These are 10 of the most interesting facts hand picked from ‘The Book of General Ignorance’, written by John Lloyd, and forwarded by English broadcaster and entertainer, Stephen Fry. The human brain is, by far, the most complex single object in the cosmos, having more neurological connections within it than there are positively charged particles in the entire universe. With this astonishing level of computing power, there’s only one thing to do with it; use it.

How many wives did Henry VIII have?
The answer? Two, not six. Henry’s fourth marriage to Anne was annulled, as the marriage was never consummated, in other words it was seen to that the marriage technically never took place, also Anne happened to be betrothed to Francis, Duke of Lorraine. At the time ‘betrothal’ would bar the individual from marriage. So that leaves 5 wives. Henry’s second marriage to Anne Boleyn was declared illegal by the pope, because the king was still married to his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Henry, as the head of the church of England, declared himself that his first marriage was invalid on the grounds that a man cannot sleep with his brother’s widow. He did the same with his fifth wife, Catherine Howard, bringing us down to two wives.

What’s the largest living organism?
The elephant? The blue whale? The T-Rex? No. The largest ever living organism is a mushroom. And not even a particularly rare one. The Armillaria ostoyae or ‘Honey fungus’ is very common, and is probably in your garden as we speak. However, lets hope it doesn’t grow as large as the largest ever recorded specimen, in Malheur National forest, in Oregon. It covers 2,200 acres (890 hectares)!! And is between 2,000 and 8,000 years old!! The majority of the organism is under ground, in the form of a massive mat of tentacle-like mycelia (the mushroom’s equivalent of roots). The giant honey fungus was originally thought to grow in different clusters around the forest, but researches have confirmed it is in fact one very, very large single organism!

Why do chameleons change their skin color?
Not to blend into their background, never have, never will. They change their color depending on a number of emotional states, they change often, and so it’s no wonder that eventually they will match their backgrounds, but only until the next change. They change color when frightened, when mating, when fighting another chameleon etc. A chameleon would have little use for blending in, their main prey, insects, tend to have eyesight unfit to spot them when they are still anyway, and being an apex predator, chameleons don’t tend to have any natural predators.

How many states of matter are there?
Three surely? Solid, liquid and Gas? Actually, it’s more like fifteen. Although the list grows almost daily, some examples are: Solid, amorphous solid, liquid, gas, plasma, super-fluid, supersolid, degenerate matter, neutronium, strongly symmetric matter, weakly symmetric matter, quark-gluon plasma fermionic condensate (pictured above), Bose-Einstein condensate and ‘strange matter’. The most interesting is possibly Bose-Einstein condensate, or ‘bec’. which occurs when you cool a specific substance down to a fraction below absolute zero (-273 degrees), at this point, things get peculiar. For example if you put a ‘bec’ in a beaker, and keep the beaker at the correct temperature, the bec will actually climb the sides of the beaker. If you don’t believe me: YouTube. This happens because behavior only before observed at atomic levels are observed at greater levels. Some scientists believe the behavior is a result of the bec trying to “reduce it’s own energy”.

What is the number of the Devil?
616. For 2000 years, 666 has been the number of the dreaded anti-Christ. An unlucky number for many, even the European parliament leaves seat number 666 vacant. The number is from the book of Revelation, the last book of the Christian Bible. However, in 2005, a translation of the very earliest known copy of the book of revelation clearly shows it to be 616, not 666! The 1,700 year old copy was recovered from the city of Oxyrhynchus, in Egypt, and deciphered by a palaeographical research team from the University Of Birmingham, UK. The team was led by Professor David Parker.

What color was the sky in ancient Greece?
Bronze! There was no word for blue in the ancient Greek language. The nearest words to blue – glaukos and kyanos are more like expressions of relative light intensity than descriptions of color. So when the Greek referred to the sky as ‘bronze’, they meant that it was dazzlingly bright, like the sheen of a bronze shield, rather than actually bronze-colored. It seems the ancient Greeks described things based on other qualities, so when a word is used that, to us, seems to indicate ‘yellow’ or ‘light green’ really just means fluid, living and fresh, and was therefore used to describe flowers, blood, the sea and sheep. It would appear to us that the Greeks were referring to all of these things as yellow colored, but that’s because of the way we describe things. Interestingly, in Russia, there are two words for blue: goluboi and sinii, one word referring to light blue, the other dark, which to Russians are two different, distinct colors, not shades of the same color, much like other cultures perceive pink to be a shade of red, rather than a color in it’s own right.

