I believe that we can safely say that the period of man’s history from 476 AD to 1000 AD is the most maligned of all. This period, known to historians as the Early Middle Ages, is still referred to by most laymen as the Dark Ages. In fact the term “dark ages” is almost as ancient as the period itself – it was coined in the 1330s by Petrarch, the Italian scholar, to refer to the decline of Latin literature. It was later taken by the protestant reformers (16th century) and then the members of the Englightenment (18th century) as a derogatory term with much broader implications, because they saw their own “enlightenment” as absent from the earlier period. Hardly a fair judgement on the past. Fortunately for modern students of history, the term is now officially known as the Early Middle Ages – a name which has no connotations at all. So, having given you the background on the terms, here are ten reasons that the dark ages were, in fact, a period of great progress and light.
The Classical Education (still used today in some schools) was the system used by the Universities which were created in the Early Middle Ages (the first in history). The universities taught the arts, law, medicine, and theology (the study of religion). The University of Bologna (founded in 1088) was the first ever to grant degrees. In addition to the classical structure (based on Ancient Greek education), these medieval universities were heavily influenced by Islamic education which was thriving at the time. While women were not admitted to Universities in the early days, the education of women did exist. The convents of the day educated the young women who would often enter at a very young age. One such women (Hildegard Von Bingen) is one of the most celebrated women of the Medieval era who had great influence over the men in power at the time.
While progress in Science was slow during this period in the West, the progress was steady and of a very high quality. The foundation was laid here for the wonderful blossoming of science that was to occur in the High Middle Ages to come. It can be safely said, that without the study of Science in the Early Middle Ages, we would be considerably behind in our scientific knowledge today. Ronald Numbers (professor at Cambridge University) has said: ‘Notions such as: “the rise of Christianity killed off ancient science”, “the medieval Christian Church suppressed the growth of the natural sciences”, “the medieval Christians thought that the world was flat”, and “the Church prohibited autopsies and dissections during the Middle Ages” [are] examples of widely popular myths that still pass as historical truth, even though they are not supported by historical research.’ [Source: Video or audio Lecture]
The Carolingian Renaissance was a period of advancements in literature, writing, the arts, architecture, jurisprudence, liturgical and scriptural studies which occurred in the late eighth and ninth centuries. The Carolingians were Franks and the most well known is Charlemagne. The Carolingian empire was considered a rebirth of the culture of the Roman Empire. At the time, Vulgar Latin was beginning to be replaced by various dialects as the main spoken languages in Europe, so the creation of schools was vital to spread knowledge further amongst the common people. It was also this period which gave us the foundation of Western Classical Music.
Under Justinian this period gave us the Corpus Juris Civilis (Body of Civil law) – an enormous compendium of Roman Law. Literacy was high,elementary education was widespread (even in the countryside), middle education was available to many people, and higher education (as discussed above) was also widely accessible. In the Byzantine empire during this period we saw a massive outpouring of books – encyclopedias, lexicons, and anthologies. While they did not create a lot of new thinking, they solidified and protected for the future much of what was already known.
This is a sticky topic, but the fact is, during the Early Middle Ages, Europe had a united Church, an agreed upon canon of the Bible, and a well developed philosophical tradition. This led (as one would expect) to a great period of peace within the Western nations. While Islam was not in agreement with the doctrines of the West, much mutual sharing of information happened and the Islamic contribution to the West is still felt today. This union of beliefs allowed for intellectual progress unseen since the Roman Empire at its heyday. In a sense you might consider this period as the calm before the storm, as it was merely a hundred years later that the first Crusade would be called to take Jerusalem back from the Muslims – an event which ended the flow of knowledge between groups.
Thanks to the learning of the Islamic people in the East, the world received its first book on algebra. The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing was written by Al-Khwārizmī (790-840) and the Arabic title of the book gave us the word “algebra”. The word algorithm comes from al-Khwārizmī’s name. This book gave us the first systematic solution of linear and quadratic equations. Later translations of his books also gave us the decimal positional number system we use today. Al-Khwārizmī, along with Diophantas, is considered the Father of algebra.
During the Early Middle Ages, architecture was diverse and innovative. It introduced the idea of realistic images in art and it laid the groundwork for the Romanesque period which was to come in the High Middle Ages. The period also included the introduction and absorption of classical forms and concepts in architecture. It can safely be said that this period was the first period of high art – with previous styles (Migration period) being much more functional and less “artistic”. In the Early Middle Ages we witness the birth of an astonishing and beautiful history of art and building.
