Top 10 Most Wicked Popes
Published on August 17, 2007 - 32 Comments
Out of the 266 Popes to have ruled the Catholic Church, ten in particular stand out for their wickedness. This is a list of the ten with a description of their errors and faults.
1. Liberius, reigned 352-66 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Pope Liberius is the first Pope not to be canonised a saint. He reigned during the height of the Arian crisis during which a large majority of the Church believed that Jesus was not God, but merely a man. The Arian heresy was fought against by the Patriarch of Alexandria Saint Athanasius who consecrated Bishops without permission.
Pope Liberius, rather than defending Athanasius, signed a document that supported those against him and condemned Athanasius. Nearing the end of his pontificate he recanted his signature and reinstated Athanasius. While the Pope did not embrace the heresy himself, he did not use his power fully to put an end to it. His reign did nothing to stop the confusion spreading throughout the Church.
2. Honorius I, reigned 625-638 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Like Liberius, Honorius I was condemned and excommunicated for heresy by the sixth general council in 680. The heresy in question was Montheism in which Jesus is seen as a divine-human, rather than the orthodox belief of physeis that he is both fully God and fully man. Patriarch Sergius of Constantinople wrote to Honorius asking him to decide the question that was causing much division at the time. Instead of clarifying the view of the Church, Honorius did nothing. His lack of action was so scandalous that for 3 centuries, each new Pope had to state at his coronation that he:
“smites with eternal anathema the originators of the new heresy, Sergius, etc., together with Honorius, because he assisted the base assertion of the heretics.”
The Roman Breviary contained the condemnation of Honorius on the Feast of St Leo II right up until the 18th century.
3. Stephen VI, reigned 896-89 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Pope Stephen VI was consecrated (possibly against his will) by Pope Formosus who, during his reign, was excommunicated for leaving the Papal seat and “conspiring to destroy the papal see”. He was eventually forgiven and returned to Rome. When Stephen VI came the Papal Throne, he had the body of formosus exhumed and put on trial (this is the famous Cadaver Synod). Formosus was accused of transmigrating sees in violation of canon law, of perjury, and of serving as a bishop while actually a layman. Stephen had Formosus’ papal vestments removed and two fingers from his right hand cut off. Formosus’ body was thrown in to the Tiber. After the Synod, public opinion turned against Stephen. He was deposed in an uprising and strangled to death.
4. John XII, reigned 955-964 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Through his mother Alda of Vienne, John XII was a seventh generation descendant of Charlemagne. John was the temporal and spiritual ruler of Rome and during his pontificate he virtually turned it into a whorehouse. Moral corruption in Rome became a major problem. After crowning Otto I Emporer of Germany in order to secure his support in a war against Berengar II of Itlay, he changed his mind and began communicating with Berengar. Otto learnt of John’s treachery and returned to Rome after defeating Berengar. He called a council which deposed John who was hiding in the mountains, and elected Leo VIII in his place. John, with a large group of supporters, returned to Rome to depose Leo VIII before Otto had even left. Otto pledged to assist Leo against John but before the matter went any further, John died. It is rumoured that he was killed by the husband of one of his mistresses.
An account of the charges against him in the Patrologia Latina states:
They testified about his adultery, which they did not see with their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had fornicated with the widow of Rainier, with Stephana his father’s concubine, with the widow Anna, and with his own niece, and he made the sacred palace into a whorehouse. They said that he had gone hunting publicly; that he had blinded his confessor Benedict, and thereafter Benedict had died; that he had killed John, cardinal subdeacon, after castrating him; and that he had set fires, girded on a sword, and put on a helmet and cuirass.
5. Benedict IX, reigned 1032-1048 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Benedict IX was Pope from 1032 to 1044, again in 1045, and finally from 1047 to 1048, the only man to have served as Pope for three discontinuous periods. He was also one of the youngest Popes (reigning from around age 18-20). He reportedly led an extremely dissolute life, and also allegedly had few qualifications for the papacy other than connections with a socially powerful family, although in terms of theology and the ordinary activities of the Church he was entirely orthodox. St. Peter Damian described him as “feasting on immorality” and “a demon from hell in the disguise of a priest” in the Liber Gomorrhianus, a treatise on papal corruption and sex that accused Benedict IX of routine homosexuality and bestiality.
He was also accused by Bishop Benno of Piacenza of “many vile adulteries and murders.” Pope Victor III referred to “his rapes, murders and other unspeakable acts. His life as a Pope so vile, so foul, so execrable, that I shudder to think of it.”
