Atheism has been around for thousands of years, and responsible for many philosophical and scientific developments. Like any movement, it has had its fair share of evil characters. As atheism has no moral precepts, outside of natural morality and ethics, it is hard to say how their atheism influenced their behavior or the particular political and similar movements they chose to follow. It seems that no matter what philosophy or religion people profess, people will always do wrong, whether or not in the name of their faith. This list is a follow-on from the Top 10 People Who Give Christianity A Bad Name.

Alfred Kinsey was an infamous American biologist and professor of entomology and zoology, who made groundbreaking research on human sexuality. Undoubtedly, he helped to progress social values – but, nevertheless, he took sadistic pleasure out of his research, and did some very weird stuff, including exploiting children for sex. Moreover, much of his research was fraud.

Many people agree that Napoleon Bonaparte, heavily involved in the anti-clerical French Revolution, was atheist – he claimed that “all religions have been made by men”. He was one of the best ever military commanders, and conquered much of Europe. He staged a coup and declared himself Emperor. While he ended anarchy in post-Revolution France, many considered him a tyrant and usurper. He ignored treaties and conventions, seeking undisputed rule throughout Europe. He plundered conquered territories. His 17 years of rule resulted in the bankruptcy of France, loss of many of her territories, six million dead Europeans and economic setback in just one generation.

Than Shwe is the 77 year old dictator of Myanmar/Burma, the head of the ruling military junta. He has overseen the formation of one of the most closed societies in the world. There is no notion of free press, and journalists who opposed his regime are detained. Aung Suu Kyi, the leader of the main opposition party, is kept in house detention by him. Civil servants are forbidden from resigning. Burma has the highest rate of child soldiers in the world, and uses forced labor on construction projects. As far as dictators go, Than Shwe keeps a relatively low, and even sullen, profile. Nevertheless, he reportedly leads an extravagant lifestyle, while his people continue to suffer a life of extreme poverty and natural disasters. In the aftermath of Cyclone Nargis, he refused entry into the country for many foreign aid organizations.

Kim Jong-Il is the de facto leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and responsible for the deaths of four million of his fellow Koreans. He is also at the heart of a bizarre personality cult; apocryphal stories such as how “at the time of his birth there were flashes of lightening and thunder, the iceberg in the pond on Mt. Paektu emitted a mysterious sound as it broke, and bright double rainbows rose up” are abundant. Those caught stealing food in the famine-struck nation, or attempting to cross the borders, are subject to public execution. Kim is continuing his lavish lifestyle and military obsession in spite of the crumbling economy. In North Korea he and his father are deified, considered saviors of the whole universe. 250,000 dissidents are confined to “re-education camps”. He has waged a war on South Korea that involved assassinating South Korean leaders and blowing up South Korean planes. He presents a great threat to the world in terms of nuclear warfare, having persuaded the Soviet Union to award him a nuclear reactor in 1984.

Jeffrey Dahmer, an infamous serial killer and atheist sentenced to 900 years in prison, said “if a person doesn’t think that there is a God to be accountable to, then what’s the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges?”. He brutally killed seventeen men and boys, dismembering them, storing their parts and indulging in cannibalism and necrophilia. In 1991, he was caught by the police after one of his would-be victims escaped. Despite pleading not guilty on the basis on insanity, the court found him sane and fully accountable. He later expressed remorse.

Jim Jones drew people into atheism through the People’s Temple, largely based in California. He said that he “took the church and used the church to bring people to atheism”. In 1978, 909 people at the restricted communist “sanctuary” he presided over in Jonestown, Guyana, committed “revolutionary suicide” at his command. This occurred after the arrival of an American delegation, which he claimed was conspiring against the People’s Temple. Men, women and children took a vial of cyanide and died within five minutes. Only a few people escaped. This event was the largest single loss of American civilian life, in a non-natural disaster, up until 9/11. This entry has the unique status of being on both the atheism and Christianity list. The reason is that the majority of people considered Jones to be the leader of a type of Christian cult, but, as the quote above illustrates, it was really a ruse to attract people who would otherwise have steered well clear of him.

Mussolini is notorious for his war crimes as a Fascist dictator during World War II. As a young man he openly declared his atheism, and in his early career as a politician was openly anti-clerical. He was the Italian leader of the National Fascist Party, became Prime Minister in 1922 and was eventually a dictator who severely restricted freedom of speech. Mussolini supported Hitler’s conquest of Austria. In 1935, he invaded Ethiopia, using poison gas, bombing Red Cross hospitals and concentration camps to kill civilians and destroy “inferior” cultures. He ordered the execution of prisoners without trial and the shooting of “witch-doctors”. Italian troops used public executions, hostage taking and burning of villages to crush the Slavic population of Yugoslavia. These acts are now widely considered an attempt at genocide. However, later he tried to associate Fascism with Catholicism in order to garner dwindling support (however his widow made it clear that he was still staunchly atheist). Mussolini was also deeply anti-Semitic.

