Since the beginning of humanity, people have invented explanations for things they don’t understand. The culprits for the unexplained have evolved from gods and demons, to ghosts and spirits, to extraterrestrials. A recent study showed that almost 1 in 4 Americans believe that, at least some of the reported UFO’s, are actually spacecraft from other worlds. Many people believe space aliens have visited Earth in the past – if they’re not here right now. Of course the vast majority of “evidence” of extraterrestrials have simple (albeit WAY less exciting) explanations. Here are 10 man-made things falsely attributed to extraterrestrial influence. Enjoy.

Discoveries of ancient artwork depicting mysterious figures have helped give rise to the “Ancient Astronaut Theory”, which claims that alien beings visited prehistoric humans, possibly interacting and sharing knowledge with them. Advocates of this theory usually point to specific examples, such as a particular rock carving in the Val Camonica site in Italy, as well as the Wandjina Petroglyph (above) sites in Australia. Using these examples as evidence reaches unsturdy ground when held up to scientific scrutiny. The popular image of two “alien” figures in Val Camonica was picked out of over 200,000 drawings – a pretty clear sign of confirmation bias. Testing at the Wandjina site showed some drawings had been repainted numerous times over, with the images evolving over time at the artists’ discretion, rendering the original artwork unknown.

According to many UFO enthusiasts, the Temple of Osiris at Abydos contains definitive proof of advanced ancient technology. The glyphs seem to include depictions of a helicopter, a jet plane and some sort of flying saucer. Unfortunately for believers, the glyphs are a result of erosion and actual replacement and re-carving of hieroglyphics. The original text is part of the titulary of Seti I, that had been changed to reference Ramsses II. Modifying and defacing inscriptions was common in ancient Egypt’s history, and in this case yielded some strange-looking results. Even stranger, UFO enthusiasts do not find it odd that there are no other examples like this in the thousands of hieroglyphs discovered elsewhere, nor is there any mention of flying machines anywhere in Egyptian literature.

The Nazca Lines are a series of hundreds of ancient geoglyphs located in Peru. These include depictions of animals, birds, fish and humans, along with simple lines and geometric shapes. Some of them are over 600ft. across and can only be viewed properly from the air. This has led to speculation by the Ancient Astronaut crowd that the ancient Peruvians were capable of advanced flight, or were trying to communicate with beings that were. Scientists have claimed the lines were of a spiritual significance, possibly pertaining to the availability of water. Also, historians have since recreated similar lines using primitive techniques without aerial assistance.

The Mechanism is a clock-like instrument from around 85 BC, that was discovered in 1900 near Antikythera, Greece. It was used aboard ships as a navigation tool because it could accurately predict locations of the sun, moon and the 5 known planets, at any given date. The device contained a complex system of gears, built with sophisticated technology, that rivaled that of 14th century clocks. Because of the precision involved in it’s construction, it’s almost exact predictions of cosmic bodies, and the apparent 1300 year gap in technology, UFO enthusiasts have cited this as evidence of alien contact, as humans could have never figured it’s complex technology out that early. However, if aliens were to blame, they would have probably told the Greeks about more than just five planets, or at least given them a magnetic compass. Of course ancient Greek literature mentions mechanisms like this one without mentioning other-worldly visitors.

Found in a tomb excavation in 1898, the Saqqara Bird has been rumored, by believers in the Ancient Astronaut Theory, to be evidence of advanced flight in ancient Egypt. They note the vertical tail of the “bird” resembles a tailplane on an aircraft as opposed to the horizontal tail feathers of a real bird. The lack of legs, and the angle of the wings has lent to speculation about the design’s capability of aerodynamic lift. Tests performed on recreations of the artifact have shown it to have no aerodynamic properties conductive to flight. Modern scientific theories suggest it’s either a religious artifact or even just a simple children’s toy.

Dogu are small humanoid figurines created in prehistoric Japan. The unusual appearance of the Dogu has been claimed to resemble some sort of space suit, supposedly complete with goggles, armor and hoses. Adding to the mystery, their exact purpose remains unclear to historians. Ancient Astronaut proponents tend to ignore the fact that the “goggle-eyed type” figures are only one of many types of Dogu, and that archaeologists have pointed out the similarity of the figure’s eyes with Inuit snow goggles. They are seldom discovered intact, with limbs having been cut or broken off. This with the exaggerated hips, buttocks, and breasts depicted suggest a possible usage in fertility rituals.

In 1966, a man claimed to have seen a saucer shaped craft over a field near Tully, Australia. The saucer allegedly left a circular pattern of flattened reeds over the area it had taken off from. Years later, this unique story inspired two English pranksters to create their own patterns of flattened crops in local fields, using simple tools. The fad quickly spread, and crop circles became increasingly complex and intricate. While some believe this is a result of alien technology advancing, or the increasingly complex nature of an extraterrestrial “message” to humans, the overwhelming majority of crop circles have been revealed as products of deception, artistic expression and/or business or tourist interests.

In December of 2009, an enormous spiral appeared in the sky over northern Norway, leading to speculation of an extraterrestrial visit. The unusual visual phenomenon lasted for 2-3 minutes, and consisted of a blue light originating on the horizon, which gained altitude, culminating into a large white pinwheel effect before disappearing “into a wormhole.” UFO enthusiasts cited this as evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, while the official explanation from the Russian government wasn’t quite as fantastic. Apparently, a Russian military missile test went haywire, and the spiral effect was either a result of a broken stabilizer engine, or the missile circling an airborne misfire beacon until it ran out of fuel and fell into the sea.

With it’s enormous stones dating past 2400BC, the purpose and construction methods of Stonehenge have long been debated. Humans are generally accepted to have built the actual monument, as comparably large stones have been erected in modern times using primitive tools. However, Ancient Astronaut theorists claim that the positions of the stones confirm an ancient ability to predict eclipses. This ability would mean the ancients had knowledge of lunar nodes – the two points in space where Earth’s orbit intersects the moon’s orbit. This knowledge wouldn’t be possible without extraterrestrial influence — or by generations of astute study that was continuously passed down and improved upon. Modern science obviously leans towards the latter, but it is possible that scientists have also attributed too much astronomical meaning to the placement of the stones.

