This is part one of what will be a two part series on the most influential scientists in history. While these are not technically the “greatest” scientists, there is bound to be some overlap as the contributions that many of these men and women made to science are among the most important. Be sure to tell us who you think should be on the future list – we already have our second ten, but it might lead to a third or fourth.
“One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done.”
Polish physicist and chemist, Marie Curie was a pioneer in the field of radioactivity, the only person honored with Nobel Prizes in two different sciences, and the first female professor at the University of Paris. She founded the Curie Institutes in Paris and Warsaw. Her husband Pierre Curie was also a Nobel laureate, as were her daughter Irene Joliot-Curie and son-in-law Frederic Joliot-Curie. Her achievements include the creation of a theory of radioactivity (a term coined by her), techniques for isolating radioactive isotopes, and the discovery of two new elements, radium and polonium. It was also under her personal direction that the world’s first studies were conducted into the treatment of neoplasms (“cancers”), using radioactive isotopes. While an actively loyal French citizen, she never lost her sense of Polish identity. She named the first new chemical element that she discovered (1898) “polonium” for her native country, and in 1932 she founded a Radium Institute in her hometown Warsaw, headed by her physician-sister Bronisława.
“Science is a differential equation. Religion is a boundary condition.”
English mathematician and logician, Turing is often considered to be the father of modern computer science. He provided an influential formalization of the concept of the algorithm and computation with the Turing machine. With the Turing test, meanwhile, he made a significant and characteristically provocative contribution to the debate regarding artificial intelligence: whether it will ever be possible to say that a machine is conscious and can think. He later worked at the National Physical Laboratory, creating one of the first designs for a stored-program computer, the ACE, although it was never actually built in its full form. In 1948, he moved to the University of Manchester to work on the Manchester Mark I, then emerging as one of the world’s earliest true computers. During the Second World War, Turing worked at Bletchley Park, the UK’s code breaking centre, and was for a time head of Hut 8, the section responsible for German naval cryptanalysis. He devised a number of techniques for breaking German ciphers, including the method of the bombe, an electromechanical machine that could find settings for the Enigma machine.
“An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field.”
Niels Bohr was a Danish physicist who made fundamental contributions to understanding atomic structure and quantum mechanics, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922. Bohr’s work helped solve the problems classical physics could not explain about the nuclear model of the atom. He postulated that electrons moved in fixed orbits around the atom’s nucleus, and he explained how they emitted or absorbed energy. Bohr mentored and collaborated with many of the top physicists of the century at his institute in Copenhagen. He was also part of the team of physicists working on the Manhattan Project. One of his sons, Aage Niels Bohr, grew up to be an important physicist who, like his father, received the Nobel Prize, in 1975. Bohr has been described as one of the most influential physicists of the 20th century.
“We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up to now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.”
Max Planck, a German physicist, is considered to be the founder of quantum theory, and one of the most important physicists of the twentieth century. Planck made many contributions to theoretical physics, but his fame rests primarily on his role as originator of the quantum theory. This theory revolutionized our understanding of atomic and subatomic processes, just as Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity revolutionized our understanding of space and time. Together they constitute the fundamental theories of 20th-century physics. His discoveries have led to industrial and military applications that affect every aspect of modern life.
“I love fools’ experiments. I am always making them.”
English naturalist and biologist, Darwin demonstrated that all species of life have evolved over time from common ancestors through the process he called natural selection. The fact that evolution occurs became accepted by the scientific community and the general public in his lifetime, while his theory of natural selection came to be widely seen as the primary explanation of the process of evolution in the 1930s, and now forms the basis of modern evolutionary theory. In modified form, Darwin’s scientific discovery remains the foundation of biology, as it provides a unifying logical explanation for the diversity of life. His 1859 book On the Origin of Species established evolution by common descent as the dominant scientific explanation of diversification in nature. He also examined human evolution and sexual selection in The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, followed by The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. In recognition of Darwin’s pre-eminence, he was one of only five 19th century UK non-royal personages to be honored by a state funeral.
“Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory.”
Leonardo da Vinci was an Italian polymath. He was an expert mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, painter, sculptor, architect, botanist, musician and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the “Renaissance man”, a man whose seemingly infinite curiosity was equalled only by his powers of invention. Leonardo is revered for his technological ingenuity. He conceptualized a helicopter, a tank, concentrated solar power, a calculator, the double hull and outlined a rudimentary theory of plate tectonics. Relatively few of his designs were constructed or were even feasible during his lifetime, but some of his smaller inventions, such as an automated bobbin winder and a machine for testing the tensile strength of wire, entered the world of manufacturing unheralded. As a scientist, he greatly advanced the state of knowledge in the fields of anatomy, civil engineering, optics, and hydrodynamics.