Mao Zedong led the Communist Party of China to victory in the Chinese Civil War, helping to establish the People’s Republic of China. He had ambitions for a strong China, but his programs largely failed altogether. He has been blamed for the death of between 20 and 67 million of his “comrades”. Under his insane rule there was a culture akin to anarchy, that killed the economy and industrial production. His “Great Leap Forward” triggered a catastrophic and massive famine. However, he is most notorious for the precepts of the “Cultural Revolution”, which led to perhaps the greatest era of cultural vandalism the world has ever known. Antiques, historical sites, artifacts, ancient documents, feng shui traditions, Chinese traditional dresses and monasteries were destroyed for being associated with the “old ways of thinking”. Many copies of the Qu’ran were burnt. Red Guard groups around the country destroyed political and educational stability, criticizing anyone who considered himself superior, destroying reputations and lives. Mao, privately, led a life of great deviancy and excess. He also exacted revenge on all those, mainly intellectuals and professionals, who had disgraced Mao in his earlier career. He also targeted anyone with links to the Chinese Nationalist Party as well as anyone who posed a threat to him. Five million were executed in death camps. 36 million were persecuted and tortured. There were even instances of cannibalism.

Pol Pot was the leader of the Khmer Rouge and Prime Minister of Cambodia from 1976 to 1979, having been de facto leader since mid-1975. During his time in power Pol Pot imposed an extreme version of agrarian communism, where all city dwellers were relocated to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labour projects. The combined effect of slave labour, malnutrition, poor medical care and executions is estimated to have killed around 2 million Cambodians (approximately one third of the population). His regime achieved special notoriety by singling out all intellectuals, and other “bourgeois enemies”, for murder. The Khmer Rouge committed mass executions in sites known as the Killing Fields, and the executed were buried in mass graves. In order to save ammunition, executions were often carried out using hammers, axe handles, spades or sharpened bamboo sticks. His attempts to “cleanse” the country resulted in the deaths of 1.7 to 2.5 million people. He also had an intense dislike of anyone with the semblance of being intelligent, such as those who wore glasses or who spoke another language.

Stalin was General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union’s Central Committee, from 1922 until his death in 1953. Under Stalin’s leadership, the Ukraine suffered a famine (Holodomor) so great it is considered by many to be an act of genocide on the part of Stalin’s government. Estimates of the number of deaths range from 2.5 million to 10 million. The famine was caused by direct political and administrative decisions. In addition to the famine, Stalin ordered purges within the Soviet Union of any person deemed to be an enemy of the state (i.e. capitalists, theists). In total, estimates of the total number murdered under Stalin’s reign, range from 10 million to 60 million. His government promoted atheism with mass propaganda in school, and held a terror campaign against the religious. He crushed the Russian Orthodox Church, leveling thousands of churches and shooting more than 100,000 priests, monks and nuns between 1937 and 1938.
N.B. Adolf Hitler is left off this list because it is widely acknowledged that, while he abhorred organized religion, there is much evidence that he engaged in “nazi mysticism” or occultism.




















I've enjoyed reading the comments on this list. It's highlighted something I hadn't really considered; that you can't give atheism a bad name. There's nothing really to atheism, it's just the lack of faith.
Atheism is so insubstantial as a world view that one MUST compliment it with philosophies. Luckily in this day and age, logic reason and great respect for science is popular along with humanism.
It's a good time to be an atheist!
Your forgot Ion Iliescu – the president who destroyed Romania! He was also an atheist.
Why do north americans with such a strong belief and background of christianity are one of the most worst countries for crime and corruption.They always seem to use the 'God told me to do it' card.Just look how many serial killers they have had and how many have used that card to justify what they have done.I am a atheist.
If anyone says 'God told me to do it' then it is probably mental illness you're dealing with it. The majority of the religious leaders would state that violent enterprises are against what they teach.
Well said Hamish and others. The point is these people were evil and happened to be atheists. I can give you a list of a few thousand crimes committed for the cause of, in the name of, or pointlessly because of religion. Now tell me how many crimes have been committed in the name of no God. Its exact point is to remove blind religious fervour that is so perfect for excusing evil deeds.