Benedict gave up his papacy for the first time in exchange for a large sum of money in 1044. He returned in 1045 to depose his replacement and reigned for one month, after which he left again, possibly to marry, and sold the papacy for a second time, to his Godfather (possibly for over 650 kg /1450 lb of gold). Two years later, Benedict retook Rome and reigned for an additional one year, until 1048. Poppo of Brixen (later to become Pope Damascus II) eventually forced him out of Rome. Benedict’s place and date of death are unknown, but some speculate that he made further attempts to regain the Papal Throne.
6. Boniface VIII, reigned 1294-1303 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Due to the King of France (Philip IV) taxing the clergy of the Church to help finance his wars, Boniface VIII released one of the most important papal bulls of Catholic History: Unam Sanctum. It declared that both spiritual and temporal power were under the pope’s jurisdiction, and that kings were subordinate to the power of the Church.
“Now, therefore, we declare, say, determine and pronounce that for every human creature it is necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman pontiff” (Porro subesse Romano Pontifici omni humanae creaturae declaramus, dicimus, definimus, et pronuntiamus omnino esse de necessitate salutis).
This is considered to be an infallible declaration of the Catholic Church. Philip retaliated against the bull by denying the exportation of money from France to Rome, funds that the Church required to operate. Boniface had no choice but to quickly meet the demands of Philip by allowing taxation only “during an emergency.” Philip’s chief minister declared that Boniface was a heretic, and in return, Boniface excommunicated the King. On September 7, 1303 an army led by Nogaret and Sciarra Colonna of the Colonna family surprised Boniface at his retreat in Anagni. The King and the Colonnas demanded that he resign, to which Boniface VIII responded that he would ’sooner die’. Boniface was beaten badly and nearly executed but was released from captivity after three days. He died a month later, on October 11, 1303.
7. Urban VI, reigned 1378-1389 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Urban VI was the first Pope of the Western Schism (which ultimately lead to three people claiming the Papal throne at the same time). Urban VI was the last Pope to be selected from outside of the College of Cardinals. Once elected, he was prone to outbursts of rage. The cardinals who elected him decided that they had made the wrong decision and they elected a new Pope in his place (he took the name of Clement VII and started a second Papal court in Avignon, France).
The second election threw the Church into turmoil. There had been antipopes, rival claimants to the papacy, before, but most of them had been appointed by various rival factions; in this case, the legitimate leaders of the Church themselves had created both popes. The conflict quickly escalated from a church problem to a diplomatic crisis that divided Europe. Secular leaders had to choose which pope they would recognize.
The schism was repaired forty years later when all three of the (then) reigning Popes abdicated together and a successor elected in the person of Pope martin V.
8. Alexander VI, reigned 1492-1503 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Born Rodrigo Borgia, Pope Alexander VI is so famous for his debased reign that his surname has become synonymous with the debased standards of the papacy in his era. Alexander’s elevation did not at the time excite much alarm, and at first his reign was marked by a strict administration of justice and an orderly method of government. But it was not long before his passion for endowing his relatives at the church’s and his neighbours’ expense became manifest. To that end he was ready to commit any crime and to plunge all Italy into war.
Alexander VI had three sons in addition to his famous daughter Lucrezia. During his pontificate virtually everything he did was to further the position of his children and family in the world. In order to dominate the Sacred College of Cardinals more completely, Alexander, in a move that created much scandal, created twelve new cardinals, among them his own son Cesare, then only eighteen years old, and Alessandro Farnese (later Pope Paul III), the brother of one of the Pope’s mistresses, the beautiful Giulia Farnese.
The death of the Pope is well recorded by Burchard: Alexander VI’s stomach became swollen and turned to liquid, while his face became wine-coloured and his skin began to peel off. Finally his stomach and bowels bled profusely. After more than a week of intestinal bleeding and convulsive fevers, and after accepting last rites and making a confession, the despairing Alexander VI expired on 18 August 1503 at the age of 72. It is highly likely that he was poisoned, though others speculate that he may have died of malaria.
9. Leo X, reigned 1513-1521 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Pope Leo X is known primarily for his papal bull against Martin Luther and subsequent failure to stem the Protestant Reformation, which began during his reign when Martin Luther (1483–1546) published the 95 Theses and nailed them to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg. When he became Pope, Leo X is reported to have said to his brother Giuliano: “Since God has given us the papacy, let us enjoy it.”
