English jurist William Blackstone once said, âBetter that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.â Even lawyers are indoctrinated with this concept early in law school. Whether you support with the death penalty or not, most individuals would agree with the statement above. Despite the United Stateâs innocent-until-proven-guilty legal system, there are several cases where a presumably innocent person is convicted of a crime, some even put to death. Sadly, we may never get a chance to find out the truth. The recent inclusion of DNA evidence in trials has been used in some cases to clear many people falsely convicted. There are ten recent cases of people who are now presumed, but not proven, to be innocent and one bonus inclusion.
In February 1983, Wanda Lopez, was stabbed to death during her night shift at the gas station where she worked. After a brief manhunt, police found De Luna hiding under a pick-up truck. Recently released from prison, he was violating his parole by drinking in public. De Luna immediately told police that he was innocent and he offered the name of the person who he saw at the gas station. Police ignored the fact that he did not have a drop of blood on him even though the crime scene was covered in blood. De Luna was arrested too soon after the crime to clean himself up. The single eyewitness to the crime, Kevin Baker, confirmed to police that De Luna was the murderer after police told him he was the right guy.
At trial De Luna named Carlos Hernandez as the man he saw inside the gas station, across the street from the bar where De Luna had been drinking. Hernandez and DeLuna were strikingly similar in appearance but, unlike DeLuna, Hernandez had a long history of knife attacks similar to the convenience store killing and repeatedly told friends and relatives that he had committed the murder. Friends confirmed that he was romantically linked to Lopez as well. De Lunaâs lawyers knew of Hernandezâs criminal past but never thoroughly investigated his previous crimes. On December 7, 1989, Texas executed 27-year old Carlos De Luna.
On June 26, 1980 in St. Louis, Missouri, 19-year-old Quintin Moss was killed in a drive-by shooting while allegedly dealing drugs on a street corner. The conviction was based largely on the testimony from Robert Fitzgerald, a white career criminal, who was at the scene at the time of the murder. He testified that he saw three black men in the car when shots were fired and that Griffin shot the victim through the window of the car with his right hand. This was Griffinâs attorneyâs first murder trial and he did not challenge the testimony even though Griffin was left-handed. He also failed to bring forth an alibi witness who was with Griffin at the time of the murder.
Griffinâs fingerprints were not found on the car or the weapon â all evidence against him was circumstantial. There is evidence that suggests Fitzgerald was promised a reduce sentence in exchange for his testimony. The prosecution also failed to address that there were two other witnesses who confirmed that Griffin did not commit the murder and they were able to name the three men who did.Appeals courts upheld his conviction and death sentence. Griffin was executed by lethal injection on June 21, 1995. Griffin maintained his innocence right up to his execution. In 2005, a professor University of Michigan Law School reopened the case. His investigation concluded that Griffin was innocent.
On the night of November 8, 1984, Ruben Cantu and his friend David Garza, broke into a vacant San Antonio house under construction and robbed two men at gunpoint. The two victims, Pedro Gomez and Juan Moreno, had been workmen sleeping on floor mattresses at a construction site, guarding against burglary. As they tried to take their cash, they were interrupted by Gomez’s attempt to retrieve a pistol hidden under his mattress. The boys shot both men killing Gomez instantly. Thinking they had killed both men, the two teens then fled the scene.
The police showed Moreno photos of suspects, which included Cantuâs picture, and he was unable to identify his attacker. On the basis of no physical evidence, no confession, and only Moreno’s subsequently recanted testimony, a jury convicted Ruben Cantu of first-decree murder. Juan Moreno now says that he had felt pressure from the police to finger Cantu. David Garza, Cantu’s codefendant, has since admitted involvement in the burglary, assault and murder. He says he did go inside the house with another boy, did participate in the robbery, and saw the murder take place, but that his accomplice was not Ruben Cantu.On August 24, 1993, Ruben Cantu at the age of 26, was executed by lethal injection. His final request was for a piece of bubble gum, which was denied.
In 1982, David Spence was accused of the rape and murder of two 17-year-old girls and one 18-year-old boy in Waco, Texas. He received the death penalty in two trials for the murders. Muneer Deeb, a convenience store owner, hired Spence to do the murders and he was also charged and sentenced to death. He received a new trial in 1993 and was later acquitted.