How many senses do you have?
At least nine. The five we all know about: Sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch, were first proposed by Aristotle, but there are now four more which are agreed among scientists to be official senses, these are:
1. Thermoception – the sense of heat (or it’s absence) on our skin,
2. Equilibrioception – our sense of balance, which is determined by the fluid filled cavities in our inner ear.
3. Nociception – Pain.
4. Proprioception – or ‘body awareness’. This is the conscious knowledge of where our body parts are without having to look, for example, close your eyes and waggle your big toe, you still know where it is in relation to the rest of you.
Some neurologists also argue that there are even more than 9. What about hunger? Or thirst? It’s certainly a grey area.

What shape did medieval people believe the earth was?
Wrong again. Since around the fourth century BC, almost no-one, anywhere has believed the earth to be flat. This misconception that people where ignorant of the shape of the earth comes from the partially fictional text ‘The Life And Voyages Of Christopher Columbus’ (1828), which incorrectly stated that Columbus set out to prove the earth was round. Truth is, nobody would have disputed the theory. Evidence shows that almost all cultures of the world worked out, through mathematics or just observation, the spherical nature of the Earth.

How does a moth react to a light?
They are not attracted to them, but disorientated by them. The reason being that moths use natural light sources, i.e. the sun and moon, to navigate. The insects use the location of the light source from the Sun or moon to determine what direction they should be facing (i.e. what direction is up!) and how to fly in a straight line. When people come along with artificial suns and moons in their bedrooms, it confuses the insect, making it think it’s somehow moving in a curved path, because the direction of the light source has suddenly changed, to rectify this, moths try to straighten their trajectory, but the light source being so close, the only way to do this is to fly around in circles. And moths don’t eat cloths, their caterpillars do.

Where is the driest place on earth?
The Sahara desert? Nevada? Actually, it’s Antarctica. Some parts of the continent hasn’t seen any rain for two million years! A desert is technically defined as an area of land that receives less than 254mm (10 inches) of rain a year. The Sahara gets 25 mm, Antarctica gets around the same amount, but some areas of Antarctica never get rain, and haven’t for millennia. Making Antarctica the driest place on earth. Also, Antarctica can claim to be the windiest place on earth, with wind speeds of up to 200mph, the fastest ever recorded.




















I was always taught that the largest living organism was The Great Barrier Reef off the coast of Australia. Happy to be corrected if wrong.
I think the difference is that the GBR is not technically one organism. It’s a bunch of coral that lives in harmony and right on top of each other, but it’s ultimately individual things. The fungus, on the other hand, is a single organism, rather than a colony of multiple smaller ones. The mushrooms that pop up above ground are just….branches (I don’t know what they would actually be called) of the larger body. Like you though, I would be happily corrected if someone knows more.
the barrier reef is many organisms stuck together the shroom is one huge mother.
It should be pointed out that it is the largest by area, with a root system with 47 000 trunks of the quaking aspen plant being the heaviest, weighing in at around 6 000 tons
Nice article, but I can tell it is a bit out of date. The Aspen tree (Populus tremuloides) forms large stands of genetically identical trees (technically, stems) connected by a single underground root system. These trees form through root sprouts coming off an original parent tree, though the root system may not remain a single unit in all specimens. The largest known fully-connected Aspen is a grove in Utah nicknamed Pando, and some experts call it the largest organism in the world, by mass or volume. It covers 0.43 km2 (106 acres) and is estimated to weigh 6,600 short tons (6,000 t).
A giant fungus of the species Armillaria solidipes (honey mushrooms, formerly Armillaria ostoyae) in the Malheur National Forest in Oregon was found to span 8.9 km2 (2,200 acres), which would make it the largest organism by area. Whether or not this is an actual individual organism, however, is disputed, some tests have indicated that they have the same genetic makeup, but unless its mycelia are fully connected, it is a clonal colony of numerous smaller individuals. Another clonal colony that rivals the Armillaria and the Populus colonies in size is a strand of the giant marine plant, Posidonia oceanica, discovered in the Mediterranean near the Balearic Islands. It covers a band roughly 8 km (4.3 miles) in length.
