, 2009 at 10:46 am
After listening to both bee clips, the pitch varies between a g and a c. The second clip is actually much higher in pitch.
Important? Not really.
69 Andres
August 4th, 2009 at 10:48 am
@ 43: I don’t think that’s what he means. The rate at which a burning match will release energy is obviously higher than the rate at which the iceberg will (all you have to do is touch a match and touch an iceberg to see that). I think what he means is that an iceberg contains a higher amount of overall thermal energy than a match.
Correct me if I’m mistaken, though.
70 Queeny
August 4th, 2009 at 10:54 am
I love these lists. Much better than the one that was posted yesterday.
71 L
August 4th, 2009 at 11:39 am
@shaymm (48):
“norm”
)
72 littleboots
August 4th, 2009 at 11:43 am
I too have issues with item #5, but then so do alot of people so I won’t focus on that. However, in regards to item #8, I once dropped a glass coffee pot from counter high onto a red brick floor. It bounced right back into my hands much to my surprise. I inspected it right after, and there were no apparent cracks or faults in it, so I proceeded to brew another pot of coffee. Well, it exploded as soon as the hot water hit it. But the fact remains…it still bounced!
73 The_Patient
August 4th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Very interesting list, I almost feel smarter!
No.9 “……..caused megatsunamis thousands of feet high.”
I must have spent 10 minutes trying to pronounce “magatsunamis”, thinking it was one word, to realize it is two! (That I CAN pronounce!)
74 frushka
August 4th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
@pplpal (68):
Important to some, and not to others. This little tidbit definitely caught my singer’s ear when I listened earlier today.
YouTubeBee pipes a long sustained tone, slightly below A=440. Then she emits 10 short tones, each one sliding down to about A=415 Hz. She follows up with a stacatto blast, ever so slightly higher than the initial sustained tone. I believe that she is an authentic Baroque-period bee, desperately trying to rebirth herself as a modern-pitch diva, but doomed to sing flat. We’ll call her Emma KirkBee.
By contrast, WAV file bee pipes in a slightly different pattern, and a FULL two semi-tones higher. Her short blasts come in groups of 7 rather than 10. This Queen Bee is clearly hopped up on caffiene or something, and she sounds hot to trot! We’ll call her Bee-yon-say.
It occurred to me that this might be a successful audition technique…. you know, waiting backstage in the green room to sing, launch into this bee-song, and all the other singers will attack your nemesis. I dunno, I think I’ll just stick with my tried and true technique: toss the other soprano into the subway.
75 Rosa
August 4th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Awesome list! Especially the fossilized lightning thing… Wow.
Also, #14 isn’t exactly a science fact, but I loved it anyway.
76 Randall
August 4th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
Shagrat:
You have a VERY bad habit of coming onto this site and making loud, authoritative-sounding, definitive statements on matters of which you have NO expertise. Knock it off.
By your own admission you are a “gifted amateur,” and not a professional in the field of paleontology. It’s always the “gifted amateurs” who pull this shit, ironically enough.
IN FACT, Shagrat, you are wrong, and the question regarding what actually killed off the dinosaurs is FAR from settled. Yes, some believe the KT-boundary asteroid strike was just the “killing blow” that ended a process of extinction that was already under way (and surely there IS evidence that dinosaurs were in decline prior to the strike) but other scientists still believe that it was the asteroid strike that was actually responsible, and that the other factors in play would NOT have led to actual extinction.
The Cretaceous extinction was a MASS extinction, Shagrat, in case you forgot that (apparently you have) and there is still no consensus amongst professionals of what causes these mass extinctions—but they are surely not due to simple, ordinary processes. They seem to require some kind of catastrophic “upheaval” in the usual mechanics of natural selection–asteroid and comet strikes being on the top of the list of suspects.