Similar to many other megalithic sites around the world, the Pyramids of Giza have been repeatedly attributed to extraterrestrials throughout the years, mostly because of the sheer magnitude of their construction. According to believers, the technology needed to build the massive monuments was not available to the Egyptians during the time they were built. The cuts and placement of the stones are said to be so precise that we cannot recreate them even in modern times. The placement of the pyramids themselves and the measurements contained within are also said to support the Ancient Astronaut Theory, such as the height of the Great Pyramid being an accurate, scaled-down measurement of the distance between Earth and the Sun, or the three Giza Pyramids correlating with the constellation Orion. Modern measuring techniques have proven hopeful ideas like those to be false, yet the rumors persist. The Pyramids of Giza do display a remarkable knowledge of engineering and measuring for their time period, but one would think that if creatures capable of interstellar travel were actually responsible for them, they would have done a better job.

Believers in extraterrestrials have also pointed to religious texts to support their claims of a previous visitation. Proponents often mention the imagery in the Book of Ezekiel, or the vimanas of Hindu Vedic texts, while some religions, like Raelism and Scientology, hold the belief of extraterrestrials as basic tenets of their faith. One thing some Ancient Astronaut theorists like to mention as a modern day comparison are the so-called Cargo Cults. These “cults” arose when the primitive, indigenous populations of isolated islands were exposed to visitors from civilized countries. For example, U.S. soldiers landed on the tiny island of Tanna, Vanuatu, during WWII to build airstrips for their fight against Japan. The tribal inhabitants viewed the soldiers as gods, and accepted gifts from them as rewards from their deities. When the soldiers left as quickly as they came, the inhabitants began recreating their “rituals,” such as marching in formation and building makeshift landing strips and planes, in order to continue the delivery of their divine “cargo.” Some ufologists have speculated that ancient religions may have developed the same way, with extraterrestrials acting the part of American soldiers.




















amazing !!! love this blog
What about Easter Island? I think aliens are responsible for that
Thought I was gonna see that too.
yeah, agreed. Easter Island shoul've been mentioned in this list. Although i do not believe that it is 'aliens' depicted in the carvings, the figures do represent the topic here.
The author of this list sounds rather skeptical about all of these. A little credulousness, please!
I agree. I also saw a recreation of the bird and it was perfectly aerodynamic and flew so thats completely false about what was said
Doesn’t matter what test you saw, it doesn’t change the fact of the other tests.
Very biased example of uneducated douchebaggery. tl;dr, just do a bit of research and learn a bit about some of the more properly unexplained phenomena. ie: those spiral events have been reported all over the world, clearly the patterns are too uniform to be a simple missile test gone awry, there is video footage of it, and last but not least; it is attributed to secret government experiments involving quantum mechanics and wormhole technology, which is a very real thing. I would at least do some proper research before I submitted a list pretentiously…. Yea aliens did it bla bla – now where’s that tinfoil hat of mine?
i remember watching videos of that norwegian spiral thing on tv, thought that the mayans were 3 years off with their end of the world predictions hahaha
George Bush should be on this list. Hes considered a lizard.
No, he shouldn't be on this list seeing that he isn't a human creation. Besides, David Icke is just bat ***** crazy.
As is the British monarchy, however, as Julius pointed out, they are not human creations!
@ Julius: If you say Bush isn't a human creation, then are you saying he IS a lizard?; a slimy, slippery, green scaly lizard? Or perhaps an alien?; a slimy, slippery, green scaly alien? Or is he just a Gremlin; a slimy green etc etc
David would laugh and actually agree with you.
well, there have been rumors that an alien ship crashed in New Mexico in a sheep farm… And Al Gore was born 9 months after that…
Nice! Don't know that the Pyramids of Giza is in precise measurement. I can't even believed that it can't be recreated in modern times. Cool!
They are also "true"square. No house/building is "true." Cant be done. Also you can't fit a piece of paper between this blocks. They however used no mortar in building the pyramids.
What do you mean by 'true' square? And the reason the blocks fit together is very simple: Erosion and gravity. When one heavy block lies upon another, in the space of 3000 years, they're going to adjust to eachother. Compare it to your butt and the couch. Furthermore, because of especially rain, the poreous limestone will gradually 'melt' and fill up the imperfections of the block underneath, thus giving the impression of being taylor-made.
wrong , armin, so wrong……
Thank-you. I was just about to point out the effect of time upon limestone. You've saved me the trouble.
"….the impression of being taylor-made. .".
And although my maiden name was Taylor, I can't take any credit for the pyramids.
So you’re telling me one cant built a house with a square base using laser levels and all that jazz? Are you a construction engineer?
And you’re also forgetting the numbers involved. For the great pyramid: about 10 years with an average of 15000 workers and a peak of 40000. Lets take now the empire state building: 1 year and 40 days and with a peak of 3400 workers. Is the great pyramid 30-40 times greater than the ESB? Doubt it. Today its not economically feasible to pay so much attention to little details. You dont have a megalomaniac with great ressources in manpower and time to build just one building.
Ps @armin good call but they also had techniques to level everything to a very precise degree.
…
You guys all do know that archaeologists have found the remains of towns in which the builders of the pyramids lived, right? There are tons of sites debunking the stupidity of the conspiracy theory that 'aliens built the pyramids'. I find it hilarious looking through sites claiming to have irrefutable evidence when they really have nothing. Anyway, the entire foundation of this myth is that the people of 4000 years ago weren't smart enough to create something like the pyramids, in which case the Great Wall of China etc. were also built by aliens *roll eyes*
Also, this wasn't directed at anyone in particular – it just drives me mad when people believe baseless conspiracy theories when there a whole sh*tload of evidence against it.
A basic Google search will come up with tons of useful sites –
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ancient…
http://ngccommunity.nationalgeographic.com/ngcblo…
etc.
about the missile thingy….. missiles actually have a self destruct sistem so if they go haywire they are destroyed, and not allowed to fly over populated areas such as was the case, where they could potentially hurt a lot of ppl. so that explanation goes right out the window – not to say it was aliens , just something else
See, your rejection of the missile explanation requires the existence of a second, greater conundrum. Why would the Russians make up a "missile test gone awry" explanation? Why would they be lying like that? I'd prefer to think you're wrong.
Good point – typically missles are tracked by a range officer and if it appears to be going haywire, espeically near populated areas, they push the button and blow them up. The Russian out of control missle excuse does not make much sense.
unless of course the malfunction was in the self destruct mechanism
Indeed, though I don't wish to make generalisations, the Russian government isn't exactly renowned for being up front about things; there are endless possibilities.