Yet another boring list. This is becoming all too common. It might have a good list, it certainly had potential,yet each explanation was too short, too weak, written as if it might a twelve year old's surprise exam paragraph.
Wow, someone didn't have their juice today, need a nap?
Okay, fair point. Then again, the list of the people who give religion a bad name is A LOT longer.
This is one of the worst lists you've done, honestly. From the lack of citations on your Kinsey assertions to the fact that none of these people were particularly known for atheism–as in, it isn't one of the first ten things I think about when I hear any of the names–it's a pretty terrible list.
I think we're scrapping the bottom of the barrel. Lists used to be something to look forward to, and getting a List published was an accomplishment.
Sadly, I think those days are over. I am seeing fewer and fewer of the old, established commenters, too. People with knowledge just dripping off them. They seem to have abandoned ship, and who can blame them? I see more and more lists that appear to be homework assignments, in the lower school levels! It's not just this SallyH person. Not by a long shot.
I'm sure SallyH is a nice person. I'm sure all the list writers are nice people, that doesn't mean they are good at researching and writing.
I really could rant on here, but I don't want to, it wouldn't help, there's no point.
So why don't you submit one?
You have the semblance of being intelligent, do you wear glasses, too? Pol Pot KILL YOU!!
“Atheism has been around for thousands of years…”
Atheism is not a doctrine that was ‘made’ or ‘founded’ – it is a default position. It is not a positive belief in any one thing, so it is not something that’s been ‘around’.
It’s a fallacy and shows ignorance when people portray it as a doctrine. It’s not.
I'm a longtime listverse reader I've found most of the lists on this site to be well researched and educational, but the unsupported attacked against Kinsey in item 10, and all together lack of knowledge on the subject matter, is enough to make me avoid reading this site in the future.
I agree. Up until now I've either commented politely on lists or, if I didn't like them, said nothing at all. But this one was so abysmal that I felt compelled to post my opinion, solely because of how negative it is – Listverse used to be my first port of call, but to be frankly honest the quality of some of these lists are declining so rapidly it makes me inclined not to come back.
I don’t agree with most of d article, though… Being atheists may have been a commonality, but hardly d influencing trait here.
Hitler, Stalin and Genghis had mustaches. But u wouldn’t say “Hey, these guys were bad. So they give mustaches a bad name”
The argument only holds if the ppl did things directly because of their lack of faith… As it stands, you have countless examples of good and bad people… within and outside faith. A correlation is not established, at least not among atheists, basically cos it is not an adherence to any particular philosophy, but a lack of one. Atheists can’t be branded under one umbrella cos the list of actions they do BECAUSE they are atheists… are few – like not going to church, or getting irritated by preachers, or arguing against curbing free speech because of religious intolerance, etc etc…
The people in the list were bad because of several reasons. Being power hungry, psychotic, exploitative, etc, are not traits that are directly attributed to atheism.
To quote from “http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/richard_dawkins/2007/10/for_good_people_to_go_evil_thi.html” -
It is easy for religious faith, even if it is irrational in itself, to lead a sane and decent person, by rational, logical steps, to do terrible things. There is a logical path from religious faith to evil deeds. There is no logical path from atheism to evil deeds. Of course, many evil deeds are done by individuals who happen to be atheists. But it can never be rational to say that, because of my nonbelief in religion, it would be good to be cruel, to murder, to oppress women, etc…
The following quotation from the Nobel prize winning physicist Steven Weinberg has become well known, but it is so devastatingly true that it is worth quoting again and again: “With or without [religion] you’d have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, it takes religion.”
This list is outright wrong on many points.
Jim Jones was much more fundamentalist Christian than Athiest
The 'facts' about kinsey aren't
Mussolini supported christianity (catholic, same thing)
Hitler was catholic! even though the church disowned him, that was his essential faith.
Stalin was educated (and probably learned everything) from the Jesuits (I believe)
Than Shwe is Buddhist!
Using the criteria on this list George W Bush could be called an athiest.
Creating ignorance is no way to combat evil.
I believe you're mistaken, dalinean. I've read that Hitler was never excommunicated or outlawed by the Catholic Church during his lifetime. Of course, if it's true that probably strengthens your point.
There is a holiday for atheists. Psalm 14:1, "The fool says in his heart 'there is no God.'" They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good." So the atheist holiday is April 1st. The fact that there is no one who does good is the reason Jesus was sent.
The fool would've said that there is no god because in that time and place it got you murdered. It seems freethought in a religion saturated society is a thoughtcrime.