The prosecution built its case against Spence around bite marks that a state expert said matched Spenceâs teeth and jailhouse snitches. Two of the six jailhouse witnesses who testified at trial later recanted, saying they were given cigarettes, television and alcohol privileges, and conjugal visits for their testimonies. Spenceâs post-conviction lawyers had a blind panel study in which five experts said the bite marks could not be matched to Spenceâs. Even the original homicide investigator on the case said he had serious doubts about Spenceâs guilt and a former Waco police detective involved in the case said he did not think Spence committed the crime. David Spence was executed by lethal injection on April 14, 1997.
On the morning of February 20, 1976, Highway Patrol officer, Phillip Black, and Donald Irwin, approached a car parked at a rest stop for a routine check. Tafero, his partner Sonia “Sunny” Jacobs, and Walter Rhodes were found asleep inside. Black saw a gun lying on the floor inside the car so he woke the occupants and had them come out of the car. According to Rhodes, Tafero then shot both Black and Irwin with the gun, which was illegally registered to Jacobs, led the others into the police car and fled the scene. All three were arrested after being caught in a roadblock. The gun was found in Tafero’s waistband.
At their trial, Rhodes testified that Tafero and Jacobs were solely responsible for the murders. Tafero and Jacobs were convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death while Rhodes was sentenced to 3 life sentences. Rhodes was eventually released in 1994 following parole for good behavior. Because the jury had recommended a life sentence for Jacobs, the court commuted Jacobs’ sentence to life in prison, but not Tafero’s. She was later released after agreeing to a plea bargain. Prior to his release, Rhodes confessed several times to lying about his involvement in the shooting. Even Sunny Jacobs claimed that Rhodes, not Tafero, carried out the shooting as well. Rhodes was the only person on which traces of gunpowder were found. Tafero was executed by electric chair on May 4, 1990. The chair malfunctioned causing the process to take over 13 minutes.
Ellis Wayne Felker was a suspect in the 1981 disappearance of a Georgia woman, Evelyn Joy Ludlum who was working her way through college as a cocktail waitress. He was put under police surveillance for 2 weeks, during which time Ludlum’s body was found in a creek, raped, stabbed and murdered. An autopsy performed by an untrained technician found that the body had been dead for five days. This information was later changed after realizing this would eliminate Felker as a suspect. Independent autopsies found that the body had been dead no more than three days.
In 1996, Felkerâs attorneys discovered boxes of evidence that had been unlawfully withheld by the prosecution including DNA evidence and a written confession by another suspect. Even the presiding judge in one of Felkerâs trials stated that his right to a fair trial had been severely compromised. Despite all this mounting evidence and doubts of his guilt, the Georgia Supreme Court denied Felker a new trial nor gave the defense more time to sort through the mounds of evidence to argue for exoneration. Felker was executed by electrocution November 15, 1996 at the age of 48. In 2000, a Georgia judge ruled that DNA testing would be performed in the first-ever attempt by a court to exonerate an executed person in the United States. The results were ruled as inconclusive.
On May 23, 1981 in Jacksonville, FL, police officer Thomas Szafranski killed when shots were fired at his police cruiser when he was stopped at an intersection. Within minutes, police officers busted into Leo Jonesâ apartment where they found Jones and his cousin, Bobby Hammonds. Police took both men in for questioning and then charged Jones, who they claimed had confessed. Hammonds gave a statement, saying he saw Jones leave the apartment with a rifle and return after he heard some gunshots.In 1997, a retired police officer, Cleveland Smith, came forward and said the officer that arrested Jones had bragged that he beat Jones after his arrest. Smith, who described the officer as an “enforcer”, testified that he once watched him get a confession from a suspect through torture. Smith claimed that he waited so long to come forward with this evidence because he wanted to secure his pension.
More than a dozen people had implicated another man as the killer, saying they either saw him carrying a rifle as he ran from the crime scene or heard him brag he had shot the officer. Even Florida Supreme Court Justice Leander Shaw wrote that Jones’ case had become “a horse of a different color”. Newly discovered evidence, Shaw wrote, “casts serious doubt on Jones’ guilt.” Shaw and one other judge voted to grant Jones a new trial. However, a five-judge majority ruled against him. Jones was executed by electric chair on March 24, 1998.