Trivial as it may seem, the weather played a much greater part in the lives of the average people during the Middle Ages and beyond. When we think of the “Dark Ages” we tend to see images of snow storms, rain, thunder, and darkness – such as we see in films like “The Name of the Rose”. The fact is, in the Early Middle Ages, the North Atlantic region was warming up – so much so that at the opening of the High Middle Ages (1100 AD), the region was 100 years into an event now known as the Medieval Warm Period. This warm period thawed much ice and enabled the Vikings to begin their colonization of Greenland and other northern nations. Ironically, the Protestant reformation (16th century) up until the 19th century suffered the Little Ice Age – the period of “enlightenment” was literally darker and colder than the “dark” ages. During this period, reforms and better knowledge of agriculture provided a boost to food supplies.
The Early Middle Ages had a complex system of laws which were often not connected, but they were effective and fair for the most part. For merchants traveling around the world, there was the Lex Mercatoria (Law Merchant) which had evolved over time, rather than being created. This law included arbitration and promoted good practice amongst traders. At the same time, Anglo Saxon Law was formed with a focus on keeping peace in the land. While this eventually lead to some very tough laws, living under the legal system in the Early Middle Ages was probably the best time to live – as it was still flexible and fair for the majority. The third important legal system was the the Early Germanic Law which allowed each person to be tried by his own people – so as to not be disadvantaged by ignorance or major cultural differences.
If you were wanting to die a martyr by starvation, the Early Middle Ages were not the time to do it! As a consequence of the excellent weather and greater agricultural knowledge, the West did extremely well. Iron tools were in wide use in the Byzantine empire, feudalism in other parts of the world introduced efficient management of land, and massive surpluses were created so that animals were fed on grains and not grass. Public safety was also guaranteed under the feudal system and so peace and prosperity was the lot for most people.






























kiwiboi – thanks for the correction. I almost said it was short for “prostitutes and convicts”.
jfrater (#58) – this is what happens when most people’s education on the middle ages is Ren Faires and movies (ie Monty Python)
copperdragon: ah – you are probably right about that. Sad.
Jamie: Wasn’t me, it was my Classically educated girlfriend. I think she ran off to read some Chaucer after that little rant. I send her your thanks. Smart and *****y!!!
Crimanon: ah – well thanks to her and congrats to you for having such a clearly intelligent girlfriend
Just for the info, a great book by William Manchester titled “A World Lit Only by Fire” really touches on the Dark Ages (among other things). A wonderful read for those interested in the topic.
Laura: I like the slope-intercept form better y = mx + b
MPW: Sweet! Congrats!!!! Well done. I’m impressed. I like oxymorons, too. My fave “pretty ugly”
Kiwiboi: I knew that too!
Lewis_RATM: I can prove why when 2 negative numbers are multiplied they must equal a positive number. Also I like imaginary numbers which most people don’t know about or understand.
To 33 Crimanon:
Maybe we’re talking from different points of view. I mean, of course something happened in those ages. And in fact the decay was in the lasting Rome Empire. But it really was still a dark age.
I don’t know what you mean with “enough excess food to support cities and the creation of entire classes of people that sat around thinking all day”.
Cities were almost abandoned after Rome collapsed.
Those classes of thinking people were monks, and most of them e had a sufficient selfproduction in monasteries. Of course there was an intelectual progress there. But comparing to the ancient civilizations was nothing.
Food doesn’t fall from sky. Or at least in those days didn’t. By fatige I ment long working hours, everyday, even in the worst conditions and strong diseases, from your childwood to your death in 30 years(if you were lucky). Those who survived could eat. Those who didn’t work so hard, couldn’t. So there wasn’t starving at all.
What I ment about Islam is that some items in this list doesn’t belong to the European Dark Ages but Muslim Golden Ages. (university and algebra)
Maybe you think those were a good time for women rights. You’re wrong. Egyptian women had better ones, and also most of the ancient civilizations. Unfortunately Roman nor greek didn’t, and those were the ones that cames to us.
I have to add that feudal lords protected them… If the case was worse to go castle and spend there the day waiting for your turn and hoping your lord justice to be fair. Feudal laws were compleatly arbitrary.
And they went to war if necesary… Yes, they did as good knights. But they went after the hordes of peasants to be massacrated while tiring the enemy.
