We have been indoctrinated since birth to try to attain things. Success is measured by social status, and that is frequently established by your wealth. OK, maybe sometimes status can be established by your natural abilities, like athleticism, or knowing how to play the trombone better than anybody else, or maybe even stunning good looks. But if you’re just average in all that, and don’t even have the talent it takes to inherit wealth, then teachers, parents and other relations, friends, casual acquaintances – everybody will push you to “improve” your lot in life. So you work hard, put in lots of hours, scrimp and save your pennies, and, 30 years later, you have a spouse and kids, a mortgaged house, car and credit card payments, retirement just around the corner, recession, ulcer acting up, lawn mower is on the fritz, plus you’ve just discovered the heartbreak of psoriasis caused by stress. But you’re “successful” because you have a bigger house than your parents had.
Well, maybe not. Imagine all the opportunities that would be open up to you if you decided from Day One to just chuck that whole idea. Here are 10 darn good reasons to duck the rat race.

Straight off, if you plan to embrace poverty, you might as well embrace not having a job, too. If there’s one good thing about being rich, it’s probably the absence of having to do anything even remotely resembling manual labor and, having embraced poverty as your personal economic philosophy, you won’t have to do manual labor, either. Why? Because, once you’ve embraced not having a job, other responsibilities like mowing the yard, washing the car, house cleaning, counting the change in your pocket and taking a shower, all these things will begin to fall like dominos. You’ll be amazed at how much free time you’ll have.

This is a no-brainer. You won’t have a single worry about losing money or possessions, if you have no money or possessions. If you’re flat broke and you find a penny someone dropped, woo-hoo, it’s your lucky day! But if you’re a millionaire banker, you probably won’t even stoop to pick up a mere penny. Just think of all the lucky days you’ll have, when that banker might go years before he has even one day he considers lucky. Now look at a picture of the Queen. Does she look truly happy? Of course not, she’s worried about her portfolio; maybe BP is down a point or two. It’s the same with Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Rupert Murdoch, et al. They might crack a smile on occasion, but you never see them cutting loose with a really big guffaw. These people are constantly worried about their wealth because they know there’s only one way for their fortunes to go. At the opposite end of the spectrum, however, I’ve heard time and again how, during the Great Depression of the 1930’s, people who were mired in poverty were happy just to be able to eat. Embrace poverty now and you too can be made happy just as easily. I read somewhere, possibly the Top 20 Wise Quotes of Confucius, that “Money can’t buy happiness”. As any idiot knows, another way to say that is ”You WILL be happy without money”. Embrace poverty now. (Note: Even if Confucius didn’t say it, it’s the kind of wise thing he would say, even if he was too fat to have properly embraced poverty.)

This item alone would allow you to ratchet down your level of stress. Imagine yourself as the typical rich, gourmand, globe-trotting web site administrator. Rather than worrying about getting the heat just right under your soufflé of hummingbird tongue, you need only concern yourself with rustling up a piece of fatback to go with the collard greens. After embracing poverty, you might eat hummingbird tongue on occasion, but it would most likely go along with the rest of the hummingbird, including the odd feather or two, perhaps in a delicate tartar, whose elegance rests in its simplicity.

The poverty enabled will never be the types to jump out of their 96th floor offices just because the latest economic indicators are troubling. Heck, a full-blown depression could pass you by with hardly a notice, while a mere recession will be looked on as a time of plenty. Here’s why: by embracing poverty, you basically bring yourself down to the level of a severe economic depression; this will be “normal” for you. Then, any improvement at all to the economy will raise your standard of living exponentially while others are still wringing their hands and wondering when things are going to get better. And, when the economy is fully recovered, maybe even booming, you’ll be perfectly situated to take full advantage of a prosperous and generous workforce.