In 1991, a fire occurred at Cameron Todd Willinghamâs home in Texas killing his three young daughters. Willingham escaped the fire with minor injuries and his then-wife was not home at the time. Prosecutors charged Willingham with starting the fire in an attempt to cover up his abuse of his girls. This is despite the wifeâs testimony that he had never abused the children and, in fact, âspoiled them rotten.â While laboratory tests verified that an accelerant was used only near the front porch, the prosecutors alleged that the fluid was deliberately poured near the front porch, childrenâs bedroom, and in the hallway to start the fire and impede rescue attempts. Gerald Hurst, who has a PhD in chemistry, reputed claims that the extreme heat of the fire meant that an accelerant was used. The Board of Pardons and Paroles received Hurstâs argument but still denied Willingham clemency.
Willingham was deemed an âextremely severe sociopathâ by a psychiatrist using only Willinghamâs Iron Maiden and Led Zeppelin posters as indications of his fascination with violence and death. Witness testimony during the fire was contradictory and inconclusive. During his trial in August 1992, Willingham was offered a life term in exchange for a guilty plea, which he turned down insisting he was innocent. Willingham was executed by lethal injection on February 17, 2004. In June 2009 the State of Texas ordered an unprecedented re-examination of the case and may issue a ruling on it at a later date.
In 1985, Helen Schartner was raped and murdered by strangulation outside a nightclub in Virginia Beach. At the time of the murder, OâDell was already on parole for kidnapping and robbery convictions in Florida. OâDell chose to represent himself during the trial and he was convicted of the murder in based solely on blood evidence and the testimony of a jailhouse âsnitch.â There was nothing else linking OâDell to the crime.
For much of the decade that followed, O’Dell’s unsuccessful appeals went to the Virginia Supreme Court, Federal District Court, and the Supreme Court, where Justice Harry Blackmun found “serious questions as to whether O’Dell committed the crime.” O’Dell’s lawyers also had an affidavit claiming that another inmate executed in 1993, David Mark Pruett, had confessed to the crime. O’Dell asked the state to conduct DNA tests on other pieces of evidence to demonstrate his innocence but was refused. An International campaign to save his life had supporters like Mother Teresa and Pope John Paul II. Both the governor of Virginia and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected last-minute pleas to spare his life and OâDell was executed by lethal injection on July 23, 1997. In 2000, the last of the DNA evidence in the O’Dell case stored in the circuit court of Virginia Beach was burned without any further testing.
On September 29, 1981, Texas Department of Public Safety Officer, David Rucker, was shot and killed along a stretch of highway near the Rio Grande Valley. Around the same time, police officer Enrique Carrisalez pulled over a speeding vehicle driving away from the road where Ruckerâs body was found. The driver exchanged words with Carrisalez before pulling out his gun and killing the police officer. Lionel Herrera was arrested a few days later and charged with both Ruckerâs and Carrisalezâs murders. Before he died, Carrisalez also identified Herrera as the person who shot him from a single photograph shown to him in the hospital (not a photo array). In January 1982, Herrera was tried and found guilty of the capital murder of Carrisalez, for which he was sentenced to death. Later that year, Herrera pleaded guilty to the murder of Rucker.
Herrera filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal court, claiming that new evidence demonstrated he was actually innocent of the murder of Carrisalez. Herrera included four affidavits from an attorney who had represented Herrera’s brother, Raul Herrera, Sr, and three others claiming that Raul Herrera, who was murdered in 1984, had told them that he had killed Rucker and Carrisalez. This lead to the Supreme Court case Herrera v. Collins where the Court ruled that new evidence demonstrating innocence did not violate the Constitutionâs 8th Amendment and Herreraâs death sentence with upheld. Herrera was executed by lethal injection four months after the ruling. In his final statement he said: “I am innocent, innocent, innocent. . . . I am an innocent man, and something very wrong is taking place tonight.”
In 1985, Texas Tech student Michele Mallin was raped and Timothy Cole was sentenced to 25 years in prison just based on her testimony. He was offered parole if he would admit guilt, but he refused. Later, Mallin admitted she was mistaken with the identity of her attacked and in 1995, Jerry Wayne Johnson confessed to the rape. She stated that investigators botched the gathering of evidence and withheld information from her, causing her to believe that Cole was the attacker. Mallin told police that her rapist smoked during the rape. However, Cole never smoked because he had severe asthma.