I know of only a few paleontologists who believe the dinos were due for total elimination regardless of the asteroid. Most still believe AT LEAST that the asteroid played the defining role in the drama, and the overwhelming majority of these believe it was the PRIMARY event the led to the annihilation of the big reptiles and other assorted species at the time.
“Gifted amateurs” should NOT make barking, definitive statements on matters for which they do NOT possess the knowledge or expertise necessary for such statements. I for one am sick of you coming on here and doing this, while at the same time railing against the owner of the site for his alleged “errors” which rankle you into your little tirades in the first place.
Enough. Give your opinions, but stop pretending to speak as a monolithic authority when you are nothing of the kind.
77 Tsiamon
August 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
I’m facinated by the sheer range of responses to this list. Somebody above complained that there was not a single ‘distinguishing’ fact on this list, and somebody else mentioned that none of these were new.
Well, what do you expect? Personally, I am a well-educated individual with several years worth of internet experience and I only knew two or three of these points; different experiences lend us different knowledge. This list is mostly full of trivia, and that’s pretty much what it was billed as. Just because YOU knew about these items doesn’t mean that they are not lesser-known.
That being said, I found several of these interesting, a few hastily compiled, and a few downright suspect. I’m not going to complain about the Nemisis star fact because, strictly speaking, it is indeed fact that there is such speculation. However, Nintendo doesn’t belong on this list, and, as somebody mentioned, the phrasing for your comment on icebergs and matches is highly suspect. Your comment on the dinosaur extinctions was also probably not very well thought out (as a particularly ANGRY INDIVIDUAL pointed out).
On the other hand, I found the fossilized lightning and stripped icebergs to be facinating.
78 emily
August 4th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Long time reader, first time commenter.
Although I have problems with this list (most of which have been repeated numerous times), I still found many points fascinating and am, in no way, disappointed.
Keep up the good work, Jamie!
79 Randall
August 4th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Boo Radley (and others):
The iceberg photo is a famous one that’s been knocking around on the net for a decade or more, if I’m not mistaken. It is in fact a composite photo, and not taken as a “single” picture at one time. There is no photographic process known (to the best of my knowledge) that could capture such a site in a single snap. Sorry.
80 atheists eat fish
August 4th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
I think a list should be judged to some extent based on the type/quality of comments it generates. Thanks to those of you who had actual scientific-based information to add to the the facts in the list. I do have to agree with those that thought the Nintendo “fact” was misplaced, though. Maybe Jfrater just thought it was interesting?
81 IkeTurner
August 4th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
@Shagrat (41):
Maybe you should reread #9 before you grace us all with a wall of text… The Chicxulub impact did in fact happen. It states that it being the cause of a mass extinction is speculated.
82 jfrater
August 4th, 2009 at 1:25 pm
@frushka (74): The difference in audio is the quality and type of recording – one is a poor video clip probably taken with a phone then compressed and uploaded to youtube – the other is a higher quality wav file
83 ionic air cleaners
August 4th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Glad I came back to this site some new very interesting items which I wanted to know more about. Great work on your site.
84 jfrater
August 4th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
@joanne (19): Here is a source for number 13 (the current ice age): “Scientists have suspected that our current ice age, which began 40 million years ago, was caused by the rise of the Himalayas. [...] Because we are currently living in an ice age — or, more precisely, in a slightly warmer interglacial period within an ice age [...]” [Source - NASA]
And here is a source for the glass ball (item 8): physics.illinois.edu.
85 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Doesn’t everybody learn #10 somewhere in childhood? That sounds like the one everybody should know. (Pressing your ear against a wall to hear, hearing better underwater) That fact was in a science textbook in grade school.
86 jfrater
August 4th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Incidentally – I added the two references in comment 84 to the main body of the list as well.
87 jfrater
August 4th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
And for the haters of the Nintendo item – surely it counts under computer science. That is my reason for its inclusion.
I am very surprised by how many haters there are on this list – to the point that some people are saying they will never come back. Have I included something that contradicts a current popular theory like global warming or something?