Not to mention it has happened two more times! (And the first one was not 2 -3 minutes, it was 30 min. to an hour.) The lasted sighting being in Australia in June, 2010. There was another missle launch attached to this one. But suprise! The missle that left ground was from Kennedy Space in Florida. It was launched a fully recorded HOUR after the event took place in Australia. What was is? Who *****ing knows at this point! THe Uniiverse is made up of more things than we think we can imagine. We haven't decovered/ detected all of the types of sciences to come in the future.
One of my favourite recent lists.
Loved it.
Interstellar travel á la Star Wars will probably never happen unfortunately
I know. I am truly bummed to know that science fiction is just that. Forget about your Star Trek, Star Wars..whatever…. AIN'T POSSIBLE. Light speed travel is not possible (except for light).
when will we realize *eye roll* …..
Just because Man says it can’t be , does not mean it can’t ….
It’s why wer’e called humans and not gods.
You people sound like those people from 200 years ago who said heavier-than-air flight was impossible. True, faster-than-light travel is impossible, but only if we limit ourselves to our current understanding of physical laws. We've only been here for like, 200,000 or so years; the universe has been around for at least 13 billion years so we have no right to tell it what it can or cannot do and we can't pretend we already know everything about it
well, Jo, i would like to agree with you , however, if you ever get a chance, read some books about a guy named Einstein. He pretty much proved that you cannot have 'faster that light' travel. If you think he may be wrong, write a paper and have it published.
Lighten up "the mick". Don't be a dick – the mick.
you're a poet and you don't know it…
Some of Einsteins theories have been proven wrong… whose to say he wasn't wrong there?
I wasn't implying that Einstein or any other great scientist of our time was wrong. What I wanted to say is that one of the basic elements of the scientific method is open-mindedness: to gain a better understanding of a natural phenomenon we must be open to all kinds of differing, sometimes contradictory or ridiculous hypotheses and then through rigorous, controlled testing filter those that best fits empirical data and then formulate a theory which best explains the phenomenon under study based on our observations and experimentations. Theories are never taken as eternal ultimate truths; they come and go as our understanding develops and our data gathering and testing methods improve. Theories that fit particularly well with observations and/or those which have effects and applications so ubiquitous and taken for granted last longer and are considered as fact(e.g. electricity, existence of atoms, orbits of planets), while those that don't stand up to scrutiny are discarded in favor of theories more agreeable with observations.
Notice the pattern here: it is the Universe that makes up the rules for us, not the other way around. Theories are our attempt to translate those rules using the language of maths and science hoping to directly use that knowledge on our continual quest to improve our way of life, not as governing laws with which to impose our will on what's possible or impossible i.e. what the Universe "can" or "cannot do" in our tendency to oversimplify things to make life much easier(case in point: the "confirmation bias" referred to by the list).
Again I'm not challenging the findings of Einstein et al as I am not very well versed in advanced mathematics and i have read about his special relativity theory and the many experiments and practical effects that support the theory. However, it's still only a theory, like any other theories, and it only explains what we can observe and not necessarily all there is to observe. We have to open our minds to all kinds of possibilities; the most significant scientific advances of our time produced more new mysteries, more new often unanticipated discoveries, more avenues for advancement than answers to the previously unanswered questions they attempted to solve.
for the record, I would LOVE to believe that there is FTL (faster than light) travel.
Our existence is only a feeble amount of time compared to the age of the universe.
We have progressed from steam power to nuclear power in under 200 years. What is in store for us in the next 200? what about the next 2000? I don't know. But, I would like to believe that there are branches of Physics and Mathematics that we have not yet discovered that may just open the doors for FTL travel. We still haven't been able to properly examine black holes, for example, and ultimately, we are only theorising what is happening based on what we can see and what we EXPECT to happen based on our current given set of rules.
So, yes, I do wish that we do acheive FTL in the near future.
Oh, and i'll go eat some humble pie for the comment ''go read some books on a guy called Einstein"… you actually some across as having read more books than me.
Nobody’s telling the universe what to do and we’re not pretending we know everything. Far from it. But when you assume that what we DO know is wrong you have to explain why. Till now general relativity works on a large scale and quantum mechanics works on a small scale. It worked for 100 years. If intelligent aliens exist ofcourse the difference between us and them would be huge. But we as a species, we’re trying to construct something. So like mike said, either make a contribution or just sit down and stop complaining like the rest of us are doing.
Great, well let us know on how far you get with your metaphysics and post a video on YouTube once you get your FTL engine working so you can prove us all wrong… until then, we'll just live in reality thanx!
Actually the its “à la” not “á la”. The second one doesnt even exist in french.
oh ok, thanks à…will try to remember it
Great list but the writer sounds like his trying to debunk things, this site is ment to be unbias, but still cheers on the research
and Oh my god I live in Tully Australia and I study stuff like this (In uni : D) and I never knew that
I don't think the writer was trying to debunk the existence of aliens, if that's what you mean; he probably just wanted to dissociate these artifacts from alien intervention and properly attribute them to human creativity/ingenuity. Our prehistoric human ancestors were just as intellectually capable as we are today – they were just as smart, as emotional, as creative, as wise, as human as us – the only thing that separates us is the vast pool of collective human knowledge that we've gathered over the hundreds of thousands of years that have since passed; knowledge that we've slowly built up from the wisdom of preceding generations.
Just because we know more today than, say, cave-dwelling early humans doesn't necessarily mean that we're any smarter, like theorists on prehistoric alien intervention in the development of modern humans seem to think: "No, they couldn't have possibly done all thes with their primitive tools and limited understanding of metal working, geometry, astronomy, etc…. Therefore, they were assisted by aliens!" What's really insulting about their logic is that they automatically associate anything they cannot easily explain to some wacky nonsense like UFO's, telekinesis or magic due to their intellectual laziness and discredit our ancestors by underestimating their motivations and the mastery and cunning involved in their methods.
(I read the following on Reader's Digest a long time ago but forgot the exact location & time, sorry) When the late US President Ronald Reagan was challenged by a young college student who said something along the lines of, "Our generation is smarter than your generation: we have jets, microwaves, space travel, blah blah…" Reagan replied, "You're right, we didn't have those things when I was your age. We invented them."
No, we are smarter now than then. Because of our higher living standards, our brains can develop much better than those of frequently-starving, plagueridden, often stressed, 'cave-dwellers'.