You are all wrong. The largest living organism is my Mother-In-Law.
Same thoughts here!
Totally awesome list! The only one I knew was about the moths, so it’s great to learn that much from one list!!!
Every single one of these was on QI.
Yes…as it says in the intro!
Great list but using another source as the basis in this manner is a bit lazy, isn’t it? Crediting it doesn’t suddenly make it your own work or research.
You want people to do field research for lists?! People usually complain at a lack of sources, now someone’s complaining at the prescence of a source. Readers truly are unappeasable.
Exactly. And I also fail to see where the Lister was trying to pass it off as his own when, in the intro, he gives full credit to the source.
I bought this book after LV recommended it for Christmas.
I don’t think I’ll buy it. These were handpicked from the book–obviously the best facts I can assume–why purchase original content when it’s regurgitated for free?
I feel like number one is just semantics, but otherwise, very cool. Always nice to see some good old facts.
Number 10 and 5 aren’t so much common mistakes, as they are technicalities which you use to be smug about.
Number 6 is not really a fact. To say it’s ’616′ because one source says so, while others say otherwise, isn’t very scientific.
You should read the text from the oldest version too. It doesn’t prove anything, it’s a very grey version of saying 616 in a way that could also be percieved to still be 666.
What’s the point in giving us a list that’s easily available somewhere else!
And number 6 is only a “fact” if you actually believe in the Bible, the Devil etc…
Or if you’re a fan of Iron Maiden (which makes more logical than believing in the Bible, really).
I think you are projecting your smugness onto this author.
Smug? I’m surprised the author thinks every item on this list isn’t common knowledge.
It’s not
Also, did anyone see the title of this list and immediately think, “Alanis Morissette?”
I didn’t until you mentioned her, now I can’t get the song out of my head
It figures…
Since when ‘strange matter’ is a state of matter?
Since around the 70′s I think.
I don’t like the vibe of this list. But i guess it’s still interesting…
You nicked all these from the QI book of general ignorance, I’m seeing very strong simularities
Well, considering it says that they are hand picked from ‘The Book of General Ignorance’ in the introduction paragraph, I’m not surprised you’re seeing strong similarities.
hahaha
Mentioning a source does not give you permission to profit from it without in any way advancing the original work. It’s unethical.
“These are 10 of the most interesting facts hand picked from ‘The Book of General Ignorance’, written by John Lloyd, and forwarded by English broadcaster and entertainer, Stephen Fry.”
Yes, that is just a mention of the original source. Obviously he’s just trying to profit off of it, knowing that people like you never read the introductory paragraph.
Actually trying reading it, please.
interesting but knew half of these. I always though 616 was the neighbour of the beast .
no that would be 665 and 667…..
Wrong. 665 and 667 would on the opposite side of the street. The neighbours of the beast would be 664 and 668. Just wanted to clarify that.
And 666 degrees is the temperature of the oven for cooking roast beast.
even tho 665 and 667 are across the street they are still neighbors…right ?
ill still refer to the lady from 5 houses down or across the road as my neighbour, not my next door neighbour but in the same neighbourhood as me .
I don’t know about any of that, but (666) 666-6666 is definitely the phone number of the beast.
Naahh… I called that number. All I got was a prison camp in Siberia. But wait a sec… that IS Hell, ainnit?
Hey, I think that’s my Ex girlfriend’s cell phone number.
Theyi tore down the house at 616 and some guy grows vegetables there now. 616 is the Number of the Beets.
Awesome list. I just knew about 616, antarctica and the senses
(and thats because im a wikipedia freak hehe)
Boring. I knew all of these.
Great story, bro.
very cool list, I enjoyed reading it.
I don’t want to be a smart-ass but the Bose-Einstein condensate isn’t below the absolute zero (that’s impossible) it’s just very near it
Well BEC can actually occur at higher temps. (about 20K) if you think of cooper pairs in a type 1 supeconductor. And i think it also works for type 2. So the temp jumps up to 100K. So thats quite good.
