A coup d’état is the sudden, unconstitutional deposition of a legitimate government, by a small group of the State Establishment — usually the military — to replace the deposed government with another, either civil or military. A coup d’état succeeds when the usurpers establish their legitimacy if the attacked government fail to thwart them, by allowing their (strategic, tactical, political) consolidation and then receiving the deposed government’s surrender; or the acquiescence of the populace and the non-participant military forces. This list looks at 10 of the most significant coups in history.
The government of Germany installed a totalitarian dictatorship in a series of measures in quick succession. On the night of 27 February 1933 the Reichstag building was set on fire and Dutch council communist Marinus van der Lubbe was found inside the building. He was arrested and charged with starting the blaze. The event had an immediate effect on thousands of anarchists, socialists and communists throughout the Reich, many of whom were sent to the Dachau concentration camp. The unnerved public worried that the fire had been a signal meant to initiate the communist revolution, and the Nazis found the event to be of immeasurable value in getting rid of potential insurgents. This event was quickly followed by the Reichstag Fire Decree, rescinding habeas corpus and other civil liberties.
The Enabling Act was passed in March 1933, with 444 votes, to the 94 of the remaining Social Democrats. The act gave the government (and thus effectively the Nazi Party) legislative powers and also authorized it to deviate from the provisions of the constitution for four years. In effect, Hitler had seized dictatorial powers.
This is so low on the list because it was a coup against Hitler’s own government.
The Orange Revolution was a series of protests and political events that took place in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005, in the immediate aftermath of the run-off vote of the 2004 Ukrainian presidential election which was claimed to be marred by massive corruption, voter intimidation and direct electoral fraud. Kiev, the Ukrainian capital, was the focal point of the movement with thousands of protesters demonstrating daily. Nationwide, the democratic revolution was highlighted by a series of acts of civil disobedience, sit-ins, and general strikes organized by the opposition movement. The protests brought about a re-vote which ultimately deposed the sitting leader of Ukraine.
The Iranian Revolution (mostly known as the Islamic Revolution) refers to events involving the overthrow of Iran’s monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and its replacement with an Islamic republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution. It has been called an event that “made Islamic fundamentalism a political force … from Morocco to Malaysia.” The revolution was populist, nationalist and most of all Shi’a Islamic. It was in part a conservative backlash against the Westernizing and secularizing efforts of the Western-backed Shah, and not-so-conservative reaction to social injustice and other shortcomings of the ancien regime. The Shah was perceived by many as beholden to — if not a puppet of — a non-Muslim Western power (the United States) whose culture was contaminating that of Iran’s.
The Egyptian Revolution of 1952, also known as the July 23 Revolution, began with a military coup d’état that took place on July 23, 1952 by a group of young army officers who named themselves “The Free Officers Movement”. The revolution was initially aimed at overthrowing King Farouk I. However, the movement had more political ambitions and soon moved to abolish the constitutional monarchy and establish a republic. The success of the revolution inspired numerous Arab and African countries to undergo a similar process to remove what they believed to be corrupt regimes. The significance of this coup is that not only did it inspire other countries to revolt, it also lead to the suez canal being nationalized which caused the suez crisis which forced France and Britain to decolonize.
The Cuban Revolution refers to the revolution that led to the overthrow of the United States proxy ruler General Fulgencio Batista’s regime on January 1, 1959 by the 26th of July Movement and other revolutionary elements within the country. The Cuban Revolution also refers to the ongoing implementation of social and economic programs by the new government since the overthrow of the Batista dictatorship, including the implementation of Marxist policies. The starting point of the Cuban Revolution is generally accepted to be July 26, 1953, the date on which a group of 160 poorly armed rebels attacked the Moncada Barracks in Santiago and the barracks in Bayamo. The exact number of rebels killed is debatable, however in his biography, Castro claims that five were killed in the fighting, and an additional fifty-six were killed later by the Batista regime. This is a significant coup because it put a communist country in the USA’s backyard which later (in 1962) almost caused a war between the USSR and the USA.
The Czechoslovak coup d’état of 1948 (often simply the Czech coup) was an event late that February in which the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, with Soviet backing, assumed undisputed control over the government of Czechoslovakia, ushering in over four decades of dictatorship under its rule. The coup’s significance extended well beyond the country’s boundaries, however, as it was a clear marker along the already well-advanced road to full-fledged Cold War. The shock with which the West greeted the event helped spur quick adoption of the Marshall Plan, the creation of a state in West Germany, vigorous measures to keep Communists out of power in France and especially Italy, and steps toward mutual security that would, in little over a year, result in the establishment of NATO and the definitive drawing of the Iron Curtain until the Autumn of Nations in 1989.
The Xinhai Revolution or Hsinhai Revolution, also known as the 1911 Revolution or the Chinese Revolution, began with the Wuchang Uprising on October 10, 1911 and ended with the abdication of Emperor Puyi on February 12, 1912. The primary parties to the conflict were the Imperial forces of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1911), and the revolutionary forces of the Chinese Revolutionary Alliance. The revolution is so named because 1911 is a Xinhai Year in the sexagenary cycle of the Chinese calendar. The Xinhai Revolution was motivated by anger at corruption in the Qing government, by frustration with the government’s inability to restrain the interventions of foreign powers, and by majority Han Chinese resentment toward a government dominated by an ethnic minority (the Manchus). The revolution did not result immediately in a republican form of government; instead, it set up a weak provisional central government over a country which remained politically fragmented. The revolution concluded on February 12, 1912, when the Republic of China formally replaced the Qing Dynasty.