I disagree, we are not smarter, and we are just more educated. There is a difference since we have extended libraries of knowledge and don't have to go through the same trial and error our ancestors dealt with, many sources being forgotten and constantly relearned leaving them in a state of perpetual discovery.
Can you, in your infinite wisdom, give one example of a crop circle that couldn't have been man-made? Furthermore, the religion thing is quite certainly not the result of an alien visitation. Religion is something that's inherent to being human. Evidence of this is that every known culture has atleast some form om religion, and there are parts of the brain that, when stimulated, give out religious hallucinations. Now unless you suggest all those cultures have been visited by aliens, and those aliens implanted a untraceable, hereditary device in our heads, i think that's pretty darn convincing.
Sorry, wrong post. This should have read:
Yes we are smarter. Because of our higher living standards, especially as children and teens, our brains get to develop much faster and further that those of our starving, plague-ridden, stressed cave dwelling-ancestors.
Can you, in your infinite wisdom, explain the blowout in the crops found in crop circles? Given that nobody has yet come forward explaining their method of blowing out crop stems and not damaging crops in such a way that makes it clear it was the result of using your feet and a wooden board, I place the burden of proof that it was humans who did this on others….namely you seeing as you are the first person who decided to comment.
And stop putting words in my mouth for god's sake (lol). Again, you cannot prove that it is not at least in part the result of aliens. I am fully aware of the experiments producing hallucinations equivalent to what religious people claim to experience. Yet again, there is no proof that it is not a combination of actually seeing aliens or ufos as well as hallucinations, or simply one or the other.
Now, all of this can be left alone if you chose to interpret what I said exactly as it is and do your own research before responding to something you don't think is correct.
For the first item, I don't even have to use my infinite wisdom, but i can simply use my farmers knowledge: Young plants, just like rainsoaked plants, are easy plieable. You should try this at home: find a field with young crops, and try to break a stalk. It's nearly impossible.
Second of all, there's something called Ockham's razor, which loosely translated states that the best explanations are the one's which make the least assumptions. For the non-alienmade theory, we need to assume far less things, than for the alienmade theory.
If I understand correctly your argument about the religion thing is: you can't prove that it isn't partly through aliens. But that's like saying, "there's a god, because you can't prove there isn't one." In the creation of religion, no aliens are needed to make a solid scientific conclusion, including them nevertheless would be really unscientific.
Last but not least I'm sorry if I misinterpreted your words, but I'm not sorry for trying (and succeding) to find holes in your theory. That's a little thing called falsification, on of the most important scientific instruments in existance.
Have YOU ever submitted a list and had it published? Take it easy, I'm not trying to be a *****y fingerpointer. Just hear me out.
Having a list published for the entire internet to read AND THEN plant their personal take on any given list subject in the comments area, opens the door to a lot of haters. Can't say that being the object of those haters is fun.
And that's on the lists that can be verified by fact.
Stepping into the realm of humankind's unknown doors of lost history, (like the existence of UFOs, etc.), leaves a lot of leeway in either direction.
I like to think that THIS author has presented 10 unknowns, with both arguments represented.
If the list seems rather biased towards a human creator for these entries, then perhaps it is because there ARE two sides to every entry. And some folks haven't got knowledge of some of the "human maker" arguments.
Or the author is exactly that….biased.
This makes up for that wretched July 4th list!
I found the article to be lacking in “glamour”. While some parts are new to me (the beginning items) others are way too obvious and well-known to be made by humans.
I was probably expecting to see the aluminium wedge of aiud and other things like that. (but im guessing that one was a hoax).
Ps: 1)about the last item. Cargo-cults. Let it not be said humans are intelligent.
2)i really cant express how dissapointed i was when hawking said that aliens are out there and we should avoid them since the might be looking ti depleat out planet for ressources. Damn man you’re a scientists. Leave the Sci-fi mumbo jumbo to those who are good at writting it.
Hawking was DEAD WRONG on that. If they are out there, bring 'em on! If they try to deplete our resources we'll give 'em hell baby! Let them get a load of "Independance Day"!
10 Human Creations Attributed To Aliens… By *****in' Morons
lol. Point well made
http://istina.rin.ru/eng/ufo/text/115.html
tiahuanaco was said to be to advanced in stone cutting technology to be done by people.
people think aliens did this. http://www.vyperlook.com/odd-strange/proof-that-a…
Unfortunately it appears the author chooses to ignore explaining that all crop circles are not man made. The author also fails to prove religion is not the result of alien visitation, instead offering up a straw man. And by the way, the images in Number 10 mysteriously appear to have halos.
Can you, in your infinite wisdom, give one example of a crop circle that couldn't have been man-made? Furthermore, the religion thing is quite certainly not the result of an alien visitation. Religion is something that's inherent to being human. Evidence of this is that every known culture has atleast some form om religion, and there are parts of the brain that, when stimulated, give out religious hallucinations. Now unless you suggest all those cultures have been visited by aliens, and those aliens implanted a untraceable, hereditary device in our heads, i think that's pretty darn convincing.
As for the halos, as the writer suggested, that's just confirmation bias. The Romans painted walking penises, so they must be real too?
Listverse is such a good site,too good in fact,maybe Listverse was created by aliens ?
I'M ON TO YOU JFRATER.
You know, I never thought of that but it is a possibility.
Kitsune, you're *****en right! And I, for one, welcome our new JFrater overlord!
Jamie is from New Zulland, which almost amounts to the same thing!
I don`t want to sound like a killjoy, but flying saucers do NOT exist. It`s a big con. The so called-"Flying Saucers," are top secret military experiments. The "Roswell," incident, it was a American military experiment. People thought a weather balloon was a UFO. And the military loved it, that people thought the weather balloon was a UFO. This let them test all the weapons they wanted, and the poor public would think there all UFO`s. Sorry to spoilt it.