Rich people will give you freebies. It’s true. As a case in point, I was reading on another list the other day (10 Cases of Appropriate Technology), that someone has come up with an idea to give laptop computers to children in the developing world. These kids aren’t demonstrating in New York or London, shouting “We Want Computers, We Want Computers” – someone is actually hunting them down and saying “Here, kid, take this”. That is a sweet deal. Another example: Habitat for Humanity can build houses in as little as 3 ½ hours, from start to finish. Imagine yourself sitting on your favorite tree stump, picking your teeth with a hummingbird beak, maybe spitting out an occasional feather, reflecting on how happy you are. Suddenly, HFH trucks appear from out of nowhere, and 3 ½ hours and lots of hubbub later, you’re gazing at your new house. It can happen. And not just in the States, either. HFH also did this in New Zealand, but it took them about a quarter hour longer, probably due to the language barrier (e.g., “Work? Oi don’t know ‘bout that, mate”). At any rate, I’m not sure if HFH includes a coat of paint or if they expect you to do it, but, dang, anybody can live in an unpainted house, especially a free unpainted house.

If you embrace poverty, this will be one of the easier things to do – you won’t have any risk at all of an immoderate intake of anything. That is the kind of thing that gets your name in the history books. Look at Gandhi: he was poor as a church mouse, just as ascetic as they come, and now he’s revered as someone who reached the pinnacle of “enlightenment” through self-restraint. But he wasn’t restrained, he was just an adept in Poverty. Be like Gandhi and you’ll get your name in the history books, too. However, imitate Gandhi too closely and you might get your name in a registered sex offender database. See? Poverty, not restraint.

Given sufficient poverty, your health will bloom as a natural consequence. Since you can no longer afford cigarettes, booze or illegal drugs, gone will be the nagging smoker’s hack, hangovers and potential health issues caused by dirty needles. As a bonus, your excessive body fat will just melt away, since you’ll probably be eating somewhat less. And you won’t have to consciously do a thing for all these benefits – no dieting, no nicotine patches or gum, and, unless you have a dealer who also chooses to embrace poverty, no tapering off from your favorite addictive drug. Your friends will be amazed at your “will power”, and medical bills will be a thing of the past.

As a poverty “stricken” individual, you’ll find it easy to discard all your old dreams of “success” and – let’s face it – unattainable aspirations. Your new desires will become much more modest, realistic and immediate. While your old bucket list might have had things like “Go to a film premier”, or “Fly a plane”, or “Stay in the best suite”, your new bucket list will be filled with items that you can tic off on a daily basis: find food (possibly by “Doing a runner”), shelter for the night, a new bucket, etc. Your sense of accomplishment will do wonders for your self-esteem.

Most crime today is caused by envy, and since the truly impoverished have no possessions, they are seldom envied. Really, what could be stolen from you, besides your bucket? Your sense of accomplishment? You’ll be able to stroll along the darkest alleyways without the slightest fear of being mugged. Granted, you may inadvertently become the victim of crime fighters, but the flip side of that is that you’ll get free room and board. And maybe free medical care.

Somebody (Confucius?) said something like, “It’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven”. Now, whether you believe in Heaven or not, it just makes sense to cover all your bases, especially if you can do it without too much to yourself. As the exact opposite of a rich man, you stand a much greater chance of being able to waltz into Heaven with your eyes closed. If you have adequately impoverished yourself, very few temptations will come your way, and those that do come your way can be dismissed with a haughty “I can’t afford that” or “Too rich for my blood, lady”. You’ll be living the lifestyle of a monk, a very deprived monk, but you won’t be stuck in a dusty old abbey somewhere. Saints have been named for less, and you’ll be able to do it as a matter of course.
Notable omissions: no taxes, unburdened by fair weather friends, won’t be drafted into the military or have to serve on juries because you have no mailbox, won’t have to deal with lawyers




















