Exoplanets or “extrasolar planets” are planets found outside our solar system. They are designated by affixing a lowercase letter, starting from âbâ towards âzâ depending on order of discovery, to their parent star’s Flamsteed designation or catalogue numbers.
When PSR1257 + 12 B and PSR1257 + 12 C (they used uppercase letters for these very first ones because they did not yet use the current nomenclature), and later 51 Pegasi b, the first confirmed exoplanets were discovered in the early 1990′s, they were hailed as the most significant breakthroughs in the field of Astronomy since the Copernican Revolution and caused an uproar in the scientific community, and revived hopes of finding Earth-like planets and perhaps life outside the Solar System. Before those discoveries extrasolar planets were deemed nonexistent by most reputable astronomers and mere mention of their existence was treated as science fiction such that no self-respecting scientist took them seriously until relatively recently. Since then Exoplanetology, the study of exoplanets has evolved rapidly into a new branch of Astronomy, uncovering more than 400 such planets (30 of which in the month of October 2009 alone), but most of them were disappointingly similar to the first ones: hot bloated gas giants revolving very close to their star with orbital periods measured in days – sometimes termed “roasters,” and brown dwarves – failed stars which can be easily mistaken for the most massive planets.
The most plausible explanation for this is that the commonly used indirect methods of exoplanet detection are biased towards large, massive objects with short orbital periods which make them the easiest to identify. Every once in a while though, with the help of advanced technology and new innovative means of improving our detective capabilities and a bit of luck we get a few surprises:
PSR B1620-26 b, nicknamed âMethuselahâ for biblical reasons, is the oldest exoplanet found to date at 13 billion years old, possibly the oldest ever considering the Universe itself is only a little older at 13.7 billion years old! It was found deep inside the core of what is called a âglobular clusterâ of stars, which are composed of the very first stars that were formed right after the Big Bang. And based on our knowledge of planet formation planets are born soon after their parent star, so if the exoplanetâs star is really old, then the planet itself must be really old as well. It was confirmed to be a planet only in 2003 which is good news for planet-hunters because if planets can be readily formed as quickly as stars just after the Big Bang then they must be as common too.
Itâs actually a system of planets, not unlike how we like to call our own solar system. The name âEpsilon Eridaniâ stands for the parent star, or their âsun,â and it has two probable planets orbiting it: one confirmed (Epsilon Eridani b) another yet unconfirmed (Epsilon Eridani c), making it the closest planetary system at just over 10 light years from the solar system. It even has not one but two asteroid belts, an inner one between Epsilon Eridani b and the star and an outer one between b and c, and also a dust ring beyond câs orbit believed to be produced by extrasolar comets bumping into each other.
When we think of planets we are used to the idea of planets around the sun in a single star system but in fact a surprising number (about one in two) of the stars we see in the night sky are really multiple star systems; that is, a group of two or more stars orbiting around their common center of mass (they appear as single points of light because of sheer distance). In the 91 Aquarii system there are five stars, and in November 2003 it was discovered that a gas giant planet was orbiting the primary star, 91 Aquarii A, and thus the planet is alternatively named 91 Aquarii Ab to distinguish it from the other stars in the system and to make room for possible undiscovered planets around those other stars. This gas giant is special because our methods of detecting exoplanets around stars require a great deal of precision which could unfortunately be thrown off by even one other nearby star, making it one of the few planets discovered in multiple star systems.
This is quite similar to the previous one in that it is a binary star system, a two-star multiple star system just like Tatooine (which by the way has become a new scientific term describing planets in multiple star systems after the hypothetical HD 188753 Ab, which could have been the first of the âTatooine planetsâ was hypothesized back in 2005 but was later disproved) from Star Wars, but this time it has five medium-size âNeptune-massâ planets orbiting around the larger star 55 Cancri A, in order of distance from parent star: 55 Cancri e, b, c, f, and d (or 55 Cancri Ae, Ab, Ac, Af, and Ad to distinguish them from the other star, 55 Cancri B). This is the most number of confirmed planets orbiting one star other than the sun and hence raises the possibility of finding more planets around stars with or without known planetary systems by showing that our solar system of many planets is not unique.