“All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.”
Galileo was an Italian physicist and astronomer. His achievements include improvements to the telescope and consequent astronomical observations, and support for Copernicanism. Galileo has been called the “father of modern observational astronomy”, the “father of modern physics”, the “father of science”, and “the Father of Modern Science.” The motion of uniformly accelerated objects, taught in nearly all high school and introductory college physics courses, was studied by Galileo as the subject of kinematics. His contributions to observational astronomy include the telescopic confirmation of the phases of Venus, the discovery of the four largest satellites of Jupiter, named the Galilean moons in his honor, and the observation and analysis of sunspots. Galileo also worked in applied science and technology, improving compass design. Galileo’s championing of Copernicanism was controversial within his lifetime. The geocentric view had been dominant since the time of Aristotle, and the controversy engendered by Galileo’s presentation of heliocentrism as proven fact resulted in the Catholic Church’s prohibiting its advocacy because it was not empirically proven at the time. Galileo was eventually forced to recant his heliocentrism and spent the last years of his life under house arrest on orders of the Holy Inquisition.
“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
Tesla was a Serbian engineer and inventor who is often described as the most important scientist and inventor of the modern age, a man who “shed light over the face of Earth”. He is best known for many revolutionary contributions in the field of electricity and magnetism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Tesla’s patents and theoretical work formed the basis of modern alternating current electric power (AC) systems, including the polyphase power distribution systems and the AC motor, with which he helped usher in the Second Industrial Revolution. Contemporary biographers of Tesla have regarded him as “The Father of Physics”, “The man who invented the twentieth century” and “the patron saint of modern electricity.” Aside from his work on electromagnetism and electromechanical engineering, Tesla has contributed in varying degrees to the establishment of robotics, remote control, radar and computer science, and to the expansion of ballistics, nuclear physics, and theoretical physics. In 1943, the Supreme Court of the United States credited him as being the inventor of the radio. Many of his achievements have been used, with some controversy, to support various pseudosciences, UFO theories, and early New Age occultism.
“A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.”
Einstein, a German physicist, is best known for his theory of relativity and specifically mass–energy equivalence, expressed by the equation E = mc2. Einstein received the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics “for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect. Einstein’s many contributions to physics include his special theory of relativity, which reconciled mechanics with electromagnetism, and his general theory of relativity, which was intended to extend the principle of relativity to non-uniform motion and to provide a new theory of gravitation. His other contributions include advances in the fields of relativistic cosmology, capillary action, critical opalescence, classical problems of statistical mechanics and their application to quantum theory, an explanation of the Brownian movement of molecules, atomic transition probabilities, the quantum theory of a monatomic gas, thermal properties of light with low radiation density (which laid the foundation for the photon theory), a theory of radiation including stimulated emission, the conception of a unified field theory, and the geometrization of physics. Einstein published over 300 scientific works and over 150 non-scientific works. The physics community reveres Einstein, and in 1999 Time magazine named him the “Person of the Century”. In wider culture the name “Einstein” has become synonymous with genius.
“To myself I am only a child playing on the beach, while vast oceans of truth lie undiscovered before me.”
Newton was an English physicist, mathematician, astronomer, natural philosopher, alchemist, theologian and one of the most influential men in human history. His Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, is considered to be the most influential book in the history of science. In this work, Newton described universal gravitation and the three laws of motion, laying the groundwork for classical mechanics, which dominated the scientific view of the physical universe for the next three centuries and is the basis for modern engineering. Newton showed that the motions of objects on Earth and of celestial bodies are governed by the same set of natural laws by demonstrating the consistency between Kepler’s laws of planetary motion and his theory of gravitation, thus removing the last doubts about heliocentrism and advancing the scientific revolution. In mechanics, Newton enunciated the principles of conservation of momentum and angular momentum. In optics, he built the first “practical” reflecting telescope and developed a theory of color based on the observation that a prism decomposes white light into a visible spectrum. He also formulated an empirical law of cooling and studied the speed of sound. In mathematics, Newton shares the credit with Gottfried Leibniz for the development of the differential and integral calculus. He also demonstrated the generalized binomial theorem, developed the so-called “Newton’s method” for approximating the zeroes of a function, and contributed to the study of power series. Newton’s stature among scientists remains at the very top rank, as demonstrated by a 2005 survey of scientists in Britain’s Royal Society asking who had the greater effect on the history of science, Newton was deemed much more influential than Albert Einstein.