Under his pontificate, Christianity assumed a pagan character, which, passing from art into manners, gives to this epoch a strange complexion. Crimes for the moment disappeared, to give place to vices; but to charming vices, vices in good taste, such as those indulged in by Alcibiades and sung by Catullus.” Alexandre Dumas
His extravagance offended not only people like Martin Luther, but also some cardinals, who, led by Alfonso Petrucci of Siena, plotted an assassination attempt. Eventually, Pope Leo found out who these people were, and had them followed. The conspirators died of “food poisoning.” Some people argue that Leo X and his followers simply concocted the assassination charges in a moneymaking scheme to collect fines from the various wealthy cardinals Leo X detested.
Not every aspect of his pontificate was bad; he raised the church to a high rank as the friend of whatever seemed to extend knowledge or to refine and embellish life. He made the capital of Christendom the center of culture.
The Venetian ambassador (Marino Giorgi) had this to say of the Pope:
The pope is a good-natured and extremely free-hearted man, who avoids every difficult situation and above all wants peace; he would not undertake a war himself unless his own personal interests were involved; he loves learning; of canon law and literature he possesses remarkable knowledge; he is, moreover, a very excellent musician.
Having fallen ill of malaria, Leo X died on 1 December 1521, so suddenly that the last sacraments could not be administered; but the contemporary suspicions of poison were unfounded.
10. Clement VII, reigned 1523-1524 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Clement VII (Giulio di Giuliano de’ Medici) brought to the Papal throne a high reputation for political ability, and possessed in fact all the accomplishments of a wily diplomat. However, he was considered worldly and indifferent to what went on around him, including the ongoing Protestant reformation.
The Pope’s wavering politics also caused the rise of the Imperial party inside the Curia: Pompeo Cardinal Colonna’s soldiers pillaged the Vatican City and gained control of the whole of Rome in his name. The humiliated Pope promised therefore to bring the Papal States to the Imperial side again. Soon he found himself alone in Italy too, as the duke of Ferrara had sided with the Imperial army, permitting to the horde of Landsknechts led by Charles III, Duke of Bourbon, and Georg von Frundsberg, to reach Rome without harm.
Charles of Bourbon died during the long siege, and his troops, unpaid and left without a guide, felt free to ravage Rome from May 6, 1527. The innumerable series of murders, rapes and vandalism that followed ended forever the splendours of the Renaissance Rome. Clement was kept as a prisoner in Castel Sant’Angelo for six months. After having bought some Imperial officers, he escaped disguised as a peddler, and took shelter in Orvieto, and then in Viterbo. He came back to a depopulated and devastated Rome only in October 1528. Subsequently the Pope followed a policy of subservience to the Emperor, endeavouring on the one hand to induce him to act with severity against the Lutherans in Germany, and on the other to elude his demands for a general council.
Pope Clement VII is remembered for having ordered, just a few days before his death, Michelangelo’s painting of The Last Judgment in the Sistine Chapel.
Technorati Tags: Pope, Popes, religion
Related ListsTop 10 Significant Listverse ListsTop 5 Myths About the Papacy Top 10 Items of Papal Regalia Top 10 Evil Movie Villains |
SubscriptionsLike this article? Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep 'em coming, or subscribe via email: |
If you find this site helpful, please leave a donation so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.
Email This Post











1. dangorironhide - October 24th, 2007 at 5:26 am
Nice list, I knew there were some dodgy ones, but I never knew all the details.
2. Bjesomar - October 24th, 2007 at 6:04 am
But best fact is that in the First Vatican Council in Rome, 1869-70, Pope brought the doctrine of papal infallibility, meaning that the Pope is preserved from even the possibility of error when he solemnly declares or promulgates to the Church a dogmatic teaching on faith or morals. And it also works retrogradly :-), so all those nice Popes were, in fact, infallible.
3. jfrater - October 24th, 2007 at 6:21 am
BJesomar: That is true - though remember that infallibility does not mean impeccability - it means that in certain conditions they are protected from teaching errors - but only in matters of faith and in doctrines binding on the whole Church - their actions as a person are not protected
4. Bjesomar - October 24th, 2007 at 6:53 am
well, yes, impeccability, schimpeccability..

whatever the case, my fellow countryman Strossmayer made a decent speech on that Council against the doctrine, and if he had objections, i’ll side with him
5. jfrater - October 24th, 2007 at 7:10 am
Bjesomar: From Wikipedia:
So I take you side with his final decision to accept the doctrine?