I laughed. Although slightly confused about why the New Zealander was written with an accent bearing a frightening resemblance to the cockney one exhibited by Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins…
do people from N.Z really have a cockney accent ? i thought they sounded like australians !
You haven’t convinced me.
dont assume the abundance of resources…
oh and if you want to live a simplistic life on a farm, i bet you a week later you will be bored out your minds.
Now, whether you believe in Heaven or not, it just makes sense to cover all your bases, especially if you can do it without too much to yourself. As the exact opposite of a rich man, you stand a much greater chance of being able to waltz into Heaven with your eyes closed. If you have adequately impoverished yourself, very few temptations will come your way, and those that do come your way can be dismissed with a haughty “I can’t afford that” or “Too rich for my blood, lady”. You’ll be living the lifestyle of a monk, a very deprived monk, but you won’t be stuck in a dusty old abbey somewhere. Saints have been named for less, and you’ll be able to do it as a matter of course.
THAT is a really REALLY stupid argument. “Cover your bases”??? Really. I REALLY wish you’d stop with the preaching. Listverse used to be really interesting and I would learn something, but these days the christian religion is always been snuck in as a specific fact.
Why couldn’t #1 have been something good and useful to everyone? YOUR religion belief is not the answer and it’s insulting to be smacked int he face with #1 RELIGION.
Such a pitiful and pathetic read. Just because you have no ambition in life doesn’t mean you should encourage others to be failures also. Enjoy your hummingbird tongues if that’s all you can look forward to!
#9 and #7 were good points but basically the same thing. Everything else on the list was ridiculous, especially #1.
Enter your comment here.AS one of the people who have done that, and I’m not poor, its the rush (at least at the age of 13 it was the rush. Right now i’d probably box my own ears for something like that).
You forgot to mention that standing in the food stamps line is a great way to meet new friends!
That quote at #1 was Muhammad
April Foos – just got it now
To everyone who is offended by this list: Please get over it. It’s called a satire. And yes I see poverty myself everyday around me. I live in India. It is a very serious issue.
But get over it. It’s only a List.
Tacky. Next you can make a “joys of Cancer” list, that will be equally side splitting.
This list is so utterly offensive I can’t believe how it was written in such jest. Everything on this list is false and trivializes poverty and what people who are impoverished go through due to larger structures of power. Such a disgraceful and distasteful list obviously written by someone who doesn’t acknowledge privilege. Lists like this are keep prejudices and oppression in place in this world.
using the word “poverty” to me conjures up the idea of people living on less than the adjusted equivalent of $2/day. people w/out plumbing or safe drinking water. without electricity in their home. without heat in a cold climate when they can’t afford heating fuel. without access to even basic education or simple health care like vaccinations, antibiotics, mosquito nets to prevent malaria, condoms, etc….. NOT some US “free-gan” hipster dumpster diving in their $50 pre-faded t-shirt and $200 pre-ripped jeans before going back to dine in their trust fund apartment.
also, the author saying things like “you need only concern yourself with rustling up a piece of fatback to go with the collard greens” either means the author is blissfully unaware that this is a traditional meal in the USA south because it grew out of the meals historically eaten by black slaves when they were fed only the parts of animals their rich white owners didn’t want (cured gamey fat -not leaf lard-, intestines, skin, bones, etc.) and whatever vegetables could be cultivated on their own time in a small hand-tilled garden (after they finished the already day-long work they did for their owners) and cooked over a small fire, hence meals like ham bones or silvers of fatback boiled with greens.
-if this is the case the author is pretty damn ignorant of US history-
or the author knows all of this, but thinks it’s funny.
-in this case the author is just a racist, classist, fuc.kwit-
so, this list fails as satire and it’s simply offensive and stupid. Magnumto fails at all but trollin’ us….
do you think his/her follow-up list will be “10 reasons people actually were better off as slaves, lol!”?
bad list. not funny. not witty. not worthy of april fools or any other day…….
^This.
This is hilarious
love it!
I don’t think being poor is bad, but it isn’t a vacation either. Most people who are homeless develop physiological problems. Being poor is basically accepting defeat, admitting you are not fit for the human race, or are simply too lazy to participate. Being middle class is becoming very similar. Being poor while making money is the best case. It then only becomes a question of self will. Abide