This article is licensed under the GFDL because it contains quotations from Wikipedia.
Contributor: Mongoose






























Oh, I see Jfrater beat me to it. Ignore my last comment and carry on.
Deucanon:
Wow! I felt that all the way from here. You actually made the ground tremble a bit.
O RLY?
Nah…but it was a powerful…made me wanna stand up and shout
“yeah!!!!!”
George Washington Carver did many things to help farmers make the most of their crops of peanuts and sweet potatoes, but the invention of peanut butter is not one of them. The first patent for peanut butter was given in Canada in 1884, when GWC was a teenager desperately trying to get accepted to college. His story is nonetheless amazing and worth a read.
Well Jfrater beat me to it so you might as well laud him too.
Great List! Can’t wait for the next 10!
Does Einstein always wear womens shoes?
Ohhhkay so maybe not the invention of peanut butter…but he did discover over 300 uses for the damn thing (peanuts)…
Thanx for the info though…and according to wika (might be wrong)..he is credited for the invention of peanut butter
*looks at the peanut butter jar and sighs*
Nice list but who’s the old woman in number 2?
@Grey Coat
u…gotta be kiddin me…you really don’t know who she is? Science’s number one hottie?
@Viktobi – I also saw that in Wiki, but there’s more info in the peanut butter listing. I think he is in fact credited with it, but even the US patent (to Kellogg) was before GWC started his research. GWC was so amazing and deserves to be known for more than peanut butter, IMHO.
@zigra
Totally agree with you on that!
just like peanut butter….
On a serious note (rare one for me) his story is pretty amazing and yes he has done alot more than just peanut butter.
Respect just gotta be there for him, and for all the other scientists mentioned who were not on the list….Great list though!
While most of his theories were totally wrong, Aristotle was incredibly influential and should be on this list.
I am really glad to see Feynman’s name coming up so much in these comments. More people need to read his books – they are extremely witty.
kakazed:
Nice try, but come off it. Avicenna and Abulcasis (no, I didn’t have to “Google” anything here, kakazed–I was quite aware who these men were) were, yes, great figures in the field of medicine in the middle ages. But bringing them up in this context is just pure defensive reaching. In no way do they rank with the men and women on this list.
It isn’t that a more inclusive, but far larger list, wouldn’t have made mention of at least one of them. Perhaps they’ll be included on Part Two. But in the top Ten? No.
It isn’t that medicine isn’t a “science” (but in strictest terms, it isn’t) in the larger sense. But in the sense that we refer to “medical science,” neither these men, nor the great healers of ancient Egypt, nor even Galen and Hippocrates, were practicing it as such. They were expounding and practicing–and furthering–the CRAFT of medicine… and in that regard they were influential. In terms of MEDICAL SCIENCE, however, they were not.
This is not just splitting hairs. The fact is that in the field of medicine, whether in terms of craft or science, few INDIVIDUALS have really stood out as greater influences. We speak of Hippocrates because he was the “first,” but even he was preceded by the Egyptian healers of the Old Kingdom. But even they and Hippocrates practiced a kind of medicine that we today would recognize as being more than partly superstition-based.
There are, in fact, few individuals in medicine who have stood out as solitary figures the way the people on this list have, in their fields. And that goes for the people you mentioned.
As I say, nice try, but you missed the mark.
And just who is “Gerber”?
I hope Rosalind Franklin will be included on the second list. Her research was necessary in Watson and Cricks discovery of the double helix of DNA. She never got the credit she deserved.
Da Vinci was a brilliant investigator but not a truly great scientist. Why? Because he didn’t attempt to communicate his discoveries to others. Quite the opposite–his notebooks were written in such a way so as to conceal his discoveries and speculations. In my view, a true scientist seeks out the opinions and criticisms of others.
Further, Archimedes deserves a place on the list, in my opinion.
Why are there always idiots who come on here and complain someone is missing from the lists? WRITE YOUR OWN FRIGGIN LISTS!