88 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
We should have a list of ‘Obvious Answers on Game Shows Guessed Wrong’
That would make for an entertaining list. :]
89 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
As a photoshopper of two years, I don’t see any evidence of a photomanip on the iceberg picture. There’s no apparent smudging or no changing textures on the iceberg or the sky (evidence of a filter used). If you further inspect it, the stripes do not seem elevated as if they were painted on, quite the opposite, they have a groove which is apparent when you look at the horizon. Also, the exposure in the picture is pretty balanced, except for the far left side. That last green stripe on the left may be photoshopped in from another iceberg as it has a very hard edge. But otherwise I’m convinced this photo is legit.
90 BooRadley
August 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
@Randall (79):
Aah, what a shame, I so wanted it to be real! But thanks for the information, Randall.
91 BooRadley
August 4th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Ha ha! When I posted the above statement, #89 had not yet shown up on the board. Still, it makes me want to investigate on my own now, which is always a good thing.
92 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
@91: I laughed quite hard when I posted that and saw your post right under me. Glad I could help.
93 reyairia
August 4th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
1889? Really? o_O You sure you didn’t mean 1989?
94 Randall
August 4th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
@Packeranatic (89):
Sorry, the photo isn’t “legit” at all—at least not in the sense that it was taken as a single snapshot at one time. It is in fact a composite image which has been highly manipulated. Here’s the link to prove it, from Snopes, with an admission from the man who created it:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/iceberg.asp
95 Gill Avila
August 4th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
You should say that the first MAN-MADE nuclear reactor was activated in December 1942. About 2 billion years ago a natural nuclear reactor burned in Gabon, Africa for a half-million years.
http://www.pureinsight.org/node/960
96 arjaythejive
August 4th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
While Shagrat has laid out much of the scientific coversation about the KT Mass Extinction, in an unfortunately dogmatic manner, Randall is absolutely correct that nothing has been “settled” about the sequence and importance of events. The most important statement by Randall is that mass extinctions “are certainly not due to simple, ordinary processes”. One of the best books on the subject is: WHEN LIFE NEARLY DIED – THE GREATEST MASS EXTINCTION OF ALL TIME by Michael J. Benton.
jfrater: I think #11 is a photo of a paperweight you placed in your bathtub!
97 Maggot
August 4th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
@Randall (94): I think you are referring to the wrong photo Randall. The “giant” iceberg thumbnail photo is manipulated per the Snopes link you provided, but I think both Packeranatic and possibly BooRadley, are talking about the “striped” iceberg photo accompanying fact #11. According to Snopes, that one is true:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/stripedicebergs.asp
98 bosoxfanzz
August 4th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
@Zack (8)
ya, here in wisconsin, when we say it’ll be cold, below zero, we aren’t changing scales… lol
99 psychosurfer
August 4th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
@Shagrat (41): Interesting, however you forgot to mention the whole Archaeopteryx and Archaeoraptor hoaxes and what those mean to your “unified-theory” purposes.
100 Damo
August 4th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Shagrat’s (41) “FACT THREE” is not a fact at all. Besides a few examples in more recent history (Isthmus of Panama, Beringia and Doggerland – all casued/influenced by the last ice age, much less than 65 million years ago), the theory land bridges has basically been dropped by modern paleontologists in favour of plate tectonics.
101 oouchan
August 4th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
@jfrater (87): Forget the haters. You did nothing wrong. Not everyone has the broad knowlege of these items and I like to learn new things.
Thank you once again Randall. Love to see your posts.