18 Brumaire refers to the coup d’état by which General Napoleon Bonaparte overthrew the French Directory, replacing it with the Consulate. This occurred on 9 November 1799, which was 18 Brumaire, Year VIII under the French Republican Calendar.
On the morning of 18 Brumaire, members of the Council of Ancients sympathetic to the coup warned their colleagues of a Jacobin conspiracy and persuaded them to remove to the Château de Saint-Cloud, west of Paris. General Bonaparte was charged with the safety of the two Councils. Later that morning Sieyès and Roger Ducos resigned as Directors. Talleyrand persuaded Barras to do the same (the troops in the garden outside were persuasive).
The resignation of three of the five Directors prevented a quorum and thus practically abolished the Directory, but the two Jacobin Directors, Gohier and Moulin, refused to resign. Gohier was taken prisoner and Moulin escaped. The two Councils were not yet intimidated and continued meeting. By the following day, the deputies had, for the most part, realized that they were facing an attempted coup rather than being protected from a Jacobin rebellion. Faced with their recalcitrance, Napoleon stormed into the chambers, escorted by a small force of grenadiers. While perhaps unplanned, this proved to be a coup within a coup.
This is particularly significant as it put Napoleon Bonaparte into power and made the Napoleonic Wars possible.
The October Revolution also known as the Soviet Revolution or Bolshvka Revolution, refers to a revolution — as part of the Russian Revolution — that began with an armed insurrection in Petrograd (also regarded as a coup d’état by the worker and soldier masses). It was the second phase of the overall Russian Revolution of 1917, after the February Revolution of the same year. The October Revolution overthrew the Russian Provisional Government and gave the power to the Soviets dominated by Bolsheviks. It was followed by the Russian Civil War (1917–1922) and the creation of the Soviet Union in 1922.
The revolution was led by the Bolsheviks, who used their influence in the Petrograd Soviet to organize the armed forces. Bolshevik Red Guards forces under the Military Revolutionary Committee began the takeover of government buildings on 24 October. On 25 October the Winter Palace (the seat of the Provisional government located in Petrograd, then capital of Russia), was captured.
The Glorious Revolution, also called the Revolution of 1688, was the overthrow of King James II of England (VII of Scotland) in 1688 by a union of Parliamentarians with an invading army led by the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange-Nassau (William of Orange), who as a result ascended the English throne as William III of England. It is sometimes called the Bloodless Revolution, but this is Anglocentric as it ignores the three major battles in Ireland and serious fighting in Scotland. Even in England it was not completely bloodless, since there were two significant clashes between the two armies, plus anti-Catholic riots in several towns.
This is on the list as it can be argued that James’s overthrow began modern English parliamentary democracy: never again would the monarch hold absolute power, and the Bill of Rights became one of the most important documents in the political history of Britain.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.






















June 1st, 2009 at 1:36 am
Cuba needs another coup, and so does Iran.
June 1st, 2009 at 1:41 am
“Cuba needs another coup, and so does Iran.”… and so does America!!!
June 1st, 2009 at 1:44 am
Alex – I think America just had one – it was called Obama
June 1st, 2009 at 1:45 am
no People Power Revolution?? no EDSA 1??
June 1st, 2009 at 1:47 am
I don’t want a conservative coup against Obama
We could end up with Emperor Bush, or something similar.
June 1st, 2009 at 1:53 am
Interesting list. I am glad that Soviet Revolution was included. That part of history affected my family.
Also, if there is ever a country that needs a coup, it’s Zimbabwe.
June 1st, 2009 at 1:59 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_power
June 1st, 2009 at 2:02 am
The Nazis coming to power sounds pretty legal to me…
I would have put the Russian Revolution first, because Russia is awesome, but that’s just me. I like this list; it probably could have been made into a top 15.
June 1st, 2009 at 2:09 am
Don’t want to step on anyone’s toes here, but to the best of my knowledge the Nazis’ ascent was completely legal and constitutional…
June 1st, 2009 at 2:41 am
Oh the Nazis coming to power was completely legal but the Reichstag fire meant that Hitler could effectively have all the power. They voted to change the constitution quite dramatically.
June 1st, 2009 at 2:45 am
EDSA 1? (the so called “people power revolution” in the Philippines) it was a botched coup, shouldn’t be in the list- since technically, it wasn’t a coup by definition- it was a mob of kibitzers and roman catholic meddlers being manipulated by the coup plotters.