Another âspecialâ gas giant in the sense that its orbital plane aligns perfectly with our line of sight i.e. it regularly passes through the face of its parent star as seen from Earth. This âtransitingâ of the planet allows us to more accurately calculate its size by analyzing the amount of its parent starâs light that is blocked off as it passes and more importantly determine the composition of its atmosphere through Spectroscopy, the study of interactions between radiation and matter (in this case, the interaction between gases and vapors in the planetâs atmosphere and its sunâs starlight). Using this method they have detected the presence of sodium vapor and more recently (October 2009) some water vapor, carbon dioxide, and methane in the planetâs atmosphere. It is also only the second planet revealed to possess organic compounds, with HD 189733 b being the first one on October 5, 2005.
The habitable zone is the imaginary spherical shell surrounding a star where conditions are optimal for liquid water to exist on an Earth-sized planet orbiting within that shell. This gas giant is special because it orbits inside its sunâs habitable zone. âBut so what,â you say, âhow is it âhabitable,â we canât live on gas giants, you know!â While it is true that we humans are as of now incapable of living on or in a gas giant, take a quick look at the gas giants in our solar system: they all have some relatively big, icy moons, and it is not impossible (albeit not certain) that Gliese 876 b could have some habitable moons (think Pandora and Polyphemus from the movie Avatar). Even if not, there is no reason not to believe that life could originate in or on gas giants, as evidenced by a paper from respected astronomers discussing the possibility of life in Jupiterâs thick atmosphere.
This gas giant was found orbiting a white dwarf star (a type of dead star) which means that at some time in the past during the starâs red giant phase (a red giant is a large dying star preceding the white dwarf stage) the planet must have been skimming its sunâs surface or possibly even orbited inside the dying star! This bodes well for the planets in our own solar system including Earth, because our sun is believed to begin its red giant phase five billion years into the future, engulfing the orbits of the inner planets and possibly reaching the present-day orbit of Mars. But even if the Earth does survive inside the red giant sun the surface will be totally sterilized by the high temperatures in the red giant sun.
Up to now we have been talking of a few noteworthy gas giants in a universe of hot bloated gas giants, but this planet, the first âsuper-Earth,â or large rocky exoplanet discovered, brought researchers much closer to finding Earth-like planets outside the solar system. A âsuper-Earthâ is defined as an exoplanet with a mass between that of the Earth and the giant planets in the solar system. They are generally considered to be rocky because for an object the size of the earth its weak gravitational force tends to attract more of the densest most massive materials (e.g. rocks and metals) but little of the lightest materials like gases, which could then be easily blown off by astronomical phenomena like radiation from its sun, atmospheric escape, or large asteroid impacts. As this rocky protoplanet grows to approach Jupiter-mass, however, its strengthening gravitational attraction allows it not only to pull more objects to its surface but also hold on to the lighter gases, setting off a vicious spiral which eventually leads to it becoming another gas giant. It demonstrated how advancements in technology achieved through cooperation in the intensive development and constant innovation of new techniques can pay off and lead to bigger things (or rather smaller things, as our refined techniques have detected exoplanets with smaller masses since then).
It was discovered soon after the first super-earth, with their masses and diameters roughly equivalent. Initial calculations, however, suggested a density greater than those of gas giants but not quite as dense as rocky super-Earths, and led scientists to believe it was made primarily of the next most abundant compound in the universe: water (which in turn is composed of some of the most abundant elements in the universe: Hydrogen and Oxygen). But given the planetâs high surface gravity due to its high mass and small radius, and the fact that it orbits close to its star, any water comprising the planet is thought to be exotic forms of âhot iceâ or water compressed into a hot, solid state by enormous pressures, like how carbon atoms are compressed into diamonds by pressures beneath the Earthâs surface.
This recent addition to the fast growing list of extrasolar planets thrilled scientists when they determined its diameter to be only about 1.7 times that of Earth with a density and inferred composition similar to that of Earth. It was among the smallest exoplanets at the time of its discovery and the most Earth-like, if not for a literal sea of molten rock and metal covering its entire surface due to its orbitâs extreme proximity to its sun! It is also one of the few super-Earths with an atmosphere, but only a really thin and tenuous one with trace amounts of water vapor and various metals in gaseous form because of extreme conditions on its surface.