What a dumb list. What does Atheism have to do with these people? How does their religious beliefs have anything to do with the atrocities they have committed?
Actually, I think Napoleon has a good name.
He sorted out france after the reign of terror.
The Napoleonic code is a byword for justice as opposed to the heap of *** that is the common law system.
The metric system is now used world wide.
France is a great country, the cradle of democracy largely a result of Napoleon.
Agnostic = someone who doesn't want to decide between believing and non believing just in case there is a God and you end up *****ing him off
My biggest problem with Athiests is how they do the very thing they claim to hate in enforcing their beliefs on people. My understanding is that many people turned from religion when the "follow us or your going to hell" Christians started getting into the media and into everyones bedrooms, the athiests stopped and said "don't tell me how to life my life".
Now all I ever here are athiests subjecting me to ridicule and hate because of my Christian beliefs. If you believe that belief in God is a terrible thing that poisons our minds and keeps us from living a good and whole life, then keep it to yourself because guess what? I believe that your lack of belief in God will lead to the exact same result, yet I don't go around demanding you listen to me.
A lot of atheists have had bad experiences with strongly religious people – I'm of the line of thought 'I'll tolerate those who tolerate me', but to be frankly honest sometimes I despair. I remember on one site a random person came to my profile and started pestering me as to why I didn't believe – this person seemed to think it was alright to question my position, but the second I questioned hers she screamed 'intolerance' and 'discrimination'.
Anyways, hypocrisy is a fundamental human flaw, and we're all guilty of it in some respect.
"Anyways, hypocrisy is a fundamental human flaw, and we're all guilty of it in some respect. "
Yep. I witness between 1 and 10 acts of hypocrisy EVERY DAY.
Just one, somewhat unrelated example:
P.E. in High School, Sophomore year:
Student: "Aw man, I hate stretches"
Teacher: "Stop being so immature, you're sophomores! You're older than that."
Student: "But I'm sore from yesterday!"
Teacher (in a mocking voice): "But I'm sore from yesterday!"
I've just learned to accept hypocrisy has a human trait. It's inherent in all people. To 100% stick behind EVERYTHING you say is pretty much impossible. What's important is what you believe on the inside, and trying to at least get a 70% practicing what you preach, because you don't want to be a failure in what you believe in!
Way to set a fire under atheists for acts that had absolutely nothing to do with their beliefs. Poorly researched a poorly though out list – I would have thought Listverse had a degree of 'quality control'.
I personally think aetheists are all snobbish narcissists who think they know everything.
It's because we do know everything *rolls eyes*. Or maybe you're just upset because one atheist slighted or offended you at some point and thusly you feel the need to hate anyone who subscribes to that (lack of) belief system? Talk about intolerance. At least some of us try, even if we're not always successful.
At least most of us know how to spell.
Saying that these people give Atheism a bad name is like saying OJ Simpson gives Bronco drivers a bad name. When are you people going to realize that a belief in nothing does not influence the actions of someone? The reason most of these people are Atheists is because in order to achieve supreme power as a dictator you must remove any notion of a higher authority than yourself.
So you're saying that not having a belief in the sanctity of human life or that your actions have no moral consequences has absolutely no effect on your behaviour or acts as justification for acting in certain ways?
People don't need to be controlled by the dead words of religion to have a concept of what is right and wrong.
No, true. I accept that.
However, there would be the essential problem of who decides what is moral. People would have vastly contrasting views with regard to this. Even if you went by the idea of what a government states is acceptable, this would essentially be handing power to people like Mugabe.
For me, this whole debate is about people stating that religion should be wiped out due to the harms it causes. I say that if it did, we'd still have plenty of troubling questions. Some even more disturbing.
'So you're saying that not having a belief in the sanctity of human life or that your actions have no moral consequences has absolutely no effect on your behaviour or acts as justification for acting in certain ways?'
The implication of your first comment was that because we aren't a part of any religion we have no set definitions as to our morals and hence are able to commit acts without the notion of an eternal consequence, or at least that's how I'm reading it (though I admit that, as with most things, this reading is entirely subjective). The fact is that religion has absolutely no hold over a person's morals – words can be twisted to suit any need whatsoever, as is evident by all the atrocities committed in the name of religion. 'There would be the essential problem of who decides what is moral' – once again, the meanings of words can change dependant on time and those reading it, so even within religion there is no clear definition as to 'morals', therefore how can it be argued that simply because one does not subscribe to a faith, their morals are lesser and the social obligation less important?