And you know this to be 100% fact?
why do you believe what the military is telling you? why do you buy the offical story? there is many references to alien intervention in ancient times. flying shields are common. i know how they work.
they engineer spacetime or the stretch of space time itself. there are two technologies that are used.
one is an electric type, and the other use two thing. the first one create a phase conjugate standing wave
that form a particle in the center or a field if you want to call it that. this technology have a problem at large distances of space since it rely on making time go faster. the second technology use a particle accelerator or an electron gun to slow down time. and uses an ultraviolet wave emanating from the distortion that they confine and split in two halves. one beam is reduced in wavelenght then combined with the other so each halved become out of phase with each other, so they repel inside a wave guide like a reflective shuttle nozzle. the wave guides is used to steer the spaceship when stars move faster in time at the shortest route, the spaceship make the star come to it. now the star become the travler toward the spaceship. the bidirectional waves is not moving with the spaceship its the fabric of space that is moving.
space and time is relative to distance. light doesn´t move trough space, its space that moves at a speed of time relative to another spacetime reference where time passes at a different rate. nature is Holographic. the hologram is made by a beam of a bidirectional wave at only one frequency that is split where one halves of the beam is changed in waveleght then combined with the other beam half to interfere. this gives you a waveleght differential that goes between low and high. the longest wave will in a fixed circumference move transverse in perpendicular direction of itself against the higher frequency, so you get a space where the wave lenght is increasing in leght in one direction and decreasing in lenght perpendicular to that direction. this is what is called a standing wave or a phase conjugate wave. it form a particle with lots of smaller particles at higher frequencies. like planets around a star. the same prosess is reapated over and over again at different frequencies to make up an entire universe.
Stonehenge was created to mark the location of the Pandorica. FACT. I saw it on Doctor Who
I'm fine with people say aliens have been here, I'm fine with people saying they haven't! I just want to know if anybodt thinks any of these are true then why haven't we seen them since?
Why come here, help us, and then bugger off never to be seen again- i don't get it!
BTW, I do believe aliens exist I just have absolutely no idea where they are in the universe.
See Law of One, and its first derivation of Law of Confusion/Free Will. It may help shed another light on your thoughts.
Ok I had a quick look. No it didn't shed any light on my thoughts. It seems quite made up. Apart from anything else there is absolutely no introduction on the matter some person, Ra, evidently spoke to people but nothing is said of how that happened. Sillyness.
Here in Norway the spiral got very little attention. The media mentioned it when i happened and the day after they gave the explanation. There were no speculations or consperasy theories. I actually didn’t think much about it untill I found a long discussion (in english) by accident a few mounths later.
spiral over norway
i don´t think the russian rocket is an accident. i think they are researching torsion field physics.
they try to create tears in the fabric of space with a theory that has not true value at all. the light that lid
up the spiral doesn´t make eny sense when you look at the shape of the light connected to the spiral.
its like it´s two rockets in action. there is always holes in rationalisation of observed.
I believe in Aliens. You telling me, the universe goes on, for like, EVER, and their`s no life on other planets? Yeah right. But do you really think there going to come to this *****hole? THey`ll see us, the way we`re at at war, with each other all the time, and they`ll say, "Blimey, I`m not going there!" You know?
good list…nice amount of reserach done…shouldn't it be "conducive to flight" at #6..??
Great list, MikeS – thanks! Although I had heard of most of these and was aware of these controversies, there were a couple that were new to me. I, like many others, would LOVE to believe that we've been visited by intelligent extraterrestrials – but just can't, really. Like Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes once said, after seeing some examples of man trashing the planet, "I think the biggest evidence that there's intelligent life on other planets is that none of it has tried to contact us."
Regarding the Norway Spiral, I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation, but I doubt it's the one given by Russia – they aren't generally so forthcoming with information, especially when it smacks of anything critical of Russian expertise, such as a missile failure. IMO, Russians can be as technologically innovative as any country in the west, and we tend to overlook or underestimate that. I think it's possible that the Norway Spiral may have been caused by a test that succeeded beyond their expectations, or in a way that they didn't predict.
Regarding the Giza pyramids, I agree that we might not be able to recreate them exactly, but then I seriously doubt ancient Egyptians could recreate the Sydney Opera House or the Empire State Building. They had manpower sources and a motivation that we can't really duplicate. A deeply held religious motivation would go a long way towards finding a solution.
I dont know. Ill go with the bulava explanation. It had more fails than succeses, plus russia has a serious problem with brain drain and they count to much on soviet technology.
In response to the statement "I think the biggest evidence that there's intelligent life on other planets is that none of it has tried to contact us.", UFO enthusiast (no clue what to call these people) claim that there is an intergalactic treaty that prevents aliens from making direct contact, or interfering in our lives, but the treaty does allow them to conduct experiments on humans (abductions).
Note that I don't believe this, but many a persons do….
I like lists that make me smile at the absurdity of people. This is one.
… People will swallow anything it seems. As we continue to learn, grow and expand our minds we find out more truths….and more questions.
Keep on learning!
Cool list, MikeS.
Very creative, original list! Great work.
good list but a bad tittle as it would seem to say that these things were DONE by aliens rather than INSPIRED by aliens. Allso you could have done a bit more research as a few of your details are a little out of date towards the end of your list. Still damn fine though and keep going
Great list.
What doesn't add up, in my mind, when we assume older civilizations had advanced technical knowledge and skills with engineering and other applied sciences is – where did it go? How was it possible that we had, but we lost all of this incredible knowledge and skill? Perhaps some of the ancient civilizations lost it, but all of them?
And why didn't these same people write it down? Some of these people did have written languages. Why isn't there an operating manual inscribed on a wall somewhere to tell people how this was done? it doesn't make any sense.
Perhaps they did just, independently, across the globe, develop these skills in isolation? Quite a coincidence but it is possible. Or perhaps there was some unknown global communication and travel system we do not know of or understand that allowed different societies to share this technical knowledge and skill across great distances? And if so – how did that communication system become lost? And again, why isn't it written down?
To me, those are the great mysteries behind these ancient accomplishments, several of which are mentioned here in this list.
The light bulb, toaster, microwave oven, and television were being invented independently… across the globe… why couldn't ancient technology be invented in the same manner as well?
As I said, it is quite possible all of these technologies were invented by differtent people across the globe at the same time, independent of one another.
However – The inventions you mentioned were made at a time when information could be shared, easily and relatively quickly, across the globe, through letters, telegraph, radio, professional journals, etc. So they were not exactly invented in total isolation. For example – the basics of electricity, vacuum tubes, cathode ray tubes, and other essential parts of a TV were known to all of those working on the invention of the first TV.
Well many ancient civilizations are afterall ancient, with time everything gets lost… the Middle East during the Middle Ages were the cultural and scientific center of the world, but with time (wars, politics & religions) much of that knowlodge was lost and look at it now. The Grand Library of Baghdad was destroyed by the mongols, the Ancient Library of Alexandria was also destroyed, many Mayans & Aztecs codices were destroyed by the Spanish… much of the ancient knowledge(specially in the libraries which cointaned a vast assortment of works) would have survived today if they haven´t been destroyed on purpose by some invader.