June 1st, 2009 at 2:52 am
jfrater – Yes, Obama was elected. I campaigned for him. I voted for him. Yet the truth of the matter is that the big picture in America is still the same. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening; healthcare benefits are going down while costs have gone up by at least 50% this year alone; more and more jobs are being lost (looking beyond the current recession, jobs that will not come back to the states for a very long time); American power and influence in the world is slowly decaying; and anyone reasonable enough to look at the way our economy is constructed would tell you that this system is unsustainable, and will inevitable call for drastic change… which is why I proposed “America” for the next necessary revolution.
hehe.. it’s funny when you thought of McCain for a coups d’etat for the American revolution. I was thinking something way more progressive and to the left!
June 1st, 2009 at 3:10 am
any revolution in the USA would need huge media backing and a propaganda campaign beforehand
that was an integral part of the coup d’etat carried out by Napoleon III who ultimately held a referrendum to legalise his takeover and won in an unbelievable lindslide
(7 million to 500,000 i think)because of his propaganda and early social reform
June 1st, 2009 at 3:16 am
Is it just me or isn’t the entire world-system in need of a revolution?
June 1st, 2009 at 3:19 am
the red star: i agree entirely, democracy is no longer democratic
and i think this global recession has proved that capitalism is inherently flawed
June 1st, 2009 at 3:21 am
“Yet the truth of the matter is that the big picture in America is still the same.”
It is? Man, you better take another look, because for one thing, the sun is shining for the first time in recent memory and there are no henchmen in the shadows.
June 1st, 2009 at 3:28 am
Coup d’Etat – wasn’t that by The Plasmatics???
June 1st, 2009 at 3:36 am
God bless King Billy and the Glorious Revolution. 1690 – 2009 Loyal and True to the British Crown for Civil and Religious Liberty. No Surrender
June 1st, 2009 at 3:42 am
Why isn’t the French revolution (1789 if I’m not mistaken) on the list? It was a shock for the western world then and it still is seen as one of the decissive moments in Western history. France becomes a republic (nr.1, now they’re up to nr. 5 I believe). State and church are teared apart. Consequences up to today: values which are still taught at school (égalité, fraternité, liberté), making 18 Brumaire possible, … And above all, it inspired and inspires lots of people.
June 1st, 2009 at 3:47 am
15 Ste : Sure capitalism might be flawed, but you tell me another market structure and I’ll tell you why it’s worse.
Democracy is democratic, most people just flip out *way* to easily nowadays. “OMG!!! CoMrAd ObAmA Is SpEnDiNg OuR mOnEyS!!!111!!one!!! oN CaRs!!!!!!!!!111i!!1one11!!!! COMMIE! COMMIE! COMMIE!”
June 1st, 2009 at 3:50 am
‘Bout EDSA 1, I would agree with corinthian0430 that it was not really a coup…
June 1st, 2009 at 4:07 am
Yeah, EDSA 1 aint no coup, its a revolution of people, although it has a little coup de etat by “Honasan” it does n0t qualify as one of the best.. Hehe
June 1st, 2009 at 4:12 am
How about Thailand’s military coup, September 19, 2006? It involves tanks and stuff. Hehe
June 1st, 2009 at 4:22 am
Im sorry but i had to ask ,How do you pronounce ”coup d’état” *Apologize for being a Retard..
June 1st, 2009 at 4:25 am
MAXX.. Its “coo-death-tah”
June 1st, 2009 at 4:25 am
“and i think this global recession has proved that capitalism is inherently flawed”
And you suggest what? Worldwide socialist revolution?
June 1st, 2009 at 4:25 am
COO DAY TA
June 1st, 2009 at 4:27 am
Wouldn’t the Taliban in Afghanistan count?
June 1st, 2009 at 4:29 am
I guess I’ll jump on this one. It’s pronounced “Coo day-TAH.” Roughly translates to “stroke (or blow) to the state.”
June 1st, 2009 at 4:31 am
America did NOT have a coup (or a regime change); America had an administration change. The U. S. Constitution is still the law of the land. Most of the sitting Senators and Congressmen were re-elected and or promoted to President, Vice President, or Secretary of State. The U. S. has had 44 different Presidents and only 1 election has been violently contested (1860).
June 1st, 2009 at 4:35 am
cooty tah? :p
June 1st, 2009 at 4:36 am
Taliban? They are terrorist right?
June 1st, 2009 at 4:36 am
Lyndon B Johnson? A lot of people say that he was behind JFK’s assassination and most people know that it was a government conspiracy. So if that’s true wouldn’t that count as a coup d’etat? If so that would be worse than the Reichstag fire as that wasn’t an assassination
June 1st, 2009 at 4:38 am
32: “Taliban? They are terrorist right?”
Yeah they are now but they were in charge of Afghanistan before 9/11 and the current War on Terror!
June 1st, 2009 at 4:42 am
How about those turkish coup d’états by the military, establishing a secular state?
Also, yeah, the french revolution is probably more important then Napoleon’s coup d’état, because the first one lead to the latter.
Napoleon III’s coup d’état had quite its importance as well, because he, as Emperor, started a war with Bismarck, which after defeat lead to franco-german resentment, hence to WW1, which eventually lead to WW2, which lead to the cold war, and once communism fell a new enemy to the western world appeared ; terrorism.
It all comes back to that.