I was wondering about that. I’ve never been told, but I didn’t think it would be possible for absolute zero to exist at all outside of theory. In order to cool something, you have to have something colder absorb some of it’s energy. To cool something to absolute zero, you would need to produce something with less than no thermal energy (unless there’s another way to cool things, in which case I’m wrong).
Funny you should say that, in systems that have a fixed total energy(a system of spins), the entropy of said system becomes bell shaped. So you have a maximum of entropy and,afterwards, as the energy of the system continues to increase, its entropy begins to decrease. (you pump so much energy, the system falls into a state that is perfectly known, aka zero entropy). So the temperature becomes negative. Yes its true that a negative temperature will give heat to any positive temperature system. But the temperature is properly negative. So when describing a temperature one has to describe a system too. Statistical physics is looney.
But yes. With your usual system i think that 0K is impossible to reach thermodynamically. There are other methods of cooling like laser cooling(but that only works for gases i think) or for crystals. When you put them in a adiabatic chamber. And you fluctuate a magnetic field, you cool the crystal.
Wow! That’s really interesting! Thanks for clearing that up! I never bothered to ask my physics teacher, so I never got a solid answer.
Intriguing, although I was aware of a number of them. A notable omission would be the strongest thing on earth…..in relation to its size….is a spider’s web.
And, yes, Alanis Morissette did come to mind when I read the title to this list. That was one of the few good songs that came out in 1995.
good list. the one about the senses though… its widely acknowledged that there are about 21 senses. there’s hunger and thirst like you said but how about the sense that your full, or the sense that you need the toilet. depth perception is a big one that people seem to miss. colour and light are also senses which are separate to sight. whats interesting is that Wikipedia doesn’t list all of the senses which is probably why there not on this list.
QI is my teacher!
Depth perception is a good one, and I’d also add spacial awareness – as in – you know the distance and direction of an object (even sometimes the speed it is travelling) just from a glance or just from the sound it makes; which makes the speed and distance to cars and people easy to judge.
SPATIAL. (“,)
sense of humor?
Nice!
I definitely agree with this.
sense of direction?
(ie knowing which way is north without map/compass)
I don’t believe depth perception could be considered a sense. Depth is interpreted by the brain by taking input from vision, not “sensed”. Id depth perception were a sense then you would need to include “colour vision” and “brightness” etc.
I’m blind in one eye, so I have no depth perception per se. I can still drive a car, though, so I guesss it’s not that important.
You only have one working eye and you drive a car? Is that legal?
Yes it is legal, at least where I live.
He had to pass a test to keep his driver’s license, though, after he lost sight in one of his eyes. He doesn’t like to talk about it much.
No one put intuition. I would have thought that would be an obvious one.
Proprioception: the ability to know where different parts of your bady are in relation to each other, along a sense of how much force is being applied.
Awesome list
How do I find the youtube video from number 7?
Start here:
let me guess? you’ve seen a few episodes of QI? thats where i learnt all this
Doesn’t anybody read the introduction? He DID mention his sources: “The Book of General Ignorance” by John Lloyd, and Stephen Fry (the presenter of QI).
BTW, the only reason I still (sometimes) watch the tele is QI.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the land in Antarctica mostly covered in snow/ice? I understand the fact of no rain fall but technically it still wouldn’t be the driest place on earth…
That’s what I thought… It is regarded as the largest desert, but if a desert just means not getting much rainfall it doesn’t necessarily mean dry, right?
Thats right; and also, from the word desert comes deserted and desolate – non of which mean ‘dry’. An Arid desert is one catagorised by the fact that is conatins no moisture, but again I suppose this applies regardless of it being extremely hot or cold, as cold places can have no moisure too. The point of the list item revolves around the word ‘driest’; which in this case refers to rainfall, not particularly the land itself – hence the ‘trick’ in the question.
On the flip side, just because a place is extremely cold doesn’t mean that it isn’t dry. Dry in this means very little precipitation.
It’s not the lack of rainfall that makes an area a desert but rather the lack of precipitation (rain, snow, sleet, and hail).