6. Bjesomar - October 24th, 2007 at 7:19 am
Well, you got to admire the guy, holding a 3 hour speech (on bloody latin, for crying out loud!!)against that doctrine in front of Pope himself and angry clergy, interrupted by screams Heretic!!, off with him!!
Later it was a political decision to accept doctrine, cuz if he didn’t, he would probably be excommunicated, along with his entire flock, cuz he was very much admired by the people.
And at the end, for me it all came down to moral dilemma: can I be both catholic, and not accept the doctrine?
No 11. on the top 10 list
7. jfrater - October 24th, 2007 at 7:33 am
Bjesomar: I don’t want to burst your bubble, but the entire council was held in Latin - all of the attending Bishops with the exception of a few Eastern ones were fluent.
8. jfrater - October 24th, 2007 at 8:55 am
bjesomar: I apologize for my last comment - I have removed the second part of it which was uncalled for on my part. I have very much enjoyed our discussion today on the moral dilemmas!
9. Bjesomar - October 24th, 2007 at 11:37 pm
Jfrater:
)
You know, Latin is for me a language of scholars and doctors, and not something used for insults.. 
I’m sorry, i didn’t catch the insult, so in don’t know is apology in order, but i’ll take it if you insist (apology, not the insult
Well, without doubt, i agree with you, it’s not much of achievent to speak in latin, if you’re learning it all life, it’s just for me personaly amazing thing the whole picture: guy sits on the bench, speaking on the shaky subject, people shouting on him, and all that in latin, like a perfect scenario for Mel Gibson movie
10. jfrater - October 25th, 2007 at 2:32 am
Bjesomar: I guess they would have to be pretty old fashioned insults - mind you, they did add a variety of new words in to Latin for the council as it was needed for the bishops to discuss non-religious topics outside of the chambers.
11. FraterPA - November 6th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
I can’t believe you left Clement V off the list. Knowing that the Knights Templar were innocent of heresy–as was lately shown–he allowed Philip IV to bully him into condemning them. That’s got to count for something.
12. jfrater - November 7th, 2007 at 12:11 am
FraterPA: Clement V certainly did have a difficult papacy though remember - he exonerated the templars and ultimately supported Boniface VIII who had railed against Philip IV. Also, as far as I can tell, Clement did not condemn the Knights - he suppressed the order (as is the right of any Pope for any reason he sees fit - and has been done to other orders in the past).
13. Avenueoflight - November 17th, 2007 at 9:52 am
Please stop by….
14. Miko - January 21st, 2008 at 3:58 am
Bizarre list. You’re leaving out a lot of whoremongerpopes and druggy murdererpopes to focus on popes whose only sin seems to have been disagreement with some of the Catholic church’s teachings?
15. ironflange - March 18th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
Fun list, but some of them were not in any way wicked, just stupid and incompetent.
16. jin - March 23rd, 2008 at 11:21 pm
ok.. weird comment,
you know why this list is/was boring…it lists canonical laws, very old history and words that are a little hard to understand , especially to ordinary people (and I’m catholic and I don’t comprehend have the things here).
Nice research though
It just doesn’t have enough “controversies” to rival your other lists.
17. Eric Gmeinder - April 6th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
This list is numbered, but for some reason it is in chronological order.
18. chsrocket47 - April 9th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Some of these guys aren’t necessarily “wicked,” but you did leave out one pope that deserves to be in the top 3 at least. Pope Julius II was one of the most brazenly corrupt popes. He was accused of bribing his way onto the papal throne, and not only did he NOT deny it he basically said “Yeah I did, what are you going to do about it?” He had countless illegitimate children, one of which was a princess. He tore down the, then, 1,200 year old St. Peter’s Basilica because it was built on marshy ground and had many structural flaws to it so he had it rebuilt. What’s wrong with this you may ask? Well several saints, including St. Peter the first pope, were buried there and he had no reverence for them. He basically threw them out with the rest of the ruble that was the old St. Peter’s Basilica (although St. Peter was not thrown out). He visited prostitutes on many occasions and encouraged many other priests to do so as well. He also went to battle on a number of occasions. I could go into to detail more about this but i think you got the idea by now.
19. Good Wolf - April 14th, 2008 at 2:20 am
So far it seems the only good thing that has come out of the catholic church is, ironically, Martin Luther.