June 1st, 2009 at 4:52 am
“Alex – I think America just had one – it was called Obama”
A revoultion where a politician says one thing and then does another. What a new concept!
i can’t believe so many people fell for his message. He is no different than any other politician.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:19 am
What about the American Revolution? The one that gave the U.S. independence from England.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:24 am
37 TrumanSparks : I believe that there’s a distinction between a revolution or revolutionary war and a coup.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:33 am
@Hal9000; The sun is shinning? No henchmen in the shadows? Do you read any type of newspaper or internet site. Wake up man, nothing has changed, in fact it’s still getting worse.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:35 am
Think you’ve misunderstood what a coup actually is. Although there is a sudden change of leadership, usually from inside the establishment, a coup is when there is no ideological reason for the change (although it may develop later)
8, 7, 6, 5 (called a coup for propaganda reasons) and 2 are revolutions due to the massive change in political ideology
June 1st, 2009 at 5:50 am
Very funny, jfrater. Oh, you’re serious.
June 1st, 2009 at 5:56 am
Coup d’Etat? Why in the good Lords name do we have to use a french word to define revolution? Can’t we just speak english? Besides… the french arent exactly known for their capacity of fighting back!!!
June 1st, 2009 at 5:57 am
@corinthian0430
i think you’re mistaken..you’re talking about the so called Edsa 2 & 3…hehe
June 1st, 2009 at 5:59 am
The list is missing the Carnation Revolution in Portugal that over threw the longest reigning dictatorship in Europe, the Salazar Regime.
And the “Nazi Coup” didn’t exist… the Nazis came to power in very legal conditions!
June 1st, 2009 at 6:43 am
I think the definition of “coup” here is too broad. If I wrote this list, the entries (in chronological order) would be: France 1799, Spain 1936, Egypt 1952, Iran 1953, Congo-Léopoldville 1960, Indonesia 1965, Nigeria 1966, Greece 1967, Chile 1973, and Portugal 1974.
June 1st, 2009 at 7:36 am
Could North Korea not get one of these? Kim Jong Il’s got to be the biggest fruit ‘n’ nutcase going!
June 1st, 2009 at 7:48 am
Very interesting list. The 18 Brumaire always makes me smile, as it involved the overthrow of “the Council of the Ancients”, which had existed for… four years.
Travis – why do these lists always have to descend into this pathetic French-bashing? The truth of the matter is that the French have a far greater history of fighting dictators than does America or Britain. You can ignore that fact if you want, but try not to choke on your freedom fries.
In reference to the legality of the Nazi party – yes, it was legal. But it was legalised concentration of political undesirables, legalised murder of political opponents and the torture and beheading of an innocent man (for the Reichstag fire). Legal or not, it was still a coup and it still brought Hitler to absolute power.
Britain is in desperate need of change. There’s nothing to distinguish between the parties anymore. It’s nothing but tabloid-pandering and sleaze.
June 1st, 2009 at 8:43 am
@ Baxter :
lol… dude it was a joke! Everyone knows the french are mighty warriors! but it does make one think that after Napolean, the french didnt really do much “war”… look what happend to their colonies in Africa… they kinda ran away… not to mention WW2… just a thought!
June 1st, 2009 at 8:48 am
Bolivia needs a coup..
June 1st, 2009 at 8:49 am
Interesting fact about the Reichstag Fire. . . For years it was blamed on the communists. Then the thinking changed and historians thought that the Nazis were really behind it. Now historians have discovered that in fact there was a communist in the building when the fire happened, but it was an accident! I don’t know if I would call it a Coups d’Etat because on one hand it did allow Hitler (unfortunately one of the smartest politicians ever to live) to assume power; however he had been in the government for several years and was put in the position where he could assume power by people who thought they could control him!
June 1st, 2009 at 8:51 am
Such a cool list!
June 1st, 2009 at 9:01 am
Sorry Craig but how the assassination of a president be more important than the rise of the Nazis? I’m gonna take it you’re american…
June 1st, 2009 at 9:17 am
What about the Velvet Revolution? Or did that last too long to be considered a Coups d’Etat. Great list, I love these history lists. I foresee an epic political battle brewing here if enough people look at this list and I think it is all because of Jamie and his comment about Obama.
June 1st, 2009 at 9:24 am
Learned something today !
JF When are we going to get a bizarre, death, suicide, cemetery list again – it went down well in the past with many interesting comments.
June 1st, 2009 at 9:33 am
What about the Velvet Revolution? I think it fits the definition of a coup d’etat
June 1st, 2009 at 9:41 am
This list suffers from a poor understanding of the definition of “coup d’etat.”
June 1st, 2009 at 10:53 am
JF I agree with zululand we need some cooler lists
June 1st, 2009 at 12:01 pm
@15, @20, @26: Too many years of cold war bought us the false notion that humans only have a choice between capitalism and socialism (or communism) as means to make the world economy work properly (or not). No system is natural, we’ve created them, and i believe we have the ability to conceive beyond that. 10000 years ago people thought that the Pharaoh would reign for ever…
June 1st, 2009 at 12:10 pm
I wouldn’t say the Nazi’s rise to power was connected in any way to a coup. They used the fire to assume control legally. However, in 1923 the Nazi’s did attempt a coup but failed. For this, Hitler was put in jail, during this time in jail he wrote Mein Kampf. I’m sure it also made him realize that to gain control of Germany he had to do so “legally.”