Maybe it’s because the author understands “dry” as the absence of rain. Tsk tsk tsk…
amazing how two list sites (listverse and C*****d) feature the largest living organism at the same day.
its happened a few times .
Very interesting, now my friends will hear some interesting facts.
Thanks chap.
So there are about 10^11 neurons. Lets just suppose that each neuron is connected with every other neuron (thats the maximum number of connections possible; and ofcourse biologically its an absurd claim). So how many connections are there. A simple math formula will give us the answer. 10^11(10^11-1)/2. So thats about 10^22 connections.
So the maximum number of connections possible adds up to the number of protons you’d find in 0.02 grams of water.
Man. I dont know about you. But the universe i live in has a little more matter than 0.02 grams of water. In fact the universe has about 10^80 protons. So you were quite off.
Even logically you’d understand that you cant have more connections than are atoms. Lets look at it this way: you have 2 neurons. The make a connection. So that means that one atom of one neuron sees one atom of the other neuron. So how can there be more atom atom couples than are protons in the universe?
Hey i used my brain. I guess i did take your advice. But do some back of the enveloppe Fermi calculations. Its fun. And gives you perspective.
Is this a reply or just junk? The universe has way more than 10^80 protons as described by the Eddington Number, as this outdated formula assumes A) all matter is hydrogen, and B) it guesses the number and size of galaxies and stars in the universe. The hydrogen atom has a diameter over 100,000 (10^-10) times the diameter of the proton in it’s nucleus; hence the ‘matter’ within this hydrogen atom is less then 0.0000000001%
I have no idea what you are talking about. 1/100.000 is 10^-5 no 10^-10 like you said. And if you do the math the volume of the proton is 10^15 smaller than the volume of the atom. (in a simplistic sphere model)
And i have no idea what you mean by ‘matter’.
The calculations ive seen where made using mass as a consideration. Not volume or density. And an atoms mass is mainly its nucleus.
Its just a rough calculation. It gives a lower bound.
My main argument still stands. Its physically impossible to have more connections in a human brain than protons. So his argument isnt valid at all. Now calm down
I agree, the idea of that many conections in the brain does seem like a mistake.
But the number of protons in the universe, the Eddington number?
OF COURSE ITS A FREAKING ESTIMATE!!!
Oh and if its “outdated” because galaxies and stars have been guessed, how do you know it is too low?
Whoaah! Great list. #5 Golden Skies – I see it in the movie 300.
YaY!!…i knew the answer to # 1 !!!
Fun list… except…
On #1… I’ve read that there is considerable debate over whether it’s the McMurdo Dry Valleys in Antarctica or certain areas (the now-abandoned Yungay town) of the Atacama Desert in South America.
NASA and National Geographic seem to think that the Atacama is the winner.
Learned a bit this morning. I did know of number one from a previous list, but didn’t know of the mushroom being the largest living organism. That just creeped me out actually. I can’t even picture that in my head and I won’t or it will scare the pants off of me!
Cool list!
There’s a certain episode of X-Files you should never watch…
please take note that the number of the beast is 666 . its just another enlgish translation that made it 616 …. well , scientist this day tries to be smart-ass , haha ! like they say that when i close my eyes im not saying the colour black but grayish – black .
Above average list – knew some of these after watching QI. Didn’t Columbus sail to American thinking he was finding a short-cut to the spice islands of the far east? Instead he found a huge land mass in the middle of the ocean by ‘mistake’. Some (perhaps anecdotal) evidence suggests he actually thought he’d landed in India – hence he called the native Americans Indians. How much of this is true..?
You are correct. That’s why the Caribbean was referred to as the “Indies” for so long and the native people on North America were called “Indians”. He thought he had landed in India or China but was surprised when none of the routes matched up with previous maps he had.
Dude, #8 is NOT true. Camouflage may not be the main function of color change in chameleons, but they do indeed use color change to camouflage too, so saying “never have, never will” is a total lie. And saying that predators don’t need camouflage because they’re at the top of the food chain is pretty dumb. Many predators, including chameleons, NEED to hide from prey in order to get close to them and catch them! I don’t care if Stephen Fry said it or not, we need to double-check these kind of claims before we spread them around like facts.
I know. Didn’t this person ever see the movie “Predator”?