@Davo
Heavens…no need to be so harsh…not everyone here is an idiot you know, and it’s simply called freedom of opinion…hahaha. People will naturally criticise…
Tesla. What a guy. The reason he is so underrated is the fact that he kept a lot of his later work hidden, and when a (suspicious)fire burned bown his lab and all his papers, he didn’t bother to write them down again. Is it true that he once plugged a lightbulb into the ground miles from his home and it lit up? Some kind of underground current? I know he didn’t use wires to do this…
@ hjolly: Agree with you! Rosalind Franklin didn’t get the credit she deserved…hopefully she will be on the next list.
Thanks for all the complements and constructive criticism. Many of the scientists people have mentioned were in fact included on my original Top 20 list. It was incredibly difficult to categorize them in a top 10 list as they all had astounding contributions to their respective fields, and I made numerous changes to the order as I compiled the list. I even asked several of my own professors for their opinion to get feedback from a variety of scientific backgrounds.
What about Ben Franklin – electricity an all?
I really liked this list, but it is far too physics-heavy. I would like to see some more biology and medicine! I think most of us would prefer to live longer, healthier lives than understand quantum physics.
And of course, Darwin should be higher on the list.
10. Copaface:
Me too, LOL. What’s with the shoes?!
To all the people who think the Tesla is a croatian are wrong!! True, he was born there but his parents were serbs and he belonged to the serbian orthodox church.
I know this because I am a Serb!
Didn`t Gerber invent baby food ?
Definitely agreeing with Watson, Crick and Franklin being on a future list! Two of my friends went as Watson and Crick for halloween. They wore their labcoats with a “HI MY NAME IS” tag on them with the names. It was epic, but no one but us bio nerds got it.
Corey said:
“I think most of us would prefer to live longer, healthier lives than understand quantum physics.”
Surely you must be joking?
Darwin should be lower, his work has less “science” in it than the rest of these.
Also to call Da Vinci an “expert” mathmetician, isn’t that kind of a stretch?
Great list though, love this stuff.
this must have been a really hard list to create, considering how much scientist have contributed to the world. one notable omission, Thomas Edison.
(Wow – key word is “influential” – Man that doesn’t leave much open for discussion)
Since I consider fundamental science, by nature, as the most influential that narrows the list down for me personally, but I won’t go into that.
There’s an underlying story here of great drama and importance. (greatly simplified) -
Max Planck was attempting to merge the equations of lower energy spectrum with the ones used with high energy. He was more or less forced to incorporate statistical math to make his ideas work, and later was criticized for this – until it all started working beautifully, beyond expectation. His results confirmed quantized energy and introduced a new physical constant known today as Planck’s Constant. Einstein took Planck’s ideas further and quantum theory was realized. Planck later pushed for the immediate consideration of relativity, and they became close friends.
But there was a side effect of this that changed physics forever, changed the world forever – quantum physics introduction statistical, probabilistic mechanics to physical reality. Neither Planck nor Einstein cared for this aspect and basically ignored its implications.
Enter young spud Niels Bohr – he on the other hand was fascinated with just this aspect of quantum theory and surrounded with a talented group of young physicists developed quantum mechanics – with all it’s fantastic predictions and contradictions of physical reality. Einstein, who took relativity and surpassed 300 years of Newtonian mechanics, was still mired in classical physics and just could not come to accept randomness in reality. So came the conflict between Einstein and Bohr and many arguments that would come in time. But, don’t think they were enemies, far from it – just two geniuses with conflicting ideas, one who held the elder in the highest respect, and the other who smiled upon the future of physics.
Bohr had an assistant, Werner Heisenberg, who went on to propose his Uncertainty Principle, and ended up heading Germany’s atomic bomb project, while Bohr went to Los Alamos for the Americans.
I wonder if Philip Glass saw that photo before he wrote his opera “Einstein on the Beach”.
#135 Randall:
First I must say that as a policy I do not like to disagree with Randall (it seems that those who do so are either the victim of a blunt instrument or a sharp scalpel – depending on the inclination of his wit).
That being said, Avicenna should be included if for no other reason than he developed, described, and thereby introduced to the world systematic medical testing. This introduction of evidence-based medicine is the basis of most ‘Western’ medical research. And by extension, many of our views of medical testing ethics, as well.
(On a more personal note: I had a discussion with my neurologist just yesterday regarding this topic, when he refused to comment on the validity of yoga, chiropractic, acupuncture, the Alexander technique, etc. as possible treatments for lumbar radiculopathy. His claiming several times that these these are not “evidence-based medicine”, inspired me to look up the phrase last night. Avicenna is, of course, mentioned as the start of “testing medical interventions for efficacy”.)