When DNA evidence showed him to be innocent, he was exonerated on February 6, 2009. Cole died, however, in prison on December 2, 1999 from an asthma attack. It was the first posthumous DNA exoneration in the state of Texas.































I agree with the death penalty on a human level (ie I want those who harm my family to suffer) but don't honestly believe it has any place in a mature society. This list goes some way to explain why.
I don’t agree with death penalty i think if the person is truly guilty they can be reminded of that the rest of there lives in prison,i think we should NOT take matters into our own hands if one innocent person is killed that’s one too many!
You know, for a first world-country, it's amazing how cruel America is to its own citizens.
Seriously? All of *****en Europes citizens are not even citizens they are subjects.
most of these are pretty iffy… on rather or not they were innocent.
Well nobody’s perfect
Tough life.
Well, the list is informative but…sorry to say this..most of the cases are happening in the US.
most of these happening in Texas…
somehow i was not suprised that all of these happened in the usa and that texas dominates the list. Thats a *****ed up state in a *****ed up country.
that’s the cause of being one-sided, impatient, etc, etc. that’s why i hate lawyers… good being bad, bad being good… they say the fight for what is right… yes only for the “RIGHT”, but they forgot what is being “LEFT”…
Very sobering list.
it must be the most horrible thing to be convicted of something you had nothing to do about. and it must be heart breaking for their families to deal with such injustice after finding out.
Death penalties are plain wrong as this list points out.
It is close to impossible to rule out mistakes and those mistakes can not be undone. Life-time sentences are better.
All civilized countries have left the road of death-penalties.
of course 80% of these are from texas, my brother is in jail right no (no joke) for a officer trying to frame him for a terrible felony when he was with me the night it happened, texas is disgusting, the only thing that is “big” in texas is the “big” dollars they get for throwing innocent people in jail and how much it costs for said innocent people to pay their way back to innocence…
I agree with you some prick cop in that *****ty place known as Texas acussed my uncle of drug dealing, of course my uncle fought and lost. Twelve years later he goes free because his innocence was finally proven after the dick who did it admitted it to his mother. My uncle lost it all in those twelve years.
No John Coffey from The Green Mile? Im outraged
@Pout (9): Yeaah life sentence till natural death would be better..atleast if the person is innocent, he/she would be alive..
Shocking and yet people still want the death penalty
thats terrible. to happen to all of these people..
@barabas (5):
Well the list is not exhaustive, in the sense, it does not cover every wrong conviction from every single country on Earth. So one cannot generalise about any particular country.
Moreover it’s the people whose mind is twisted..i feel their nationality/race/ethnicity has nothing to do with it.
Anyways that’s my opinion and everybody is free to have their own… and i’m neither pro/anti USA.
This is nothing compared to the number of Infants Presumed Innocent After Execution. I’m talking about abortion, baby.
The difference there is not everyone considers a foetus to be ‘alive’. It’s entirely subjective, mate.
The solution is simple. If you don’t like abortions then don’t have one but don’t try to push your opinions and morals on others.
Oh geez, how about we stick to the topic rather than trying to force your opinion down everyone’s throats?
Those of you commenting about most of these happening in the US are ignoring the point that in the US, there exist such a system such that innocence can still be inquired into even *after* execution, whereas in a “lesser” society, there may be no desire look into it any further once the deed has been done. Addressing your wrongs is preferable to ignoring them.
@Tony (16): Oh no, not that controversial irritating debate again..
Good list. Sad and thought-provoking. In my country, it is estimated that about 80% of the convicted criminals are innocent. The death penalty was recently abolished because of the Catholic Church’s influence over the state, but still a great injustice continues. You can get convicted by a simple eye testimony from a non-credible witness, you’d be given a corrupt and stupid public attorney and if you don’t have any money, that will almost certify your guilt.
Very good list.