June 1st, 2009 at 12:21 pm
A revolution is not the same than a coup. The latter is done by a small group. The Orange, the Cuban and the Iranian Revolution are not coups, but revolutions. Just watch the pictures for the Orange and the Iranian revolution, does those look like small groups to you?
June 1st, 2009 at 12:57 pm
would the Gunpowder Plot (in England) be considered a failed coup?
June 1st, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Hal9000: “It is? Man, you better take another look, because for one thing, the sun is shining for the first time in recent memory and there are no henchmen in the shadows.”
Really, the “sun is shining”? This country is in tremendous debt, with this administration still looking on ways to spend even more (healthcare, cap & trade environmental issues, etc.) Inflation is on its way – let’s hope it doesn’t turn into hyper-inflation.
And as for henchmen, every administration has them, so don’t be fooled or naive. Obama’s top henchman – Rham Emanuel.
June 1st, 2009 at 1:30 pm
I believe that the Portuguese Carnation Revolution in 1974 should be part of it as well. Quite important
June 1st, 2009 at 1:37 pm
if you are adding revolutions, then personally i would have added the Singing Revolution, since it is after all about my home country. and also because i find it to be one of the most extraordinary protests that has succeeded
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singing_Revolution
maybe as a bonus?^^
June 1st, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Can you follow this up with a list of TOP TEN UNSUCCESSFUL coup d’etats??? Just a thought
June 1st, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Im sure someone already said this but…
American Revolution duh
June 1st, 2009 at 2:58 pm
I believe people power from Philippines is worth mentioning.
June 1st, 2009 at 4:55 pm
m: Awesome revolution; made me a bit weepy even. I was relating the story to the hubby, his reply — “Estonians are cool”(he races with a bunch of your compatriots). After reading about The Singing Revolution (a shame it wasn’t more heavily covered here in Canada)I’d have to agree.
June 1st, 2009 at 7:30 pm
I agree with #45, most of these aren’t coups at all, according to your own definition. Number 10 doesn’t even involve a change in government.
June 1st, 2009 at 10:28 pm
great list!
June 1st, 2009 at 10:29 pm
Yes it did – the Nazis came to power.
Or am I missing something?
June 1st, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Many of us consider the 2000 US (s)election a judicial coup d’état.
June 1st, 2009 at 11:08 pm
Wasn’t the nazi coup a real coup? How?
June 1st, 2009 at 11:44 pm
Late O’ Day…many of us consider opinions like yours idiotic and anti-intellectual!! Of course, that has never stopped a liberal before!
June 1st, 2009 at 11:59 pm
The Obama Administration is much different from the presidency of George W Bush. I think America is heading in the right direction, although there is a long way to go.
June 2nd, 2009 at 12:37 am
Obama…. the lesser of the two evils..or the smarter of the two? which could be more dangerous actually.
June 2nd, 2009 at 1:53 am
I don’t get why everyone is so negative against a bit of socialism?
The capitalist system doesn’t, so why not try something different?
June 2nd, 2009 at 2:22 am
I think a lot of people don’t like a “bit of socialism” because they believe that it can lead to communism quite easily.
I think capitalism is the best system, it’s problem, as I see it, is that it’s very “feast or famine.” The feasts are great, the famines suck. That’s how it is.
June 2nd, 2009 at 4:02 am
how come philippines coup isnt here..
just asking…
June 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 am
The philippines is not there simply because there NEVER was a coup d’ etat there.
June 2nd, 2009 at 7:40 am
Churchill summed up Socialism quite well:
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
June 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am
#78 & #81
Why don’t we all follow the example of Scandinavian countries? They have a mixed system of socialism and capitalism and they are by far the best place in the world to live in. Low poverty, great health care and educational system, the quality of life there is unbelievable.
And I have to agree with #58 who stated earlier that since man has created socialism, communism and capitalism he can create something new. We can officialy declare capitalism a failed system. Look where this system got us today.
On the actual list subject, where is Francisco Franco of Spain? He became a dictator on April the 1st 1939 and stayed in office until his death. He is best known for his oppression against Basque, Galician and Catalan minorities and of course for his love for Real Madrid team.
June 2nd, 2009 at 10:30 am
Love the list! The French had some funny names for their councils indeed… but I suppose the Japanese do too with the Diet.
I gotta agree with Magdalena… who cares about capitalism & communism/socialism anymore completely? Balance is the key!
June 2nd, 2009 at 10:34 am
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
Sounds like churchill was having a bad day. I like the fella, but he’s hammering socialism too hard (got to remember the time he lived in as well).
There’s nothing wrong with socialism in its purity, just like capitalism… but since nothing can work as a purity, then the mixture of both is far better than either or.
June 2nd, 2009 at 11:17 am
@magdalena – Capitalism has a bright side and a dark side.
It’s a matter of point of view: people living in countries that prospered under capitalism, usually by “exporting” the bad collateral effects of their economic system (like the maintenance of a cheap unqualified workforce, for example), tend to believe that capitalism is great and communism means “the equal sharing of misery”. I don’t believe they would think the same way if they where forced to menage their own share of misery instead of making the third world do it in their place.