Direct exoplanet observation has been compared to watching a gnat flying across the face of a searchlight on a foggy day from miles away (source: National Geographic). Fomalhaut b and HR 8799 b, c, d are the first exoplanets directly imaged in optical wavelengths (that is, in colloquial terms, photographed) using huge Earth-based telescopes at W.M. Keck and Gemini Observatories in Hawaii along with the Hubble Space Telescope. Truly an impressive feat, yes, but not quite as impressive as the next one.
Itâs roughly the same distance from its star as Neptune is from the sun, so it only receives and reflects a tiny fraction of its sunâs light, like Neptune. But if you thought observing Neptune from the Earth is hard enough, try photographing an object as dim as Neptune, only from 50 light years (about 500 trillion kilometres or 300 trillion miles) away in another star system! Thatâs exactly what the Hubble space telescope did in November 2009. Whatâs really interesting about this and the previous item is that these telescopes are scheduled to be replaced by a new generation of more powerful telescopes, some of them dedicated solely to planet-hunting (notably the Terrestrial Planet Finder or TPF to be launched in 2015 with a stated mission of – you guessed it – finding terrestrial planets). So if the old general purpose and soon-to-be-obsolete Hubble telescope can accomplish that, who knows what more we could find with the newer, specialized telescopes!
Infrared detectors on Nasa’s Spitzer Space Telescope detected large amounts of vaporised rock, along with fragments of hardened lava, known as tektites, which are usually formed by meteorite impacts. The existence of such a large amount of these kinds of material that would be enough to obscure a starâs light points to a huge impact – a planetary collision – in order to produce that much debris.
Its discovery shows that catastrophic planet-scale collisions are not very uncommon in the universe, and supports the widely accepted theory that the Earthâs moon was created by a similar event in the distant past. Furthermore, computer simulations have predicted the remote possibility of future collisions in our solar system 3 billion years into the future, far from the 2 years that pseudo-scientist nuts want you to believe.
This one is very much like COROT-7b but it is closer to Earth at 42 light years and hence can be more comprehensively studied. Like COROT-7b its surface is much hotter than Earthâs, but much milder than that of COROT-7b which could allow for a thicker and denser atmosphere, if one exists.
At 7 to 14 times the mass of Earth this planet is considered to be a super-Earth but remarkable in that its orbit is inside the habitable zone, and has a solid surface allowing for any water present on its surface to form liquid oceans and even landmasses characteristic of Earthâs surface, although with a much higher surface gravity. So striking is its resemblance to Earth that it has inspired some people to send greetings intended for possible intelligent life forms that could have developed similarly to us.
Can you imagine talking about exoplanets at a party and going about how awesome PSR1257 + 12 B, PSR1257 + 12 C, PSR B1620-26 b, HD 209458 b, ” Arae c, COROT-7b, GJ 758 b, GJ 1214 b, and HD 172555 are? Thatâs whatâs led to the creation of the Exoplanet Naming Society a little over a year ago, which aims to replace the current designations of exoplanets with mythological names for easy reference, like the planets in our solar system. Now you can participate in this exciting new age of discovery by assigning obscure unpronounceable names to distant balls of rock and gas for future grade school children to memorize.



































I've read that satelites probing Mars have discovered several worms in the sands of Mars and was called "marsworms". Apparently, this is the mortal enemy of…earthworms
howdz youf findz outedz (:|)
Good list
Nice pics. It’s kind of scary thinking how big our universe actually is!
some of the facts are incorrect, but i commend you on a list well done.
Great list! Stupendous work! My planetary viewpoint has just expanded a lot..
that is just tooo cool
very good read
Although there is a bunch of interesting info in this list, I think I’ll try to digest it all in the morning, after I’ve slept.
I am looking forward to the comments from the astronomy inclined readers that come to this site.
Space scares me. The idea of it going on and on and on, the concept of infinity for some reason makes me nervous. Watching Trek (I always enjoyed The Next Generation alot) I always imagined them just falling, I know it’s not logical but the complexity of this stuff is outta my league. Way cool though. Good list.