@JFRATER: For the last 3 days very time I acess this site my antivirus goes insane. This is what it shows: Threats found: 1
Here is a complete list:
Threat Name: MSIE ADODB.Stream Object File Installation Weakness
Location: http://listverse.com/2009/02/01/top-10-best-tv-and-movie-cops/
Hope it helps
I will be the first to confess that I am pro the death penalty – but this list shows how we must be extremely careful in its application.
I am pro-death penalty too, but only in cases where there is zero doubt as to guilt. People like the BTK Killer and Joseph Edward Duncan (google them) should already have been put to death IMO. BUT – I don't think the death penalty is appropriate when there is only guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt". And this business of denying the testing of some DNA evidence just because of some procedural BS is ridiculous, and denying new trials because of missing some deadline or other, is reprehensible. I firmly believe there are POS's out there who have relinquished their right to life due to particularly heinous crimes, but only when there is NO doubt as to their guilt.
Post badly needs editing.
It is terrifying that most of these executions are taking place recently. We pardon humanity for the offenses of the middle ages, etc because “they happened so long ago, things are very different now.”. This list forces us to gaze into the blank stare of our apathy as it exists today. Its not an execution if its murder.
I like an idea that I heard- the population of a country should vote whether they should have the death penalty. If the majority vote for it then they have it, BUT every person who voted pro death penalty has their name recorded. For every person found innocent after their death, a random name is taken from the pro death penalty list and that person is then executed.
I think it might make people think twice about the death penalty, and possibly help ensure a less corrupt legal system.
It’s an imperfect world.
Imperfect judges…
Imperfect rules…
Imperfect system…
We need to look somewhere else.
Unfortunately, becoming a caped crusader is not an option.
I believe in “thou shall not kill.”
The only people who are pro death penalty are people who have done no research on it’s effectiveness. jfrater I have never been more disappointed in you.
There is no unemotional reason for the death penalty that you can name and the justice system cannot be governed by emotion.
Jake, the death penalty is 100% effective in insuring that they never kill again. While there may be other methods that are almost as effective, they would involve locking a person up and not allowing him the slightest possibility of physical contact with another person, not even another convict. And that, IMO, would be "cruel and unusual punishment", something the U.S. is against.
Personally, I’d say that murder is a cruel and unusual punishment … admittedly not as unusual as it should be though.
only in extremely (and I mean extremely) severe circumstances can killing ever be justified as a method ofjudicial punishment. Murder is murder whether it is state sanctioned or otherwise
@Jacob (21): I AGREE!!!!!
anybody else seeing the TEXAS pattern here?
@jake ryder (26): The “Justice System” is penned down by that father who has not watched his daughter being gangraped and that mother who has not witnessed her son being burnt alive by a mob in broad daylight.
what exactly is your point?
Sure, if someone did any of those things to anyone in my family, I’d probably want some kind of bloody, horrific and/or torturous punishment bestowed upon the perpetrators, I’d probably want to administer said punishment myself as well. However, the fact of the matter is that in that situation you aren’t really in your right mind, you may want something but that doesn’t make it right.
@El the erf (24): so no el the erficator?? Damn. Dude don’t you think we comment a wee bit too much. Ive just took a peek at the about section and to my great embarrassment i was first. So i guess ill take a break from all commenting for a while. C ya dude.
Ps: im living under the assumption that jfrater is a catholic. So i dont know but seing comment 19 and 20. Well its epic
On the bright side, think about the people who got away scot free
Here’s ten more reasons why the death penalty is wrong.
@jake ryder (26): I completely agree. It’s always going to be in the hands of men and women and we are all too flawed to be making arbitrary decisons about if someone should live or die. So many examples on this list prove this where there is overwhelming evidence that a mistake has been made but those that can change the outcome refuse to say “Ok we were wrong, he can go free” because they have often built their careers on that conviction.
@jfrater (20): I’m suprised at you. I always assumed you were a religious man but then how can we justify making a decision that is for god to make (if he exists, which I don’t believe but you, I think, do)?
Killing is wrong.
@Barold (34): Killing is *****y!!
@Arsnl (30): And about time you troll. Shame on you! Why don’t you just take your toys with you and go play on the highway. We can do without little Arsnls running amok an’ creating ruckus in here… Shoo!
ps…relinquishing the crown without further bloodshed was smart thinking on your part pardner.