I hope that made sense – I'm a lot better at writing things in my head than I am on a computer
I also hope I didn't go too far off what you were initially saying – I just wanted to get that view out there, and I hope I didn't offend anyone in doing so.
It certainly made sense. You've made some good points.
However, although many atrocities are committed in the name of religion, many more positive acts are accomplished in the name of religion. If one has no faith, there is no responsibility on that individual other than that they create themselves. That's fine for many people, but I believe the world will turn for the worse if religion was completely abandoned.
The funny thing is, I've argued a lot on this particular message board, I'm not even particularly religious.
'However, although many atrocities are committed in the name of religion, many more positive acts are accomplished in the name of religion.'
And for however many atrocities committed by atheists, there are also many positive acts too
I understand that religion can be used to give hope, but that's just never appealed to me. I'd rather see the world clearly, make my own judgements and live my life without the notion of an eternal damnation/redemption based solely on my current actions. I treat others how I would expect to be treated myself, I understand right and wrong and that is the basis of my morals and how I live my life.
And I don't usually argue on this site, but this list really irked me. It has very weak foundations and was very poorly thought out. And I should be revising for my exams tomorrow instead of getting into religious debates XD
No, he's saying that not beleiving in a god doesn't effect your actions.
"When are you people going to realize that a belief in nothing does not influence the actions of someone?"
When are people going to realize that Atheism IS NOT NIHILISM?!?
Half of these people are not even atheists to begin with! Kim Jong Il claims he has divine powers; atheists don't believe in divinity. This should be "Top 10 Non-Christians."
I think this list makes no sense. Being atheist has nothing to do with the act these people did. Being atheist should be simply the normal state of sound minded men.
oops I just noticed i mispelled a bunch of things, i apologize for that.
One mor thing, to all those dudes saying "Just because I´m atheist it does not mean I don´t have morals" I think everybody knows that, you probably have morals, it seems that the need for morals is part of our human nature..however, is not about if you have morals or not, is about wherever having morals is coherent with your beliefes.
Try this mental excersise: Justify human rights. Why do people have rights? Why are we different from animals? (there are many obvious reasons, however, none of them imply that we are any different beyond some purley biological-evolutinoary adaptations). Animlas can kill each other, why can´t we? aren´t we all just highly evolved animals? can there be evil or good when there is no transcendence? (one day the universe explodes and whatever we did, thought, said or didn´t say just doesn´t matter)
Try answering those, and compae your answers to how you live your life.
SPOILER ALERT:
you won´t be able to answer them without the use of a concept called dignity. Dignity is tricky, it is the belief that all humans are valuable just because they are humans, a concept first described by S.t Paul (the reasoning goes "God sent Jesus to die for humans, humans must therefore be awesome and valuable)
Truly most people live their life following their morals, most of them have no friggin what their morals are or more importantly, where their morals come from. Some blindly follow, some cherry pick whatever they want, either way, people shouldn´t be discussing this topics.
"Think for yourself they have been telling us, but I ask: What if I´m an idiot?"
——–Honorio Valderrama
we aren't different from animals, we are animals. and who says animals have no rights?
Pretty crappy list….I don’t doubt that these guys are atheists and all, but did you have an eight grader write this one up? jeez, man.
I agree with most comments here that say that these people did not act because of their beliefs with the possible exception of one or two. However, most of these people are not known for their atheism. When I think of Napoleon, I don't think of how he was an atheist, I think of how we was a brilliant military strategist until his Russian campaign. I believe this to be true for the general population also. The same goes for most of the other people on this list too. When I think of them, I don't think of their atheism, I think of what they actually did.
And just fyi, I consider myself a Roman Catholic.
This and your Top 10 People Who Give Christianity A Bad Name list are totally out of sync as the prior list contains people who define themselves and their actions by their particular Christian beliefs, whereas this list contains individuals who just happened to have no faith in a higher power and carried out unrelated actions. Very poor list from such a good site
Religion is old news, Atheism is the new trend. I don't give a flying *****. Both are arrogant therefore I hate both.
and how, pray tell, is either one arrogant?
An argument has been put forth by jfrater, amongst others, that Christianity should not be held any more accountable for the actions of Christians than Atheism should be for the actions of Atheists.
And to some extent they’re right, this list could just have easily been called “Another 10 Amoral Sociopaths”.
But here’s the thing: Atheists (I’m agnostic, myself, not atheist) don’t devote their Sunday mornings to an excercise in group-think where they all nod their heads sagely as a guy in a frock, who’s taken time out from fondling the altar-boys, tells them to “Do unto others as you would have done unto you”, and then go out and completely fail to live up to that standard.