I still vote Earth as the *****iest planet alive.
Someone do a top 10 Smells list (or several: best, worst, unique, etc.)
Well, I’m astronomy inclined (I write for an astronomy blog), and I love this list. But, hey! Where are the credits for the images you used? NASA/JPL, ESA, SOHO, and the astrophysicists who created these images don’t mind at all for you using them, but you have to credit them.
What’s oddball about these planets then? I Don’t get it.
Great list! Great job JohnS.Just a quick question though, since #1 is the most earth like, how come scientists are concentrating on Mars instead of this to be the next earth?
@sgcvelasco (13): probably the distance issue – Mars is within our reach.
It is the distance issue, plus current technology and funding. Plus, Voyager 1, the furthest man-made object out in space, was launched in 1977, and it took it until 2003 to reach the determined boundary of our solar system.
@scrumpy (12): I agree – the title has been changed accordingly.
good list just shows me how little i know about space….
Actually I’ve been commenting here for a while, but it seems Jamie didn’t use my usual name here – Thanks for publishing my first list Jamie! And thanks to all the commenters so far
@C+++ (3): It would be great if you could be more specific about those facts that I’ve gotten wrong – I sourced most of these items from the news of their discovery, so maybe a few things have changed since then
@scrumpy (12): It’s because almost all of the exoplanets discovered were gas giants with extremely close orbits to their star. This makes them the easiest to identify because our indirect methods are biased towards finding these giants. you can read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_detecting_extrasolar_planets
@sgcvelasco (13): Mars is far closer to Earth(400 million km vs. 20 trillion km)
@jfrater (16): I wanted to post in one comment all the links to the sources but why won’t it show?
Wow! A bunch to take in today. Heard of the super-earths before, but didn’t know they were called exoplanets.
I love space and everything to do with it and would hope to have a chance to see it “live” if possible. Probably not, but it would be interesting.
Cool list, JohnS.
I Have A Question, Does Nimbiru(A.K.A. Planet X) Exist? And If So Why Wasn’t It Included On This List?
It is a theoretical planet
Interesting
@jfrater (16): But why? We have a lot of fascinating lists already. But then I really can’t think of a better synonym so it’s OK. I called them oddball because, well, they’re ball-shaped, and more importantly because they stick out from all the hot boring gas giants, some of which may have just been discovered as we write but do not notice. They’re like computer-animated movies: the first ones were awesome but now with every new release most of the world just goes “meh” because we have a lot of them now.
BTW advanced happy (Chinese) new year everyone! I had wanted this list to be published on Valentine’s day which coincides with the lunar new year. I’m not usually superstitious but odd numbers and round objects are symbolic of good fortune in Oriental new year’s traditions
Another American list….Why am I not supised?
hmm interesting stuff
but american
Hey, less than a yr ago i remember reading about a planet about 3-5 times the size of earth, in the habitable zone, and of all things, discovered in the solar system which Star Trek calls “Vulcan”, home of the vulcans. This was big news, are any of these planets that planet?
Not to nitpick, but the universe is not 13.7 billion years old, that’s just how long it takes light to reach us from the furthest point in the galaxy to date.
Basically the true “age” of the universe is unknown since we’re limited based on what we see. For example, a star 20 billion light years away could possibly be 19 billion years old and we’d have no knowledge of this star even existing since the light wouldn’t get to earth for another billion years.
Also, why didnt you use the ACTUAL picture for #5… There is an actual picture you know (which was quite amazing the first time i saw it) but i realize its not as flashy as this…
Oh and for those of you who asked for people were are astronomically inclined, I majored in Aerospace Engineering with an emphasis on Astronautics and space travel so this is kind of part of my field. Although I will yield that I am hardly an astronomer!!! just know some of this stuff.
Oh Also i remember that the planet nicknamed vulcan, had another twin planet on the same solar system… and i think it was like 50 light years away or so, if that helps
Also, last i checked (around July) we had about 320 exoplanets. WTF we have more than 400 now? I went to JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratories in Pasadena, CA, a part of NASA (sort of)) and they had all this info on exo planets. Their stuff was a yr old, but they didnt think things would change so quickly so by the time they did their exhibition, Their banners had pretty outdated info on exoplanets hahaha kinda funny i thought.