This is worst than the “top 10 reasons we should revive the dark ages” list. I hope this is an April fool’s Joke… fail nigga this site is loosing stock …lack of swag…JFrater aint cooking.
boring! let’s get back to the poorly-edited articles either bashing the US or lauding european culture in the dark ages.
please stay away from comedy, listverse. i need you to find me interesting wikipedia articles, not prove to me how unfunny subjects of the crown can be…
WOW…this is one of the MOST insensitive lists I have ever read…I’m surprised it was even allowed here…and if it is an april fools joke..next time try actually posting it on..oh i dont know? APRIL FREAKIN’ FIRST
I want to b a member
This list was hilarious. I honestly feel for anyone who took it seriously, sympathizing with their very real poverty, albeit on a different level.
This list didn’t make fools of the poor. It was a mockery of the rich. I happen to know that JFrater takes poverty very seriously, and satire like this is a great way of addressing the most serious of issues. The same mentality that could denounce it as an attack on the poor is the same that could write Mark Twain off as a racist, when he was anything but.
Exceptional list, Jamie. ::: standing applause ::: Exquisitely tasteful, and a veritable feast of people’s hummingbird-tongue-like delicate sensibilities. AUTHOR! AUTHOR!
CORRECTION: didn’t see “by Magnumto”, and would like to give proper credit:
Kudos to Magnumto for writing it and to JFrater for publishing! The fact that it offended so many, and for the reasons stated by each, was the dessert!
DELICIOUS!
Way to completely trivialize poverty and the people suffering through it. I hope you die of hunger or over exposure.
I’m also aware this wasn’t meant to be taken seriously, but it really was awful satire and that doesn’t excuse the stupidity of it. As said before, A Modest Proposal is good satire, this comes off like a someone in grade school wrote it.
In the movie “Camelot” the song “What Do The Simple Folk Do” is sung with obvious and comedic effect which underscores just how detached royalty often is from the ravages and realities of poverty. So you don’t think the “song” that was composed by this author has any comedic value or artistic merit. Therefore, it must be somehow sad, tragic, out of touch – and must be taken, not just seriously, but so seriously that you actually express hope that the author dies “…of hunger or over exposure”.
As I wrote before, it is your poverty I lament, on another level, and because it is so extreme, and so reflective of what I see as the very worst of humanity at its well-intending, but dark and misguided core.
No, I honestly don’t think there is any comedic value here. The satire was neither funny nor well thought out. It completely missed its objective by making poverty seem trivial and something incredibly easy to deal with rather than highlighting the struggle and tragedy of it. The “artist” completely failed in that regard, so once the piece fails as satire it just becomes offensive. It was ridiculous on my part to wish harm on the author, that was stupid and uncalled for, but I stand by my original statements, you can’t write something offensive and claim it’s satire when the quality of writing is so poor. As pointed out before, the author clearly misses the point in several places and then the piece just becomes downright racist at one point. I honestly fail to see the humor in this, not because of the subject matter, but because the author failed so horribly in his mark that it no longer reads as effective satire, it just comes off as insensitive and juvenile.
John wrote: “It completely missed its objective by making poverty seem trivial and something incredibly easy to deal with rather than highlighting the struggle and tragedy of it.”
No. By that one sentence I can see that you don’t get it. It didn’t hit YOUR objective, but ITS objective was achieved, and dead on the mark. I’ll explain.
The “story/list” is being told – AT ALL TIMES – tongue-in-cheek – from the perspective of the clueless (who alone are being mocked – in this case the author who has taken that character on himself). That character’s “job” is not to make poverty seem difficult, or to highlight the struggles or tragedy of it. Why? Because the character IS clueless, that’s why.
Trivializing poverty is EXACTLY what clueless rich people DO. Contrary to your assertion, having everyone speak as a projection of your sensibilities would defeat that purpose altogether. And it wouldn’t be satire doing it how you suggested, regardless how it was delivered.
I had a friend do a similar version of this list just a few weeks ago. She said (and she is far from wealthy, or even well off), in an “old-rich” Thurston Howell III accent, “I wonder what the poor people are doing now. Not eating ice cream, that’s for sure. Much too cold for that.”
Hilarious. It was said in precisely the same vein, and with the same mocking tone (mocking the clueless rich, NOT the poor). And it was funny as hell. Just like this list was. TO ME, that is.
As to the “quality of the writing”, that’s both subject and irrelevant. Not being able to recognize satire, or seeing the satire as “poorly done” does not make it otherwise.