102 diogenes
August 4th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
yeh, so anyway, to add my own (as stated in the intro).. a couple of recent studies that have fascinated me and yet there is very little to go on, as I am not in the field/lab/school and am most often not willing to dish out the doe for the original Science/Nature journal publications, which in turn may make all ongoing studies and their findings “lesser known” to a degree, because it usually isn’t until the news is out and other people in the specific fields can do their own studies and comparisons, ect and begin to build off of the current and past evidence in order to write essays/findings/books and get the knowledge/facts out there to the so called masses. An outsider can only get so close, but yet amateur discoveries happen all the time too, such as the recent earth-size whatchamacallit that smacked into Jupiter. okay,Maybe that’s not the best example. (here’s a list for you Blogball-”top ten amateur discoveries”)
Anyway, why am I wasting so much time here blabbing? The two science studies/facts(?) within this past month of July2009 that have hit the newspapers and I have found interesting are:
The “anti-aging” Soil of Easter Island
and
The sleep patterns of ants.
first:
A compound found in the soil of Easter Island, called Rapamycin (named after the Captain Cook island-discovery-title Rapa Nui) “extends the lifespan of old mice:28 to 38 percent” states the ScienceDaily.
three concurrent studies ongoing.
so whatabout-
UNESCO
indigenous farmers
tourism
the unearthed moai
second:
Humans have R.E.M. (rapid eye movement). Ants have R.A.M.(rapid antennal movement)
the worker fire ants that must protect the queen(s) only sleep a total of 4hrs & 48min a day(thats 250 cute little ant naps-each lasting a tad more than a minute each)
The queen on the other hand sleeps in 6minute stretches over 90times a day, equaling a 9hr sleepday.
this all fluxuates a little, depending on the workload during the day. This difference in sleep cycles affects life cycle, as the worker ant may last for 6months and the queen, 6yrs.
103 DaniBee
August 4th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
The icon for this list–the GIANT iceberg? It’s not a real picture. Go lookit up on Snopes.com
I’d proviced a link, but my food just arrived^^
104 barbecue online
August 4th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Good to see that people still know what they are talking about. So much BS around these days!
105 Maggot
August 4th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
@DaniBee (103): The icon for this list–the GIANT iceberg? It’s not a real picture. Go lookit up on Snopes.com
[sigh]
106 gabi319
August 4th, 2009 at 6:07 pm
@Maggot (105): [sigh]
haha, best comment all day. LV + computer access makes staying late at work worthwhile.
107 frushka
August 4th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
@jfrater (82):
I figured that was the case.
I’m pretty crushed that you didn’t like my silly explanation from a singer’s point of view.
Oh, well. I’m a dork.
108 Corey
August 4th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
As a scientist, I’m always disappointed with science lists (on any website) because the facts are always so common to any scientist. This succeeded in having some pretty interesting ones!
Although there were only 2 I didn’t know.
109 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 8:01 pm
@103 Of course that one isn’t real. That cannot be achieved…
But I took a closer look and some amigos of mine helped me spot some irregularites in the other iceberg photo that show it is made up of 2 pictures.
I. The “iceberg” is overexposed and possesses different lighting than the sea photo, which is cloudy and grey.
II. The “iceberg” in particular is bad quality, with patterns left from rotating the stone-like object and has different “water” underneath it that flows in a different direction.
III. When you apply Curves and mess with the RGB settings, you can clearly see a bad erase job with even a corner of the original pic visible in the sky where it was soft-erased.
IV. It clearly has the texture of a stone-face, and not an iceberg.
The striped iceberg has clearly been faked. (I know, I’m a hypocrite.)
110 Packeranatic
August 4th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Plus it is not consistent of icebergs that actually have stripes in them.
111 Julieann
August 4th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Ha. The only one I was framiliar with was the one about the whip. Cool list!
112 nomohsar
August 4th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
“15 Fascinating Lesser-Known Science Facts”
but #5 “There is a current scientific hypothesis”…
are you saying, it is a science fact that there is a current scientific hypothesis…then this can go on forever
113 រិន រ៉ាឌី
August 4th, 2009 at 9:12 pm
yes sure
114 Shifty
August 4th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
@frushka (34): lol I’m going to have to try keeping my eyes open next time I sneeze to see what happens. I hope eyes pop back in easily
115 COCO OBRIEN
August 4th, 2009 at 11:21 pm
can’t everyone just enjoy the list? GOSH! lol I didn’t know about most of these, very very interesting stuff, GOOD JOB JFRATER!!