Octopussies (hmmm- what’s the plural of an octopus? Octopie? mmm…. pie
*makes a Homer Simpson face*) can also change their colour at will.
Octopodae???
OCTOPODADES!!! Can’t you people speak Latin any more???
Thank you so much for mentioning the chameleon lie! That is my pet peeve and drives me absolutely crazy!
You are mistaken when it comes to #3. By saying that “almost no-one, anywhere has believed the earth to be flat” is untrue. This statement could have been true during the time of exploration, but there are many websites in our society today that try to convince that the world is flat. There are thousands of people that walk around with the assumption that we live on a flat planet because of these websites.
Meh a few thousand out of 6 billion people is still “almost noone”.
Pretty cool list. Made me feel smart for knowing most of them.
I hope this list won’t be included in a future book from this site. At least the book of general ignorance has references in the end, not like the Ultimate Book of Lists…
Great list. I don’t if it’s been copied word for word from the book, but it doesn’t matter: It IS superbly written, unlike other factoids list.
Please make a part 2!
Means a lot to hear that CSTVT, May make a part 2 if i find the inspiration.
Q-Where is the driest place on earth?
-
A-Atacama desert
The sky in Greece is still blue no matter what you call it. I can call the sky purple, but that doesn’t make it true.
That said, I really didn’t like today’s list. It comes across as smug and nitpicky.
Man what did you just copy QI?
Just kidding,just kidding.
I thought the driest place was Atacama Desert
From Wikipedia:
“The Atacama desert is, according to NASA, National Geographic and many other publications, the driest desert in the world”
So I can’t say that #1 is necessarily true.
Somebody’s read the big book of general ignorance….
Somebody hasn’t read the intro…
greaattt! the number of the beast is my birthday…june 16…just wonderful
I’ve been wondering this for a few years now, so if anyone has anything to offer, please do. I keep wondering if any rural folk believed the world was flat. Apart from what a church might tell them, they might have little reason to believe otherwise. This has been a curiosity of mine.
Well the bible says the Earth is flat several times, so I’m not so sure church would help them out there.
The earth being round and the center of the universe was a major part of Catholicism for the better part of a millennium.
Well first of all I was just making a joke, but that just goes to show you how little christians actually follow the bible lol.
Just because they lived in a rural area it didn’t mean they were functional retards.
No it doesn’t. What I’m saying is that in times like the middle ages, for instance, people in agrarian towns would have very little reason to travel from home, so they wouldn’t. They would have very little observable evidence, given a lack of precise measurements and knowledge of calculus, to conclude that the earth is round. Sailors HAD to know the earth was round, and as a result, populations near the coast generally knew this as well. The vast majority of the population lived near the coast, so most people knew. I’m just wondering if it was common for people who were disconnected from commerce to conclude that the earth was flat (note this would be a small number of people).
I think you only need to look from a high place to see the earth is round. Therefore, nobody thought it would be flat (except some lunatics).
Regarding number 10 on this list he never had an annulment with Catherine Howard on the grounds that he cannot sleep with his brother’s wife…Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard were cousins but Catherine H. had only been married to Henry. He instead had her beheaded because she was quite the little slut and had an affair with Thomas Culpeper. Their marriage wasn’t even valid in the eyes of the “church” because of her informal engagement to Francis Dereham and it had never been broken.
“He did the same with his fifth wife…”
In other words, the author is contradicting himself. How can she have been his 5th wife if he only had two? Nah, he was married 8 times, and so he had 8 wives.
No. He was Henry the 8th. Married 6 times; 6 wives.
Sorry… I had to point it out… : D
Very cool list – well researched and delivered. Great Job!
Found the Greek color perception (or lack thereof) fascinating – also did not know about the Chameleon. I thought it was a defense mechanism as well as and indicator of aggression etc. Very cool.
There are a few facts that can be disputed though – The Pando, a colony of Aspen tree, all sharing the same root system and genetically identical, found in Utah. Over 80,000 years old and weighing over 6,000 tons it provides that lowly fungus with some heady competition.
Also parts of the Atacama Desert in Chile, hemmed in by mountains on both sides, have seen no precipitation for a millennia. The area is sterile – no living things, not even lichen. Of course people still tried to live there; the desert is littered with abandoned saltpeter mines and there are still active copper mines.