Most of these arent even accidental. Appauling.
@Miss_Info (35): That was certainly Ted Bundy’s opinion. Any relation?
@barabas (5): Ya thats why everyone I know is trying to GTFO of this country and no one is trying too move in and get a green card, Oh wait…
@Me (23): Ya and everyone who supports the legalisation of Drugs should have their names put on a list, and everyone who overdose’s should have the same happen to someone on the list.
reading this depresses me..
need to grab a cup of coffee…
Silly bloody Americans. They always have to learn the hard way, don’t they?
@jfrater (20): You’re in favour of the state having the power to murder for vengeance. Congratulations.
vengeance or justice? thats subjective, im anti-dp by the way, mainly because why give the bastards an easy way out when we can make them suffer for the rest of their lives?
This is the reason why Australia doesnt have the dealth penalty it went out ages ago because the government realised people were being wrongly accused of the crimes
I’ve got it–Let’s kill everyone in TEXAS–Naw, why stop there, lets kill everyone in the USA. Then all the wisemen would have to pick on someone else.
We are FREE to air our dirty linens for the world to see, does your country do the same?
Okkkk boring list but did not break my “7th interesting list in a row in listverse streak”.
I am actually surprised ‘Sacco and Vanzetti’ didnt make the list. They sparked media attention all over the work and even had support from HG Wells and Albert Einstein that the two were not responsible for what they did.
Correction:
I am actually surprised âSacco and Vanzettiâ didn’t make the list. They sparked media attention all over the world and even had support from HG Wells and Albert Einstein that the two were not responsible for what they did. They were just killed simply for their beliefs about anarchy, although, they never exacted any plans whatsoever.
@wodvamp I’m the same… I can’t imagine how the mother of the bonus felt to lose her son the way she did and he was innocent. I liked this list even though it was depressing
Great job (no I’m not being sarcastic lol)
I find it interesting in debates like this that there’s always someone who’s pro death penalty who talks about really emotive and upsetting crimes like gang rape or someone being burned alive. The fact is that how upsetting, disgusting or depraved a crime is has nothing to do with how the perpetrator should be punished. Justice is blind (hence the blindfold on the statue) and has to be implemented rationally, evenly and fairly. It doesn’t make sense to differentiate between different kinds of crime based on how they make you FEEL, that’s just a stupid bull***** attitude people have where they think it’s rational to base decisions on how they FEEL about things.
I think this list illustrates very well the most compelling argument against the death penalty. There are other more philosophical arguments to do with justice, retribution, the purpose of punishment, deterrents etc but really I think this is the only argument needed. You can talk about how disgusting certain crimes are all you like but imagine how you’d FEEL if a member of your family was executed (ie murdered) for being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or having the wrong colour skin, or having a ***** lawyer. There is no place in any civilised society for the death penalty for ANY crime, EVER. And yes I include paedophiles, rapists, murderers, terrorists and even Saddam Hussein in that.
Well now here is a topic that has a long-time Listverse lurker to finally be botered to join in a list debate!…Hhello all!
Firstly – @ Me (23) – Well that is just the most ludicrous suggestion in regards to the death penalty I have ever heard…the ancient saying of ’2 wrongs do not make a right’ has rarely been a more apt summation of anything…Do you seriously actually think that is a good idea?? Or are you just saying that to back up your belief that a death penalty should not exist?
As far as the death penalty itself goes, I must say that I really do feel it should have SOME place in our legal system (and by ‘our’ I am talking of Australia) – however…the legal system as it stands here is so disjointed, and just so inherently broken & downright contradictory & at times seemingly arbitrary, that the system itself needs some serious working out before a death penalty should possibly be considered to be implemented here.
But fixing that is a whole other kettle of fish…but I say: IF we can ‘fix’ the system – then in cases where there is NO doubt of guilt – and removing technicalities from the law whereby a person is clearly guilty, but faces a light sentencing or suchlike on one of these ‘legal technicalities’ – and where the crime is considered sufficiently bad or the offender sufficiently ‘unfixable’ (i.e. Repeat offenders of heinous crimes) – then I see no reason at all for these people to exist. None.