There is ONE thing you stated which shows that you wouldn’t have known the difference anyway: You actually thought that the one being mocked (the one with the rich/clueless perspective) should serve as one “highlighting the struggle and tragedy of it”. No, that is NOT Archie Bunker’s purpose, nor would the humor of All In The Family have worked if he did that. Archie Bunker goes over the top – in the other direction – and everyone has a laugh – at HIS expense. Why? Because he buffoonishly trivializes everything he doesn’t understand.
John, here is one more example, from the movie Trading Places, with Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd.
Dan Aykroyd plays Louis Winthorpe III, a spoiled, pampered, silver-spoon trust fund executive who works at a Wall Street brokerage firm. He has just spent a night in jail (his first ever), having been framed by his ultra-wealthy bosses, who are playing with his life on a $1 bet. When pasty-faced Winthorpe gets out of jail the next morning, he says to his fiance (in all seriousness):
“Well! If this is indicative of the state of correctional institutions in this country, they might as well let them all out. It’s far worse on the inside!”
See it? That is from the perspective of a clueless rich person, who has no idea that “correctional institution” means jail/prison, and is ALWAYS a nasty place for anyone to be. He thinks it’s a place for “correction”, but ONLY AS HE perceives it.
That is where the humor comes in. That is what makes it satire. The author of this list wrote from a SUFFICIENTLY CLUELESS perspective that it should have been obvious. But to some it wasn’t. And I think that the offended sensibilities of all who didn’t get it was ICING ON THE CAKE!
I’ll keep it short. Please show me where this clueless narrator was introduced and established. On a website known for it’s fact based lists and little, if ever any character work, why should the audience assume we’re supposed to read this in the voice of a privileged rich person. Both the examples you provided are clever and funny, this could have been if it was from that perspective but without the writer making that evident, anyone can just make an offensive list and then just claim it’s satire. “10 best things about being a slave. Lol, don’t worry guys, I’m mocking slave owners of the 1800′s without a single hint of character throughout the list, I’m only going to use tone so it comes off like I actually think these things. Why so mad?”
Alright, John, fair enough. For me, the content of the introductory text established the character up front, but I’m always on the lookout for tongue-in-cheek anyway, and I do concede that it’s necessarily obvious to everyone.
It was not Confusiouss…. It was Jesus, Who said the thing about the rich man, going through the eye of a needle
Guys, I’m pretty sure this article was supposed to be tongue in cheek…
Btw, to the writer, Gandhi was not poor, not by a long shot. He dressed as modestly as he did as because majority of Indians were seriously impoverished due to the colonial rule and couldn’t afford even ‘complete’ clothes. As a man of the people, this was his way of solidarity and protest.
Just thought, you should know
Christ said “it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to get into heaven.” no some eastern philosopher. get your facts straight.
I wonder if some of the people that are really upset about this list would also find Jonathan Swift’s Modest Proposal distasteful?
Only those who dont realize that A modest Proposal is a SATIRE…
This List is pretty ridiculous especially the best reason, thats no reason to embrace poverty, most of us that aren’t already poor already have faith in god, and this is kind of sad that your number one would be that. Anyone can go to heaven.
I love listverse but i see a underlying tension with respect to the legacy of Gandhi. While you are entitled to your opinion, as i am to mine, there is a minimum decency levels that we need to maintain. Don’t we?
Gandhiji had nothing to do with this subject and even if we agree to your view on his ***** experiments, leaving out his experiments with truth & non-violence does not justice the impact he made on mankind.
Let us not degenerate an otherwise great experience on the site with repeated poking at one person
If this was an April fools joke…why the hell is it still on here? It is the most biased, distasteful piece of crap list so far on here…
We (my spouse and I)have experienced major poverty,thankfully without kids.
I usually laugh at your sarcastic stuff you guyz are good writers,but this time not so much.If you ever need a list about overcoming poverty,drought,
or incredible odds i am your go to writer!Keep up the good work and by the way
Richness is of the soul and not the wallet.
Ha ha, this was funny. But also kind of not funny!
This actually could’ve been a very insightful list and I was looking forward to reading it but unfortunately it wasn’t
Is it really serious????
Lmao. This list is funny but there is something to it. We could save a lot of money if we didn’t have to have the latest clothes, cellphone, car, or the biggesh houses. It amazed me that people spend 50-70$ a month on phone bills. I pay only $15 a month.