I totally agree that life wasn’t as bad as in low middle ages (let me doubt about cultural development). And maybe it was better -or equal- than in lasting Roman Empire. But comparing to the Old ages there was a cultural fallout, without doubting. There come the Dark Ages term. (used also in many others times in history)
The dark ages were the fundation of our society. But grew from the bottom. A tabula rasa forgetting about the past better times.
¿will anybody say that we’re better than Egyptians, for instance?
…
…
algebra rocks!!!!
please Crimanon, ask your girlfrind to tell us more…
if im an honorable mention for the catergory og buffoonery than who is the winner?
slickwilly gets the nod for nickname infringement
slick, if im the honorable mention who is the winner?
i nominate you for the catergory of nickname infringement:)
thats weird at first it wouldn’t send so i did it again and it double posted….weird
i know you are but what am i?
a fan of rush…hahaha
limbaugh???
that is correct, sir.
i kid because i love…
wowzers! really?
my pops used to watch his show when i was little
i used to call him crusty limbaugh
Jfrater: there you are! I was wondering what happend to you..
WarningDontReadThis: I am always here – just not always talking
I am starting to get settled in now so my posts should increase as my time does
Awesome List! I love the dark ages!
Jfrater: I thought it might be because of the whole moving thing. Moving is though, and you most of had a rough time moving from the UK to New Zealand.
JB: Congratulations, My GF just called you an Idiot.
Here is why; Keep in mind these are notes that she just wrote down after reading your reply. We’re kind of in a hurry, having a life and all.
Roman Empire is not the topic of this list and it had Indeed fallen before this time.
Feudalism, as a form of gov’t, didn’t develop until the end of the Early middle ages.
Universities flowered in Europe, See number ten on the list.
All points about Geniuses standing on the shoulders of Giants; Europeans of the middle ages had flourishing trade with the Middle east and Islam so ideas traveled as well.
PS. You should really proof read your comments.
____
Respond soon, I love it when she turns that shade of red.
believe what i say or i’ll harpoon your ass, via the internet!
MPW: Look for me at #66. Good to have you here tonight. So you hate algebra but you nailed your final? Good enough for me.
Vera Lynn: thanks, glad your here too
MPW Good night,Darlin. Finally a night that’s not dangerous. Be safe. Be well. You’re important.
Good night Vera Lynn, talk to you tomorrow
schweet!
Ancient Greece invented calculus ( Archimedes), atomic
theory ( Democritus, Empedocles book) etc. Ancient Egypt had electric batteries ( in the British Museum now), the reaction steam turbine ( Heron), mathematical proof, geometry ( as in Apollonius Theory of Conic Sections), number theory.
The Dark Ages were NOT a period of great intellectual advance by comparison.
Basically, We could subtract the time between between
the murder ( by a churchman’s mob) of the mathematician Hypatia, and Galileo ( or even Newton)
as a period of no really significant scientific progress.
This is true, even with the few exceptions of the high
middle ages–not all that significant.
In short: Calculus built the modern world–and it was lost for 1.5 millennium because of the anti-intellectual church.
I don’t care if that church invented the basic system of classical music–it pales by comparison.
Archimedes did not invent calculus. His work was not destroyed by the Church. We know of one essay of his that was lost over time; but not because anyone set out to destroy it. This set out a method of calculating the answer to the method of exhaustion; but Archimedes regarded it as a "cheat." He said it was a way of getting the answer by arithmetic as an aid to getting the answer properly by geometry. A copy of this essay was found fortuitously on a palimpsest under a later document. It appears to have been a 10th cent. copy made by Byzantine Christians, and later overwritten by Sinai monks in Islam territory. There is no reason to suppose that it was the only copy, or that it was overwritten by intent. At the very time frame when it was overwritten, William of Moerbeke was in Greece and Sicily translating the entire Archimedian corpus into Latin, so there was clearly no animus against Archimedes.
The calculus is dependent on concepts like velocity, acceleration, and esp. instantaneous velocity. These terms did not even exist in Greek and were coined by the medievals, specifically by folks like Grosseteste, Bradwardine, and Heytesbury. (These were in the High Middle Ages, however.) Heytesbury IIRC came within an ace of the Dedekind cut and was exploring what we call limits and open sets, although he called it the doctrine of first and last moments. But his younger contemporary, Nicholas Oresme, would invent the "+" sign as an abbreviation for _et_ ("and"), and until a full panoply of mathematical notation was in place, the algorithms of al-Khwarismi would still have to be framed in words with the occasional letter stuck in to represent a generic variable.