To JohnS: are some of these found by the Kepler telescope? It is orbiting around the sun, and is heliocentric located at Legrangian (sorry for the spelling) point #5 I believe… trailing earth, as a Trojan asteroid would (sorry if I am overwhelming you with too much info)…
@JohnS (23):
Read above comment (sorry didnt tag the first time)
Also, how is this an american list? because americans made the discoveries?
While I agree that American “superiority complex” can get a little ridiculous on MOST things:
1) Sorry the US is unchallenged in space knowledge and
2) There are of planet wide importance, even if your country doesnt have a space program.
how could this be considered american-centric?
am i just missing the joke?
In the middle of the introduction to this list is a sentence which begins “Before those discoveries extrasolar planets were deemed nonexistent by most reputable astronomers … “. This is not only untrue, but flat-out ridiculous. No reputable scientist in the 20th century would have denied the overwhelming statistical probability that there were more planets out there. Some may have doubted that we would ever have the means to find them, though. Other than that one bizarre assertion in the intro, though, this was a really good list.
@Maximuz04 (37): Indeed some of the items on this list were discovered by the Kepler telescope, but I can’t remember which ones eaxctly
@Hubert (40): Oh yes those who doubted that we would ever have the means to find exoplanets were those that I had in mind as I was writing, sorry
@JohnS (32):
I was actually going to mention the thing hubert said too. No one in their right mind really doubted their existence but like you said, many (however not all) doubted our technological prowess so soon.
@Maximuz04 (38): This isnt the same. NASA is unmatched in space travel e.t.c, but not so much astronomy.
What about COROT, the French program to find exoplanets, which has found 7 planets in the last 3 years. SuperWASP, a joint program from Spanish, South african, UK and other countries has found 18 in the last 4 years. HARPS, a program run in portugal and spain, has found 32 exoplanets to date. Not to mention the first exoplaneds ever discovered were by a bunch of Canadians. The USA has found its fair share too, but I dont think it is punching above its weight on this one.
The average human mind trying to digest space is like the average athiest writing off God.
Average human mind – I can’t comprehend infinite space.
Average athiest mind – If there is a God then where did He come from?
I don’t have a point, by the way. Nor do I feel athiests are somehow not average humans
It’s just my way of coping with the vast possibilitys of… Everything. Trying to find reason.
PS – Excuse the spelling.
Iâve heard that astronomy absorbs tremendous amounts of money. What I wonder is… is it taking in too much for just pondering the mysteries of the universe?
I mean, wouldnât it be wiser to spend a fraction of this money for more mundane purposes?
It’s not that I don’t like seeing the pretty pictures from the Hubble telescope, but I wonder if it is worthwhile.(?)
Super cool!
k darlin
When will they be coming then? I mean the aliens!
how about 3075 AD ? Seems like a nice year! but some people think they are already here haha! Scared of humans hiding in their big pencil like ships ! *****ing cowards made a journey from so far away and don’t care to show there *****ing face! I mean how about coming down on a public television won’t that be thing? I Think scientists are right, all in the crooked heads of people!
@Maximuz04 (29): @Sodamancer (30): It’s become a running joke here at Listverse. Several lists were about things like Presidents of the US, or American football or baseball, and so on. There would be tons of angry comments accusing Listverse of being “too American.” It got to the point of being ridiculous. Now someone posts the too American comment on just about every list, no matter what the subject.
Great list but at no.4, you say that 50 light years is 500,000,000,000,000 light kilometers away. That is way to short. It is way, way further than 500 trillion kilometers.
@Moddy (20): “Nibiru”, AKA the planet currently theorized to be “Planet X”; is only theorized at this point. This is the official stance.
However, there is evidence that another very large planet is out there beyond the orbit of Neptune/Pluto/Charon, because the orbits of all of the outer planets are still being disturbed by some other object’s gravity.
At present, the only people who talk about “Nibiru” are conspiracy theorists, and those who are mislabeled as such.
As for why it wasn’t included on this list, well the reasons are two:
1- It has not been conclusively proven to exist yet,
2- Even if it DID exist, it is within our own solar system and hence is NOT an extra-solar planet. An extra-solar planet is one which is found BEYOND our solar system.