I think he should be included as an influential scientist.
OK Randall – please tell me where I am mistaken.
Mongoose:
I think your list was very well done, and I am looking forward to the next one. I like the fact that you gave each scientist a lengthy paragraph so that we could actually learn something about him/her. Keep up the good work!
First of all Tesla is hard. He should be number one. And ***** Newton for calculus! I hope he is proud to make thousands of high school students fail a class every day
Hang on! I think someone pasted Einstein’s head on Laura Bush’s body!
138. Davo-
maybe people are making suggestions (the ones who actually are making suggestions, not just mindless criticisms) because mongoose’s introduction includes this phrase:
“Be sure to tell us who you think should be on the future list.”
-it’s official, people not reading the intro is my LV pet peeve, but i think it’s the only one.
153. astraya- i thought the same thing (and the counting crow’s song too, not just glass’s work.) i think i want a copy of that picture
149. Mongoose – i think biology vs. quantum physics is a fair point, one that hinges on your definition of “influential” -i didn’t hear back from you on this when i asked for clarification earlier.
are we talking about influence in the further development of science itself? or influence in the daily lives (quality and expectancy) of people as a whole?
is an understanding of space-time or quantum reality more influential to humanity as a whole than antibiotics, vaccinations (for that matter the very understanding of the existence and nature of pathogens), or plentiful food grown with synthetic fertilizers and an understanding of genetic heritability to breed better plants and livestock?
these are all valid questions because they require us to agree on what “influential” means to answer them.
Just to clear things up, jfrater wrote the introduction, not me.
The way you should figure out who is most influential is on a 5 point system. A point for influence in daily life, or 2 points if it is something everyone has (like toast). Same deal for advancing science concepts and all that boring stuff. And a point for awesomeness (Like just about anything Tesla did)
Yo J Frats when are you going to make a death metal list?
161. Mongoose-
thanks for the clarification on the intro-
but, especially in light of that, can you answer the question? it’s your list, so what did you want it to be about?
influencing the discipline of scientific thinking? or science that changed lives?
I’m leaning toward the former. in my eyes understanding the origin of the universe is awesome and worthy, but hard to do if you’re dying of malnutrition, sepsis, of food poisoning, but it’s not my list.
-or food poisoning-
What did darwin invent, controversy?
Newton is 1 because, unlike darwin, he isn’t full of CRAP!
Newton … isn’t full of CRAP!
Newton devoted the greater part of his study to alchemy and other varieties of what would nowadays be considered wacko psuedo-science.
Edison and Bell are inventors not scientists so I wouldn’t include them. I would include Faraday prominently and James Clerk Maxwell, Aristotle too, Leibniz perhaps. Surprised by many on the list, such as Tesla and Niels Bohr, they are important by ask the question as to why, Joules, Kelvin,Hooke, Copernicus, Rutherford, Watson and Crick,Hawking, Mendal and so many others aren’t here. I feel this list will be in many parts!
To be honest, I am surprised there aren’t some “older” scientists on that list like Aristotle. Though back in days of Aristotle it was nearly impossible to differentiate between economics, politics, philosophy and science.
As part 1 of a two part list, I have zero complaints about this list. Only kudos, with an extra tip of the hat for good research and the quotes.
I may change my tone after part 2 comes out — there’s some folks I think might be overlooked.
I loved the pictures…
oouchan, (141),
“@ hjolly: Agree with you! Rosalind Franklin didn’t get the credit she deserved…hopefully she will be on the next list.”
Her side-lining has always been a pet bee in my bonnet. However I propose she belongs on a separate list along with, for example, Alfred Russel Wallace, as: Unfortunate OR Overlooked Scientists (or People) Who Aren’t As Famous As They Ought To Be.
How did I end as a top commenter again? I thought the standards had skyrocketed.
If no one has said it so far, Jane Richardson. Maybe Not the Most important, but has to be by default a favorite of mine.
You’ve replaced me on the top list. Bastard!
::::Points and laughs:::::
L’il Boots where are you?! We miss you’re infectious personality…
your…not “you’re” heheh….brain cramp
CurtShmurt: At least, you know about at different spelling.
You’ve just dropped off the “Top Commenters” list again.
I’ll be fine, I was never that popular any way.