How is this well-researched if it’s just taken from somewhere else?
Well that’s what research is – read up on something, learn about it, put it in your own words – although yes, this is kind of a cheat – usually disparate sources eh? Maybe should have stated good choosing and paraphrasing?
I’m calling foul on #6 and #1.
First of all, the author asked what was the DRIEST place on earth, not what received the least amount of rainfall. Unless I’m mistaken, there’s a crapload of ice in Antartica, so that makes it very “wet”.
Secondly, one document doesn’t discredit all the others. The concept of 3 for repetition, 6 for incompleteness and therefore supporting the representation of 666 as being a wholly “unacceptable/unclean” number is supported throughout the Scriptures and the contents therein, both literally and prophetically So, one document misrepresenting it as 616 doesn’t suddenly discount all the others. That would be like saying Tom voted for the Republicans, but 200,000,000 other people voted for the Democrats, to the government must be Republican.
First of all, the author asked what was the DRIEST place on earth, not what received the least amount of rainfall.
It was a rhetorical question, clearly intended to preface the subject of deserts and comparative precipitation.
Unless I’m mistaken, there’s a crapload of ice in Antartica, so that makes it very “wet”.
If you’re going to split hairs – it can be argued that for something to be “wet”, you need liquid. Obviously, ice is not a liquid. Sure, as ice melts, the remaining ice can itself become covered in wetness, but in a place where the surrounding temperature never rises above freezing, that particular ice would never become wet.
Love Stephen Fry and QI – have all the books
regarding #8. I was just watching some NatGeo show the other day and it showed a baby chameleon change its color to match a bush in order to hide itself from an adult chameleon hunting it. The adult didnt see the baby and went about his way. So they do change themselves in order to camoflouge themselves. And they do have natural predators (one being other chameleons)
#8 is definitely wrong.
And #10-he did have all those wives. just because they were annulled after doesnt matter. At some point some people considered them married.
Get on the trolley listverse!
At this point the comments have corrected the majority of the list pretty well (which I find hilarious). Just refer to the comments for the “updated” list.
i gather you got all this information from the TV Programme ‘QI’…becuase i already know them all and i heard them from the tv show ‘QI’
read the bloody intro
10 is wrong. Even using the author’s logic, it’s still wrong.
When Henry divorced Catherine or Aragon and married Anne Boleyn, he sent Catherine to live alone, where she died shortly after Elizabeth was born. So when he had Anne executed, he was then free and clear to remarry and have the marriage recognized by the church because he was a widower following Catherines death. He married Jane Seymour, who died following complications from childbirth, again making him a recognized widower. The next wife, Anne of Cleves, he quietly annulled the marriage and married Katherine Howard who he exectuted on the ground of adultry. Still, he was a widower. Lastly, he married Catherine Parr, who he stayed married to until his death.
So that’s 3 wives.
somebody’s been copying qi then
read the bloody intro.
I don’t understand. How can Antarctica become the “driest” place on earth, if it has water everywhere? I mean, just because it is unable to receive rain doesn’t really mean its necessarily mean its the driest.
Well, how well can you breathe snow or grow a tree in it? That’s what makes it a desert: a lack of vegetation or means of sustaining life in some parts.
I once commented on a previous list, where I stated that the number of the beast was 616……but I was told I was wrong haha. Oh well, great list even though I knew all of these, being an avid fan of the QI tv series and owning ‘the book of general ignorance’.
I sometimes wonder how schools are getting away with these inaccuracies.
Henry VIII`s marriage to Anne Boleyn WAS valid. It was because of the thug Catholic Church, that the marriage was never recognised.
You, or QI, or whoever wrote the damn list, are completely wrong about chameleons. They certainly do change color to hide from predators (among other reasons). So they definitely have, and most likely will in the future.
He definitely read the “Book of General Ignorance” before writing this!!!! Haha. I just bought and read the book, and all of these are in there. That’s awesome, this may be the first time I knew all of these things before I read them!!!!!
just wondering have you been reading the Book of General Ignorance?
read the intro.
rt Jamesy dito!
Guess there were no original lists on the docket today?