Hypatia was not a mathematician in our sense. She regarded the sublimity of mathematics as a tool for achieving closeness to God. Her main business was Neoplatonic philosophy of the school of Plotinus, although the only titles of her writings that have come to us are mathematical works along the lines of Diophantine Equations for Dummies. The only contemporary account of her murder makes clear that it befell because she took sides in a political quarrel, and politics in Old Alexandria was a blood sport. Her horrific death was no more or less horrific to modern sensibilities than the death of bishop George at the hands of a pagan mob, the massacre of Christians by a Jewish mob, the ethnic cleansing of Jews by a Christian mob in retaliation, and so on. Even the pagan Romans had long before noted the tendency of Alexandrians of all stripes – Egyptians, Jews, Greeks – to riot at the slightest pretext. One such riot almost got Julius Caesar and – according to Strabo, Plutarch, and other ancient pagan historians – resulted in the destruction of the Royal Library.
“The Dark Ages were NOT a period of great intellectual advance by comparison.”
The Dark Ages were NOT a period of great intellectual advance by comparison.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machiavelli
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meister_Eckhart
To name some …
+ Plus all the great mind that worked on the universities at Paris and Oxford
“In short: Calculus built the modern world–and it was lost for 1.5 millennium because of the anti-intellectual church.”
That is just so simplified and plane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism
Why do u think the “dark ages” ended? A surprising collapse of the church?
man, if only those Vikings had found an alternative fuel to row their boats with, maybe they wouldn’t have been so vicious and cranky from all that heat.
…oh wait:)
Barabas: well said!
wormcan: if they had discovered petrol earlier, they might have discovered New Zealand a good 1,200 years before anyone else!
I suppose a lot of this is about context. Effectively we do have some darkness – the loss of confidence and security in one part of Europe following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire – but arguably this is counterbalanced by a degree of recovery and the rise of a new civilisation (Islam) not too much later. To stretch the context, we don’t have an Eastern dark age equivalent in China etc.
I would surmise that a dark age takes on a lot more significance and seems much darker if you were a classically educated western European.
ARRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!
As I pointed out earlier, “Dark Ages” is NOT to be considered synonymous with “Middle Ages.”
So no–Barabas’ point isn’t really on the mark (though he/she is correct in pointing out that the Middle Ages were hardly bereft of intellectual progress). Almost ALL the people and events and artistic achievements we think of as valuable and edifying that COME from the Middle Ages came from AFTER the 8th or 9th century.
There was a TRUE Dark Age, therefore–which was the period of two or three centuries AFTER the arbitrarily agreed upon Fall of the Roman Empire and the arrival of Charlemagne on the scene–who in essence was one of the chief figures in saving our Western Civilization.
So yes, it’s wrong for anyone to assume that the Middle Ages were an intellectual and artistic cipher—of course they were far from it. But we’ve gone too far here in dismissing the aspect of a “Dark Age,” which was very real and had left our civilization in great peril for a substantial period of time. And really the only thing that kept it alive for a time was the Church, until such a time as men like Charlemagne brought it back into the light.
Jfrater: Let’s set the record straight on this, okay? This looseness with historical nomenclature makes my old historian’s hands shake with frustration.
Oh and here’s another ‘proof’ with false logic like Kiwiboi’s
Lewis – I did not use “false logic” in my equation (though there are bound to be more elegant depictions than mine).
Anyhows…ask a pure mathematician if 0.999(recurring) = 1.
The answer is “yes”.
MPW: Don’t worry, man. You’ll probably never win in the category of buffoonery, at least not as long as I’m around. I am and will always be the reigning champ of buffoons.
As for the Medieval Warming Period. Your text and graph show it starting at about 1000, when the period being discussed ends. Can this be one of the top 10 reasons, then?
Also, commenters seem to be blending the entire medieval period into one homogenous block, kind of like the movie A Knight’s Tale. You have to remember that from the deposition of Romulus Augustulus to the Battle of Bosworth (common bookends to the Middle Ages, though debated) was longer than from then to now. The Inquisition, the Black Death, the Investiture Controversy, even the monarchial papacy, don’t come until after 1000.
The comment about religious unity holds true, at least in an official context. There were East/West schisms, but they remained short term until the 1054 one (and even then it wasn’t assumed to last as long as it has).