116 Ghoti
August 5th, 2009 at 12:03 am
I’d like to know why people are demanding a source for number 8, when there is a link to the source in that section. click the link, then come back and argue if you still think it’s BS. Personally the explanation to me seems sound.
117 lowercase_v
August 5th, 2009 at 12:31 am
a sudden urge to watch starwars i have.
118 Mark
August 5th, 2009 at 3:15 am
You should really have expanded on points one and ten a bit more. Very interesting though, it sure taught me a thing or two
119 eggplantinspace
August 5th, 2009 at 5:33 am
excellent list
120 dan231
August 5th, 2009 at 6:47 am
(79) these are true photos of ice burgs, not compsites.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/stripedicebergs.asp
121 JDsg
August 5th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Regarding the Nintendo cards, the card game is most likely “Go-Stop.” Go-Stop is very popular in Korea, and I was told that the cards were originally produced by a Japanese company (most likely Nintendo; I forget exactly which one). I have several decks of Go-Stop cards, but for those of you who don’t have the chance to go to Korea you can play the game online for free.
122 D. Sharp (again)
August 5th, 2009 at 8:38 am
I’ve seena few comments about the iceberg photo, and whether it is shopped or not. There are many pics of “colored” icebergs/formations online. Do some quick searches. You’ll find many amazing pics, in better quality too.
123 pplpal
August 5th, 2009 at 11:01 am
@frushka 74
Your singer’s explanation was both insightful and hilarious! Consider it well appreciated by a violinist who lives her life crippled with perfect pitch.
And yeah, I figured sound quality had a lot to do with it. But still, those damn bees need to comply with G#-A and not go off humming Cs. No quality control in the beehive, apparently.
124 hurdy gurdy man
August 5th, 2009 at 11:27 am
great list, it’s just a shame that all of the pseud-scientists here have some type of chip on their shoulders and use ALL CAPITAL letters to scream about how much smarter they are then everyone else reading the list, i’m not reading the comments any more, they take too much enjoyment away from the lists…
125 Alicia
August 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
I feel like this list did not have a very scientific tone.
126 Swede
August 5th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
That iceberg – heat thing can be explained easily: Suppose you are sitting in a large cave, large enough to contain an iceberg, if one should be brought in. Further suppose that this enormous cave is very cold, say some degrees below freezing. You need to warm the cave up by a few degrees. Now think: What heats the cave more, lighting a match or bringing in the humongous iceberg (which is some degrees warmer than the cave)? The answer should be obvious even to non-scientific types – the iceberg heats the cave a lot more than your pathetic single match!
127 Swede
August 5th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Uh, I just came to think of something: If the cave is warmer than the iceberg to start with, the match will be more efficient than the iceberg. Heat always flows from the warmer object to the colder, without exception. So my example above does really only deal with absolute heat contents, as if we measure everything from a temperature of absolute zero.
128 Nauplius
August 5th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
@Maggot (105): The picture that Randall and DaniBee are referring to is the one on the main page, not the one with the list itself.
129 Maggot
August 5th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
@Nauplius (128): Please, do tell…
130 sof
August 5th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
The companion star hypothesis isn’t widely accepted, as there is limited evidence to support it. It’s an interesting idea for a book or movie, but very unlikely in real life.
131 someone
August 6th, 2009 at 1:14 am
One of the facts in this list has got to be bullshit.
No. 3 where the guy and his wife are in their car when it gets hit by a meteor is not true. It simply cannot be true. Not many people know the physics behind meteors so it’s easy to make people think this story is true but seriously it’s not true. For a meteor to create the same destruction as its own weight in T.N.T, it has got to be travelling at 2.9 km/s or 2,900 meters per second.