And the same can happen to us right now, we have two main storage devices: books and computers (CDs, flash drives, etc) Books with time will rot away, and CD's or any computer related device needs stable conditions to survive. So if some kind of apocalypse happened and only few people survived, much of that information would be lost because there wouldn't be anybody to keep it in the appropiate conditions, books will de destroyed by humidity and eaten away by insects and others creatures, computers storages devices would also be afected by humidity, components would rust, fungus would grow on it, cd layers would peel, and even stone would erode. Also nobody inscribes technical data on wall or stone, its very impractical if you don't think your civilization will die someday, and its only used for political or religious accounts so that you know who did that or what it commemorates (like many monuments today)
And finally you have to think that many of those ancient accomplishments were kept in secret and only few people knew exactly how to do it, so that it would impress the common people and made them believe that their leaders came from the heavens or are sons of gods because they made those impressive structures (just like today people think they must have been aliens) In the case of the greek mechanism and other inventions like that, I think they would also keep their methods of construction very secret so they would have been the only ones to make it and so have all the market.
how about bermuda triangle?
probably the main reason of why these are attributed to aliens is that they where never proven and never will..
The Bermuda Triangle is a joke. I personally have over 600 flight hours in the Bermuda Triangle and have yet to disappear. The weather there is very unpredictable and can easily be underestimated. What may look like a small storm cell can sometimes hide severe winds and dangerous lightening.
Chances are you tell yourself that you know the "truth" already, and no matter the amount of fact that has surfaced on said issue you immediately dismiss them because they aren’t giving you the answers you are looking for.
Whether you believe in extra-terrestrials or not, there's much more physical evidence that they do exist than there is of most of the things in the bible. Yet, more than 25% of the population would say they believe in some sort of omnipotent 'god'.
It's a matter of faith. You will NOT dissuade anyone's beliefs because you find flaws in the story or reasoning, whether it be Jesus or aliens.
you really needed the Easter Island monuments on this list.
Not to mention the paintings (byzantine era and Ancient Indian) that featured what seems to be propulsion driven flying machines.
The 'BONUS' should've been the Face On Mars that was photographed by the American satelite in the Cydonian region of Mars.
And please don't start me on the Pyramids of Egypt….
I don't think the face on Mars is valid anymore, considering that it was nothing more then pareidolia caused by the high contrast and limited detail in the image.
Hello Gauldar. The face on mars is actually one of many 'artefacts' found in the Cydonia region.
i could go on and on about what was seen in the photos but instead i will point to a book that is worth reading if you have an interest in this subject.
The Monuments Of Mars by Richard C. Hoagland.
until you read this book, and this is the original author on the topic, not the many crap sensationalists authors that have come afterward, you might be pleasantly suprised at the content.
The dismissive comments made by NASA about 'tricks of light and shadow' don't hold any credibilty.
What you say intrigues me. I will check the book out. They found water there right? Why not more?
Thanks!
I will check the book out.
Before you read it, you should be aware that Hoagland is generally considered to be a conspiracy theorist, pseudoscientific nutjob.
It's SO funny that the list mentions confirmation bias.
"Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, independently of whether they are true."
"A series of experiments in the 1960s suggested that people are biased towards confirming their existing beliefs. Later work explained these results in terms of a tendency to test ideas in a one-sided way, focusing on one possibility and ignoring alternatives. In combination with other effects, this strategy can bias the conclusions that are reached. Explanations for the observed biases include wishful thinking and the limited human capacity to process information. Another proposal is that people show confirmation bias because they are pragmatically assessing the costs of being wrong, rather than investigating in a neutral, scientific way."
That certainly sounds familiar… Since scientists are sooooo sure that there's no such thing as aliens, that's how they'll carry out their tests and experiments in the first place. Of course they'll investigate with a closed mind, and favor and talk about studies that suggest these are hoaxes and whatnot, without even giving a moment of chance to the scientific fact that the intricacies of some of these "human creations" have not fully been explained by science.
Scientists are always right! And that's why aliens don't exist: because scientists are sure they don't, even before they start investigating!
Confirmation bias indeed…
Actually if you were to tell a scientist or even an astronaut that there is no such thing as aliens they would laugh in your face. Considering there's over 50 *****tillion planets in the solar system its extremely hard to believe we're the only one that can harbor life.
PS this is my first comment on this site after reading lists on here pretty much every day for about 2 years
It depends on the scientist; you are assuming that all scientists think that way.
50 *****tilion planets in the solar system?
The bastards. The bastards. They throw out pluto for not being planety enough and they chuck in another 5*10^21-8 (or 5*10^36-8 depending where you’re from). Such hypocrites. This is plotuphobia at its worst. Lets make everybody a planet. Except pluto. We dont like pluto. pluto is not planet material. It makes me sick.
Why don't you act like a grown up and remind Arsnl he used "solar system" incorrectly, rather than act like a pompous ass.
Sorry, Universe
Poorly Written!
Nice list, though I take exception to number 3. Anything the Russians say should be taken with a grain of salt. I'm not saying that it is evidence of alien visitation, merely that I don't buy the story that it was an out-of-control rocket. As for the rest of these, I've heard all the stories, done the research, and reached the same conclusions. (I am something of a paranormal investigator (a sideline hobby) and one of the first things we learn from any reputable expert is to have a healthy dose of skepticism. It's fine to want to believe, but don't let that get in the way of seeking out the truth.)
As for the existence of extra-terrestrial life; it's a given fact that life exists on other worlds. We already know this, as Lifeschool pointed out above. If you need further proof, consider the mathematical angle:
There are estimated to be some 200 billion stars in the Milky Way galaxy. We are also discovering that extrasolar planets are a lot more common than we once thought. So, if we assume that 1% of the stars out there have a planetary system, that's about 2 billion solar systems. If we assume that of all of these solar systems, 1% have a planet in the habitable zone, we get 20 million potential "Earths." If we allow a further 1% that any one of these particular planets has just the right conditions for the spark of life to form, that means that there are 200,000 planets in the galaxy with life of some sort. If you also allow a 1% chance that on any of these planets, that life will become significant (a multi-cellular creature), you still have 2,000 worlds with higher animal life. Now, let's assign a 1% chance that any of these life forms will develop sentience. That's 20 worlds with intelligent life in our galaxy.