The problem with using old terms like Middle Ages, Early Middle Ages, or Dark Ages, is that they imply homogeneity, which isn’t accurate. The 6th century was different from the 11th in a great many respects.
Oh, and algebra sucks.
Kiwiboi: I was studying it there and the only reason it works is because you’re denying the normal fact of multiplication that when you multiply by 10, you add a zero. I think that’s why it works anyway.
Vera Lynn: Square root of -x, and the like, right?
Kiwiboi: So yeah, it isn’t false logic, but it is pretty sneaky, :p
Anyway, cool list.
Although Ted Turner has spoken about his attempts in purchasing Notre-Dame de Chartres (as far back as the early 90′s) and to have it “updated”, a final price is still being negotiated. He said that if all went according to plan, the “coatings” would be similiar to that of auto paint, protecting the shape of the architecture for centuries to come and “popularizing the past” with a vibrant intensity. Along with other additions, such as a swimming pool and squash court, Turner has stated that his “New Chartres” may include glitter.
reply to #52. dgsinclair:
I was being silly.
to Crimanon girlfriend
sorry for my last post length and my bad wrigting (I was sleppy)
feudalism appeared in the IX century. I presumed you reffered to that when you talked about those medieval laws…
Here’re the anglosaxon laws. No mention to women. Just say that they’re allowed to recive a part his husband testament:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/saxlaw.htm
Most of the points are refered to the King rights, not people ones.
I don’t know about germanic ones, but I presume will be more of the same.
The late Western Roman Empire (from c. II to V) was a dark age. I was just saying that I agree: maybe High Middle Ages were better times.
Point 10: “In addition to the classical structure (based on Ancient Greek education), these medieval universities were heavily influenced by Islamic education which was thriving at the time.”
And something more. The first universities were founded in XII century, so not in high middle ages.
The trade routes were the remains of the ancient Mediterranian cultures. I don’t understand your thesis in that point. They weren’t as travelled as in Old Ages.
Very few European scholars had acces to algebra. And in most places was considered an heretic knowledgment. It was in low middle ages, in XII century, when that knowlegdment came to us.
Have you ever been in Europe? If you have the opportunity, do it and go see as much museums as you can. You will really enjoy it if you like Medieval.
Is just that seems like your education comes from a kind of Opus Dei or evangelist studies. And I think it doesn’t. Isn’t it?
PD: that final words were just for your own fun, Crimanon
On top of all that, the Dark Ages probably weren’t as putrid and filthy as modern portrayals make out. The again, if I went for a visit I still think I’d take some disinfectant and a spray bottle of Febreeze, just to be on the safe side.
Slickwilly, all kidding aside you seem really smart.
Finally correcting the views of the masses!!!
to JB from the GF
I never said that the ‘little guys’ didn’t get the short end of the law stick. But women steadily lost their rights throughout the 1000 years of the middle ages; until the modern era (now we can actually vote). I know the most about English Medieval history, my continental knowledge is not as broad. I have not been talking about the High Middle Ages.
Its important to remember that trade and the movement of people has always happened. No country is that isolated, no mater what century you are talking about. Of course the European universities were influenced by the Islamic world; go algebra. Few scholars could get a hold of any book much less one written by a godless heathen.
I have been to Europe several times (4 countries). I would love to go again. The museums are wonderful.
Don’t bad mouth my education. I have had many really great teaches, and do not appreciate them being dispareged.
Yes please some precise nomenclature, would be great.
Crimanon (or I presume, the GF):
By your own admission you’re more familiar with medieval ENGLISH history as opposed to that of the continent… a caution, then: it would be a mistake to take what we know of English civil law of the time and then apply it as a synecdoche to the rest of Europe. The plight of women and of the poor and downtrodden in general was *far* more miserable in the various continental states of the time… of course this varied from place to place, and was largely dependent upon the will of the local big-shot, be he duke, prince, or even the occasional bishop.