Anyway, XX century was harsh, it’s time for new thoughts and proposals.
June 2nd, 2009 at 1:53 pm
I totally agree with Bizarri. Capitalism only looks great thanks to imperialism.
Suffering is just outsourced, in a manner of speaking.
There’s a reason consumer products cost three hundred times more than the cost of production. Weak countries get the short end of the bargain.
Actually that’s a big understatement. Weak countries are faced with living standards close and sometimes even worse than old-time slavery and colonialism.
I believe it was Lenin who explained how the working class in the powerful countries are bought out and stripped from their revolutionary spirit by the elite implementing small reforms that just mean the working classes in other countries suffer even more.
Now, speaking of Lenin, I do have to mention that the October Revolution wasn’t exactly ‘led’ by the Bolsheviks.
By Lenin’s and Trotsky’s own admission, the Bolsheviks hindered the Revolution, because they wanted to control it. All the progress of that revolution was made by spontaneous action and the Bolsheviks were more concerned with getting the newly collectivized industries under their administration than helping even more workers collectivize their workplaces.
June 2nd, 2009 at 4:12 pm
@68 – mom423
hehe, thank you, but the honour goes to all Baltic countries, not just Estonia. and even if they didn’t sing as much, they were still part of the same revolution
June 2nd, 2009 at 4:48 pm
Obama is doing what he can with what he has. The problem is that too many American liberals want change and they want it now, and then they give up when change takes time or runs into trouble, shaking their heads in contempt at the inability of their countrymen to adapt. If you want to change the world, you have to keep pushing, slowly, gradually, making compromises, making friends. You can’t just elect a new guy and expect that the economy will turn around and the rivers will flow with milk and honey in four months. The man has a lot of work ahead of him. And it doesn’t help that he’s working against a terrified Democratic majority and a Republican minority party that opposes everything he does, screaming in the media every time the man steps out of the White House.
Give Obama a break. He’s not Superman. He’s just a human being, flawed and limited like the rest of us. So sorry if you thought you were electing Jesus Christ. You elected a man. A great man? Well, your grandkids will have to decide on that one.
June 2nd, 2009 at 7:12 pm
I strongly suggest that you place the October revolution first. Not because of the revolution itself but because of the massive long term effect it had on the modern world for years to come.
Think about the effects of this revolution!
-Communism was introduced into the world.
-Terror spread across the Russian people as the politburo forced their regime. Peasants suffered raids from the NKVD taking their grain and were collectivized in large farms, the town workers lost all right and had minimal wages, the nobility lost all their possessions, religion was abolished, priests were sent to gulag and tortured (as an atheist I agree with abolishing the church BUT killing priests and desecrating the graves of saints was inhuman). This all got a lot worse with the rise of Stalin.
-After WW2 tensions were building up between the communist east and capitalist west. This lead to the cold war aka indirect conflict. Both sides struggled to spread influence. This lead to many bloody revolutions in smaller countries in Europe, Asia and America (Cuba actually).Korean war, Vietnam war, Berlin Airlift crisis and later the Berlin wall construction. Not to mention the uprisings in Hungary and several other communist puppet states which resulted in bloodshed.
- NUCLEAR bombing on Japan! Yup, you read this correctly! DO you know what was the main reason USA chose to nuke it rather than invade with convectional weapons? A military operation was already planned with Stalin, both USSR and USA were to invade Japan and divide it. Russia was supposed to get north Japan. Since USA did not want 50% of Japan to become communist nor did they want an open war with USSR they had to >>swiftly<>without<< help from the Russians. And how did they accomplish that? BOOM!
All of there are just some of the long term effects of the October revolution. You could blame all of this on communism alone I guess but what caused communism? October revolution
June 2nd, 2009 at 9:39 pm
like a wayyy easier way to explain the definition of a Coup d’Etat is that it is a ’sudden siezure of power.’ That’s it.
June 2nd, 2009 at 9:43 pm
89 Razor11000 : Some very good points and I do appreciate them, but the Glorious Revolution sparked democracy as we know it, which has probably affected the world more than Communism.
June 3rd, 2009 at 6:05 am
#81: The Scandanavian countries do not have the burdens that the US or many other countries have to deal with. The US is struggling with illegal immigration, which taxes our systems tremendously. Also, the US spends a fortune to police the rest of the world (which is another debate topic, but still a fact). Maintaining military bases throughout the world costs billions per year.
Scandanavia has had the fortune to take advantage of such protection as well as not having other burdens such as massive immigration. They have had the fortune of being able to have quiet stability which allows them to reinvest in their own country rather than support others. That makes a huge difference in their inherent success.
June 3rd, 2009 at 7:19 am
#92
First of all my comment refered to all the western countries who have a capitalistic system and not to the US in particular. I am Greek and I would love my country to make an example out of Scandinavian countries.
I have to disagree with you on the matter of immigration. The Scandinavian countries don’t have illegal immigrants just because they welcome all immigrants and give them the same rights and obligations that their own citizents have. It is widely known that Sweden has many Greek and Arab immigrants but they managed to give them equal chances. I’ve lived in Finland for a semester and I’ve seen many immigrants there also. Of course the number of immigrants in the Us is vastly larger than that of the Scandinavian countries but my point is that with proper organisation and preparation the situation in the US would be better.