Now consider that Hubble has revealed that ours is but one of roughly 80 billion galaxies. So if we apply the same numbers to every galaxy in the observable universe (the part that we can see), it becomes a staggering 1.6 trillion civilizations.
Of course, the likelihood of us ever meeting (or being visited by) even a single one of these are almost as remote. The distances involved are just far too great. Unless there exists a technology that can alter physics as we understand them, it is unlikely that we will ever meet (or even confirm the existence of) our neighbors.
For those of you that can't grasp how a missile could create shown in the picture for #3… take a look at this video. It may help to explain things.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4
I watched You Tube video that claims to be of the actual event and it does not look at all like something that would be created by a spiraling out of control missile. And it just disappears into what appears to be a – for lack of a better description – black hole, at the end. Wouldn't a missile exhaust its fuel and eventually fall back to earth? Or explode?
I think it is far more likely to be some form of unexplained and seldom seen atmospheric phenomenon than either a UFO or a missile.
Great info, Ike.
I saw a missile go haywire and blow-up while on Venture Blvd in Studio City, part of Los Angeles, on afternoon. It was awe-inspiring, it was so beautiful!
All the cars pulled over to the curb to just watch, and let me tell you, NOTHING gets L.A. drivers to pull over to the curb! Everyone, including me, had out their cell phones, calling people to go outside to watch.
Pretty spectacular stuff.
Reporoducing a phenomenon doesnt prove that was the cause. *****ysis into the speed of roation of the spiral ruled out any airborne particles and tended toward EMF type activity.
Nice list, but what's with that terrible fake pic of stonehenge?
No face on Mars and how that was debunked?
Read the title: "10 human creations".
good reply, astraya. good reply. even i had to take another look !!!
#3 Ofcourse d government would come up wit some lame ass explanation.Since when hav they been known 2 present d public wit d truth??
its always either som weather ballons busting or some ‘secret’ expt gone haywire acc 2 them.even d roswell incident,didn’t they make up some bull***** excuse about an experimental weather balloon crashing? i’m not saying they lied every time they presented an explanation.but i do believe a hell lot of bull***** is being served 2 us
Cool list. I love how people point to aliens to explain dumb *****.
dumb *****?
so you don't believe in "aliens"?
Good list! As usual, the comments are just as good.
Much of history is hard to prove and much of it is theory based on what we think we know. In several thousand years from now, do you think humans will know exactly what OUR intentions or influences were. NO. How could they unless they were here. They base it what they think they know of us. Same as we do for ancient times. I don't think much can be proven 100%.
everyone in the comments sounds soo sure of themselves which only proves you all know absolutely nothing. Regurgitated hearsay on whichever side of the coin you want your facts to fall upon to prove your point.
its laughable.
@Arsnl
Sorry if I looked as if I were complaining on my other post, please see my thoughts on above(longish) response to the mick.
Well yes you are quite right but i have some small things to add (in general personal opinion)
1) Im just a math graduate but i do enjoy physics so i can say without a doubt that einsteins theory of relativity wont dissapear. It will be included in a more general one. In fact he was aware of this. Thats why he was looking for a grand unifying theory. Like newton’s theory. It didnt dissappear. We still do it in mechanics classes. So yeah if you want to do physics you have to know it/accept it
2)” not as governing laws with which to impose our will on what’s possible or impossible” well here you have to make a distinction. Can faster than light travel/time travel really exist or are we in fact imposing our will on the universe. It can go both ways. We can restrict it or we can assume it can do things it cant (there isnt any observational truth of it being possible)
3)”only explains what we can observe and not necessarily all there is to observe”. Well here is the big problem. A theory has to be falsifiable (spelling). That means you must have the means to test that theory. So if you have observations that dont confirme your theory you either change it or scrap it or whatever. Or if every observation confirms your theory then all is good. Untill now. But you cant assume that there is something out there in the universe that exists but you cant observe it. That is unscientific and frankly useless. Where do you stop assuming. Where do you stop guessing.
Science is what we know. Not what we assume. (plus in general physicist and mathematicians look in general for beauty and aesthetics but thats a side note)
Wow! You have just risen several dozen points in my personal estimation.
I am not a mathematician nor physicist, but I read heavily in physics, especially quantum. I have the deepest respect for those who practice the sciences. Right now, I am reading M-Theory.
I am an artist, a photographer, by trade, but my workroom is bookshelves, wall to wall, floor to ceiling, all non-fiction, mostly science. A bit of history. A section is devoted to the classics, and to Photographers.
Thanks
Im not doing any real sciences. Now i am steering towards engineering since it pays better but i really love reading physics articles quantum physics, cosmology and some books like haking's are really amazing and bizzare.
I did see a documentary about Ed Witten and i was blown away. The guys that won the Fields Medal are out of this world.
Aliens ate all the dinosaurs for lunch!
~burp~
Excellent, excellent list. I blush to admit that I believed in the ancient astronaut stuff back when I was a spacey adolescent. Fortunately my taste for solid (though popularized) science won the day.
What short memories we have, to think that people were just hunter-gatherers in the years before steam was harnessed…
this is what i think.
the ancient egyptian gods made the ark of the covenant, actually lots of them powered by nuclear batteries as electric tesla radio transmitters placed in stone sarcophaguses inside the king and the queen chambers in the pyramids at giza. the stone sarcophaguses was used to shield the people from the radiating ark´s under transport. sombody removed one of the ark from the stone sarcophaguses tuched it and got exposed to radiation poisoning. that the ancient gods was either aliens or crossbreed between aliens and humans.
the the gods was the giants in number of tousands lived 10 times longer than humans and used their great knowlege of the universe to build constelations of pyramids acting as beacons transmitting to the stars. used antigravity technology to comunicate with the aliens in all 12 constelation of the zordiac.
knew all about electromagnetic waves time dilation and doppler effects caused by changes in the lenght contraction of celestrial and planetary bodies.
How could you possibly come up with all that! And just leave it as an opinion without offering any citation?? You sound delusional and mistake your imagination for reality.
Off topic: Question for the board or JF: How can you set the comments so that all the replies are visible each time you click on a list? It'll do it the first time for me, but not subsequently.
i hope jamie answers this because it seeems to be some kind of mystery
the posts, at least on my end, shows all the comments in totality until comment #100 is posted, at what point it collapses all the replies into nests. its a *****ing pain in the ass as most days (5 a wk) i can only peruse the lists for a little while, right after jafe posts them, and dont really have time for comments until i get out of work, at which point, due to murphys law, it is enevitbly past comment #99.