There is an element of hypocrisy in the negative behaviours of religious people that is simply not present in the actions of non-religious people, no matter how the religious try to spin it.
Fair point, but you really are tarring all with the same brush there. There are many religious people who are devout and moral.
And they'd be just as if not more moral without church.
WRONG.
You are saying that there is a 100% solution to moral problems.
What you SHOULD be saying is this:
"There are many religious people who are devout and moral, there are many religious people who are depraved and atrocious, and they'd be just as if not more or less moral without the church".
You see, the reason there are different beliefs (Atheism being a belief, not a lack of belief, again, THAT IS NIHILISM, NOT ATHEISM, just to clarify), is because there are different moral standards that people believe work FOR THEM. There are plenty of religious people who do not believe in or attend churches. You see, SOME people would lose ALL sense of morality when they leave a church, because their standards have become dismantled. It's not that Atheism is some perfect lack of theism where EVERYONE should be. I'm religious, but I don't believe that my belief is better or more preferable than any other person, simply because some people are incompatible with what I believe, just as I am incompatible with, say, Satanism (I'll never accept a belief system in which half of them are just Atheists, and the other half is just anti-religious, anti-culture idiocy).
I just use what was put on my dog tags "NRP" – No Religious Preference when the US Navy asked. That was 30 years ago and I'm still NRP. Those ism-istic words just inflame everyone needlessly. I try to do my non practicing quietly. But as for this list, most of these MEN were/are insane sociopaths. Kinsey I don't buy that one. The rest pretty much wanted to be god e.g. good ol' Kim-Il and pals.
Napoleon was kinda cool, the main bad thing he did was declare himself Emperor. Otherwise he was dragging Europe into the future by destroying a corrupt system of aristocratic privilege at its roots, which is great.
Stalin wouldn't have turned out evil if he hadn't gone to seminary.
Jim Jones was a christian.
General Than Shwe's cannot be presumed to be an atheist. There is no evidence for or against the idea.
You lied about Alfred Kinsey and his research.
If Benito Mussolini was an atheist, why did he do so much for the RC Church ?
As for the rest, yes, they're probably atheists but so what ? Together they have contributed far less to the collective sum of human misery than religion.
This is stupid, all of these people did those terrible things because of powerlust. Atheist doesn't a politic ideology, merely a personal choice, like *****ual tendency. Do you really believe that Ancient Greeks or Romans kills each others because of their *****ual behaviours, or more likely beacuse they want richness and political power? Atheist never kills in the name of their God/s because they don't believe in any God to kill in the name of. This full of crap pursuits to criminalize atheism and atheists, that's all.
After reading some of the comments, there are atheists here that could be added to the list.
e.g.?
people often say that atheists are evil because of these people, but id just like to point out that they never killed in the name of atheism, unlike many religious people.
God damnit, these people didn't kill for Atheism. Besides, people who give religion a bad name are Christopher Hitchens (NOT Richard Dawkins). I mean, how do you go pro Nader then pro Bush in a year?
The victims of Jim Jones did not "take a vial of cyanide", they were forced to drink a cyanide spiked grape drink similar to Kool-Aid.
The difference between these people and people who give religions a bad name is that these people don't commit atrocities because they are atheist (with the exception of Dahmer).
Also your piece on Kinsey was really inaccurate. He did use his work to satisfy his own *****ual desires, which was wrong, but not sadistic. He also did interview a pedophile for his work, which I again do think was wrong, but saying he *****ually exploited children for his work is a huge stretch. And what work did he do that was fraudulent? He did over and under represent some demographics in his work, but he did not hide or tamper with his methodology or results. All and all, while he did do some morally questionable things he hardly deserves to be on this list. I must say this really makes me question the amount of actual research the writer did on this piece.
Napoleon Bonaparte rule resulted in the bankruptcy of France, loss of many of her territories, six million dead Europeans and economic setback in just one generation. I idolized him.
Here's an idea for a list: "Ten People who give not believing in the *****ing tooth fairy a bad name". You dumb *****.
Hold on — how can Jim Jones be on this list when he was also on the Christianity one?
Atheism is just another religion, if you think about it. Atheists seek others with the same beliefs, and attempt to spread the word of these beliefs to others. It's another organization to enforce conformity, and dismiss those who believe differently. Just like any religion. Being an Atheist is about as daring and radical as being a Baptist.
Atheism is the absence of belief in a deity. It is not a religion, if you think about it.