this whole list is so de-motivational lol
I am late to the party, but I really liked the list. I currently live in poverty and I feel a sense of peace I have not felt in a while.
Our current structure hordes all the resources and then make a profit on giving it back to the people. How can there be empty homes and homeless people at the same time? I say ditch the system. Everything you need is provided by our Mother Earth. Money is an illusion; a hundred dollar is printed on the same material as a 1 dollar bill. We create crime, homelessness, “poverty”, and other issues to make a profit. I think the world would be a much happier place if we all ditched the system. Go back to sharing and trading within the community…How can there be hunger when the earth provides us all we need?
Anyway, since I have been living in my car, I have been thinking that this is not a bad ides after all.
I wrote this when I was unemployed and living in my car seemed to be just around the corner – unless it got repossessed. Things got much better though, and they will for you too. Good luck.
I see mocking the poor never goes out of style. This was obviously written by someone who has never had to worry about keeping the lights turned on or where their children’s next meal is coming from. These stresses can take a toll on your physical and mental health. Poverty brings only fear and uncertainty about the future. I’ve been there. It’s miserable. And…Yes, I know it’s satire with the intent to provoke laughter. Better luck next time.
Have you guys noticed that the comments is actually more fun to read than the list itself ??
bunch of deluded being discussing about something so seriously all the while it was just for a reading material.
Love this page! Most on the list only works for first world countries though. ha!
For reason # 1, that was Jesus who said ” It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to go to Heaven.”- Luke 18:25 hope this helps!!
give me my 4 minutes of my life back
this is so lame.
If this is your dream Obama is your man.
En España ya lo hemos conseguido gracias a Zapatero.
In Spain already we have obtained it thanks to Zapatero.
“Somebody (Confucius?) said something like, “It’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven’. ”
Jesus Christ said that, whether you’d like to admit it or not..
If poverty is so good then why aren’t poor people happy!
The list may have been made just to show the funny side of the poverty but in reality poor people really don’t care about things like these
i’m in. where do i sign up?
New Zealanders don’t say “mate” they say “bro”
…just saying.
“Rich people will give you freebies.” Wow.
Yeah, not a real list, but real distasteful. The fortunate laughing at the unfortunate. Nice work, listverse.
I thought this list was reasons to embrace other people living in poverty! Also, in the picture on no. 5, Gandhi looks like he’s at a rave.
Who said gandhi was from a poor background?…. get your facts right….
He was a son of a diwan (High official) in a princely state and had the money to travel to london during those early days… it meant lot of cost….
Inspite of being a person from high background he fought for poor people thats why he was famous…
A. Factually incorrect – Gandhi was an accomplished lawyer and lived the way he did out of a choice to lead the freedom movement so he could empathize with the average man in the sub-continent who was “that” poor. (Clearly the author has never had any experience of the poverty in India or Africa)
B. Whatever Gandhi did does not make him a ***** offender- all these facts he himself proclaimed- moreover, he never claimed he achieved enlightenment or performed any such acts to try and achieve enlightenment.
All that aside I think this article is quite funny in its own way
!!!
Actually I think poverty is overrated. But I love the post and the message behind the satire. Coming from economic disaster portugal, and as a victim of the 2007-2008 crash, this sort of thinking is right up my tree. You meet people here who actually live like that, more or less – much of it is a huge inconvenience and makes you very dependent on other people – but it is also a reality that doesn’t look like it will be going away anytime soon. I don’t regret the radical change of lifestyle I’ve had – from luxury stresssed out modern city to no money isolated backward country. Downgrading is hard, but it is another wizening adventure that everyone should try
You completely missed the #1 best reason to embrace poverty… You get to set your own hours and sleep in as long as you want!!!!! …oh wait…. that’s just unemployment. Well SAME THING!
I count the author of this list an optimistic and an opportunist
Well, I already do this (even tho this list is a bit an exaggeration in some parts) and I’ve never felt better…I’m sorry for those who think this is BS…stop buying crap and working to buy more crap.
Find some inspiration here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrowth (inspiration I said, not “follow it as a religion because this is the only truth”)