About the crop circles,im sure some of them,say even a majority of them were created by humans. but the designs of some crop circles are too elaborate to have been created in a day.n if these crop circles were worked on 4 a long time im pretty sure somebody would have noticed it. but these crop circles simply seem to pop up without their having being there recently. that’s weird.
Some of them are in binary also and some even using Ascii
Fake crop circles are, for the most part, easily identified. Their geometry is very poor, circles are flattened or off centre, straight lines are bent. THe rest have highly structured geometry with NO misplaced lines, off centred circles or wobbly lines. There is also EM forceds left behind at the perfectly formed crop circles that are not present when *****ysing fakes. Coupled with the highly intricate weaving of plant matter, right angle bends only possibly under high temperatures – whilst directly opposite the bends show no signs of heating; pranksters bent every join one by one? Another intruging aspect is that whilst the crops may be flattened, flowers and the like are left untouched.
I have observed something after reading th comments. I cant understand as to Why are we so biased towards our own principles and beliefs. Why cant we listen to views of our opponent and try to accept that he/she may have a point. We want others to accept our view but we will never give in to their ‘imbecile’ point. We will continuously try to prove ourselves and ignore whatever th other is saying.
Pls try to be rational about my point. I accept that aliens never built arms circles or stonehenge or even th pyramids. They dont come in flying saucers and abduct peaceful hilly billies fr some sadistic *****ual experiments. Its not feasible. There is no proof. It is crap and hilarious.
But on th other hand, we can never say that aliens dont exist. Its nuts. We exist. So why cant they exist. Are we so special. Are we so intelligent. Do we have th patent for intelligent life somewhere in th galaxy?
I believe in science. I have been thrown out of th house (though fr few minutes) when i tried to prove to my granny that 16 handed god or elephant god cannot exist. But i accepted that there is something which gives us power when we need. Religion gives us hope, though it kills too.
There are two sides of th coin. Even if we dont accept it, it cant vanish. Here, people are arguing about their beliefs and ignoring others. Its highly idiotic. Years earlier, people thought we cant fly. Try to think what would have happened if u had told man about internet, or even laptops 200 years ago. Hell, think about kublai khan or julius caeser being told about mobiles. Both would have ordered ‘chop chop’ and off with ur head. Today we cant live without them. So try to be rational, and accepting. Dont accept *****, but accept that th notion of ***** exists in urself and others. Both are actually full of ***** somewhere inside. U cant refuse it.
Interesting list. I think that many people have a tendency to undervalue the capabilities of ancient humans. To each his own.
Question.
What about those big spherical stone balls found in Costa Rica? Did they ever figure out who might have made those?
Why do you imagine they have to have been "made"?
They are a naturally occurring item. Have you ever seen a geodesic rock? They are usually quite round and if you cut one open it has a hollow inside with crystalline formations.
They dropped off big spherical stone aliens!
Bias.
They are out there watching us for sure !
They must be bored stiff.
@Arsnl
Thank you very much for clarifying. I’m really sorry for being such a troll; I’ve only had 2 hours of sleep in the past 48hrs so maybe that explains at least part of my horribly nonsensical incoherent wording lol. gotta get some sleep now, it’s past midnight over here
BTW I am very pleased to learn that we have similar interests! I too was once a math major(but had to stop on my 3rd yr due to financial reasons) and I also enjoy physics, among the other natural & social sciences 8D
My bad. I came a bit too hard on you. I thought you were one of those people that think that physics is way wrong and we should change everything.
Btw financial reasons, know what you mean. I had to take engineering now. But its also good cuz i can do a bit of physics too.
This list is a prime example of why I became a huge fan of this site. Well done!
To BethanM: I checked out the video link you posted and I've never even heard of that site. thank you!
http://facepalm.ytmnd.com/
I think the discussion about extra-terrestrials is best summed up in a quote. I can't remember from where, or who said it, but they said "either there is life out there or there isn't, and each option is scary."
Well said.
#9, the hieroglyph that resembles (NOT) a flying machine, actually looks more like the glyph for "scared bark", somewhat a little the less defined for wear.
It has all of the right ingredients if you look closely.
I almost said it could be a hoe, but it was too intricate. So I'm going with "sacred bark". That's a boat.
Maybe so, but I still believe we (life, this planet, the universe) are a forgotten science project pushed to the back of the fridge in favor of the leftover pasta and meatloaf and boiled okra from last week.
Plus, we'll never know for sure what is what (at least not in our lifetime).
Unless the predictions about 2012 come true….
THERE IS NO PREDICTION ABOUT 2012!
If that one salient point hasn't gotten across to everyone by now, I can't imagine what will get it across. 2012 was simply the end of that particular calendar cycle.
That's it.
That's all.
End of story.
there are many other predictions from other sources, religions and cultures which show 2012 is significant. I’m not stating whether I believe in it or not, I’m just really tired of people posting opinions based on their lack of research and the assumption that they’re intelligent
Disagree if you like but I think The Great Pyramids are just burial mounds or gravestones…
Check out some info on the Giza pyramid from Drunvalo Melchizedek, sacred geometry, Law of One
If you had taken your time to actually research the pyramids you would know that they were much more intricate when they were built, and were covered in limestone and capped with gold, so as to appear to be one block rather than a few thousand. What we see today is merely the internal structure of the pyramids. Do your research next time you want to write something about the pyramids.
If you delete the blue spiral coming down from the center, I have seen the circular white "rainbow" in the sky…and NO, I WAS NOT ON ANYTHING!
It was in the Yucatan, and I had snuck into the Chitzenitza-Itza Archeological Park before dawn in order to climb El Castille, the large stepped pyramid in the center to see the sunrise from there. I sat in the doorway of the priest's hut, assuming that the doorway would face the new day.
Well, I was wrong. As the sun began to rise, it was behind me. At the same time, a heavy ground fog covered the forest below me. The angle of the sunlight on the moisture-laden air created an atmospheric phenomena, a set of pure white rings of light, one inside the other, just like that photo.
It raised goose-flesh all over me. It was eerie.
I could perfectly understand how a civilization with no knowledge of astronomy or physics might misinterpret that as a sign from visitors from another world, or a sign from God. As it was, I was so entranced by it that I was totally unaware of the Park worker who had finally seen me, and was standing next to me calling, "Miss,Miss, Miss…" for who knows how long.
I wasn't released from my trance until the phenomena dispersed.