10 People Who Give Atheism a Good Name: Too many to list here, for they're responsible for the majority of the knowledge we have about anything that really matters. Throwing off the shackles of religious dogma can open up a new world of intellectual possibilities. Religion must be eradicated.
This list doesn't make sense to me… I'll give you an example: Say for instance i created a religion, called "listversism" (Bear with me) and i'm the only person who believes in it. I call everyone who doesn't agree with me athiests, even those who identify themselves as religious, so that's everyone on the Earth apart from me. So if they go out and kill someone they are then seen as killing in the name of athiesm? So then everyone that has ever killed anyone has killed because they are athiest and therefore give athiesm a bad name. To me, it doesn't seem logical to kill in the non-belief of something because you'd have to be doing it for another reason, weather it is hate for a certain religion etc. I could be wrong but thats how i see it.
I’m impressed that you found a theme built on a grid that is so mathematically structured. It thrills me to think someone went to that trouble. No wonder everything here looks so nice.
http://mohammad-mohsin.blogspot.com/2010/05/difference-between-human-and-evil.html
Kim Jong Il is not an Atheist. He believes he IS God. Therefore he cannot be an Atheist as we believe there are no Gods.
This list is so incredibly deplorable, I can barely put it into words. You can't do an evil act "in the name of atheism." Atheism is NOT a philosophy. It is NOT a belief system. It is merely an absence of belief in a personal deity as defined by thousands of irrational, man-made gods and creation myths. Nothing more! You can't define a persons political beliefs, ideologies or practices based on whether or not they are an atheist. I have to say, after reading such an incredibly baseless list … I'm not sure If I can in good conscious read any other posts If this is the level of thought-process put forth on other topics.
Communism, specifically behind the iron curtain, was an explicitly atheistic ideology, but atheists desperately do not want to be linked to communism and all of the inhuman things done by communists, who by being communist are explicitly atheist also.
We can see the results of state sponsored atheism by simply Google’ng up The Agrarian Reform Law.
You can spin it any way you want, but communism and atheism have been intertwined and people HAVE been killed in the “name” of atheism, dare I say more so than any other ideology? Yes I dare.
communism is inherently atheist, this is correct, but that doesn't mean that atheism is inherently communist. Being killed in the name of communism is not in the name of atheism, but in the name of an atheist ideology. who killed in the name of atheism? not an atheistic ideology, but just in the name of lack of god.
Could there actually be someone worst then Stalin? How about someone who would condemn 6 billion people to eternally burn in hell for the smallest disobedience of his rules. Religious people are the ultimate evil and they are also stupid.
Who are you thinking of? Please try to refrain from using hate language – even if your opponents may do it, you can be the better person.
he's thinking of the biblical god.
Great leader Stalin was a hero who industrialized the USSR and turned it into a world superpower.
Mao Zedong was a great hero of the proletariat and political genius, who did a lot for china unlike traitor Deng Xiaoping.
Kim Jong Il is a great general and brilliant leader not as good a Great Leader Kim Il Sung but still a brilliant leader who has been doing a great job of defending the DPRK from U$ and $outh 'korea' aggression.
The 'facts' of the amount of people that these great heroes have 'killed' are obviously from U$ imperialist propaganda and the lies from defeaters who have sold out to U$ bribes and corruption.
DOWN WITH U$ LIES
LONG LIVE MARXIST-LENINISM
LONG MAO ZEDONG THOUGHT
LONG LIVE THE JUCHE IDEA
LONG LIVE THE IDEAS OF GREAT LEADER KIM IL SUNG
LONG LIVE DEAR LEADER KIM JONG IL
MANSE MANSE MANSE MANSE MANSE
Are you atheist? Do you believe in a God? Or do you think the Great Leader is God? This is a fascinating experience for me because there are no North Koreans where I live.
Yes I am an atheist. Great Leader Kim Il Sung was a great revolutionary hero and political genius but a god no.
Contrary to popular believe Juche is NOT a religion it is a political theory, it is form of Marxist-Leninism theory that teaches self-sufficiency and the Philosophical principle we as humans are the masters of our own destiny.
"Man is the master of everything and decides everything" Great Leader Kim Il Sung
And the four douche bags that published books recently.
Actually, Hitler was a christian, and not an occultist. There is evidence of some Nazis being occultists, but Hitler actually thought he was doing God's work.
What sort of clueless and/or dishonest godbot wrote this crap?
Claiming that Jim Jones or Benito Mussolini had any atheist views is like claiming the Nazis did’t kill jews. It’s revisionism of the worst sort.