Now, Since you will probably like it, I am including a link to something interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_%28star%29
Wonderful list with actual thought and research put into it. The subject of the universe just fascinates me to no end.
@JohnS (22): Can somebody clear this up for me?? The Chinese new year, from Wiki:
“Lunar New Year refers to the beginning of the year in several calendars. It is commonly assumed that they are all based on a lunar calendar. However, this is not the case. Several sinospheric cultures’ new year is based on the lunisolar Chinese calendar: i.e The Chinese New Year.”
Similar pagan / christian traditions:
“Widwinter/Yule: The festival was originally celebrated.. [on] a date determined by the lunar Germanic calendar.. ..i.e 21st December.”
So my question is – which lunar new year IS the start of a new lunar YEAR? Answers on a postcard.
Fascinating list BTW – highly commendable.
@Lifeschool (43): Pick one. They’re both correct as far as they go.
Wicked list dude
@Sodamancer (30): Yes, its a running gag to post “Too American” on every list after a notable set of blogs last year. Similar to the ubiquitous “Worst List Ever” tag.
Oooooo! I love these kinds of lists!
@enigmasterpiece (47): “Due to the value of melange, attempts have been made to transplant production onto other planets. However, placing either adult sandworms (often smuggled with funds going to the Fremen) or sandtrout into existing deserts always met with failure.” scource.
Sorry, I’m going now.
Bring back Pluto.
Nice list. Got my learn on today.
@Lifeschool (49): Then how did they get it to work on Chapterhouse?
How about 10 most amazing life form discovered on the extra solar planets?
Great list! I want to go to super earth! This earth sucks big time!
@salfordio (35) Please, this is a science list, not a superstitous fairytale nonsense list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrasolar_planet
The vast majority of known extrasolar planets have been discovered through indirect methods:
Astrometry: Astrometry consists of precisely measuring a star’s position in the sky and observing the ways in which that position changes over time. If the star has a planet, then the gravitational influence of the planet will cause the star itself to move in a tiny circular or elliptical orbit around the common center of mass.
Radial velocity or Doppler method: As the star moves in its small orbit around the system’s center of mass, its velocity also changes. Variations in the star’s radial velocity – that is, the speed with which it moves towards or away from Earth â can be deduced from displacements in the star’s spectral lines due to the Doppler effect. Extremely small radial-velocity variations can be
detected, down to roughly 1 m/s. This has been by far the most productive method of discovering exoplanets.
Transit method: If a planet crosses (or transits) in front of its parent star’s disk, then the observed brightness of the star drops by a small amount. The amount by which the star dims depends on its size and on the size of the planet. This has been the second most productive method of detection, though confirmation from another method is usually considered necessary.
Gravitational microlensing: Microlensing occurs when the gravitational field of a star acts like a lens, magnifying the light of a distant background star. Possible planets orbiting the foreground star can cause detectable anomalies in the lensing event light curve. This method has resulted in only a few planetary detections, but it has the advantage of being especially sensitive to planets at large separations from their parent stars.
Pulsar timing: A pulsar (the small, ultradense remnant of a star that has exploded as a supernova) emits radio waves extremely regularly as it rotates. Slight anomalies in the timing of its observed radio pulses can be used to track changes in the pulsar’s motion caused by the presence of planets.
Eclipsing binary: If a planet has a large orbit that carries it around both members of an eclipsing double star system, then the planet can be detected through small variations in the timing of the stars’ eclipses of each other. As of December 2009, two planets have been found by this method.
Circumstellar disks: Disks of space dust surround many stars, and this dust can be detected because it absorbs ordinary starlight and re-emits it as infrared radiation. Features in dust disks may suggest the presence of planets.
@ Tommy 55
I was not going on about any relgious stuff per say but rather trying to put into words how hard it is for us to understand things of a magnitude beyond our own. Athiests and God was just an eg. The understanding of Time would have worked just as well. I find the finite (ie us) trying to comprehend the infinite (time, space, God, the depths of stupidity of your average Youtube comment) facinating.
just forget about the misspells.
@Diogenes (59): I put in for Planet Spaceballs.