I do have to agree with you though on the subject of military expenses. If only the US decided to take care of their citizents first and then spend money to police the rest of the world things would be much easier.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:39 am
Reading the heading of #9 – The Orange Revolution I had visions of reading about Anita Bryant and a whole bunch of Florida Citrus growers taking over Washington, D.C.
Mentioned before but…
Bonus: Obama’s coup d’Etat of America – not with the help of the military but with the media.
Projected 11-12 Trillion $ in debt
Government taking over private companies
Spend Spend Spend Spend Spend
Government promoting class warfare
Socialism
oh yeah…America is moving in the right direction (*rolls eyes*)
America…where you are knee-deep in sh*t and have the government and media tell you that you are in a field of flowers…and then have them launch an all-out attack on you if you dare use your constitutional right of free speech to dispute it.
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:54 am
Ya know, the reason why the Scandinavian countries are doing well is because they take care of their citizens through the socialist ideal of a “net” that stops people from plunging beneath a certain line of economic poverty, etc. It’s quite obvious that economic freedom determines how much ‘opportunity’ an individual can have, making freedom more available to all. Thus, the balance between capitalism and socialism the Scandinavians have is probably a better system of government. Also, it has little to do with immigration… the United States simply hasn’t taken care of its own citizens enough since the advent of blatant open-market economics.
The_Snowdog
“Projected 11-12 Trillion $ in debt”
Government taking over private companies
Spend Spend Spend Spend Spend”
You realise that if the government didn’t spend, the US economy would be in more serious trouble? It’s called countercyclical fiscal policy… a mainstay of good economics. Oh, and the government is not nationalising private companies, simply becoming the major shareholder, which, hopefully… they will cease to be once the companies have regained strength. This is not socialism, this is just a government looking out for its broader economy, and thus, its citizens.
“Government promoting class warfare
Socialism”
So? This, I believe, is a good thing.
June 3rd, 2009 at 1:24 pm
mark & clare (9&10)
ive just been studying the Nazis rise to power and as one hisotrian put it it was a ’symbiosis of legality and terror’. although many of Hitlers methods were technicaly ‘legal’ they were mostly achieved through terror by the SA and SS. The death of Hindenburg was the final obstacle out of Hitlers way… using the emergency decree (technically legal) he took up the role of chancellor and president with the title ‘Fuhrer’.
In the begining Hitler was all for a revolutionary coup d’Etat yet this failed miserably with the Munich putch in 1923… he later began his ‘legal revolution’ which in many incidents was actualy combined with terror and violence.
June 3rd, 2009 at 7:26 pm
Cool!
June 3rd, 2009 at 7:30 pm
@80..
there was a coup de etat in the phil..
it was when Ferdinand Marcos was still the pres…
and during Estrada’s time…
but im not that sure though..
LOL..
it could be another kind of coup…
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:55 pm
96 Lowdog : I am also rather knowledgable on the subject, always nice to meet a likeminded person. My understanding of it was that the Nazis actually had some rather significant public support, that is how they started, as a working-class movement based on popular sentiment. As far as I know the Reichstag was actually very much in favour of the Reichstag Fire Decree. Granted that it was misinformation by Goebbels that made them worried in the first place, but as far as I’m concerned, what Hitler did – to take control of Germany – was quite remarkable. He was a brilliant man, very charismatic, if only he had supported some, more moderate ideals. If only…
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:58 pm
94 The_Snowdog : Rofl! Just shit out those party lines wherever you go, don’t bother thinking about them. Why should you bother? Free from responsibility to make your own mind up, blissful ignorance my friend. Read some proper political or economic articles, *then* comment on it. Not just what the Republicans, or your favourite Conservative radio show host, tells you.
June 4th, 2009 at 6:37 am
“The protests brought about a re-vote which ultimately deposed the sitting leader of Ukraine.”
Not true. The term of Leonid Kuchma, the sitting president, expired. The election was between two new candidates, one of whom was responsible for mass fraud and electoral violations. There was no deposition of any sitting leader, but a conflict over the legitimacy of the vote. The election was ruled fraudulent by the Constitutional Court on 3 December 2004 and a re-run was cast, therefore the Orange Revolution was not a coup.
June 4th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
The state of California has been experimenting with socialism for quite some time, and now they are flat broke. Actually, worse than flat broke as they have more liabilities and obligations than assets, and it’s getting worse. Ask Californians how their little experiment has worked out.
June 4th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
102 Steelman : Learn what socialism actually entails, then come back and say that again. Dickhead….
June 5th, 2009 at 6:16 am
What about the Easter Rising of 1916 in Dublin that eventually lead to the removal of British Domination of Ireland after 600 years , all the more remarkable for the fact that the seat of the British empire was no more than a couple of hundred miles away. C’mon Connelly , Pearse et al, as for the bigoted comment on post 18 maybe he can explain the apparent lack of civil liberties meted out to the catholic population of northern Ireland in the 50s and 60s
June 5th, 2009 at 10:53 am
@42 we call it a coup becuase there is no english word for it as there have been very few in english speeking countires, another popular word would be putsch (german)
I might consider doing an unsucsessful coups list.