Please read up on Jim Jones and Benito Mussolini to discover the facts. Just because these people are implicated with religion, do not presume they are religious. Historians agree that they were atheist.
Atheists are the scum of the earth creating a good image for themselves while being secretly selfish. Bunch of Machiavellian deceivers.
There is no such thing as an honest atheist. On one hand Atheists try to come across as sophisticated intellectuals, but when it comes to what they base their morality on, they suddenly act all simple minded and pretend they don’t know what the problem is.
Please do not generalise.
normally when I come across these generalizations like this, I'd say it's true of some but not others. but I won't even give you that, because I have never seen an atheist who, upon being asked about their basis for morality, ''acts all simple minded and pretends they don't know what the problem is.
Just a short point at the end, but Hitler was a catholic until his death.
Um, no. Read up on it.
about # 9- I think it was a parody of the people saying you can't give atheism a bad name. I think that wasn't what most of them meant though.
Benito Mussolini was raised under the boarding school of don bosco(a famous catholic saint) in italy
he was raised and teach under pure christian doctrines.
Sure he was taught by Catholics – most people are. But he became atheist – that happens.
One caveat you should mention about Mussolini was that he was a devout Catholic until he entered public life.
At the time in Italy, atheism was fashionable so he very well could have been a still practicing Catholic, though in secret.
Another thing about Mussolini, he made a deal with Pius IX . In exchange for publically endorsing facism, Mussolini would turn over control of all schools to the church.
Finally, Jim Jones was no atheist. Listen to his final recording available on youtube and he mentions living in the afterlife with their families numerous times. Hardly the words of an atheist.
Poor list.
One thing about Stalin everyone should know, he was a theological student at Gori. He was studying to be an orthodox priest.
You fail in deducing from the fact that these people had religious backgrounds and childhoods that they remained so. No. They became atheist. Such things happened. If you don't believe me, look up their quotes and the testimonies of people who personally knew them. Mussolini was atheist – don't delude yourself. Just because he made a deal with the Pope didn't mean he was a theist. And Jim Jones was atheist – of course he talked about the afterlife – he was deluding people, and taking control of them by promising eternal life. He really was atheist. And yes, Stalin studied to be an orthodox priest. Does that make him a sympathiser with theists? No, he contributed to the almost entire annihilation of the Russian Orthodox Church. He hated religion. Remember that many atheists had religious upbringings.
Poor comment.
Atheism as a belief in the non-existence of a higher power was never out to preach or condone the evils of the world, some of which include but aren't limited to mass murder, molestation/rape charges, human torture on any level. NOR do Christianity, Buddhism, or some of the major religions out there accept it, much less promote that animalistic behavior. Thank goodness for that too, or we would've seen crimes committed by religious and secular people alike on a worse level than we have witnessed in these times. You can't expect that just because some criminal decides to follow his own twisted, COMPLETELY out of context 'word of God' that we see that as an excuse to openly condemn the religion as a whole – just because the criminal threw the blame on his religion, or lack thereof.
It's the individual who chooses to perform such actions, hurting others in the process – not the religion or its doctrines.
Notice that all of these atheists had done nothing new and these atheists have only repeated what religious people have done which has received them saith-hood. While atheists do indeed commit similar crimes against humanity as religious people do, atheists hardly worship these people unlike how religious people still accept the saint-hoods of murderers and rapists like Theophilus of Alexandria (saint).
At the best, we must except that humans err as the only conclusion we can come upon discussing human history.
If Theophilus of Alexandria (one obscure saint venerated by only the rather small Coptic Orthodox Church from 1600 years ago) is the best example you can come up with for religious people "worshipping" rapist and murderer saints, then I don't think your point holds much sway. No, people are not canonised for murdering and raping, much as you would like to generalise and believe.
This list is so full of bull*****.. Let me explain why:
8. Than Shwe is not an atheist, but an interpretation of buddhism.
7. Kim Jong Il is as far as you can get from atheism, he's a Juche, a part of Kimilsungism. His own religion, where he is the God. He even have stories of birds taking his father to heaven. How "atheistic" is this?
6. Jeffrey Dahmer was baptized before he was executed, raised in a religious community by religious parents. Not an atheist.
4.3.2.1 — Just because they happen to be aheist, doesn't mean they were driven by atheism. That is in fact impossible and illogical. They all also used hats, maybe that's the connection?
Hitler was a Catholic..
I honestly don't understand what wicked idiocy made you write this list.
look at the pathetic atheist slime defend mass genocide their comrades have commited
typical low IQ thinking from morons who aren't smart enough to believe in a diety
(160 IQ, suck it *****es)