20. jfrater - April 14th, 2008 at 3:10 am
Good Wolf: I am pretty sure that anyone who has benefited from the modern legal system, university system, or hospital system would beg to differ
21. Good Wolf - April 14th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Well I got put in my place. I’ll clarify then. In a doctrinal manner and general not-being-an-evil-bastard way the best thing to come out of the catholic church is Martin Luther
22. chsrocket47 - May 6th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Good Wolf: you’re not too far off. if the Reformation didn’t happen the Catholic church would’ve collapsed in its own hypocrisies. After the Reformation, the Catholic church immediately changed its ways. There is nothing wrong with the modern-day Catholic church.
23. Eva - May 27th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Nice list. Wow… lots of things I didn’t know and I’m a Catholic. It’s always great to learn something new. Amazing research.
24. Vera Lynn - June 19th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
I don’t know too much about this. I got lost in the language more often than not. Very wordy. What I did catch was very interesting, and in some cases, disturbing.
25. Mike - July 10th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
What about Innocent III? He started the inquisitions and continued the Crusades. i think that killing over 60 million people is more wicked than simply going against the teachings of the church like most of these popes did.
26. bmccaf10 - July 20th, 2008 at 4:29 am
Mike– I don’t know where you got your information from but 60 million is WAY off. Modern historians place the number around 1000-5000 for the Inquisitions.
As to the list, what about Pope Paul VI? There are some trustworthy sources stating he was a practicing homosexual before (as Archbishop of Milan)and during his pontificate. Not to mention he presided over Vatican II which practically decimated the Church from within. Empty seminaries, empty churches, empty everything now. And dare I suggest the beloved Pope John Paul II? He let the Church continue in its free fall, and the few times he tried to help it only exacerbated the problem. Add in the clergy sex scandal which he had to be aware of and his disdain for Archbishop Lefebvre(which is eerily equivalent to the Athanasius/Liberius situation), and I think we have a contender.
27. Double - August 1st, 2008 at 6:57 pm
It is very curious that there are no ‘wicked’ popes here after the 16th Century. The Papacy colluded with Mussolini’s facists in the Lateran Pacts of 1929, with Hitler’s Nazis in the Reichkonkordat of 1933, declared neutrality in 1939 and virtually stood by as 6 million jews went to the gas chambers (perhaps the Papacy saw the Nazis as fulfilling their own 2000 year ambition). There is also much evidence to show that the Catholic Church (possibly with the Pope’s knowledge) operated escape routes to South America for Nazi war crimminals after 1945. You don’t have to squint much to see that Pius XI (1922-39) and Pius XII (1939-58) could easily be added to this list.
28. Mike - August 16th, 2008 at 10:52 am
bmccaf10-
Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I realize that I got my facts wrong, however, you are not quite right either. Historians say that 3000- 5000 people were killed in the Spanish Inquisition between 1560 and 1700. More even were tortured. Then there are the other Inquisitions to think about. And let’s not even get into talking about the Crusades death tolls.
So maybe I distorted the facts a little bit before. However, 3000- 5000 people killed and tortured in only one Inquisition is still a large number. Then, you have to add on the death toll from the Crusades. You end up with a very large number, much more than any other pope has ever killed. Therefore, Pope Innocence III definitely deserves the number one spot on this list. Most of these popes are just up there for going against the Church’s teachings. None of the Popes on the list are responsible for genocide.
The source of my numbers:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_.....nquisition
29. Malindi - October 14th, 2008 at 10:57 am
You mean all these were popes? Then the Catholic church must be a place to get the real mercy from God.
30. Spaz - October 15th, 2008 at 12:50 am
I love your lists but this one sucked. I am not a Catholic so I don’t know much of it’s history, but I would say that some of the recent Popes or even Cardinals should be on the list. How can you not put on the list the recent Popes who have condone the child molesting that has been taken place here in America. That is worst than pretty much most of what is on the list. I can not and would not become a Catholic because of this. I do not understand why there has not been an uproar from Catholics to correct this wrong. It seems like the Pope and the Catholic leaders are gods and can do no wrong. Help me understand if I am wrong.
31. Lenny - October 25th, 2008 at 2:21 am
I think you could safely throw in every single Pope from he very beginning and every one of them would be considered wicked - for the very simple reason of perpetuating the fraud of Christianity on the world.
32. Steelman - November 17th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
Lenny,
Way to be charitable. Typical atheistic arrogance.