June 7th, 2009 at 11:55 am
“I might consider doing an unsucsessful coups list.”
If you do that I would definitely have to recommend Hitler’s 1923 Munich Beer Hall Putsch.
June 7th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
i think there are ones from that period in germany that came closer i.e the kapp putsch
June 8th, 2009 at 2:33 am
The biggest problem with this list – apart from all the Yanks crapping on about Obama, which is totally irrelevent to the list topic – is that using your own definition in the intro over half of the entries do not belong here. A REVOLUTION IS NOT A COUP DÉTAT.
Mobutu in Zaire, The military in Myanmar, any of the several coups in Pakistan, the 53 Iranian coup is much more deserving the Khomeini’s REVOLUTION, Pinochet in Chile, Argentina in 1976, Panama 1968, Nigeria 1984, hell even the three coups in Fiji (Rambuka, Speight and Bananarama) are all more deserving than 10, 9, 8, 6, 4, 2 on the list.
June 8th, 2009 at 2:47 am
Travis,
Not for the first time I see you taking pot shots at Frances lack of courage/ability to fight especially as regards WW2. Here’s something for an ignorant never been invaded Yank to think about before flapping his virtual gums just to hear the sound of his own voice.
How many times has the USA been invaded?
When has the USA EVER lost an entire generation of it’s male populace due to war?
France was in exactly this position 20 years before WW2. Is it any surprise they basically tried to ignore Hitlers rise to power in the hope he would forget about them? Not very realistic, but understandable.
June 9th, 2009 at 3:08 am
I still don’t understand how could you guys forgot the French Revolution of 1789.
Which invented the world revolution (or coup d’état whatever).
Which was the first big western violent and unexpected change of mind of an entire population.
Which leads to an end a 1000 years old royal family.
I hope that you didn’t thought that Napoleon’s coup d’état was at the same period.
June 9th, 2009 at 7:26 am
America needs to have a coup and take our country back. Obama is a very dangerous man who is making our country weak. People need to WAKE UP!
June 25th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
#89 Razor11000
You said “Russia was supposed to get north Japan. Since USA did not want 50% of Japan to become communist nor did they want an open war with USSR they had to >>swiftlywithout<< help from the Russians. And how did they accomplish that? BOOM!"
Read up a little more–those bombs would've been used even if the USSR never existed. Anyway, good thing for Japan that we used them, otherwise northern Japan, like East Germany and the rest of the Warsaw Pact nations would have spent at least the next 45 years enduring a political, economic, and cultural rape at the hands of the filthy Russians, and today, instead of Japan being the second most prosperous country on Earth, the entire northern half of the country would be a complete shithole. Who knows, with a divided Japan, the Korean War could've easily became World War III–at the very least the economic position of the West would've been greatly weakened and, who knows, the USSR may not have collapsed at the end of 1991.
June 25th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Sorry Razor11000, but though the October Revolution was important, the rise of democracy is even more so, for not only have there always been more democracies than commie dictatorships, but in the future, democracy will be the way the entire world trends into, not Communism, a bankrupt, failed philosophy that only a small minority of uneducated, over-reacting morons (like Red Star) actually think still can work. Oh, and let’s not forget how all commie countries actually go through the motions of trying to appear to be democratic, having elections (albeit rigged ones with only 1 choice), and sometimes including “democratic” in the formal names of commie countries. Yes, democracy has been, and will be, much more influential and positive for humanity than the excrement of communism ever was, an ideology that has left nearly 100 million corpses in its wake (yeah, but I guess the world and the US still needs that sort of retarded revolution, huh Red Star?). Capitalism may need a little regulation, but to overthrow what the world has now over a bump (a much smaller bump than our ancestors got over in the Great Depression) for the sake of the tried and failed mass-murdering stupidity of communism is absolutely IDIOTIC!!!
June 25th, 2009 at 7:51 pm
To #12 Alex: Why does America need a Revolution??? Things may not be perfect here but they will get better–and we will have universal health care in the next four years. Who says our current economic structure is unstainable? Marxist idiots like yourself or ecofreaks with no conception of economics or the march or technology? What we need is at least a modicum of regulation, not a revolution. What we need are less eco-damaging energy sources and infrastructure–which we will get, and which will enable us to maintain our economy and our standard of living. With smart, non-Bushesque, diplomacy we can keep and even expand our influence and power. What we don’t need–and not just us but the entire world–are moronic defeatists like yourself whose intelligence is so limited that they can only conclude that if society isn’t perfect than obviously it must be destroyed and rebuilt in an even more half-assed way. America needs some changes made, but it sure as hell doesn’t need to become some crap nation where political disputes can only be solved with violent revolution.
July 4th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
Where is Polish Revolution in 1989?
August 7th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
what about presidents/leaders with highest coup attempts?
August 11th, 2009 at 10:01 am
I dont understand u, wasnt the boyne in present day REPUBLIC OF IRELAND which means BILLYS infulence has been absolved LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC!!!!
August 31st, 2009 at 11:53 am
No French Revolution? No American Revolution?
October 22nd, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Another concern is when you call support, if it is not a production system problem, it does not get critical attention. ,