Why should the rest of us pay to keep these people sitting in a room somewhere? Life in prison?? (and here in Ausralia with our slap-on-the-wrist/random sentencing system, to actually get a Life Sentence you have to have committed some seriously baaa-aaaaad crime(s)!) – Then what the hell is the pont of that?!…Please tell me? If one is not considered fit to be allowed back out into society – then one serves no purpose or offers no value whatsoever to the human race. You may as well not exist.
I have read a number of times that in many US states – more is spent on housing a prisoner per capita, than is spent on educating children. (For but one example of this: http://fresnobeehive.com/opinion/2010/01/schwarzenegger_proposes_spendi.html) And that just seems a bit chicken & the egg to me…the less education you give, the less opportunties and the more inequality you create – then the more crime you will eventually create. So fix those systems first – and the flow on effect should trickle down, hence allowing you to actually achieve that goal of spending less on incarceration/rehabilitation – and so on and so forth….it might take a while, but the logic of it is irrefutable.
We need to move forward as a species…and to that end, there are some things we just simply do not require – and violent, pathalogical, dangerous criminals are one of them…they serve no purpose, offer no benefits – so cut them out and move on with things.
Well, that’s my 2 cents anyhow…some will no dlubt judge it callous or harsh or whatnot – and perhaps it is…but that’s honestly how I see it & so I would love to hear your arguments & logic to the contrary.
N.B: Religious pontificators with your “But it’s simple: God says Thou Shalt Not Kill!!1!!1!” need not apply….Yes, you don’t like it because your instruction manual/rulebook says it’s bad – ok, I get that…But I actually find this to be a most fascinating topic & would like to hopefully hear some more in-depth arguments than that here – For OR Against…
@Danny. I think USA usually dominates this list because they keep phenomenal records and the smallest things that reach the media and be promptly published. Like the trials of OJ Simpson for example. It was apparent ‘the trial of the century’ they called it. It had the attention of all the Americans world wide and when it reached the Internet, the author’s wrote it up as something spectacular. It true that other countries do use death penalties, but since those ‘trial of the century’ or whatever about other convicted victims get in the way, when researching about it, you will not find the results you are asking for. Thus, it is extremely difficult to be not biased when taking information solely from the Internet. If the author used a book instead, it would be an entire different story where you can spout your views on it.
@Danny (47)wat the hell is wrong with you!! for one everyone knows that supposedly the US has the best judicial system in the world. Most countries dont even do half if any at all the forensics we use to try and liberate people from punishable crime. I know one thng I’d rather rot in jail then get shot by 100 men or behead or burn ar any other (no offence) barbaric customs of other nations. And as far as his book goes I dont see anyone tryna sponser or publish anything your doing! Probably because you lack talent! Go and finish your whiskey bottle no1 is begging you to stay.
I think this is more of an indictment of bent policemen than the use of the death penalty.
For everyone that says it’s not fair to take a life for a life, is it fair for some sicko to rape and murder little children, and in 20 years be let out? The penal system is in such disarray.
Interesting to note also that all of these examples are American. God bless the USA.
Overworked public servents and the pressure to solve a case as quickly as possible. Overworked lawyers/ public defenders, too many appeals for the court employees to handle. That is why so many of these monumental mistakes occurred.
To be fair, you could add to this list the vast majority of executions carried out in backwards-ass police states like Iran, Saudi Arabia and China, the most barbaric nation on the planet.
Whole ”nother list!
Ok, this is an appallingly written sentence:
“He was put under police surveillance for 2 weeks, during which time Ludlumâs body was found in a creek, raped, stabbed and murdered.”
Unfortunately, it makes a shocking event seem almost comical.
Let me help you out there:
“He was put under police surveillance for 2 weeks, during which time Ludlumâs body was found in a creek; it had been raped, stabbed and murdered.”
@Carlos (55): Actually Carlos, calling a human being “it” is much worse.
@Carlos (55): Where’s your list?? Dont nitpick at his grammatical error, or are you that bored???
@ Hogarth, yes you could say that. But then again if you’re going to slag those countries off and call yourself civilised and them barbaric (and maybe use that as an excuse to invade them), then you need to put your own house in order unless you want to be a massive hypocrite. People in glass houses and all that…
Also- remember this- THE DEATH PENALTY DOES NOT WORK AS A DETERENT.