That means that if a 1 kilogram meteor hits the ground at 2.9 km/s, then it would have the same impact as 1 kilogram of T.N.T exploding on the ground. Meteors don’t travel slower than 12 km/s.
To put it into perspective, 12km/s is roughly 35,000 kilometers per hour. If you are American then it’s about 19,000 miles per hour.
Do you seriously believe that a 1.4 kilogram rock, flying downwards at 12km’s per second is going to break a guys finger and come to a halt in the back seat? I certainly don’t.
If you still aren’t convinced, the other day i broke my toe by dropping an empty wine bottle on it from 1.5 meters above the floor. This 3 pound, supposed “meteor” has been doing 15x the speed of a Tomcat for the last 50,000 years and it just made friends with gravity.
132 Mark
August 6th, 2009 at 3:50 am
@Ethnic_Tension (43): Wow, if only all of us were as oblivious as you. At least we wouldn’t argue, it’s easier than trying to teach the jackasses science.
133 DaniBee
August 6th, 2009 at 6:48 am
@Nauplius(128) Glad to see someone understood…
134 Maggot
August 6th, 2009 at 8:53 am
@DaniBee (133): Glad to see someone understood…
Do you understand why this post is even more dense than your previous one?
135 Randall
August 6th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
@someone (131):
In point of fact, meteors have struck the earth on several occasions with very low impacts. There are at least two cases recorded where meteor fragments have penetrated the roofs of houses with only minor damage, and a meteor once struck a car in upstate New York with only comparative minor damage.
There’s more to the physics of meteor strikes than the equation you indicate. At a certain level, wind resistance and other factors come into play.
136 isabelle16
August 7th, 2009 at 1:22 am
Number 8 is amazingly very true. I actually have a lot of glass balls, for my cats, cause they go mad playing with them and when i dropped them on the balcony, since I have tiles on the floor they were baouncing extremly high, way higher than the rubber ones. It really is interesting.
137 DenzeLL
August 7th, 2009 at 2:51 am
I actually thought the image in Facts 11-15 is an overturned surfboard at first sight.
138 saber25
August 7th, 2009 at 5:27 am
Hey man honestly, I’ve known all of this before. I ain’t bragging but it’s really true. But thanks for the list
139 kapostrophelay
August 8th, 2009 at 5:39 am
nice to know
140 ruben
August 10th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Very good list.

But I have to say: #1 and #2 disappointed me cause they´re quite obvious.
Every cavities exposed in a pressure changing environment “breathes”
#6 Is really interesting!
Cheers!!
141 Draith
August 16th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
@someone (131): As someone else stated, there are other factors once a meteor enters the atmosphere and encounters wind resistance and whatnot…
I’m not a scientist or anything, but I mean there IS the concept of terminal velocity, yes? I can’t be certain that that applies to a meteor flinging toward earth, but if it is caught by earth’s gravity as you say, then wouldn’t the science of gravity itself also affect it?
142 Seanithan
August 19th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Neither compression, nor quality of recording devices would change the pitch of something.
Along with that, there are many grammatical errors which hinder this list.
143 sanju
November 16th, 2009 at 6:04 am
its interesting
144 Ahmed Mokhtar Elsonbaty
December 25th, 2009 at 11:51 am
The title is LESSER so the main material is lesser theory physics ,aplications ,this must be the main points of your speach ,not leave the major and fill all your pages by hollow comments from where you brought time,and patient to write this sorry of mhat I said but you must hear it thanks
145 Daniel MotherFucker
December 31st, 2009 at 5:06 am
i love (131) someones comment. extremely entertaining.
146 A6M4
April 12th, 2010 at 12:50 pm
@Zack [8]: You know the scale for star magnitudes is still backwards, although it has a much better reason to be so…
147 Zachary
July 1st, 2010 at 8:07 pm
ooh i like your thinking