Also, as I’ve repeatedly pointed out in this thread (I assume you’d agree) we should really be more precise about this rather vast stretch of time we’re talking about here. As I’ve said, the first two or three centuries following on the fall of Rome WERE the real “Dark Age” in every respect–and here I’d argue with your assertion that “trade and the movement of people has always happened,” as you seem to mean this in a positive sense. During that period, there was certainly a movement of people–who have been referred to as barbarians, of course–great migrations of uncivilized (in the strict sense of the word, in that they did not live in settled, organized cities) people who, yes, may very well have carried on some sort of trade to an extent, but this movement and this trade (if we can call it that) were hardly what is meant when we think of constructive exchanges of ideas and goods between peoples and states. Rather, it produced a total neglect of building and scholarship (certainly intellectual ideas–for close to three hundred years–were not being disseminated) and a breakdown (and total loss) of the once-organized merchant system of the Empire, which didn’t return until after roughly the 9th century, and then only partially.
Obviously the mistake here, which the list was meant to address (but needs to do a better job of addressing) is in people thinking that ALL of the Middle Ages were misery-laden and uncivilized. Not true, of course, and particularly not true of the period between AD 1000 and the beginnings of the Renaissance in the 15th century. But it’s also a mistake to not nail home the fact that there very much WAS a *real* Dark Age, and it very nearly did bring our civilization to a total halt. The influx of Islamic learning, the rediscovery of Classical Graeco-Roman civilization and scholarship, and the interest in rebuilding or recreating something more lasting than mere existence-of-the-moment did *not* occur until about the 9th century.
Prior to that there *was* isolation, illiteracy (in the extreme), privation, and little hope.
I find this article to euro-centric.
10 reasons the dark ages weren t dark…
I didn’t know that the dark ages are a BOOM! forward to the technological and knowledge advances of people despite coming up with things as revolting (such as the gruesome methods of execution) as how nice knowledge is.
i thought the dark ages pertained to europe golden age of islam occured around that time.
Number 9′s “God the Geometer” picture is hillarious. When did god and fact ever come together lol!
Appa’s right (#107) This article is Euro-centric. (haha)
Fabulous list J! Informative and entertaining. No#6 is *****ing fascinating. Its certainly a far cry from where humanity is at the moment. All these algebra jokes are hilarious too. Cheers all! Spread the love. Bring on the dark ages two. ***** this modern accelerated matrix we live in today. I want unity, love, knowledge, prosperity, shagging in open fields, religious harmony, fair law, no law against shagging in open fields, algebra, food, art, and fields of men and women shagging each other rotten!
While most of Europe was experiencing a dark age Ireland was actually going through a golden age and was known as ‘The Land of Saints and Scholars’. That came to an end with the English invasions of the 12th century.
While I for one agree that the term “Dark Ages” is too severe of a description for that era of time; I do think that the pace of developement in Europe took a decided step back during that era; especially when compared to the Roman Civilization.
This had mostly to do with the power vacuum that was created with the decline of Roman power in Europe; much of the devolopement seen in Europe was propped up by Roman Empirialism and once financial and technical support from Rome eroded; no suitable replacement came to pick up the slack. Without roman Technical knowledge the northern Germanic tribes had to learn everything from scratch until Roman science and engineering was re-introduced by Islamic traders and the spoils of Crusades.
Another major factor was that most of Europe was controlled and occupied by the “barbarian” cultures who were barely influenced by Rome before it fell. This was the major failing of later Roman policy towards it’s territorial holdings. By the end of the Roman Empire most Emporers and aristrocrates had developed quite a xenophobic attitude towards foriegners in generals which evolved into outright hostility. Case in point was the tragic dealings with the Visogoths which led to the sacking of Rome. Had Rome implemented a more open policy of fair trading and open communication with the Northern Germanic tribes history would have went in a completely different direction. Germanic tribes would have been fully indoctrinated into Roman culture and even had Rome fell it’s culture and ideas would have carried on in Europe; a perfect example of theis effect was Hellinism in the Middle East. Even after Greek power waned in the Mediterranean it’s influence carried on for hundreds of years and was the primary progenitor of Roman culture.
While there were bright points during the Early Middle Ages; by and large the high end engineering and science that was the cornerstone of Rome was lost in Europe; and it took quite a long time for Europe to “rediscover” classical knowledge and improve upon them. Had Europe not lose this knowledge for 1000 years then once again the history of Europe would be completely different from today.
THAT’S HORRIBLE!! Too bad over 50 MILLION innocent people were slain and burned at the stake during this time. But I’m glad to see that you can look on the positive side of such a horrible event!
i would think algevra was a bad thing lol
i hate this list all those bad people I hate the screded list
bad list of bad things i hate it lol
:0
;( ;0
:p
i really liked this list,especially since i am doin a project on the dark ages,it really helps me understand and gives me facts,thank you sooooo much!!!!